Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 11:32 |
Textbook wrote:
I agree that this needs to be done. My biggest problem is that Italy is a genre which has never made the slightest bit of sense to me. |
I disagree, I suppose, because I consider "Berlin school" a more appropriate name for what we pass of as Progressive Electronic here. Makes more sense than not including Aphex Twin.
|
|
|
Textbook
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 03:16 |
I agree that this needs to be done. My biggest problem is that Italy is a genre which has never made the slightest bit of sense to me.
|
|
irrelevant
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 01:05 |
Oliverum wrote:
[QUOTE=JJLehto]
[QUOTE=Triceratopsoil]
oh, and they should get rid of prog related
I never understood the purpose of this either, to be honest. For me the
logic behind this seems a little flawed. If a member of prog band makes a
pop music album, then the music is not prog related, the artist is
(kind of) . Therefore the genre does not describe the music.
I mean, Metallica and Queen on PA?
If cut down of genres is needed then this should be the one to go, imho.
|
Queen have clear prog elements in their music.
|
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 08:58 |
I thought it was a little crazy when metal got a three way split, but it was explained and I never complained. Besides which if you want to see more metal subs, we have a place for you and that's metal archives. Everything metal prog or otherwise. We used to have a sub called art rock and it got a three way split. These kinds of changes are never made without careful thought and debate. As far as getting rid of prog related, a lot of people have worked hard writing reviews and it would hardly be fair to flush their work down the toilet. I should also add that controversial artists are never added without careful thought and debate. Finally, if you read the current definition of PR I think it perfectly explains why we have it, so there.
Edited by Slartibartfast - November 29 2010 at 08:59
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Oliverum
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 30 2010
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 132
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 08:23 |
You guys have nothing better to do then disrespect others work? [/QUOTE]
That was not the point of course.
|
All the best freaks are here, please stop staring at me. Marillion - Freaks (1988).
|
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 07:33 |
|
|
|
Oliverum
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 30 2010
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 132
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 06:08 |
[QUOTE=JJLehto]
[QUOTE=Triceratopsoil]
oh, and they should get rid of prog related
I never understood the purpose of this either, to be honest. For me the
logic behind this seems a little flawed. If a member of prog band makes a
pop music album, then the music is not prog related, the artist is
(kind of) . Therefore the genre does not describe the music.
I mean, Metallica and Queen on PA?
If cut down of genres is needed then this should be the one to go, imho.
|
All the best freaks are here, please stop staring at me. Marillion - Freaks (1988).
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 23 2010 at 14:39 |
Zappa to Eclectic ain't happening, we've been down that road
|
|
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: November 23 2010 at 14:35 |
I really don't feel like this site needs more metal subgenres.
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: November 21 2010 at 06:06 |
I don't think splitting the three metal categories further on until there is one category per genre is a good idea because there are a lot of metal genres (progressive ones of course). Anything in between just one metal category on PA and one category per genre is arbitrary, and between the arbitrary number of 3 and 5 categories I definitely prefer having 3. IMO what the PMT should do is to write in the hearder of each band biography what genre does the band belong to (making sure that genre is defined in the category definition). This is the simplest solution to a problem that I've given thought to in the past; in the Post/Math we have the same problem, like people calling Math Rock bands "Post Rock" just because these two genres share the same PA category and people don't know enough about them to make the difference. RE the Eclectic issue, that was a fun read Colin, but I can't take it as a worthy proposal
Edited by harmonium.ro - November 21 2010 at 06:08
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: November 21 2010 at 00:03 |
Triceratopsoil wrote:
oh, and they should get rid of prog related
|
|
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 23:55 |
|
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 23:52 |
Triceratopsoil wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
and, while we're undermining the entire genre structure on PA, we should
change the name of eclectic prog to "I wish I was King Crimson
- prog" or "We have prominent saxophone playing but aren't jazz -prog" or maybe simply "eccentric prog" and then put all the artists that vary
release by release genre-wise (e.g. Zappa) into eclectic prog, which is now empty after moving all those other bands (of course some of them, the legitimately eclectic ones, will stay) |
|
|
|
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 23:32 |
oh, and they should get rid of prog related
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 20:42 |
Not being on the inside I have no clue... But we all hear about the epic PMT log jams and insane quantities of work.
There is one PMT that covers all, if I'm correct. Maybe a Prog Metal team, one for experimental/post and one for tech/extreme would make the load easier.
Also I do like the idea of splitting experimental and post up.
Post metal IMHO is a fairly exclusive and specialized sub genre.
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 20:37 |
I think that the addition of more 'metal' subgenres was debated and really isn't something the site is looking for.
Anyway, I really don't have time to discuss the rest of your suggestion, not a bad idea though.
|
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: November 20 2010 at 20:31 |
Something we were just discussing in the shred room, the current organization of sub-genres on PA leaves a lot to be desired. -experimental/post metal has just become a dumping ground for bands that don't quite fit into post/math rock, prog-metal, extreme/tech metal, or RIO/Avant. Therefore, I propose experimental metal and post-metal become 2 separate sub-genres, and we add in another one, avant-metal. One result of this would be that people looking for post-metal bands can actually find them in the category, instead of digging through piles of progressive black metal bands, avant-garde bands, noise bands, etc. We would also be able to move bands that don't quite belong in RIO/Avant (e.g. Sleepytime Gorilla Museum, Mr. Bungle) into Avant-metal; things like Diablo Swing Orchestra (whom we were having trouble categorizing some time ago) could go into experimental metal, as well as those black/folk/ethnic metal bands (Senmuth, Orphaned Land, Agalloch, etc.) Then, there's the problem of artists that, due to their extensive discographies, defy categorization (I think the most well-known case would be Frank Zappa)... (from the Shred Room, edited somewhat for content)
Triceratopsoil wrote:
and, while we're undermining the entire genre structure on PA, we should
change the name of eclectic prog to "I wish I was King Crimson
- prog" or "We have prominent saxophone playing but aren't jazz -prog" or maybe simply "eccentric prog" and then put all the artists that vary
release by release genre-wise (e.g. Zappa) into eclectic prog, which is now empty after moving all those other bands (of course some of them, the legitimately eclectic ones, will stay) |
I fully don't expect this to get anywhere, but one can always dream
Edited by Triceratopsoil - November 20 2010 at 20:36
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.