Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - For my Libertarian friends
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFor my Libertarian friends

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 200201202203204 269>
Author
Message
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 10:25
I love when we manage to trick Pat into defending Beck.
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 10:36
I just don't understand people getting so upset about him.  Just don't listen/watch if you find him so abhorrent.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 10:51
You libertarians here in PA are all very intelligent... That's why it baffles me to see some support for PAlin... Ok, you like what she represents... But do any of you find it in yourself to support this idiot? (disregard the last comedic bit... I post this because of the debate part which is REALLy fun... LOL)





Edited by The T - October 20 2010 at 10:51
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 10:53
I strongly dislike Palin and O'Donnell, so I guess you're not addressing me.
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:12
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

You libertarians here in PA are all very intelligent... That's why it baffles me to see some support for PAlin... Ok, you like what she represents... But do any of you find it in yourself to support this idiot? (disregard the last comedic bit... I post this because of the debate part which is REALLy fun... LOL)





A) What does this have to do with Sarah Palin?

B) The phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear in the constitution. The first amendment says:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "
Which basically means that the Government can't establish an official state religion or tell people how to worship. I think Jimmy Kimmel needs to read the constitution before attacking someone else for not having read it.


Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:20
a) I was just making a connection between these two "mama grizzlies" that's all. Both have been attacked for being less-than-prepared. 

b) and both receive some defense from time to time! Remember, I literally said "disregard the last comedic bit". I post this here because I couldn't find just the debate part. It's not just Kimmel bashing her for this. 

But when you cite the constitution you say "basically means that the Government can't establish an official state religion or tell people how to worship"... What else could we need? Confused



Edited by The T - October 20 2010 at 11:22
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:22
I guess this could start another debate: do you believe in separation of church and state? Is it on the constitution? 
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:27
I believe in what the first amendment states, but I don't agree with the ACLU interpretation that the government can not permit any expression of religion on public property. For example, prohibiting, not just prayer, but "moments of silence" in schools, or the display of the ten commandments in courthouses.

The reason for the wording of the first amendment has to do with the way things used to be in Europe, where you could be jailed for refusing to practice the state religion or for worshiping a different god. Obviously that is a bad thing and what the founding fathers were guarding against.


Edited by thellama73 - October 20 2010 at 11:28
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:27
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

I guess this could start another debate: do you believe in separation of church and state? Is it on the constitution? 

I believe on the whole it's obviously the appropriate way to operate - as with most things, the devil is in the details.

Ask yourself if you have a problem with this (a memorial in the Mojave desert)


being on Federal land, and if that constitutes an "establishment of religion" per the First Amendment.

edit:  my link didn't work, here's a link to the picture:



Edited by Padraic - October 20 2010 at 11:30
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:29
I wouldn't like the ten commandments outside any courthouse. It just sends a wrong message. Justice has to be blind. If I ever was a witness in a trial, I'd have to ask not to swear on the bible. 

The moment of silence part though is ridiculous. Didn't know that. I didn't even know the practice had a religious origin (I guess that's why is not allowed?)  
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:31
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

I wouldn't like the ten commandments outside any courthouse. It just sends a wrong message. Justice has to be blind. If I ever was a witness in a trial, I'd have to ask not to swear on the bible. 

The moment of silence part though is ridiculous. Didn't know that. I didn't even know the practice had a religious origin (I guess that's why is not allowed?)  


Yeah, they're afraid that someone might use the moment of silence to pray. Heaven forbid!
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:33
Dead
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:36
Incidentally, it has been a long standing tradition in America to have the ten commandments represented in courthouses. The ACLU filed suit against the practice a couple of years ago, but I am not sure of the result, so I don't know if it is still going on.
Another example is attempts to remove the words "In God We Trust" from U.S. currency. Is this really so offensive?
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:52
Originally posted by Lozlan Lozlan wrote:

Wait a minute...there are actually people that defend Glenn Beck?  I thought humanity were all agreed that he was a hideous, mutated trainwreck of a pundit, a bloviating clown who subsists on meaningless hysteria and displays of bloated self-aggrandizement. 

Am I wrong?


Yes you are.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 11:55
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

I love when we manage to trick Pat into defending Beck.


You mean this entire thing was an elaborate ruse to trick me Angry. Damn your dastardly schemes .
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17332
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 12:08

Opinion piece of the Tea Partiers

No doubt the last sentence will irk a few.  Wink
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 12:10
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

I guess this could start another debate: do you believe in separation of church and state? Is it on the constitution? 


Yes I believe in it. I don't believe the state can endorse anything. Equality under the law would forbid it doing such a thing

Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. The phrase originated in a correspondence that Thomas Jefferson had. The amendment states that the Federal government can have no official religion or make laws restricting the practicing of religion.

For a long time states had official religions and used tax money to fund the Churches. The Constitution applies to the federal government always remember. I don't agree with official state religions obviously as I said above, but if we're talking about what the document says, then that's simply what it says.

 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 12:12
Teo, I'm probably the most liberal-minded libertarian you're likely to talk to on here. I have no time for Palin and her ilk. Not because I think everything she says is wrong, but because she's obviously clueless most of the time. Why should I pay any respect to someone who doesn't even listen to herself? 
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 12:17
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Another example is attempts to remove the words "In God We Trust" from U.S. currency. Is this really so offensive?

Yes. Because that phrase wasn't on our currency to begin with; it was forced onto it by religious right nutjobs, and in that case, religion influenced the laws. Same situation with cramming in the 'under God' portion of the pledge of allegiance. It wasn't there to begin with until crazy people told the government to recognize religion and slap it on there. 

And The Ten Commandments are fictional laws that are more concerned with keeping the sabbath holy than protecting the rights of women or children. I can perfectly see why displaying them in an actual court of real, logical laws would be found insulting by a few people. 


Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17332
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2010 at 12:24
Can one be liberal and libertarian?  I thought the two were generally at odds.  Or are you just saying on some issue you swing one way, and on other issues you swing the other? 
 
Just curious. 
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 200201202203204 269>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.477 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.