Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
1791 Overture
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 29 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
|
Topic: Your attitude towards Neo-prog? Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:42 |
Apparently, a lot of people really hate the genre, and I've never been able to figure out why. Is it because it's considered "watered-down" progressive music? The cheesy 80's synths used at its inception? Not enough folk, jazz, or avant-noise?
Personally, I think it's one of the best genres of popular music around because of its strict focus on excellent songwriting as its only hook. It uses prog elements in a smart and conservative way and devotes itself to those elements of prog that were developed uniquely as part of the genre, rather than borrowed from others. I also enjoy how it has become heavier recently, embracing a blend of grit and sophistication that prog metal attempted but in my opinion never really realized. The bass is generally highly melodic yet very forceful, which is one of my favorite aspects of rock music. The tendency toward a conceptual and professional atmosphere is the icing on the cake.
So, what do you guys think? I know there are quite a few reviewers here who like it, but I don't know if it's as universally accepted as "good" music as, say, Zeuhl or RIO, which I think is unfair.
|
|
sleeper
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:54 |
Its a worthwhile genre and when done at its best, is excellent. The likes of Marillion, Pendragon, IQ, Arena, Pallas, Saens and a few others have released some really good albums, and despite what some people insist on believeing , none of them where ever Genesis clones as the arrangments and composition was always very different. The problem with it is is that there is an awful lot of half-assed rubbish in the genre thats best described as prog by numbers with no creativity at all, let alone originality. Its also noticable that a lot of the bands are good to great live, but their studio albums lack any real bite to them.
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 15:57 |
I don't generally like the Neo Prog from the 80's specifically, because I think it sounds too watered-down and derivative of bands like Genesis and Rush. On the other hand, I think Neo-Prog got better in the 90's. For example, Marillion and Dream Theater left behind the glam-rock and revitalized/enhanced their sound during this period. Marillion especially changed, for obvious reasons.
There are many people who do like Neo-Prog and will vouch for it strongly. I'm not one of them, but to each his/her own.
|
|
zravkapt
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 12 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6446
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 16:40 |
I think people who enjoy Neo the most are those with a very mainstream taste in music generally. I can't get into Marillion, they seem too poppy and soft-rock-y to my ears, not what I'm looking for in "prog." I heard one IQ album and thought it was decent but nothing special. Right now, I'm listening to the first Pallas album and plan on reviewing it at some point. I enjoy this album much more than what I have heard of Marillion or IQ. I have a feeling that I would like the Neo of the '90s and 00s more than the 80s stuff.
|
|
jean-marie
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 27 2010
Location: FRANCE
Status: Offline
Points: 2585
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 16:40 |
In the eighties i didn't like what was called Neo Prog, these last days , i'm realy keen on Marillion ( Hogart time ) and Pendragon ( was at the show in Paris last week )
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 16:51 |
I love it. Give me Arena, IQ, Pallas, and Fish-Marillion (plus Brave) any hour of the day. I have never understand the bad reputation it seems to have. Some of my favorite albums listed in PA belong to neo-prog. And Genesis's "And then there were three" and "Duke", both of which I love, would quite nicely fit in the genre, too.
|
|
|
TheGazzardian
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8667
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 17:23 |
I'm not against it and in fact enjoy quite a bit of it. But none of it has wowed me the way other prog rock has.
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35750
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:19 |
I don't like Neo-Prog, but then I tend not to care for "melodic rock" oriented music.
|
|
|
Nathaniel607
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 374
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:36 |
It's fine. I really try to dismiss as few genres as possible. Very few genres are intrinsically broken as forms of music (well... in my opinion, I guess).
Err... but more specifically, I haven't heard tons, but stuff I've hear, is lovely, and people just seem to hate it because it's inspired by the greats and dismiss it all. It seems to me that if a lot of them took the time to listen to some, they would realise there's a lot of original compositions and ideas involved.
|
|
|
giselle
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 18 2011
Location: Hertford
Status: Offline
Points: 466
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:43 |
I certainly don't hate it, but in general, it is a bit diluted, unoriginal, and uninspired (IMO).
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 18:57 |
I'm not interested in it other than Marillion.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 19:29 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
I'm not interested in it other than Marillion.
|
There's other Neo-Prog than Marillion!?
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:10 |
1791 Overture wrote:
Personally, I think it's one of the best genres of popular music around because of its strict focus on excellent songwriting as its only hook. It uses prog elements in a smart and conservative way and devotes itself to those elements of prog that were developed uniquely as part of the genre, rather than borrowed from others. I also enjoy how it has become heavier recently, embracing a blend of grit and sophistication that prog metal attempted but in my opinion never really realized. The bass is generally highly melodic yet very forceful, which is one of my favorite aspects of rock music. The tendency toward a conceptual and professional atmosphere is the icing on the cake.
So, what do you guys think? I know there are quite a few reviewers here who like it, but I don't know if it's as universally accepted as "good" music as, say, Zeuhl or RIO, which I think is unfair. |
I don't know, Pallas debut has only excellent songwriting? That apart, in prog, I tend to look for sprawl with the exception of Gentle Giant's work but they were a singular band and don't have peers in what they did. For more 'crisp' music without much noodling and such, I'd rather listen to smart rock or pop music because I want long pieces to have ambition and some breathing space. With that said, I love Fish-Marillion but could never really get into the other neo prog outfits. Maybe I liked it more for Fish's passionate singing, without which that Celtic guitar formula would probably run dry for me sooner. And Zeuhl or RIO are not universally accepted at all. In fact, a lot of prog listeners don't like either or only very few bands. But because these are more underground or obscure, people who don't like it don't seem to talk about it or review it but neo prog gets reviewed by a lot of people and gets some flak. It's like how in metal, doom metal gets high ratings because only its core fanbase is interested in discussing it whereas power metal gets trashed by a large section of the metal audience. Universally liked prog would be the good ol' symph and also fusion. Some people don't even like Canterbury so even that is not a universally accepted genre of prog.
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:42 |
Alitare wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I'm not interested in it other than Marillion.
|
There's other Neo-Prog than Marillion!? |
Just an admission that I don't know the genre outside of Marillion.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Lark the Starless
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 15 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1902
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 20:50 |
I like what I've heard so far ("Misplaced Childhood", "Script for a Jester's Tear", and "Tales from the Lush Attic").
There's far more for to listen to, however. There is this French neo-prog band (Evolutive) that "claims" to be neo-prog (their 2 albums are available for a free download, if anyone's interested) but they sound way too poppy to be in PA, IMO. I personally don't see how they got into PA.
|
|
|
SaltyJon
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:02 |
I haven't found any I particularly enjoy yet, but that's not to say it's not there.
|
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 21:14 |
Lark the Starless wrote:
I like what I've heard so far ("Misplaced Childhood", "Script for a Jester's Tear", and "Tales from the Lush Attic").
There's far more for to listen to, however. There is this French neo-prog band (Evolutive) that "claims" to be neo-prog (their 2 albums are available for a free download, if anyone's interested) but they sound way too poppy to be in PA, IMO. I personally don't see how they got into PA. |
I've got just about all of their stuff and I like it. Seems like they've been stuck in a bit of a rut lately. Neither is it good nor bad. Perhaps they need to go through more personnel changes like Yes or something.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Harry Hood
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1305
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 22:15 |
I personally love Neo-Prog. Some of my favorite bands are Neo-Prog. I'd even go as far as to say I enjoy many of them more than their 70's counterparts.
I think a lot of people dislike Neo-Prog because they simply don't understand it or have enough of a proper context for it.
When the Neo-Prog scene started out, it was a bunch of bands in the same area playing a lot of the same venues and hanging out together. As a result a lot of those earlier albums sound kind of samey.
After about a decade or so most of the bands that stuck around grew and developed their own distinct style, as well as making significant development as songwriters. While Pallas have carried the torch for the "classic neo prog" sound, IQ, Pendragon, and Marillion are not the same bands people remember from the 80's. And they're honestly better for it.
As long as you keep an open mind and realize that there's way more to these artists than their "classic" albums, I think there's a lot to love in the neo-prog community.
|
|
|
The Truth
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 22:36 |
Marillion is about all that I like. Many others really just tried to hard to do what had already been done and didn't improve on it.
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: May 17 2011 at 22:42 |
All day 'errday.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.