Megan Fox or Jessica Biel - Progressive Rock Music Forum

Author

Message

Topic Search

Topic Options

Epignosis

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524

Posted: October 28 2010 at 07:17

martinprog77 wrote:

i prefert salma

I said that last time!

https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays

Epignosis

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524

Posted: October 28 2010 at 07:18

Very well, you can have her. I'll take Keeley Hazell. Tongue

https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays

Padraic

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169

Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:09

Epignosis wrote:

Very well, you can have her. I'll take Keeley Hazell. Tongue

* Nods head in approval *

Catcher10

Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847

Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:16

Epignosis wrote:

JLocke wrote:

CoCambria wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

JLocke wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Neither really.

This.

Oh, right. Forgot. Neither of them are pudgy enough for you.

Biel isn't so bad, but I don't find her attractive really.

Megan Fox looks absolutely frightful to me. Pinch

Ok, to say that Megan is frightful is just extreme.

Its not like she looks like Susan Boyle. Unless you prefer her. She is pudgy too!

Rob has very particular taste in women. He seems to only go for the types of girls he knows he'll actually have a chance with. While that's a very realistic way to be, I hardly ever agree with him.

In this case, however, I actually do see his point. Fox's lips and eyes make her look like a fish.

Wha??

I've dated all sorts of girls, from wholesome to trashy, tall, skinny and blonde to short, dumpy and brunette.

The only type of girl I go for now is the one I'm married to, and I'll have you know I don't have any chance with her! Ouch

But yes, as for Fox:

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/09/megan-fox.jpg

Gah! She gives me the shivers. Pinch

Neither for me

.....not that she gives me the shivers, close, but I just wonder what the heck is under that 14lbs of makeup? She certainly keeps Maybelline in business....

manofmystery View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335

Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:31

Padraic wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Very well, you can have her. I'll take Keeley Hazell. Tongue

* Nods head in approval *

While I wouldn't kick either of these two out of bed, Jessica Biel would be my choice. Been a fan ever since she posed for Gear.

Time always wins.

Marty McFly View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968

Posted: October 28 2010 at 09:34

Epignosis wrote:

My thing is "Why do guys find those women that attractive?" I don't understand it- probably never will. No biggie. It's all a matter of opinion, and that's a good thing, because someone found me attractive.

I find you ~~attractive~~ as well. Nah, bad choice of word, more like sympathetic (basic word: sympathy). Said guy happy in relationship with a girl for two years and four more years before this one with various girls.

Girls.

To be honest, I won't touch Megan Fox even if she danced in a flirting way in front of me. She's simply too artificial for me, I like different kind of girls.

Yes, you can make ironic post now and show some totally gross photos of "natural" girls and I would perhaps laugh, but I hope you understand my point.

Edited by Marty McFly - October 28 2010 at 09:37

There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

-Andyman1125 on Lulu

Even my

thellama73 View Drop Down

Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368

Posted: October 28 2010 at 20:41

JLocke wrote:

martinprog77 wrote:

i prefert salma

And I prefer Penelope.

What is it with you guys and Hispanic women? A few years ago Asians were all the rage, now it's Hispanics. I'm sorry if I sound like a racist, but I'm really not attracted to ethnicities other than my own (except in certain rare cases.)

Epignosis

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524

Posted: October 28 2010 at 20:45

thellama73 wrote:

What is it with you guys and Hispanic women?

My criteria has less to do with ethnicity and more to do with teh bewbs. Geek

https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays

UndercoverBoy View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148

Posted: October 28 2010 at 20:59

Boobs are overrated.

JLocke

Prog Reviewer

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:03

thellama73 wrote:

JLocke wrote:

martinprog77 wrote:

i prefert salma

And I prefer Penelope.

Well, that's your problem, isn't it? Not mine.

The only reason I countered with Penelope is because men typically pit those two against each-other as the famous hispanic woman of choice. I was simply stating my preference of the two. If you want to go into ethnicities, the simple answer from me is that I honestly don't care what race a woman is. Nor do I have a preference (although I admittedly have a more natural attraction to black women, and I honestly cannot explain that).

Logically, though, it makes no difference to me. I judge my attraction to a woman based on everything about her, looks being only one piece of that. For you to assume that just because I posted a pic of Penelope Cruz somehow means I have a 'fetish' of sorts for hispanic women exposes your own bigotry as far as I am concerned.

Why don't you enjoy your narrow-minded view of the opposite sex on your own time? Assuming I have just as narrow an opinion regarding some other ethnicity is ignorant. I like all women. I don't put them into boxes as you apparently do. Women are individual human beings, just like you and I.

Edited by JLocke - October 28 2010 at 21:14

JLocke

Prog Reviewer

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:04

UndercoverBoy wrote:

Boobs are overrated.

I agree 100%

Epignosis

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:07

JLocke wrote:

UndercoverBoy wrote:

Boobs are overrated.

I agree 100%

Well

to both of you!

https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays

JLocke

Prog Reviewer

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:11

Epignosis wrote:

JLocke wrote:

UndercoverBoy wrote:

Boobs are overrated.

I agree 100%

Well

to both of you!

There's just no logical reason why protruding mammary glands should be sexually arousing to me. I've never understood the fascination. If a girl doesn't have big ones, that makes her not worthy of my love or affection? Surely not. (The same could be said regarding a woman's race or hair color, or any other pointless thing guys place so much importance on)

Epignosis

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:23

JLocke wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

JLocke wrote:

UndercoverBoy wrote:

Boobs are overrated.

I agree 100%

Well

to both of you!

"Love and affection" do not equal "want to have sex with" for most of people here, am I right?

https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays

TheGazzardian View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8677

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:23

JLocke wrote:

Fallacy: using logic to explain lust.

Edited by TheGazzardian - October 28 2010 at 21:24

JLocke

Prog Reviewer

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:30

TheGazzardian wrote:

JLocke wrote:

Fallacy: using logic to explain lust.

Well, I don't ''lust'' after big titties, either. Maybe I'm alone in this, but even when I lust after someone, I lust after the whole thing, not just one aspect that is supposed to be extra-sexy to me. And besides, since when did supposed good-looks have anything to do with the male libido, anyway? Isn't that just a primal physical desire that will ultimately kick in regardless?

JLocke

Prog Reviewer

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900

Posted: October 28 2010 at 21:32

Epignosis wrote:

JLocke wrote:

Epignosis wrote: