Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is "The Wall" Progressive Rock
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs "The Wall" Progressive Rock

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Message
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2011 at 10:40
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

It's art rock. I prefer to lump art rock with prog rock because the distinction between the two gets really blurred often.   DSOTM is more progressive than prog, if that makes sense, but in 1979, rock concept album was not the most progressive idea around (although yet to be flogged to death), so The Wall is neither.  I'd call Meddle both prog and progressive.
 
Just because The Wall isn't the first concept album doesn't mean it's not progressive, it's stupid to say all newer concept albums can't be progressive since there are many different kinds of themes they can explore.
 
The Wall may not be the first concept album to feature the kind of themes it did (alienation, bitterness, fascism) but it was the first to execute them as well as it did.
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13056
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2011 at 17:44
Originally posted by irrelevant irrelevant wrote:

Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by lucas lucas wrote:

Originally posted by let prog reign let prog reign wrote:

I think it's because it is not very progressive. 
You rate an album on the level of "progressiveness" ?
 
And who cares if an album is less "prog" than others ? it certainly doesn't mean it is inferior.
 
I am wondering what specifically the poster feels makes The Wall "not very progressive".
 
Is it the artwork by avant-garde cartoonist Gerald Scarfe? Is it the fact that it is a concept album about a rock musician's descent into isolation and madness, based in part on Floyd guitarist Syd Barrett? Is it the trial scene where a judge that looks like a massive buttocks sentences the defendant to be exposed before his peers? Is it three separate sections of "Another Brick in the Wall" sung from different viewpoints? Is it the enormous amount of studio time spent on sound and vocal effects? Is it because the movie based on the album was one of the most surreal and arresting rock film experiences ever created? Is it because the song "Comfortably Numb" fades in an out of reality, with Waters handling the conscious sequences and Gilmour singing the hallucinatory parts, and then finishing with a towering extended lead that is one of the greatest ever recorded?
 
Oh...wait...those would all indicate a highly progressive album. Never mind.

No, that indicates they put a lot of thought and hard work into it. 
 
That they put a lot of thought and work into it is neither here nor there.
 
Someone put forth the proposition that DSotM was more "progressive" than The Wall, and additionally stated The Wall was "not very progressive." I have yet to see valid clarification of such statements. To be honest, I believe such statements to be subjective in the extreme and not very factual.
 
 
 
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
The Neck Romancer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 01 2010
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 10185
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2011 at 19:03
Originally posted by Progmind Progmind wrote:

I really dont care if "The wall" its progressive or not

I really enjoy this album and contains very good songs


The OP cares, that's why he made this thread.
Back to Top
iluvmarillion View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 3242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 01:45
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Yeah I'm sure when somebody here says "this is not progressive" they really just mean "it's not prog", if that's what they mean then that's what they should say.
 
Because the next time I see somebody with a Kamelot avatar saying Brian Eno isn't progressive I WILL try to ruin that person's life. Angry
 
I know I'm really nitpicking over a simple thing, but it really does bug me. I don't think the tern"progressive rock" has been shortened to "prog rock" over time just out of sheer convenience. Because as the genre has evolved it's been made VERY clear that prog doesn't strictly mean progressive anymore.
 
It did at first, when the term was first being used for bands that actually were progressive, but then people started using the term for bands like IQ and Toto and so shortening it to prog became a neccesity because calling those bands progessive would (and should) result in you being completely laughed at outside of the prog community.

Agree. When I listen to Arena, IQ and Pendragon I feel I'm listening to very dated music. Doesn't mean it's not Prog rock. When I listen to David Bowie I feel I'm listening to an artist always ahead of the game, experimenting with new music forms and willing to collaborate with other artists to achieve his ends. I think more of David Bowie as a progressive Pop artist and influencer of Prog rock artists such as Marillion. Coming back to the original question I still don't see why an album such as Animals is more progressive than The Wall, apart from the obvious that Animals has longer songs! 
Back to Top
Rockjf1 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2010
Location: 2
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 01:51
Of course it's progresive maybe not songs alone but the whole concept with emotional lyrics gives this album a very progressive side so yes it's prog
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 03:35
Originally posted by Progmind Progmind wrote:

I really dont care if "The wall" its progressive or not

I really enjoy this album and contains very good songs
this is the best attitude to haveThumbs Up
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 04:08
Originally posted by iluvmarillion iluvmarillion wrote:

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Yeah I'm sure when somebody here says "this is not progressive" they really just mean "it's not prog", if that's what they mean then that's what they should say.
 
Because the next time I see somebody with a Kamelot avatar saying Brian Eno isn't progressive I WILL try to ruin that person's life. Angry
 
I know I'm really nitpicking over a simple thing, but it really does bug me. I don't think the tern"progressive rock" has been shortened to "prog rock" over time just out of sheer convenience. Because as the genre has evolved it's been made VERY clear that prog doesn't strictly mean progressive anymore.
 
It did at first, when the term was first being used for bands that actually were progressive, but then people started using the term for bands like IQ and Toto and so shortening it to prog became a neccesity because calling those bands progessive would (and should) result in you being completely laughed at outside of the prog community.

Agree. When I listen to Arena, IQ and Pendragon I feel I'm listening to very dated music. Doesn't mean it's not Prog rock. When I listen to David Bowie I feel I'm listening to an artist always ahead of the game, experimenting with new music forms and willing to collaborate with other artists to achieve his ends. I think more of David Bowie as a progressive Pop artist and influencer of Prog rock artists such as Marillion. Coming back to the original question I still don't see why an album such as Animals is more progressive than The Wall, apart from the obvious that Animals has longer songs! 
 
Yeah, I don't think a band has to be progressive to be prog, and even if I don't find a band progressive I don't consider that a bad thing, if they have a sound they are good at, nothing wrong with sticking to it.
 
But yeah, there are many progressive musicians from many genres that are not prog rock.
 
There are electronica artists who can be considered progressive (Aphex Twin), hip hop artists who can be considered progressive (Madlib), even punk artists can be progressive, in fact that's essentially what post punk was, progressive punk.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 07:11

Floyd were always leaders of the movement, not driven by it, so by the time they had recorded Dark Side of the Moon they had already covered most of the ground that we consider to be Prog Rock, from its Psychedelic beginnings, through the avant garde, space rock, symphonic/baroque rock, prog folk, electronic prog, heavy prog, jazzy prog and pop prog and were moving into Art Rock with albums as an art form rather than just a random collection of nice tunes or a contrived assortment of themed tracks held together by an external concept.

That last point is an important one, concept albums and Rock Opera, (or Rock Musicals as they should more accurately be called), didn't tell the whole story within the music, they required some-other means to convey the back story - an external narrative to unlock the meaning and to relate the concept - if someone needs to explain the concept then it doesn't really work as a concept. The Wall is one of the few concept albums that does not need CliffNotes to aid the listener in understanding the message or the idea being expressed - it's contained there in full within the lyrics. Of course Floyd were not the first or the only band to do this, The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway doesn't need the narrative on the album sleeve, but it has it never-the-less, then that was Gabriel's method, on stage he would use short surreal stories to prelude each song (mainly to fill-in time while Rutherford, Hackett and Banks tuned and re-tuned between each song) so the narrative on the album sleeve is an extension of this. Waters didn't use such contrivances, his stage "presence" could not support that (the whole idea of Floyd was a band that hid behind "spectacle" on stage and that is reflected in the concept of the wall and the surrogate band), apart from a few iconic moments like Waters hitting the flaming gong or Gilmour's back-lit solo during Comfortably Numb, they did not engage in the stage theatrics; that happened around them and in front of them, or perhaps in spite of them - another point emphasised in the production of The Wall as an album; in the construction of the Wall itself on stage; and in Parker's cinematic version where Floyd do not appear at all, each are just another brick in the wall in the same way that Cousin Kevin, Uncle Ernie and the Gypsy are just bricks in the wall for Tommy.
 
Of course the whole of that last paragraph just concerns the story as portrayed by the lyric, so begs the question "can lyric be progressive?" - something that I feel is not exactly overlooked in Prog, but at least sidelined to secondary importance, an idea not helped by some of the more toe-curling lyrics that Prog is destined to throw up from time to time. My answer to this is "yes, of course" - Hammill is the past-master of the Progressive lyric and has few equals, Bowie for all his adoption of trends in music and pseudo-intellectual tangents is Progressive lyricist who can form seemingly simple songs from esoteric and erudite concepts and ideas that could at times leave Sinfield's oh so clever lyrics wallowing in a land of make believe. Anderson (Jon) is oft derided for his incomprehensible and baffling lyrics, but that in essence is what Prog is musically so those same ideas given voice should be accepted as being on par with the music - music and lyric being equal components of the whole, of equal weight and equal relevance. These lyricist show that the gulf between Prog lyric to Pop/Rock lyric is as wide as the gulf between Prog music and Pop/Rock music, something that we recognise in the definitions of Progressive Rock in the PA Guide to Prog Rock and something to be considered before nay-saying some of the additions to the archive.
 
Dark Side of the Moon was Waters first successful foray into this realm of progressive lyricism, and one of the few Floyd albums where the balance between Progressive Music and Progressive Lyric achieved equilibrium, (I could add that this numbers as one of the few Prog albums ever to achieve this). Wish You Were Here and Animals tips the balance back towards the music and the lyric, while important to Waters maybe, is less important to the listener. However, on The Wall and The Final Cut we see the emphasis shift away from the music, so the lyric (and Waters' influence) is more important than the music that carries it. Here the music is composed to fit within the time constrains imposed by the lyrics, without that restraint and the withholding of musical excess and extended soloing, the album's length would increase with furthering the concept one iota - and to that end a double album is long enough, a triple or quadruple album would become an endurance. That is not to say that the music is unimportant, or not progressive in itself - instrumental versions of those albums, should such a thing exist, would still be progressive - musically both albums are not a million miles away from Atom Heart Mother in the way themes and motifs replicate and repeat through each track and in the overall tone and feel of the music - the fact that we can recognise the similarities between these albums is more than just the observation that they were composed by the same person or played by the same musicians (substituting Kamen & Ezrin for Geesin & Smith where appropriate).
 
As Bob said early on in this thread, we need to regard The Wall as a whole and not as a compendium of individual songs, and with that we need to take into account the lyric content as vital component of the whole when assessing it as a work of Progressive Rock; that the elevation to the "high art"  that some appear to hold Prog Rock requires that acceptance of lyric as narrative prose taken as something "higher" than melodic rhyming couplets to sing along to in the shower or woo a prospective mate on dancefloor.


Edited by Dean - February 06 2011 at 08:12
What?
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 07:21
Interesting post Dean, you put a lot of thought into that.Clap
Back to Top
let prog reign View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 11 2010
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 256
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 08:02
Originally posted by lucas lucas wrote:

Originally posted by let prog reign let prog reign wrote:

I think it's because it is not very progressive. 
You rate an album on the level of "progressiveness" ?
 
And who cares if an album is less "prog" than others ? it certainly doesn't mean it is inferior.
Of course I don't rate an album by how progressive it is. I just think that may be the reason I don't like the album as much. My musical tastes lie with progressive rock
Once upon a time there was some writing on the wall we all ignored, until the time that there was war and feasts of famine at our door
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 08:11
Originally posted by let prog reign let prog reign wrote:

Originally posted by lucas lucas wrote:

Originally posted by let prog reign let prog reign wrote:

I think it's because it is not very progressive. 
You rate an album on the level of "progressiveness" ?
 
And who cares if an album is less "prog" than others ? it certainly doesn't mean it is inferior.
Of course I don't rate an album by how progressive it is. I just think that may be the reason I don't like the album as much. My musical tastes lie with progressive rock
Big smile I would suggest perhaps that your tastes lie within a subset of progressive rock Wink
What?
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 09:06
Yeah, I agree with Dean for the most part, rock operas really need to be judged as a whole. Like previous Floyd albums, many of the songs do segue together as if they were a part of something bigger.
Back to Top
let prog reign View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 11 2010
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 256
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 09:07
Because this thread has caused so much arguing and fighting I've decided I will make poll on what you think. Is The wall progressive rock or not
Once upon a time there was some writing on the wall we all ignored, until the time that there was war and feasts of famine at our door
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 09:41
Confused really? Why? The only person with a negative opinion is you and you're not exactly putting forward arguments as such.
What?
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 10:24
The Floyd albums up to and including DSotM are far more progressive than anything Genesis, Yes or Tull put out.
Watch the DSotM Classic Album programme and you will understand.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 10:33
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

 
Just because The Wall isn't the first concept album doesn't mean it's not progressive,



I didn't say that was the only reason.  As usual, the point flies right over your overreactive head.   Did you even read the full post?

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

it's stupid to say all newer concept albums can't be progressive since there are many different kinds of themes they can explore.


Agreed and I didn't say THAT in any case. Read properly.

 
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

The Wall may not be the first concept album to feature the kind of themes it did (alienation, bitterness, fascism) but it was the first to execute them as well as it did.


Flash news, all your favourite albums and bands are not and cannot be progressive just because they are YOUR favourites. Prog is not about good or bad. 
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2011 at 19:54
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Originally posted by iluvmarillion iluvmarillion wrote:

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Yeah I'm sure when somebody here says "this is not progressive" they really just mean "it's not prog", if that's what they mean then that's what they should say.
 

Because the next time I see somebody with a Kamelot avatar saying Brian Eno isn't progressive I WILL try to ruin that person's life. Angry

 

I know I'm really nitpicking over a simple thing, but it really does bug me. I don't think the tern"progressive rock" has been shortened to "prog rock" over time just out of sheer convenience. Because as the genre has evolved it's been made VERY clear that prog doesn't strictly mean progressive anymore.

 

It did at first, when the term was first being used for bands that actually were progressive, but then people started using the term for bands like IQ and Toto and so shortening it to prog became a neccesity because calling those bands progessive would (and should) result in you being completely laughed at outside of the prog community.


Agree. When I listen to Arena, IQ and Pendragon I feel I'm listening to very dated music. Doesn't mean it's not Prog rock. When I listen to David Bowie I feel I'm listening to an artist always ahead of the game, experimenting with new music forms and willing to collaborate with other artists to achieve his ends. I think more of David Bowie as a progressive Pop artist and influencer of Prog rock artists such as Marillion. Coming back to the original question I still don't see why an album such as Animals is more progressive than The Wall, apart from the obvious that Animals has longer songs! 


 

Yeah, I don't think a band has to be progressive to be prog, and even if I don't find a band progressive I don't consider that a bad thing, if they have a sound they are good at, nothing wrong with sticking to it.

 

But yeah, there are many progressive musicians from many genres that are not prog rock.

 

There are electronica artists who can be considered progressive (Aphex Twin), hip hop artists who can be considered progressive (Madlib), even punk artists can be progressive, in fact that's essentially what post punk was, progressive punk.


I think it was really bad that the name of the genre ended up being "Progressive Rock" or "Prog" or whatever, it rather makes people want to think of the genre about the music "progressing", whether it is within the same song, the same album, or within the boundaries of the genre (the new album has to offer something new to music, to "progress" music). However, I don't think that's the whole description of the genre, though it is an important part of it. I liked better the early description of the genre "art rock", for I believe it describes better the whole point of prog (at least at the beginning), which was to do something better with rock music.
Back to Top
Tavastia View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 30 2010
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2011 at 16:28
I agree with Dellinger. Sometimes the arguments on "Progressive Rock" are as illusive and individualstic as on "Black Metal". 
Back to Top
topographicbroadways View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2011 at 16:36
[/QUOTE]

I think it was really bad that the name of the genre ended up being "Progressive Rock" or "Prog" or whatever, it rather makes people want to think of the genre about the music "progressing", whether it is within the same song, the same album, or within the boundaries of the genre (the new album has to offer something new to music, to "progress" music). However, I don't think that's the whole description of the genre, though it is an important part of it. I liked better the early description of the genre "art rock", for I believe it describes better the whole point of prog (at least at the beginning), which was to do something better with rock music.[/QUOTE]

\Thread. With prog it is very easy to over-analyse when how you feel as you listen is the most important thing, the genre of prog is about emotions in the music and not solely about complexity. Floyd were never a band that played in 9/8 and showed off a great deal of virtuosity but were always a prog band.
Back to Top
javier0889 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 07 2011 at 16:50
People are assuming that prog has to be the "common sound" of the genre, like Yes, Genesis, etc.
Pink Floyd was more like "carefully crafted rock music", more avant garde on their early years, more "pop" or accesible if you like on their later years. But the level of experimentation that Pink Floyd represents to the common "rock" or "pop" music, both in lyrics and musical composition, is enough to reckon them as "progressive rock". To be honest I don't care if they're prog or not, but I think about them as a progressive rock band.
So yes, The Wall is a prog album for me.
http://www.last.fm/user/javier0889
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.244 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.