Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 22 2011 at 16:48
lucas wrote:
harmonium.ro wrote:
lucas wrote:
Joanna Newsom is not pop , she is, according to Roy Harper's own words "a pioneer of folk rock music like him".
Yeah, if you want to use the most precise tags and descriptors, then nothing's pop. But even so, Joanna Newsom is folk rock in the same universe where Jethro Tull is atmospheric black metal If we're into precise tagging, I'd say that what Joanna plays is acoustically supported vocal music, with a great emphasis on both composition and melody. Pop, in my book.
I remember a guy at a jazz gig, who told me that he hates pop when I was talking about ELP You are right, generally speaking every artist/band from the Beatles to Cradle of Filth can be regarded as pop. Only jazz and classical music would escape this tagging
Jazz and classical escaped only because they had no MTV and VH1 back in their day
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 22 2011 at 17:03
You'd love that album, it's very sophisticated and ambitious, even progressive at times. I recommend it to you (the new one from 2010 is nowhere near that good, IMO).
Joined: July 15 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Posted: January 31 2011 at 07:50
I am sorry guys, but no pop "artists" these days stand a chance against what pop used to be in the past: Depeche Mode, Elton John, Michael Jackson, Duran Duran, Tears for Fears, Soft Cell, Level 42 etc... Those guys had "balls", nowadays there are only puppets.
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Posted: January 31 2011 at 08:15
overmatik wrote:
I am sorry guys, but no pop "artists" these days stand a chance against what pop used to be in the past: Depeche Mode, Elton John, Michael Jackson, Duran Duran, Tears for Fears, Soft Cell, Level 42 etc... Those guys had "balls", nowadays there are only puppets.
I assume sarcasm, not sure though. If not, there be a few jokes lined up for those who choose to swing.
As others have mentioned, it depends what counts as Pop. If you mean top 40, the internet has vastly changed the face of music. There's lots of great music in the realm of Pop, but top 40 is completely different than it was in the days of Casey Kasem.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Posted: January 31 2011 at 10:31
overmatik wrote:
I am sorry guys, but no pop "artists" these days stand a chance against what pop used to be in the past: Depeche Mode, Elton John, Michael Jackson, Duran Duran, Tears for Fears, Soft Cell, Level 42 etc... Those guys had "balls", nowadays there are only puppets.
I don't consider Depeche Mode music of the past as opposed to the pitty worthy present, they are in an excellent moment of their career, not at all like some of their contemporaries which are now some sort of Madame Toussaud's act (U2, Metallica, etc.)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.