Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
I just want to point out that I've never heard Meshuggah play polyrhythms. They just play backbeats. IE, the drums have longer bars that "overflow"into the guitars' next bar. Not really that complex. I'm sure Meshuggah themselves have said as much.
"Polyrhythms" are when you play two rhythms against each other that don't go together normally. Such as playing five in a beat and 4 in a beat at the same time. I don't count 3 over 2 as this is a very simple rhythms. Or even 4 over 3, but anything more complex than that is - such as 3 over 5, 7 over 6 etcetera.
Anyway, yeah, Magma are very tight. So are other Zeuhl bands - Ruins especially. Zappa is probably the tightest though... "Echidna's Arf (Of You)" and "Don't You Ever Wash That Thing?" are two displays of astounding tightness!
Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Posted: December 12 2010 at 06:17
I say Rush are very tight - listen to YYZ for a prime example! But tough to beat ELP and Pictures at an Exhibition - the first 5 minutes are tight as a razorblade.....
Joined: January 03 2010
Location: Lowell, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Posted: December 11 2010 at 08:36
I'd say Gentle Giant and The Dixie Dregs. Saw both several times and both bands, though quite different, can flat out play and have a lot of fun doing it and were as tight as it gets.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: December 10 2010 at 22:12
I would go for Gentle Giant. They switch instruments literally at will and keep going on like clockwork. Derek's singing lets them down, but the instrumentation is bang on target.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18066
Posted: December 10 2010 at 20:56
Starhammer wrote:
Magma is not that tight; in fact, they're quite loose because they improvise a lot; their music is quite flexible.
Not according to Stella.
They are tight, because they rehearse a lot. But they do have moments in the choral score that allows some freedom, and they tend to work with each other, because at times Christian is gone, and you have to stay with him, or Stella is gone off the high voice, and he goes with her. But other than those small parts, in general, most of Magma is very tight and well rehearsed.
The music would not have lasted, or survived, if it wasn't so. And I think that this was the one thing that Christian understood very well about what he created -- although I don't think that he could have done all this by himself ... and that the time and place and people helped provide him with a template ... that is still going strong 40 years later.
Edited by moshkito - December 10 2010 at 20:57
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: January 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1601
Posted: December 10 2010 at 20:02
I came in here to mention Zappa also.
Not as prog (though still progressive) but Phish is absurdly tight. They take improv's about as far as physically possible and go through some crazy stuff whilst staying amazingly tight.
And did somebody say improvised music isn't tight? I don't see how it being improvised is relevant, if anything it's more impressive that it's tight when improvised. Tightness is how well everybody clicks and reacts to each other, not how many of the same notes they hit at the same time.
And to me having feel is required of all music, so I don't really care for a lot of the absurdly heavy bands that stay consistently heavy at all times.
Edited by himtroy - December 10 2010 at 20:04
Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18066
Posted: December 10 2010 at 16:33
Hi,
Amon Duul 2
So hard and so much and so full ... that anything past their early day concerts sound like the worst crap you ever heard.
Some music, you can not let go down the tubes, and is not meant to be done as a folks song or accapela by Renate and a guitarist ... that simple!
The only live stuff of theirs that sounds good is in the "Live in London" album.
Sometimes I think they take their "freedom" of expression thing and recklessness for creativity a little too seriously and think that anything they do now is more important than what was done then, or before ... and while there is a point to be made there, there is also a lack of respect for the good work that was done before ... and that has nothing to do with one's opinion of it later in life.
To my ears, AD2 is a very sad thing today ... I will listen to one more album though!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Joined: September 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 86
Posted: December 10 2010 at 16:19
I'm not a huge Dream Theater fan, but when I heard Octavarium, it went right to the top of my "tight" list. [Bruce Hornsby does some of the loosest "tightness" I'm aware of.]
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.205 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.