Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why isn't prog popular?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy isn't prog popular?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 14>
Author
Message
RoyFairbank View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 10:35
The reason why Prog is not popular is that it is a heavy music listener's genre. A lot of people don't listen to an album the whole year round, they need jingles. Even those who listen to music may not sit down and listen to music for regular extended periods. This is the Ipod century, after all.

I'd suggest out of heavy listeners to music in general there is a high correlation to prog fans (and related high-quality genres).

This is 70-90% of the problem. The other may be the attraction of soft listening, which can be provided by country, soft-pop/rock and in minority, classical, jazz etc.
Back to Top
AllP0werToSlaves View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 29 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 10:41
Two words: instant gratification.

Prog doesn't cater to those without patience.
Back to Top
Acidchrist View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 11:33
Wow, my first post!

I think progressive music isn't popular because it can be challenging to our expectations of what music should be. We all grew up on music in 4/4 and in simple major or minor keys with predictable song structures. Predictable music is simply enjoyable. People might enjoy subtle changes in what they expect, but it can be a bit much at first to switch straight from radio rock to progressive music.

I was raised on Yes and Rush by my father, so progressiveness became the norm for me. 
For somewhat that hasn't slowly grown in the direction of progressive music, it's probably a bit much to take.

Doesn't mean they're less intelligent, or have worse tastes. It just means they aren't prepared for music that's more challenging to listen to.

On top of this, the long jazz and classical influenced structures of progressive songs make it easy for listeners to grasp the concepts of the music on the first listen. Most people will grow to love progressive music over time if they hear enough of it, in my experience.



Edited by Acidchrist - January 21 2011 at 11:35
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 11:41
Originally posted by Acidchrist Acidchrist wrote:

Wow, my first post!

I think progressive music isn't popular because it can be challenging to our expectations of what music should be. We all grew up on music in 4/4 and in simple major or minor keys with predictable song structures. Predictable music is simply enjoyable. People might enjoy subtle changes in what they expect, but it can be a bit much at first to switch straight from radio rock to progressive music.

I was raised on Yes and Rush by my father, so progressiveness became the norm for me. 
For somewhat that hasn't slowly grown in the direction of progressive music, it's probably a bit much to take.

Doesn't mean they're less intelligent, or have worse tastes. It just means they aren't prepared for music that's more challenging to listen to.

On top of this, the long jazz and classical influenced structures of progressive songs make it easy for listeners to grasp the concepts of the music on the first listen. Most people will grow to love progressive music over time if they hear enough of it, in my experience.



I agree halfway with this. But I also know people who listen to classical music who'd dismiss prog but not pop.  So, over and above the challenging nature of the music, the biggest 'problem' with prog is that it rejects established genres and established modes of rendering and seeks out those that work to achieve what expression - unique or not - that the artist may have in mind.  People like music in neat formats, it somehow makes the listening process easier for them. I personally find music too closely adhering to the format boring, so it's no wonder I love what prog stands for.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 11:56
Here's what I think, repeating a bit of what others said:
 
- It doesn't gratify instant gratification. Check!
- It's not danceable, it doesn't go along with your average chick. Check!
- Most people don't really care for music as a form of art. Check!
  . people don't listen to albums or even whole songs anymore. They just want to download the hit and listen to it repeated times till it's out of fashion.
  . people don't really know what they're listening to. Maybe not a bad thing per se, and here comes the part that we (Prog fans and other music fans) are "music nerds". A guy can listen to Enter Sandman and a Nickleback song and think they're the same rock. People don't really listen to the music, if it's catchy so be it, they careless for the musicians and what are they playing.
 
Yeah, I could think of some more stuff, but I think the basics are there. 
 
That's why I think that a Prog fan generally is meant to broad their music horizons, since they generally appreciate music as a form of art and not simply because it's catchy or hip. They appreciate what they're listening to and dare to search for more art that can satisfy them, plus they give their time for dedication of it.
 
Not trying to put us, fans, like superhumans or anything.
 
BTW: this is all coming from a 16 year old guy, so this is what I see between my friends and social group (?).


Edited by The Quiet One - January 21 2011 at 12:00
Back to Top
JS19 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Lancaster, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 12:12
Originally posted by Acidchrist Acidchrist wrote:

Wow, my first post!

I think progressive music isn't popular because it can be challenging to our expectations of what music should be. We all grew up on music in 4/4 and in simple major or minor keys with predictable song structures. Predictable music is simply enjoyable. People might enjoy subtle changes in what they expect, but it can be a bit much at first to switch straight from radio rock to progressive music.

I was raised on Yes and Rush by my father, so progressiveness became the norm for me. 
For somewhat that hasn't slowly grown in the direction of progressive music, it's probably a bit much to take.

Doesn't mean they're less intelligent, or have worse tastes. It just means they aren't prepared for music that's more challenging to listen to.

On top of this, the long jazz and classical influenced structures of progressive songs make it easy for listeners to grasp the concepts of the music on the first listen. Most people will grow to love progressive music over time if they hear enough of it, in my experience.


Hey, welcome to the PA forums, we're all friendly (mostly Tongue), ..... just watch out for Walter LOL

I agree 100% with your post. I was raised in a 'progressive' environment too, so I just grew to love what I heard, and normal music just missed that something special. I think to be honest, you can learn to love anything, if you listen to it enough, but prog rock doesn't have that instant pull that some music has, but is ultimately more rewarding in the long term.

Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Here's what I think, repeating a bit of what others said:
 
- It doesn't gratify instant gratification. Check!
- It's not danceable, it doesn't go along with your average chick. Check!
- Most people don't really care for music as a form of art. Check!
  . people don't listen to albums or even whole songs anymore. They just want to download the hit and listen to it repeated times till it's out of fashion.
  . people don't really know what they're listening to. Maybe not a bad thing per se, and here comes the part that we (Prog fans and other music fans) are "music nerds". A guy can listen to Enter Sandman and a Nickleback song and think they're the same rock. People don't really listen to the music, if it's catchy so be it, they careless for the musicians and what are they playing.
 
Yeah, I could think of some more stuff, but I think the basics are there. 
 
That's why I think that a Prog fan generally is meant to broad their music horizons, since they generally appreciate music as a form of art and not simply because it's catchy or hip. They appreciate what they're listening to and dare to search for more art that can satisfy them, plus they give their time for dedication of it.
 
Not trying to put us, fans, like superhumans or anything.
 
BTW: this is all coming from a 16 year old guy, so this is what I see between my friends and social group (?).

I'm the same age, and I base what I know about mainstream music from my friends, who, however, seem to be just as passionate about music as me.


Edited by JS19 - January 21 2011 at 12:15
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 12:14

Everyone has very good reasons why prog may not be popular. The difference now is the availability of media coverage, news at faster than the blink of an eye. There is so much content being thrown at us that to me anything that might have good content gets lost in the distribution....so it can become "un-popular" very quickly in our society.

Back in the day for me the music media was my rock magazines that I used to subscribe to, received in the mail and of course the stories and news had happened 2 months prior or more. Concert reviews were months old...Album reviews were at least a month old......but that was the news back then.
Today an album gets reviewed the day it is released and sometimes before it is released to the public...
Basically I just feel there is no time for people to experience music as we used to back in the day.
 
 
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 12:17
To me the question always was how can a experimental artistic current become mainstream. It does happen once in a while.

Progressive rock was a subculture of 70s pop culture, and to me it is a difficult thing to explain how the hell it actually went mainstream up to a point, considering that it was an avantgarde pop movement. I assume it was the allignement with a phase of early development of the media and entertainment industry, before it really "industrialized" itself and imposed cheap, accessible products that sell way better. Anyway, after the interest in classic rock and its culture went down in the late 70s, people who were into new, exciting things went with  post-punk, new wave, synth-pop, metal, early techno music etc. (or with the new avantgarde movements, like no-wave, industrial music, noise music, etc.) and those nostalgic with the 70s sound went with the most accessible aspects of it (like AOR). I would rather categorize this situation as normal, in the context of a well established of an entertainment industry, rather than the privileged 70s scenario.

Edited by harmonium.ro - January 21 2011 at 12:19
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 12:26

Different people use music for different things.

Probably the most common ones:
1. Background sound to enhance a mood: Most prog changes too much to work here
2. Dancing: Enough said.
 
Prog is like art house film. You have to really enjoy the artform itself. Appreciate a good performance, the craft. Also, some of it is going to be BADDD. Of course some of the best stuff is there too. You have to have enough patience to sift. Sometimes the best stuff breaks out to a bigger audience, if it's not too wierd.
 
There are alot of hard core music listeners like us who gravitate to other genres like classical and jazz or ??? But alot of people have to get to a burnout point on mainstream music before they start looking for something else. That requires a lot of listening first.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Progosopher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6467
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 12:55
I think there are as many reasons, or variations of them, as there are people who listen to music.  Most people want to be entertained by music, so a catchy song is easier for them to listen to, and there are plenty of opportunities that require virtually no effort.  But it is difficult for me to describe what the general population thinks since I live in a cave high in the mountains (metaphorically speaking of course) and popular culture is filtered before it enters my awareness.  Here is one thing I can say for certain though:
 
Most of my old friend from high school (pre-milennial) are musicians and have been since then.  Most of them at the same time do not like Prog at all.  One would think it would be otherwise but it is not.  I have pondered over this for years and have reached a conclusion: They do not like Prog because it wears its musicianship on its sleeves.  It is music about music, rather than music which serves the song.  In that way, even though the musicinship levels of Prog tend to be high (they aren't always), they lack a certain aesthetic subtlety.  As one friend has said about Allan Holdsworth, "Wow, he's really good.  I have no idea what he's doing.  I'm getting a headache.  Please make him stop."  This is from a person who has transcribed Telemann pieces onto electric bass, so he knows his stuff.  To me, it is a strange attitude.  Or maybe the whole attitude is really sour grapes, but I don't think so.  This same group tends to not like Jazz either, I think perhaps for the same reasons.
 
This attitude may translate to the general public.  They don't understand it; it takes some knowledge of music to appreciate and most people don't have that.  Geek
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 13:11
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

Here's what I think, repeating a bit of what others said:
 
- It doesn't gratify instant gratification. Check!
- It's not danceable, it doesn't go along with your average chick. Check!
- Most people don't really care for music as a form of art. Check!
  . people don't listen to albums or even whole songs anymore. They just want to download the hit and listen to it repeated times till it's out of fashion.
  . people don't really know what they're listening to. Maybe not a bad thing per se, and here comes the part that we (Prog fans and other music fans) are "music nerds". A guy can listen to Enter Sandman and a Nickleback song and think they're the same rock. People don't really listen to the music, if it's catchy so be it, they careless for the musicians and what are they playing.
 
Yeah, I could think of some more stuff, but I think the basics are there. 
 
That's why I think that a Prog fan generally is meant to broad their music horizons, since they generally appreciate music as a form of art and not simply because it's catchy or hip. They appreciate what they're listening to and dare to search for more art that can satisfy them, plus they give their time for dedication of it.
 
Not trying to put us, fans, like superhumans or anything.
 
BTW: this is all coming from a 16 year old guy, so this is what I see between my friends and social group (?).


You have a wise head on young shoulders certainly. The only bit I have a little niggle with is that which I've highlighted in red. Perhaps I'm confusing value with memorability but 'catchy' is really hard (just you try to write a melody that window cleaners, postmen, housewives and their descendants can't stop singing to themselves for years to come)

But otherwise yes, I think you're correct that Prog fans are not necessarily discouraged by music that contains no readily identifiable 'hooks' and that we have many other criteria through which we can discern a value in the music of our choice.




Edited by ExittheLemming - January 21 2011 at 13:15
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 13:27
^I agree, but I'm not talking about that cathiness. If not just the mass(es) catchiness, which is for example a reggaeton tune that has the same rhythm and sex themed lyrics than any other from the "genre", and still it's the law that it's catchy for all the people. Not sure if I explained that clearly.
Back to Top
timburlane View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: March 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 58
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 13:37
Because a lot of people don't like it. Having said that more people like it now than has been the case since the mid seventies. My boss, with whom I share a lot of musical interests (we're both music teachers) doesn't care for prog much at all although he does like Radiohead and the Penguin Cafe Orchestra. When we were both teenagers in the mid/late seventies he toally bought into the whole "Year Zero" ethos that punk had and has never really got over it. Ultimately he, like many others, finds prog to be pretentious and exclusive not having the "say it brilliantly, say it in three minutes and make sure you can dance to it" attitude that pop music has.
never eat anything bigger than your head
Back to Top
Acidchrist View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 13:43


Quote
I agree halfway with this. But I also know people who listen to classical music who'd dismiss prog but not pop.  So, over and above the challenging nature of the music, the biggest 'problem' with prog is that it rejects established genres and established modes of rendering and seeks out those that work to achieve what expression - unique or not - that the artist may have in mind.  People like music in neat formats, it somehow makes the listening process easier for them. I personally find music too closely adhering to the format boring, so it's no wonder I love what prog stands for.

I would definitely agree with this!
Also, that's a pretty darn good reason to like prog.

Quote
Hey, welcome to the PA forums, we're all friendly (mostly Tongue), ..... just watch out for Walter LOL

I agree 100% with your post. I was raised in a 'progressive' environment too, so I just grew to love what I heard, and normal music just missed that something special. I think to be honest, you can learn to love anything, if you listen to it enough, but prog rock doesn't have that instant pull that some music has, but is ultimately more rewarding in the long term.

Thanks for the welcome! Smile
And I think you're right about it being more rewarding in the long run.

And about being able to learn to love anything: I am a giant fan of 90s gangster rap, which is musically the virtual opposite of progressive rock. I used to despise rap, but after hearing enough of it I learned to love the style of lyricism and the simplicity of the music. I bet that a lot of people would like prog if they heard as much of it as they did radio-friendly music.


Edited by Acidchrist - January 21 2011 at 14:18
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 14:48
Originally posted by silverpot silverpot wrote:

Originally posted by zravkapt zravkapt wrote:

Prog was huge in the 1970s, and it's more popular now than it was in the 1980s.


Yep. It was actually about the only thing we listened to. We didn't know it was prog though. LOL

It was the Punks that gave this kind of music a bad reputation and "music" from these orcs killed peoples apetite for more complex music it seems. At least it has taken until now for it to recover.
I think a forum like this shows that this kind of music is gathering momentum again.
Which is why Keith Emerson and Johnny Rotten being the best of friends is sheer perplexity for me.LOL   But seriously....who am I to say why and what for? After all the garbage I've witnessed I must find irony in  this subject in order to survive. I second that motion of the punks giving prog a bad reputation.It's a sad situation and the punks had the power to influence the minds and mentalities of the youth in the 70's. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what really happened to Progressive Rock in the late 70's.
 
What feels kind of strange to me now is the realization from my past that Emerson, Wakeman, and Ian Anderson were once on the front covers of Creem magazine, Hit Parader, and Circus monthy and for years. Smashing up organs, wearing tights, wearing long robes was part of the rock star mentality.Marketing these musicians in that fashion surely attracted a wide variety of rock music fans. I'm sure fans might find it all laughable today. There is even more irony to think about here. For example the pictures of these musicians on magazine covers brought about the interest to fans of Hard Rock (Sabbath), Stadium Rock, and Top 40   Eventually that diverse of an audience began talking about the music stating it was trippy or had complex arrangements....just as proggers today often do. It was an in your face promotion method which in return attracted a huge audience.  The end result for a course of time was this: A vast amount of people in the early to mid 70's were enjoying Progressive Rock for what it really meant. Appreciation for the art of someone playing an instrument like a fine wine. The overall welcoming of that aspect during the 70's gives me chills when I think about it today.
 
The respect of an audience that was not full-fledged prog. They respected the compositions, attended the concerts, and bought the records. Names like Bill Bruford were like household names at rock concerts. It's a sad ending in the sense that it simply had to end by the hand of discrimination. The punks actually influenced a major part of the late 70's youth to believe that improvising on an instrument was the characteristic of a nerd. That is how I examine the big picture. That many people being influenced by a half-wit mentality or following that twisted ideology is scary. I hope there is a future for Prog so musicians can stop burning their tires off on daytime jobs and starving eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches 3 times a day. 


Edited by TODDLER - January 21 2011 at 14:56
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17511
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 15:01
Originally posted by JS19 JS19 wrote:

This seems like a simple question, but I think there's more to it than just: 'it's not catchy'.

Any thoughts?
 
I think it has a lot to do with the arts in any one country.
 
In places where arts tend to be accepted a bit more and respected for their history, the chances of a musician doing something that is appreciated more for its work and attempt is a lot more valuable than in places like America ... where it is all about the ____ size, fame and fortune! And the fans that it generates, of course.
 
Even in London, one could appreciate the classical chops and hands of a Keith Emerson, whereas in America, it was all about the loudness, the glow and the fame ... and the advertising.
 
Literature is also an issue. Both Melody Maker and what it became later, were not great, but they were also a lot more respectful of what the art was and the artist wanted to do. When comparing it to Rolling Stone in America, the work they do is nothing but a dish rag, and has been since its inception, more concerned with the bare covers and the famous slut-ting it was promoting, instead of the music itself. In fact, I like to say that Rolling Stone, has no music taste whatsoever.
 
They did do some odd things, and the likes of Mr. Gonzo was always a trip, but he was something that they could not ignore, because he was the coolest of the cool, and that goes with the fame and everything else really well.
 
I also think the educational system has a say in the whole thing. The American systems have not recognized the arts for a long time, and made sure that programs were cut for the arts so Mapplethorpe and other revolutionary artists could not get a voice or get more famous. America, has no idea what "art" is, and most of it is a nice picture of onions and tomatoes in the dining room!
 
Sometimes it's really trying discussing art against that kind of vision and visual ... too much of America is about the commercial show for it, and nothing else. And the worst part? ... the kids and the folks believe it! ... so go back to your American Idol?


Edited by moshkito - January 24 2011 at 13:56
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
natewait View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 08 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 218
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 15:13
By very definition Pop music is popular. It is what the average person hears the most. It is what they hear on the radio, or from TV, or from their friends. Since this is the music they become familiar with, it is the music they end up listening to.

That is why when people are introduced to prog music they might find it "weird" or "pretentious" or even "boring." It is because Pop music has become the standard by which to judge music for most people, and in comparison to pop music, I can see how people would come to those conclusions about prog. They don't really give the music a chance, and just judge it on the surface by how it compares to what they are familiar with.

Also, I think most people are casual music listeners. They don't want to put too much effort into finding music, so they stick to the biggest hits on itunes, and are happy with that. It isn't worth the time, effort, or money to find other forms of music they might like. Why should they when they are perfectly content with the music they already have?

I think Prog music listeners are those that either grew up with it and became familiar with it from their parents (thus, it in a way became their 'pop' music) or were more inclined for adventurous music due to their nature or from being a musician themselves and had friends that introduced them to it or developed a certain flavor for it through their exploration of music. But, I think these are the minority. Most people just listen to what they happen to come across and don't put too much effort in finding new music. Since pop music is the most accesible, that is what they listen to.

But, those are just my random thoughts...

Please check out my Progressive Music Blog: The Leviathan.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Online
Points: 17511
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 15:30
Originally posted by The Quiet One The Quiet One wrote:

...
  . people don't listen to albums or even whole songs anymore. They just want to download the hit and listen to it repeated times till it's out of fashion.
  . people don't really know what they're listening to. Maybe not a bad thing per se, and here comes the part that we (Prog fans and other music fans) are "music nerds". A guy can listen to Enter Sandman and a Nickleback song and think they're the same rock. People don't really listen to the music, if it's catchy so be it, they careless for the musicians and what are they playing.
 ...
 
About some 30 years ago, a book came out called ... The One Minute Manager ... and while I was not going to get worked up about the Zen style that it was trying to get across, in the end, what it was getting across was ... be stupid, and make it quick and get it over with. In other words, a manager that talked to you like that is not going to last very long, specially if it is a serious situation. Secondly, the part I thought was bad, was ... that it wanted you to lower the expectations and also accept what was in front of you ... make you the social/commercial zombie (makes you wonder why we like all those movies?) that does not talk, say anything, and on top of it (or more importantly for a corporate America!) ... or question anything ... because in America might is right! Money is right! Sales is right!
 
The length of the piece, is, as you mention above, also an issue. And it is quite visible here in this board that many people do not have the patience, the desire or the ability to enjoy a long piece of music ... and before long, the only thing they can say is that the solo was boring ... which right away tells you that the focus was not on the "music" and its story (as classical music and the best music always has in any genre!) ... but on something that is a personal preference, that did not go right for that person.
 
It scares me to hear people saying that Steve Hackett was just soloing in "Firth of Fifth" ... screw the lyrics and screw the story ... because it means absolutely nothing, if it is just a solo ... and totally pointless at that ... why bother setting up a musical passage ... if all it is is a solo ... that's not even "progressive" in its concept and actualization!
 
Between you and I, and it is not a comment that people are not capable of it, they all are ... they just have to "want to check it out" ... when listeners are infatuated with Apple, Oranges and Rapsodies and crap, they really have no idea, or the ability to sit and listen to a symphony, or an opera ... and when someone says something about it, it becomes an insult on their intelligence. IT's NOT ... it's a challenge ... do you have the ear to hear more or not?


Edited by moshkito - January 24 2011 at 13:59
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Xanatos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
Banned

Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Latin America
Status: Offline
Points: 305
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 15:48
Simple , not everybody is a musician xD
Back to Top
JS19 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Lancaster, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2011 at 16:05
Originally posted by Xanatos Xanatos wrote:

Simple , not everybody is a musician xD

I'll have to disagree with this. I am a music student (classical) and I know a lot of musicians, and not one is an avid fan of prog. It's not what people want when they sit down after a technical practice or composition, they want simplicity and enjoyment, and I understand the feeling. People don't want to mix work/school and relaxation, so complex structures and time signatures remind people of work/school.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 14>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.