![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 200201202203204 269> |
Author | |
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
I love when we manage to trick Pat into defending Beck.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
I just don't understand people getting so upset about him. Just don't listen/watch if you find him so abhorrent.
|
|
![]() |
|
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
You libertarians here in PA are all very intelligent... That's why it baffles me to see some support for PAlin... Ok, you like what she represents... But do any of you find it in yourself to support this idiot? (disregard the last comedic bit... I post this because of the debate part which is REALLy fun...
![]() Edited by The T - October 20 2010 at 10:51 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
I strongly dislike Palin and O'Donnell, so I guess you're not addressing me.
|
|
![]() |
|
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
A) What does this have to do with Sarah Palin? B) The phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear in the constitution. The first amendment says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. " Which basically means that the Government can't establish an official state religion or tell people how to worship. I think Jimmy Kimmel needs to read the constitution before attacking someone else for not having read it. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
a) I was just making a connection between these two "mama grizzlies" that's all. Both have been attacked for being less-than-prepared.
b) and both receive some defense from time to time! Remember, I literally said "disregard the last comedic bit". I post this here because I couldn't find just the debate part. It's not just Kimmel bashing her for this. But when you cite the constitution you say "basically means that the Government can't establish an official state religion or tell people how to worship"... What else could we need? ![]() Edited by The T - October 20 2010 at 11:22 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
I guess this could start another debate: do you believe in separation of church and state? Is it on the constitution?
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
I believe in what the first amendment states, but I don't agree with the ACLU interpretation that the government can not permit any expression of religion on public property. For example, prohibiting, not just prayer, but "moments of silence" in schools, or the display of the ten commandments in courthouses.
The reason for the wording of the first amendment has to do with the way things used to be in Europe, where you could be jailed for refusing to practice the state religion or for worshiping a different god. Obviously that is a bad thing and what the founding fathers were guarding against. Edited by thellama73 - October 20 2010 at 11:28 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Padraic ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
![]() |
I believe on the whole it's obviously the appropriate way to operate - as with most things, the devil is in the details. Ask yourself if you have a problem with this (a memorial in the Mojave desert) being on Federal land, and if that constitutes an "establishment of religion" per the First Amendment. edit: my link didn't work, here's a link to the picture: Edited by Padraic - October 20 2010 at 11:30 |
|
![]() |
|
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
I wouldn't like the ten commandments outside any courthouse. It just sends a wrong message. Justice has to be blind. If I ever was a witness in a trial, I'd have to ask not to swear on the bible.
The moment of silence part though is ridiculous. Didn't know that. I didn't even know the practice had a religious origin (I guess that's why is not allowed?)
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
Yeah, they're afraid that someone might use the moment of silence to pray. Heaven forbid! |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
Incidentally, it has been a long standing tradition in America to have the ten commandments represented in courthouses. The ACLU filed suit against the practice a couple of years ago, but I am not sure of the result, so I don't know if it is still going on.
Another example is attempts to remove the words "In God We Trust" from U.S. currency. Is this really so offensive? |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() |
Yes you are. |
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
![]() |
|
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() |
You mean this entire thing was an elaborate ruse to trick me ![]() |
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
![]() |
|
Finnforest ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Offline Points: 17332 |
![]() |
Opinion piece of the Tea Partiers No doubt the last sentence will irk a few.
![]() |
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
|
![]() |
|
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() |
Yes I believe in it. I don't believe the state can endorse anything. Equality under the law would forbid it doing such a thing Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. The phrase originated in a correspondence that Thomas Jefferson had. The amendment states that the Federal government can have no official religion or make laws restricting the practicing of religion. For a long time states had official religions and used tax money to fund the Churches. The Constitution applies to the federal government always remember. I don't agree with official state religions obviously as I said above, but if we're talking about what the document says, then that's simply what it says. |
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
![]() |
|
JLocke ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
![]() |
Teo, I'm probably the most liberal-minded libertarian you're likely to talk to on here. I have no time for Palin and her ilk. Not because I think everything she says is wrong, but because she's obviously clueless most of the time. Why should I pay any respect to someone who doesn't even listen to herself?
|
|
![]() |
|
JLocke ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
![]() |
Yes. Because that phrase wasn't on our currency to begin with; it was forced onto it by religious right nutjobs, and in that case, religion influenced the laws. Same situation with cramming in the 'under God' portion of the pledge of allegiance. It wasn't there to begin with until crazy people told the government to recognize religion and slap it on there. And The Ten Commandments are fictional laws that are more concerned with keeping the sabbath holy than protecting the rights of women or children. I can perfectly see why displaying them in an actual court of real, logical laws would be found insulting by a few people.
|
|
![]() |
|
Finnforest ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Offline Points: 17332 |
![]() |
Can one be liberal and libertarian? I thought the two were generally at odds. Or are you just saying on some issue you swing one way, and on other issues you swing the other?
Just curious.
|
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 200201202203204 269> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |