| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
adace1 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 320
|
 Topic: The Beatles vs. Pink Floyd
Posted: November 27 2010 at 16:30 |
|
This one is pretty difficult for me. I'm going with Beatles by a hair.
|
|
|
 |
Mastosis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2010
Location: Siberian Divide
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 16:40 |
Didn't even have to think about it - Pink Floyd all the way! 
|
|
Hercules
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 16:53 |
|
Floyd.
Vastly more talented.
|
|
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
|
|
tdfloyd
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 06 2008
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 997
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 16:54 |
|
Comparing apples and oranges to me. I am usually in a different mood to listen to either group. An exception is sometimes I could want to listen to PF or some latter day Beatles Both are obviously monsters with huge followings of fans and groups but I listen to PF much more.
|
|
someone_else
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Online
Points: 24295
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 16:58 |
|
I like both, but not equally. My vote goes to Pink Floyd.
|
|
|
|
Tychovski
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 19 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 249
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 17:00 |
|
Beatles - love them both, but no choice to be made here.
|
|
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974, it's a scientific fact.
|
|
Jake Kobrin
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 18:01 |
|
Equal.
|
|
|
|
Progosopher
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6467
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 18:46 |
Equal.  One cannot replace the other, nor can I listen to one when I am in the mood for the other.
|
|
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
|
|
dave-the-rave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2006
Location: NY metro area
Status: Offline
Points: 276
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 19:29 |
|
I voted Floyd because their music speaks to me emotionally... but I respect the Beatles and what they accomplished enormously. Likely have been no Floyd had there been no Beatles.
|
|
Manuel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 09 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13351
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 21:25 |
 tdfloyd wrote:
Comparing apples and oranges to me. I am usually in a different mood to listen to either group. An exception is sometimes I could want to listen to PF or some latter day Beatles Both are obviously monsters with huge followings of fans and groups but I listen to PF much more. |
You took the words out of my mouth, or my fingers in this case.
Both have different moods, and were quite important in the development of rock music, maybe the Beatles having an edge on this department, but Pink Floyd meant more for progressive music in general, and rock in particular.
I indeed listen to Floyd more than the Beatles, but really enjoy both bands, depending on the mood I'm into.
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: November 27 2010 at 22:23 |
|
Pink Floyd easily. Though I do like The Beatles too.
|
|
Atoms
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 12 2010
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 546
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:37 |
|
I've never voted against Pink Floyd in similiar polls, this is no exception.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:38 |
|
The Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:39 |
Hercules wrote:
Floyd.
Vastly more talented.
|
Besides Gilmour I don't see it myself. Vastly?
|
|
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:42 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Hercules wrote:
Floyd.
Vastly more talented.
|
Besides Gilmour I don't see it myself. Vastly? |
Wright might also be a better keyboardist than Macca, but that's it. Besides, Beatles are more talented composers.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:55 |
rogerthat wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Hercules wrote:
Floyd.
Vastly more talented.
|
Besides Gilmour I don't see it myself. Vastly? |
Wright might also be a better keyboardist than Macca, but that's it. Besides, Beatles are more talented composers. |
Perhaps he is. But vastly superior? Well I suppose some may say so.
|
|
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 06:57 |
|
You are right, I wouldn't say he was VASTLY superior to Macca either. He had a knack for coming up with beautiful textures like very few keyboardists I have heard but not technically such a big deal. And Macca was a better songwriter by far too.
|
|
yanch
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 03 2010
Location: Lowell, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
|
Posted: November 28 2010 at 08:23 |
|
The Beatles.
|
|
Follix
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 02 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 130
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 02:47 |
Macca is a better bassist/musician than Waters but I give a small edge to Waters versus Lennon on lyrics tho. Gilmour destroy Harrison on guitar, total mismatch (Whatever Rolling Stones magazine says  ) Wright was the best pianist of both band but also the worst musician if we exclude the drummers. And although Lennon/McCartney is the best songwriting pair in history I don't see how a band with Ringo Starr as a drummer can knock off the mighty Floyd and the Gilmour effect is just too important.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 11:03 |
Follix wrote:
And although Lennon/McCartney is the best songwriting pair in history I don't see how a band with Ringo Starr as a drummer can knock off the mighty Floyd and the Gilmour effect is just too important.
|
Why not, they have Nick Mason and not Billy Cobham at drums. That apart, the reason is there in your sentence, because songwriting is very important and Beatles arguably wrote the better songs.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
The Beatles vs. Pink Floyd
