Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
CoCambria
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 07 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 27
|
Topic: Megan Fox or Jessica Biel Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:25 |
I was just curious after the Jennifer Anniston and Angelina Jolie Poll, how the PA members would rate Megan Fox and Jessica Biel? I prefer both, but I have to choose Megan. It's her eyes that do that make here absolutely gorgeous. Megan has the right balance of beauty and smoking hot!
|
All The Best FREAKS are Here! Please Stop STARING at ME!-Marillion
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:34 |
Neither really.
|
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:43 |
Jessica Biel is just plain gorgeous. Megan Fox is a mouth-breathing nymph.
|
|
Stooge
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 09 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1003
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:43 |
I'll go with Megan Fox, but I don't think she'd appreciate me. Her loss. I prefer Ann Hathaway over both of them, and probably quite a few others.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:52 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Neither really. | This.
|
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:58 |
Epignosis wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Neither really. |
This.
|
Oh, right. Forgot. Neither of them are pudgy enough for you.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 16:59 |
JLocke wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Neither really. |
This.
|
Oh, right. Forgot. Neither of them are pudgy enough for you. | Biel isn't so bad, but I don't find her attractive really.
Megan Fox looks absolutely frightful to me.
Edited by Epignosis - October 27 2010 at 16:59
|
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:00 |
^ Yes, I've never seen the big deal with her, either. I like Biel because she looks much more natural than many of her fellow actresses/models.
|
|
CoCambria
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 07 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 27
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:06 |
Ok, to say that Megan is frightful is just extreme. Its not like she looks like Susan Boyle. Unless you prefer her. She is pudgy too!
|
All The Best FREAKS are Here! Please Stop STARING at ME!-Marillion
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:08 |
Rob has very particular taste in women. He seems to only go for the types of girls he knows he'll actually have a chance with. While that's a very realistic way to be, I hardly ever agree with him.
In this case, however, I actually do see his point. Fox's lips and eyes make her look like a fish.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:44 |
JLocke wrote:
Rob has very particular taste in women. He seems to only go for the types of girls he knows he'll actually have a chance with. While that's a very realistic way to be, I hardly ever agree with him.
In this case, however, I actually do see his point. Fox's lips and eyes make her look like a fish. | Wha?? I've dated all sorts of girls, from wholesome to trashy, tall, skinny and blonde to short, dumpy and brunette.
The only type of girl I go for now is the one I'm married to, and I'll have you know I don't have any chance with her! But yes, as for Fox:Gah! She gives me the shivers.
|
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 17:50 |
Meant no offense, Rob. I simply stated my opinion that the type of girls you always seem to scoff at are girls that nearly every other guy in america would give a limb for, while the girls you always say are the 'true' beauties are more natural, everyday pretty girls. The former NONE of us would have a chance with, since they aren't real. But I'm one of those fellas who still goes for the hollywood definition of attractive at times, though not always. It's more like my tastes are fairly broad, so sometimes my type of girl overlaps with hollywood's type of girl. It's mere coincidence, really.
Fox, on the other hand, hollywood can keep.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 18:05 |
JLocke wrote:
Meant no offense, Rob. I simply stated my opinion that the type of girls you always seem to scoff at are girls that nearly every other guy in america would give a limb for, while the girls you always say are the 'true' beauties are more natural, everyday pretty girls. The former NONE of us would have a chance with, since they aren't real. But I'm one of those fellas who still goes for the hollywood definition of attractive at times, though not always. It's more like my tastes are fairly broad, so sometimes my type of girl overlaps with hollywood's type of girl. It's mere coincidence, really.
Fox, on the other hand, hollywood can keep. | None taken.
My thing is "Why do guys find those women that attractive?" I don't understand it- probably never will. No biggie. It's all a matter of opinion, and that's a good thing, because someone found me attractive.
|
|
|
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 22:45 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Neither really. |
|
|
Synchestra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 07 2009
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 734
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 23:30 |
One day we will have a 'hot celebrity A vs hot celebrity B' poll where I actually find both participants attractive. Not today, I guess. Still, of the two I prefer Megan Fox. She was the only reason to get through the second half of Transformers 2 (you know, after you get over the boyish 'Woah! Robots! Explosions! Awesome!' part)
|
'Yeah, thats.. Whatever you're talking about for ya' - Zapp brannigan
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 23:35 |
My standards of beauty are as unrealistic as the next guy, but I have to agree with Rob that neither of these women do much for me. If it's Hollywood girls we're after, I like Elizabeth Hurley in the first Austin Powers movie, Courtney Cox in the early 90's and Megyn Kelly on Fox News (the last of which is my ideal woman in every way.)
|
|
|
SaltyJon
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772
|
Posted: October 27 2010 at 23:51 |
If it's Hollywood girls we're after...Grace Kelly or Lauren Bacall (not current Lauren, 1940s Lauren).
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: October 28 2010 at 00:30 |
Megan Fox was pretty but then she decided to make her lips horrendously bigger. Jessica Biel has a pretty face and some other quite spectacular assets... . She wins.
|
|
|
martinprog77
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 31 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2523
|
Posted: October 28 2010 at 02:48 |
|
Nothing can last
there are no second chances.
Never give a day away.
Always live for today.
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: October 28 2010 at 04:12 |
martinprog77 wrote:
i prefert salma
|
And I prefer Penelope.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.