Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Theism vs. Atheism ... will it ever be settled?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTheism vs. Atheism ... will it ever be settled?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2021222324 174>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 03:27

Ah but I don't count the vast swathes of people who "say" they belong to a religion but don't actually practise it in their lives. I mean there's HUGE amounts of people who will say they are Christian because they think it's a good thing to aspire to but then don't actually DO anything at all. To count as a Muslim in my book, you must live by the koran and Islamic principles. I do not see the number of people who do this increasing at all.

Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 03:15
Why do I think the total number of Muslims is increasing? Because it is, based on articles that I read which referred to studies, and which I don't doubt for various reasons. I also said that I agree with you that most of them who are living in free societies are moderates. But that doesn't mean that the extremists aren't active "behind the scenes" - and the climate of political correctness has developed to a point where they don't even have to be extra-careful not to give themselves away.

http://jihadwatch.org

And specifically (pertaining to Eurabia):


Or on a global level:

And in the US:

Outlawing Islam is clearly a violation of people's rights, but outlawing Sharia is definitely something that I would support. 






Edited by Mr ProgFreak - November 13 2010 at 03:50
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 02:57

Yes I've noticed that he'll stick absolutely to the original bible as the unquestionable word of god at one moment and then go with a marketing-friendly revisionist stance the next. Still, I'd like him to answer that question himself.

But why on earth do you think the total number of Muslims is increasing? If you actually look at the changes going on or talk to people from there, you'll notice they're becoming more and more westernised and apathetic about their religion. The dawa programme launched to peacefully convert westerners to Islam has been (quietly) pronounced dead in the water and it seems that the Saudi government have decided that economic prosperity and good international relations are a much much higher priority than getting everyone to be a muslim because they (again quietly) don't think it would ever happen in a million years. While they talk a fundamentalist game in order to save face, really they know that fundamentalism is absolutely toxic to their nation's standing in the international scene and are (once again, quietly) pushing away from it.
 
Again, talk to them and they'll talk about how their own prophecy is that Islam will deteriorate further and further over time with more and more Arabs turning away from it, leaving only a small number of faithful who will be saved at the end of the world. (However this belief is only held by some sects, not all.)
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 02:41
^ I know what you mean, but I wouldn't say that "none" of them really believe. As I said above, I think that it's a small fraction. But once the total number of Muslims increases to a point where they could grasp political power, I think it would be relatively easy for the extremists to "persuade" the moderates to take their Koran more seriously. Like Howard Bloom said in a recent interview posted on YouTube (obviously I'm paraphrasing it): Violence is a potent multiplier ... you only need to slit a couple of throats, and suddenly a *lot* of people will play along nicely.

About Iván and the bible: He picks and chooses. He'll often use Bible verses to prove a point, and when faced with a contradictory verse he'll produce a "catechism". The strange thing about it is that he thinks it makes sense.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 02:18
Working closely as I do with so many Arab people, I can say that the "Muslim tide" is a fairy tale. None of them really believe. They leave class early to go to the mosque on Friday but instead they go to eat pizza and quite cheerfully flaunt all the rules of the koran, smoking, drinking and sleeping around. The thing is they're human just like everyone else and once exposed to normal unrestricted life, a large number of them will choose to live in the real world, not according to something someone has told them in order to maintain their own authority. I predict that just as with Christianity, Islam will fade further and further. It has only remained relatively strong because of its insularity. As Muslims increasingly travel abroad and connect up with technology, we can expect that to change.
 
Ivan: Serious question here- is there even any conflict with being a lawyer and being a religious person? Because couldn't you argue that the law of man is a "false idol" as it were and that the only law a Christian person should respect is that set out in the bible?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2010 at 02:01
^ I don't know how accurate the translation is, but the gist of the message is consistent with what I've heard from other sources. One of the elements is that he doesn't advise against violent actions because they're wrong - he does so because they hurt their cause. In his view, Muslims should try to play along and pretend to agree with the concept of freedom and equality until their numbers have risen to the point where they have a majority and can overthrow the governments - and then they would not even have to use violence, but simply a 2/3 majority to abolish the constitutions and introduce sharia law. And looking at demographics, I think that the time frame of 20 years is not quite realistic, but in 40-50 years, if things don't change we could indeed have a Muslim majority in many European countries.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 20:38
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Incidentally:


Unrealistic?


I don't think this is far fetched. Granted, those millions of people aren't all "infiltrating" society with that purpose in mind (indeed I think few of them are even thinking about these issues), but I do think that many of them could be "mobilized" by clever leaders, when the time is right.


I had seen the first video already and pretty much agreed with everything it contained.

However, has it been established how accurate a translation is represented by the subtitles of the second video? If it is a faithful translation of what the interviewee is saying, 'to the letter' he is not condoning violence but merely urging European Muslims to aspire to western ideas of respectability and credibility e.g. become wealthy and successful with a view to helping spread the religion amongst influential people. The idea of 'freedom of speech' for the west equating with the sacredness of the Koran is rather ironic
I think: Dissenters of freedom of speech perpetuate most of the violence designed to stifle same and dissenters of the Koran are the victims of violence designed to expand its influence.
He does however play the 'pogrom' card very strongly and asks us to associate every instance of social violence/unrest involving a Muslim population as that engineered by the 'infidel' as provocation to drive Islam out of Europe. Frankly the latter is disingenuous bollocks.


Edited by ExittheLemming - November 12 2010 at 20:50
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 20:10

Religions are dying all over the world... you cant fool people forever with sutch fairy tale nonsens.

Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 17:41
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

You're all so insecure... Specially the little bigots who cry "delusion" and need the internet to prove their manhood... Poor little creeps who are probably peeping toms for women since they probably can't get off their computer chairs to go live in a normal world...

Mike and Ivan have had a sometimes war-like argument here but both are reasonable people... but when post-pubescent waste like Nightshine appears, the forum becomes a sanctuary for idiocy.... 


Bravo, I'd have been proud of that one Wink
You don't have copyrights on that one... I would love to use it in a couple of places... Big smile
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 17:27
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

You're all so insecure... Specially the little bigots who cry "delusion" and need the internet to prove their manhood... Poor little creeps who are probably peeping toms for women since they probably can't get off their computer chairs to go live in a normal world...

Mike and Ivan have had a sometimes war-like argument here but both are reasonable people... but when post-pubescent waste like Nightshine appears, the forum becomes a sanctuary for idiocy.... 


Bravo, I'd have been proud of that one Wink
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 17:17
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I just don't get why it bothers atheists so much that their beliefs are not universally shared. I see this all the time. I have a lot of friends who believe in the ridiculous fiction of man caused global warming, but it only bothers me when they try to tell which lightbulbs I have to buy.


Would you like to elaborate on that point?
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 17:16
PinchLighten up guys.
 
@Adam: I won't put Textbook and Nightshine in the same bag with Mike. TB and NS are simply trolls, no arguments, just sarcastic jokes and trying to make fun out of everybody. That's not a problem, they prove each time that they don't have arguments at all.
 
@Mike: Don't take this thing so seriously, I guess. The complete year you have been arguing with Iván and you won't change his mind, neither him to you. I just want you to see the position of Dean and other atheists that they don't need to attack others point of view. They give arguments but not calling delusional people to anyone who don't think like yourself.
 
I agree that new-age, post modernism cr*p is too much on fashion this days and it's sad to see that everything is right and wrong at the same time. Just keep it cool, you don't need to get mad with other people you probably won't met in your entire life. Spend less time in this thread and more time trying to be good to the World outside... I would try that... if I wasn't that lazy...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 16:09
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:



The main claim which I made I also provided evidence for:

I don't believe in any gods.

I also made other specific claims that I also provided evidence for - you simply ignored the evidence, which is something that you're entitled to do. 


Mike, you not only made a claim:

  1. You accused us of ignorant
  2. Delusional, 
  3. Even stupid in one case
  4. You even supported the claim of one of your Youtube videos that we were child abusers because we taught religion to our kids (Almost sure you did)
If you had said I don't believe in God and given your arguments, nobody would had replied, but you called us names and shouted you were not willing to respect our beliefs, even if most of us respect your right to not belief.

So in this case you need evidence that our beliefs are silly with no bas and that God doesn't exist...Something you can't prove.

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


I said that your theories of "god" don't make any sense to me ... and for some specific claims there are logic arguments that show that the theories are contradictory. 

Yelling at me and iterating your ridiculous idea that the one who starts a thread has the burden of proof doesn't impress me at all.


Mike, it's universal..Anybody who makes a claim must support it, if you claim something you need to prove it...Even in science. if somebody opened a thread saying that those who believe in Newtonian Physics are delusional and ignorants, he would carry the burden of the proof, because he stated something



Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


In these threads a lot of evidence was presented on both sides. I think that my side wins because the evidence is more conclusive and much better in line with reality. If you disagree on that - fine, neither of us can "claim" to have won the discussion, that's for the reader to decide. However, your notion that I haven't presented any evidence is ridiculous and a gross - and dishonest - misrepresentation.




You believe your evidence is solid, I haven't seen any evidence at all.

I insist, in the moment you claimed religious people were delusional because they believe in a God that doesn't exist...You must support this claim with evidence, it's not ludicrous, it's universal


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

This thread is about Theism vs. Atheism, not about Catholicism vs. Atheism. Have your cake and eat it, too - you represent all religious people here. If you don't, like I said above, you'll first have to present some convincing arguments that your moderate Catholicism is the right position, and the fundamentalist Protestants are wrong. Who are you to call them delusional?Big smile

I haven't called them delusional Mike, that's a term only you use, I have said that at least 2/3 of Christians (Even gave this percentage) don't believe in Creationism, and being that 2/3 of the Christians are Catholics and the Catholic and the Catholic doctrine (which I posted before) accepts evolution..I'm not lying or insulting anybody, I gave 100% correct evidence.

Now, I believe I'm short, almost 54% of the mainline Protestants believe in Evolution, more than 75% of Hindus, Buddhists, Jewish and 45% of Moslem accept evolution, sand even 24% of Evangelist Protestant, 22% of Mormons  and 8% of Jehovah Witness believe in evolution.

So my data is accurate, at least 2/3 of Christians believe in evolution (And I was short).

Now unlike you, I respect the belief of those don't accept evolution, even when I don't share it, so don't come again with that nonsensical statement.

Just o end, I have said repeatedly "I can only talk about Catholicism" You believe you can reduce atheism to one big concept while there are atheists that talk about strong, weak, positive and negative atheism...In my case I can't place all religions in the same sack.

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 
Nonsense. You are a Catholic. Catholicism has certain tenets. From these tenets follows that I, as an atheist, am deluded ("fool" is the word used in the translated bible, I think). You don't have to start a forum thread to make me aware of that.

Mike, please check before speaking, Catholic Catechism specifically says that Atheism is a sin againsr the Church, only for those who previously were Catholics, but it's never said that atheism is delusional.

But most important judge me for my acts, and I showed nothing less than respect for all beliefs or disbeliefs.


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


I know that they do not mean it metaphorically. It's all a big scam anyway, so who cares how you would describe it ... again, it's up to you to explain what you're doing. It's a practice of your religion - if you can't even explain what's going on, how could we (atheists) even begin to say something specific about it? This is your skewed logical system at work again ... you believe until proven wrong, I don't believe until it's demonstrable.


Any silly claim *could* be true ... that's why I keep mentioning analogies to Unicorns and teapots. The problem is that when you adopt a position of "I believe until proven wrong" then you really don't have any basis for rejecting anything - you are forced to believe all kinds of nonsense. If you don't happen to believe all kinds of nonsense then I would say that "believing until proven wrong" is *not* how you go about in daily life.




If you want to claim a belief is silly...You need to present evidence it's false...Until now, you haven't done this.

Now, transubstantiation is not a scam, we are not gaining anything, we honestly believe it's true, and you are accusing us of omitting a fraud (Scam = Fraud), you should be able to prove this.


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


So you simply don't care whether your beliefs are actually true. Well, I do, and that's the difference between our positions.

I believe they are true, and that they can't be proven with scientific method, as simple as that, I believe there's more than science.

Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 12 2010 at 16:13
            
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 15:33
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I just don't get why it bothers atheists so much that their beliefs are not universally shared. I see this all the time. I have a lot of friends who believe in the ridiculous fiction of man caused global warming, but it only bothers me when they try to tell which lightbulbs I have to buy.


Is that referring to your signature?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 14:07
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I just don't get why it bothers atheists so much that their beliefs are not universally shared. I see this all the time. I have a lot of friends who believe in the ridiculous fiction of man caused global warming, but it only bothers me when they try to tell which lightbulbs I have to buy.
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 13:29
Incidentally:


Unrealistic?


I don't think this is far fetched. Granted, those millions of people aren't all "infiltrating" society with that purpose in mind (indeed I think few of them are even thinking about these issues), but I do think that many of them could be "mobilized" by clever leaders, when the time is right.
Back to Top
Adams Bolero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2009
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 679
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 13:28
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

HugYing Yang
Originally posted by Adams Bolero Adams Bolero wrote:

This thread should be closed. It has reached the nadir of senseless name calling. I gave my opinion months ago but I realise there's no point anymore. The 3 heavy hitter atheists have descended into bad tempered and foul mouthed rants.There's no reasoned discussion here. Textbook, Mike and Nightshine I bid you all good day. Learn to respect people's beliefs no matter how much you disagree. We're all trying to find meaning in our lives and human beings will always differ on what they find the meaning to be. Some will find no meaning but still carry on . A little human compassion and sympathy is what's needed. Religion can do good things and bad things and so can atheism. It's we humans that's the problem. Discussions like this get so heated because we're talking about something that is central to who we are whether we're religious or an atheist. But we should never let these arguments undermine the basic principles of respect and restraint. Once we do we should stop such discussions.

You, Sir, are a troll. Now please, with sugar on the top, will you leave this bleeping thread alone?HeartYing YangHug
I'm a troll? I just responded to you telling me to ''fxxx off'' last night but both your post and my response was deleted. Just because I ask for a respectful conversation with no hatred i get called a troll? Ok then I will leave you to your ''reasoned debate''. Goodbye.
''Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal.''

- Albert Camus
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 13:11
HugYing Yang
Originally posted by Adams Bolero Adams Bolero wrote:

This thread should be closed. It has reached the nadir of senseless name calling. I gave my opinion months ago but I realise there's no point anymore. The 3 heavy hitter atheists have descended into bad tempered and foul mouthed rants.There's no reasoned discussion here. Textbook, Mike and Nightshine I bid you all good day. Learn to respect people's beliefs no matter how much you disagree. We're all trying to find meaning in our lives and human beings will always differ on what they find the meaning to be. Some will find no meaning but still carry on . A little human compassion and sympathy is what's needed. Religion can do good things and bad things and so can atheism. It's we humans that's the problem. Discussions like this get so heated because we're talking about something that is central to who we are whether we're religious or an atheist. But we should never let these arguments undermine the basic principles of respect and restraint. Once we do we should stop such discussions.

You, Sir, are a troll. Now please, with sugar on the top, will you leave this bleeping thread alone?HeartYing YangHug


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - November 12 2010 at 13:12
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 13:05
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



It's not only absolutely relevant but also essential Mike, the one starting a thread or questioning other people's beliefs is the one making a claim, and he who makes the claim has to prove it.


The main claim which I made I also provided evidence for:

I don't believe in any gods.

I also made other specific claims that I also provided evidence for - you simply ignored the evidence, which is something that you're entitled to do. 

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:



Mike, I don't need a piece of evidence to believe, I'm not trying to convince you to stop being an atheist or questioning your disbelief, you are the one who started a campaign of threads saying that God doesn't exist, that we are foolish, delusional etc.

If you want to make those claims...YOU NEED EVIDENCE, AND YOU DON'T HAVE IT.


I said that your theories of "god" don't make any sense to me ... and for some specific claims there are logic arguments that show that the theories are contradictory. 

Yelling at me and iterating your ridiculous idea that the one who starts a thread has the burden of proof doesn't impress me at all.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:


Mike, when you make a claim...You need evidence, as simple as that, we haven't made a single thread questioning your disbelief (we only reply to your questions or attacks), but withoiut any evidence you have started several threads saying we are wrong and foolish..That's not enough Mike.


In these threads a lot of evidence was presented on both sides. I think that my side wins because the evidence is more conclusive and much better in line with reality. If you disagree on that - fine, neither of us can "claim" to have won the discussion, that's for the reader to decide. However, your notion that I haven't presented any evidence is ridiculous and a gross - and dishonest - misrepresentation.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

BTW: Ignorant? Are you misunderstanding the term "argument from ignorance" again? But yes, I think that often Theists are forced to be ignorant of scientific facts because otherwise they would have to admit that their belief is false. Young earth creationists are a good example ... they claim that our planet is 6-10 thousand years old, so whenever they are presented with incontrovertible evidence, like carbon dating, stalagtites, plate tectonics, dna generations etc. they can either be honest and drop their faith or continue believing a lie.

Mike, we left creationists behind several pages ago, don't insist with that nonsense, most of us don't believe in Creationism, I given you solid evidence of this, so stop bringing that.


This thread is about Theism vs. Atheism, not about Catholicism vs. Atheism. Have your cake and eat it, too - you represent all religious people here. If you don't, like I said above, you'll first have to present some convincing arguments that your moderate Catholicism is the right position, and the fundamentalist Protestants are wrong. Who are you to call them delusional?Big smile

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:

I'm the first one to criticize literal interpretation of creation and a few pages ago I also criticized those who still claim geocentrism is truth...And you know it, so don't insist

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 
A nice attempt at legal trickery. But that would put you in an infinite regress. Sorry, but there are claims, and rejections of claims, and if any rejection was a claim just like the one it objects to, we would end up shifting the burden of proof around for all eternity.

Consider the following claim:

"There are unicorns"

Now, if some people start believing in that claim, and at one point someone starts a thread "AUnicornism vs. Unicornism ... is it settled?", then would you honestly say that it is up to the one who started the thread and rejects the claim that Unicorns exist to actually demonstrate that there are none?

Mike, if I believe in Unicorns, it's my problem, and I don't have to prove anything to you or anybody  as long as I don't go to a public site and say "Unicorns exist and those who don't believe are ignorant idiots". If I come here and make that claims, you are entitled to ask for evidence of why I'm calling you an ignorant idiot.


Nonsense. You are a Catholic. Catholicism has certain tenets. From these tenets follows that I, as an atheist, am deluded ("fool" is the word used in the translated bible, I think). You don't have to start a forum thread to make me aware of that.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:

In the same way, I been here for years without even mentioning God except to criticize Christian Ptrog as a form of propaganda, but one day you come and say "Christians are delusional ignorants because they believe in a God that doesn't exist"...In this case I'm absolutely entitled to demand you to support your claims with 100% incontrovertible evidence.


Your entitled to hear some reasoning on my part, which I've given. 100% incontrovertible evidence does not exist for *any* claim. Except maybe for the law of identity, but there are some navel-gazing philosophers who would object.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:

It's simple, if you say something....You have to prove it, every civilized justice system in the world works this way.


"I don't believe in Unicorns". What's there to prove? There is no proof either way, all that we can do is to assess whether the stance makes sense or not. And the reason for coming to the conclusion that it does makes sense is because nobody has ever found objective evidence for Unicorns.

Now, if you agree with that - just replace "Unicorns" with "gods".

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:



Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:



Well, if you really think that the Eucharist turns into the actual flesh of Christ when you eat it ... I hope you're not a vegetarian.Wink

Mike, I won't fall again in the game, I explained this issue pages ago, I don't need to support my belief, you need to support your claims (BTW: You know that physically doesn't turn in flesh and bones, transubstantiation FOR US is a different issue).


I know that they do not mean it metaphorically. It's all a big scam anyway, so who cares how you would describe it ... again, it's up to you to explain what you're doing. It's a practice of your religion - if you can't even explain what's going on, how could we (atheists) even begin to say something specific about it? This is your skewed logical system at work again ... you believe until proven wrong, I don't believe until it's demonstrable.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Any silly claim *could* be true ... that's why I keep mentioning analogies to Unicorns and teapots. The problem is that when you adopt a position of "I believe until proven wrong" then you really don't have any basis for rejecting anything - you are forced to believe all kinds of nonsense. If you don't happen to believe all kinds of nonsense then I would say that "believing until proven wrong" is *not* how you go about in daily life.



But if you want to claim a belief is silly...You need to present evidence it's false...Until now, you haven't done this.


You just don't get it.Sleepy

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

My claim is that there's not enough evidence to accept your position. I refuted all the evidence you presented - except for claims that are unfalsifiable, which for the same reason aren't valid arguments. As it stands, I don't have to give you anything. Again, present some objective reasons why your claim is true and that of Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists isn't - that would be a start, but you can't even do that. 

I agree with that, there's not enough scientific evidence to prove my beliefs, we don't care, we still believe and perceive a kind of evidence you are not able to understand, but on the other hand,  there is absolutely no evidence to prove your claims that we are delusional ignorant are true.

Iván

So you simply don't care whether your beliefs are actually true. Well, I do, and that's the difference between our positions.
Back to Top
Adams Bolero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2009
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 679
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2010 at 13:04
This thread should be closed. It has reached the nadir of senseless name calling. I gave my opinion months ago but I realise there's no point anymore. The 3 heavy hitter atheists have descended into bad tempered and foul mouthed rants.There's no reasoned discussion here. Textbook, Mike and Nightshine I bid you all good day. Learn to respect people's beliefs no matter how much you disagree. We're all trying to find meaning in our lives and human beings will always differ on what they find the meaning to be. Some will find no meaning but still carry on . A little human compassion and sympathy is what's needed. Religion can do good things and bad things and so can atheism. It's we humans that's the problem. Discussions like this get so heated because we're talking about something that is central to who we are whether we're religious or an atheist. But we should never let these arguments undermine the basic principles of respect and restraint. Once we do we should stop such discussions.
''Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal.''

- Albert Camus
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2021222324 174>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.261 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.