Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ecologic urgency : Air traffic excess
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedEcologic urgency : Air traffic excess

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 15>
Author
Message
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 06:58
It's very simple, governments must compensate.

They will not and i don't blame them for.

But that's what happens.






Edited by oliverstoned - February 26 2011 at 07:01
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 07:35
I love how you keep posting these pictures as if they are supposed to shock and horrify us. LOL
A dead bee in the snow? Oh my god, you must be right!
I think the vapor trails are rather pretty.
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:16
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



The smart thing to do would be to anticipate that situation and save oil stocks to make planes fly for really important things.


I'm not sure why this is the smart thing to do.  "Really important things" is a pretty subjective judgment to make. >>> reserving oil reserves for really essential things: how about space-minded programs, boat & ship uses (in terms of amount of merchandise to pollution rates boats are really cool, force fluvial transport wherever possible instead of truck transport (I mean screw the just-in-time delivery system >>> they increase pollution by tenfolds) and stop people from flying across the planet for holidays and dumb/useless business trips  >>> how's that for a start??? 
 
 
 
 
But assuming some government or governmental conglomerate did make such a judgment, all it would do is cripple the economy. >>> how is that a bad thing???ConfusedConfusedConfused.... Our economical system (f**ked up right from the start) is bound to disaster soon or later  (the sooner, the better for the planet if you ask me) 
 
 
 
A plane ticket would cost triple or more what it does now (since airlines would otherwise lose a significant portion of their revenue).  The cost of goods will increase beyond what people can pay. >>> no it won't, because the goods will not come from across the planet anymore... it'll (the consumer good) be made locally (therefore re-create jobs escaped to China) and won't pollute zillions of CO2 just to get to the supermarkets near you.  
 
 


Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:


And not to enable people flying to the other side of the world because
it's the trend, to impress the neighbour or simply because they are bored.



I get bored a lot and really want to impress my neighbor.  Are you saying flying in an airplane will solve both of these?  Shocked
 
Olivier is right.... we're flying on a stupid whims nowadays.... very few airplane travels are really essential... it's all superfluous and nausiating to our planet's atmosphere.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:22
This is quite... Absurd. Now we want a government aganecy to regulate where when how and why we should fly?

Let companies come up with a fix. Let's not go back the the 19th century, please? (at least in communication issues... i can accept it in music )
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:25
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

You overestimate the power of threads in this forum, Rob. Wink
Embarrassed
You overestimate the desire of people to make their own decisions Rob. Let's have someone decide what's "necessary" flying and what's "innecessary".
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:28
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

This is quite... Absurd. Now we want a government aganecy to regulate where when how and why we should fly?

Let companies come up with a fix.
 
 
 
Let's not go back the the 19th century, please? (at least in communication issues... i can accept it in music )
 
get real, will you.... as if they're ever going to moderate flying needsby reducing the offer
 
Why don't you just give a flame-thrower to a pyromaniac??? you'll get better results at stopping the Muppet's cookie monster ingurgitating sweetsTongue, than letting the oil and transport industries moderate pollution by decreasing the transport to the essentials.
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:34
Exactly...........the money is not a fix, the companies pay a fine, pass the bill to the consumer in higher prices and keep right on polluting
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:35
"Get real"? That's what I've been trying the entire thread
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:38
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

"Get real"? That's what I've been trying the entire thread
Soooo...
 
when do you plan on succeedingShocked??? still this year...Tongue or before the end of the centuryLOL
 
 
ps: don't set yourself up that way.... it's too easy... aélmost takes out the fun Cool
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 12:39
At what point does polluting the environment become criminal.......if I vandalized your property it would be a criminal offense, accountability and a double standard, corporations are above the law in many cases.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 13:01
Oh to hell with earth. Disapprove
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 13:08
The only sensible thing is go back to mud huts and pooping on the side of dirt roads.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 26 2011 at 13:11
^Hey your poop now will make the world a bad smelling place!
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 02:35
I'm not sure why this is the smart thing to do. "Really important things" is a pretty subjective judgment to make. >>> reserving oil reserves for really essential things: how about space-minded programs, boat & ship uses (in terms of amount of merchandise to pollution rates boats are really cool, force fluvial transport wherever possible instead of truck transport (I mean screw the just-in-time delivery system >>> they increase pollution by tenfolds) and stop people from flying across the planet for holidays and dumb/useless business trips >>> how's that for a start???

Yes the boat is the less polluting mean of transport along with the train which should be imposed by states over plane for inner flights.




But assuming some government or governmental conglomerate did make such a judgment, all it would do is cripple the economy. >>> how is that a bad thing???   .... Our economical system (f**ked up right from the start) is bound to disaster soon or later (the sooner, the better for the planet if you ask me)

I’d add that the decreasing of economy is a fatality anyway, as our economies are based on oil and nothing is done to anticipate the end of oil. BTW all datas regarding oil stock are hidden, each one will keep its secret stash until the last drop. We do nothing to prepare the transition.



A plane ticket would cost triple or more what it does now (since airlines would otherwise lose a significant portion of their revenue). The cost of goods will increase beyond what people can pay. >>> no it won't, because the goods will not come from across the planet anymore... it'll (the consumer good) be made locally (therefore re-create jobs escaped to China) and won't pollute zillions of CO2 just to get to the supermarkets near you.


Exactly. Anyway all that is not tenable, even on medium term. So why wait to be in the wall to react ? We’re not sure at all that plants, seaweeds (that produce a good part of the oxygen and recycle CO2 ) and pollinators insects will stand the modification of quantity and quality sunlight caused by a doubly and/or treby of the current traffic’s volume !
       

Edited by oliverstoned - February 28 2011 at 02:42
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 02:39
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I love how you keep posting these pictures as if they are supposed to shock and horrify us. LOL
A dead bee in the snow? Oh my god, you must be right!
I think the vapor trails are rather pretty.



They are.

And agree, those pictures are not exactly the best for conveying a message. Even the first one in this thread.
I I can only imagine how many contrails are over my town...

And how bad are they?
There's much better (as in saddening) pictures you can find to scare us man!
Those sad polar bears on the small ice block always do it Cry
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 02:59
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:






This is rather beautiful.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 04:11
Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:


Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:




This is rather beautiful.


You already wear a chip under the skin?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 06:32
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:


Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I love how you keep posting these pictures as if they are supposed to shock and horrify us. LOLA dead bee in the snow? Oh my god, you must be right!I think the vapor trails are rather pretty.
They are. And agree, those pictures are not exactly the best for conveying a message. Even the first one in this thread.I I can only imagine how many contrails are over my town...And how bad are they?There's much better (as in saddening) pictures you can find to scare us man!Those sad polar bears on the small ice block always do it Cry


If you care much about far away polar bears than your everyday sky...it probably means that you never watch the sky, maybe you spent too much time in front of a screen to realize what really happens.
But know that the melting of ice is GREATLY increased by air traffic excess as the excess moisture make the ice melt much faster then a dryer air...

Have a look here if you want polar bears:


http://www.planestupid.com/polarbears



Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2011 at 13:06
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

 
And how bad are they?
There's much better (as in saddening) pictures you can find to scare us man!
Those sad polar bears on the small ice block always do it Cry

I agree. Animals suffering always do it for me... CryCry
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2011 at 10:51
Here's my two cents on the subject:

Blown way out of proportion.

On a global scale it would take a lot more "contrails" to seriously affect anything. Sure, you can make some pretty impressive snapshots of contrails set against a sunset close to a big airport. But that doesn't mean that we're close to extinction.

BTW: It's a bit similar with global warming. Mind you, I'm not a global warming denier ... there is something going on, but it remains to be seen whether it's because of us (as a species), or because of other natural causes, or both to a varying degree. To the people living close to the sea and near or even under sea level I would suggest, for various reasons, to relocate. As for the polar bears ... I don't think they'll simply disappear. But even if they do - so have 99.8% of all the species that ever lived.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 15>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.209 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.