Things you're really, really NOT into. (not music)

Yes because when an attack on American soil occurs which causes a pronounced change in foreign policy for at least the next decade and results in thousands of deaths it's 'conspiracy theorist' thinking to question:

A) If the government is covering it's behind because it didn't know about the attack, but should have known so, and is so negligent in it's duty to protect us

B) The government knew that attack was going to occur and allowed it happen .

C) The government neither knew of the attack nor does the information suggest that they should have reasonably been able to prevent it, but it high governmental officials had strong connections to these individuals through past interventionist policies which are being covered up by the weak in-house investigation which occurred.

Actually all of those things are pretty plausible and not out of line with the past history of our government. 

I have serious doubts with about the integrity of global warming. Much like I do about string theory. Physicist who oppose string theory pretty much have their researched mocked and find it very hard to get grants. Those that grant them have already decided the theory is verified and research is only needed to develop it, not to critique it. A similar thing seems to be happening in climatology. Also, their mathematical models tend to be absurd, among many other issues I have with the movement. 

I don't smoke marijuana lols. I just have this thing where people should be able to do what they want when it's not hurting others instead of being hunted like foxes by the government, thrown into jail on taxpayer dimes to become hardened criminals leaving their families shattered and struggling to survive.

Yes that incredibly complex situation can clearly just be explained by the fact that no weapons are laying around. Let's ignore the multiple uses for firearms, the fact that prohibitions don't remove any good from an economy, and that school massacres can be committed with scores of items available where you live (maybe a car, maybe a barrel of gasoline, maybe a knife, maybe one of the hundreds of deadly devices you can make just by raiding the chem lab in your highschool). 

I hardly think that having a consistent political philosophy, rather than one riddled with contradictions, is cherry picking, but you probably have a nonsensical explanation for that point too.