Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:49 |
The T wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
I was in wal-mart once and they had big packages of macaroni and cheese for 19 cents each. I couldn't believe it. Now I know that mac and cheese is not the healthiest meal in the world, but I bet it's healthier than McDonald's and MUCH cheaper.
|
Macaroni and Cheese is as garbage as mc donalds... Just as garbage. Actually, Mc Donalds may be even better. At least it has some kind of meat...
Why is that poor people are more obese then? It would be because of poor choices I assume. Just like buying lottery tickets. Does this mean that, in the US, poor people are poor because they deserve it? ALWAYS?
No, it means most people are obese because of the dietary and lifestyle choices they make, regardless of income level. There are exceptions, but this applies to the majority. I myself am overweight and make poor decisions despite being able to afford pretty much any type of food I want.
Now that we're talking about obesity then Rob, (and unrelated to the poverty relationship), why do you think the US has the biggest (and by FAR) rate of obesity in the world?
I don't know - we might get fast food/junk food peddled to us more than anyone else in the world, or because prosperity begets laziness, there's probably a host of factors.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:52 |
The T wrote:
Now that we're talking about obesity then Rob, (and unrelated to
the poverty relationship), why do you think the US has the biggest (and
by FAR) rate of obesity in the world?
| Hmm...do you even look things up before you post by the way? Where is the data that says the US has the biggest (and by "FAR") rate of obesity in the world?
According to Forbes, the USA is #9.
Rank | Country | % |
1. | Nauru | 94.5 |
2. | Micronesia, Federated States of | 91.1 |
3. | Cook Islands | 90.9 |
4. | Tonga | 90.8 |
5. | Niue | 81.7 |
6. | Samoa | 80.4 |
7. | Palau | 78.4 |
8. | Kuwait | 74.2 |
9. | United States | 74.1 |
10. | Kiribati | 73.6 |
11. | Dominica | 71.0 |
12. | Barbados | 69.7 |
13. | Argentina | 69.4 |
14. | Egypt | 69.4 |
15. | Malta | 68.7 |
16. | Greece | 68.5 |
17. | New Zealand | 68.4 |
18. | United Arab Emirates | 68.3 |
19. | Mexico | 68.1 |
20. | Trinidad and Tobago | 67.9 |
21. | Australia | 67.4 |
22. | Belarus | 66.8 |
23. | Chile | 65.3 |
24. | Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) | 65.2 |
25. | Seychelles | 64.6 |
26. | Bahrain | 64.1 |
27. | Andorra | 63.8 |
28. | United Kingdom | 63.8 |
29. | Saudi Arabia | 63.5 |
30. | Monaco | 62.4 |
31. | Bolivia | 62.2 |
32. | San Marino | 62.1 |
33. | Guatemala | 61.2 |
34. | Mongolia | 61.2 |
35. | Canada | 61.1 |
36. | Qatar | 61.0 |
37. | Uruguay | 60.9 |
38. | Jordan | 60.5 |
39. | Bahamas | 60.4 |
40. | Iceland | 60.4 |
41. | Nicaragua | 60.4 |
42. | Cuba | 60.1 |
43. | Germany | 60.1 |
44. | Brunei Darussalam | 59.8 |
45. | Slovenia | 59.8 |
46. | Peru | 59.6 |
47. | Vanuatu | 59.6 |
48. | Finland | 58.7 |
49. | Jamaica | 57.4 | I lol'd that #3 is "Cook Islands."
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:52 |
thellama73 wrote:
The T wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
The T wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
I was in wal-mart once and they had big packages of macaroni and cheese for 19 cents each. I couldn't believe it. Now I know that mac and cheese is not the healthiest meal in the world, but I bet it's healthier than McDonald's and MUCH cheaper.
|
Macaroni and Cheese is as garbage as mc donalds... Just as garbage. Actually, Mc Donalds may be even better. At least it has some kind of meat...
Why is that poor people are more obese then? It would be because of poor choices I assume. Just like buying lottery tickets. Does this mean that, in the US, poor people are poor because they deserve it? ALWAYS?
Now that we're talking about obesity then Rob, (and unrelated to the poverty relationship), why do you think the US has the biggest (and by FAR) rate of obesity in the world?
|
Obviously not always. People have runs of bad luck and hit on hard times, no question. But you have to concede that there is some correlation between being smart and driven with being successful. There are smart, driven poor people and there are stupid, lazy rich people, but on average smart, driven people will be more successful.
|
I actually agree on that.
Just like with obesity... previous health problems notwithstanding, obese people are there because they've made poorer choices, therefore they're more stupid.
Therefore the US is one of the countries with the most stupid people in the world.
Therefore there is need for a government to provide for them
Impeccable.
|
Ah, logic.
1. Your first premise discounts the possibility of being stupid in other ways. French people are not obese, but they smoke a lot more, so in that regard they are stupider. 2. You second conclusion doesn't follow at all. If government provides for them, how will they or their children ever learn? Also it ignores the injustice of income redistribution and the existence of private charity.
|
Now you also want to take public education away from them... What chances do they have now to ever learn??
|
|
|
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:52 |
thellama73 wrote:
Negoba wrote:
I'll go where people (not here, just in general) seem to want to avoid...culture and intelligence.
Our values about hard work and reward are cultural ideas that were taught to us...they're not absolute truths. Furthermore, those of us gifted with a certain degree of intelligence are able to pick and choose somewhat, sticking with the parts of our upbringing that work for us and discarding some parts that we don't like or aren't working.
If you're born poor and slow third generation and work isn't part of your family's culture, what honest chance is there for you to break out? There are examples, but most of those are at the head of the intelligence curve within their own culture groups.
Add in mental illness (also more common in lower SES groups) and this whole "pick yourself up by your bootstraps" crap is revealed for the fantasy it is.
I'm not excusing anybody, or blaming anybody.
|
If work isn't part of your culture, you'd better change your attitude to your culture if you want to be successful in this country. Of course, if you don't want to work, that's perfectly fine with me, just don't complain when you don't have very much money.
|
How many people reject their cultures of origin? How many people of below average intelligence reject their cultures of origin? How many people of below average intelligence and minimal financial means break out?
If the choice is break out or starve, things would be different. But we'd have to accept alot more people dying of starvation, and a helluva lot more crime. And that's part of the libertarian system, people have to be able to truly fail. No where near the majority of people are ready for that. Most would argue that part of having a civilized society is so that starvation and murder to eat don't have to happen.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:54 |
The T wrote:
This "go work and you'll not be poor, lazy bum" mentality might have some truth behind it but it's horribly generalizing and unfair. Just like the "homeless are bums" idea of people who seem to ignore that most homeless are mentally ill people affected by the desinstitutionalization that was carried out in previous decades. Oh yes, it's so easy always to blame those in the weaker positions for their problems.
When you're born in poverty, with poor and uneducated parents, chances are it'll be very difficult to get out of it since the vicious circle is in effect... As Negoba as saying, when you're born in one of this "lottery-ticket buying, mcdonalds eating" families, chances are THAT IS WHAT YOU WILL LEARN TO DO, and unless you have some good education or someone to guide you when you're young, leaving the poor ranks will be difficult. | Vicious cycle or not, it isn't the government's place to intervene.
|
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:54 |
No one is saying that it's easy to go from being poor to being rich. Of course it isn't But it is possible. And it's not matter of working harder alone, but also working smarter. Finding a niche in the market that needs filling. Plenty of people have accomplished this, but I agree that it's very difficult. The general philosophy of America is that those who overcome this difficulty should be rewarded for it, whereas those who do not have that choice. Even the poorest Americans are not starving to death. If they want more, opportunities exist.
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:55 |
Epignosis wrote:
The T wrote:
Now that we're talking about obesity then Rob, (and unrelated to
the poverty relationship), why do you think the US has the biggest (and
by FAR) rate of obesity in the world?
|
Hmm...do you even look things up before you post by the way? Where is the data that says the US has the biggest (and by "FAR") rate of obesity in the world?
According to Forbes, the USA is #9.
Rank | Country | % |
1. | Nauru | 94.5 |
2. | Micronesia, Federated States of | 91.1 |
3. | Cook Islands | 90.9 |
4. | Tonga | 90.8 |
5. | Niue | 81.7 |
6. | Samoa | 80.4 |
7. | Palau | 78.4 |
8. | Kuwait | 74.2 |
9. | United States | 74.1 |
10. | Kiribati | 73.6 |
11. | Dominica | 71.0 |
12. | Barbados | 69.7 |
13. | Argentina | 69.4 |
14. | Egypt | 69.4 |
15. | Malta | 68.7 |
16. | Greece | 68.5 |
17. | New Zealand | 68.4 |
18. | United Arab Emirates | 68.3 |
19. | Mexico | 68.1 |
20. | Trinidad and Tobago | 67.9 |
21. | Australia | 67.4 |
22. | Belarus | 66.8 |
23. | Chile | 65.3 |
24. | Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) | 65.2 |
25. | Seychelles | 64.6 |
26. | Bahrain | 64.1 |
27. | Andorra | 63.8 |
28. | United Kingdom | 63.8 |
29. | Saudi Arabia | 63.5 |
30. | Monaco | 62.4 |
31. | Bolivia | 62.2 |
32. | San Marino | 62.1 |
33. | Guatemala | 61.2 |
34. | Mongolia | 61.2 |
35. | Canada | 61.1 |
36. | Qatar | 61.0 |
37. | Uruguay | 60.9 |
38. | Jordan | 60.5 |
39. | Bahamas | 60.4 |
40. | Iceland | 60.4 |
41. | Nicaragua | 60.4 |
42. | Cuba | 60.1 |
43. | Germany | 60.1 |
44. | Brunei Darussalam | 59.8 |
45. | Slovenia | 59.8 |
46. | Peru | 59.6 |
47. | Vanuatu | 59.6 |
48. | Finland | 58.7 |
49. | Jamaica | 57.4 |
I lol'd that #3 is "Cook Islands."
|
Rob, you're usually very exact but now you're being ridiculous. You're comparing the self-proclaimed richest nation on earth with 300 million people with countries where probably one obese person makes half the population...
I should've added "in the industrialized world" and then it would be absolutely true. The US kicks the hell out of all Europe and prosperous countries in obesity...
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:56 |
Epignosis wrote:
The T wrote:
This "go work and you'll not be poor, lazy bum" mentality might have some truth behind it but it's horribly generalizing and unfair. Just like the "homeless are bums" idea of people who seem to ignore that most homeless are mentally ill people affected by the desinstitutionalization that was carried out in previous decades. Oh yes, it's so easy always to blame those in the weaker positions for their problems.
When you're born in poverty, with poor and uneducated parents, chances are it'll be very difficult to get out of it since the vicious circle is in effect... As Negoba as saying, when you're born in one of this "lottery-ticket buying, mcdonalds eating" families, chances are THAT IS WHAT YOU WILL LEARN TO DO, and unless you have some good education or someone to guide you when you're young, leaving the poor ranks will be difficult. |
Vicious cycle or not, it isn't the government's place to intervene.
|
Why...
|
|
|
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:57 |
Epignosis wrote:
The T wrote:
Now that we're talking about obesity then Rob, (and unrelated to
the poverty relationship), why do you think the US has the biggest (and
by FAR) rate of obesity in the world?
|
Hmm...do you even look things up before you post by the way? Where is the data that says the US has the biggest (and by "FAR") rate of obesity in the world?
According to Forbes, the USA is #9.
Rank | Country | % |
1. | Nauru | 94.5 |
2. | Micronesia, Federated States of | 91.1 |
3. | Cook Islands | 90.9 |
4. | Tonga | 90.8 |
5. | Niue | 81.7 |
6. | Samoa | 80.4 |
7. | Palau | 78.4 |
8. | Kuwait | 74.2 |
9. | United States | 74.1 |
10. | Kiribati | 73.6 |
11. | Dominica | 71.0 |
12. | Barbados | 69.7 |
13. | Argentina | 69.4 |
14. | Egypt | 69.4 |
15. | Malta | 68.7 |
16. | Greece | 68.5 |
17. | New Zealand | 68.4 |
18. | United Arab Emirates | 68.3 |
19. | Mexico | 68.1 |
20. | Trinidad and Tobago | 67.9 |
21. | Australia | 67.4 |
22. | Belarus | 66.8 |
23. | Chile | 65.3 |
24. | Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) | 65.2 |
25. | Seychelles | 64.6 |
26. | Bahrain | 64.1 |
27. | Andorra | 63.8 |
28. | United Kingdom | 63.8 |
29. | Saudi Arabia | 63.5 |
30. | Monaco | 62.4 |
31. | Bolivia | 62.2 |
32. | San Marino | 62.1 |
33. | Guatemala | 61.2 |
34. | Mongolia | 61.2 |
35. | Canada | 61.1 |
36. | Qatar | 61.0 |
37. | Uruguay | 60.9 |
38. | Jordan | 60.5 |
39. | Bahamas | 60.4 |
40. | Iceland | 60.4 |
41. | Nicaragua | 60.4 |
42. | Cuba | 60.1 |
43. | Germany | 60.1 |
44. | Brunei Darussalam | 59.8 |
45. | Slovenia | 59.8 |
46. | Peru | 59.6 |
47. | Vanuatu | 59.6 |
48. | Finland | 58.7 |
49. | Jamaica | 57.4 |
I lol'd that #3 is "Cook Islands."
|
See: New World Syndrome for the first seven.
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:57 |
Negoba wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Negoba wrote:
I'll go where people (not here, just in general) seem to want to avoid...culture and intelligence.
Our values about hard work and reward are cultural ideas that were taught to us...they're not absolute truths. Furthermore, those of us gifted with a certain degree of intelligence are able to pick and choose somewhat, sticking with the parts of our upbringing that work for us and discarding some parts that we don't like or aren't working.
If you're born poor and slow third generation and work isn't part of your family's culture, what honest chance is there for you to break out? There are examples, but most of those are at the head of the intelligence curve within their own culture groups.
Add in mental illness (also more common in lower SES groups) and this whole "pick yourself up by your bootstraps" crap is revealed for the fantasy it is.
I'm not excusing anybody, or blaming anybody.
|
If work isn't part of your culture, you'd better change your attitude to your culture if you want to be successful in this country. Of course, if you don't want to work, that's perfectly fine with me, just don't complain when you don't have very much money.
|
How many people reject their cultures of origin? How many people of below average intelligence reject their cultures of origin? How many people of below average intelligence and minimal financial means break out?
If the choice is break out or starve, things would be different. But we'd have to accept alot more people dying of starvation, and a helluva lot more crime. And that's part of the libertarian system, people have to be able to truly fail. No where near the majority of people are ready for that. Most would argue that part of having a civilized society is so that starvation and murder to eat don't have to happen. |
I don't understand the point you're trying to make. We all know it is difficult to break away from your upbringing. So what? Why is that my fault?
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 14:59 |
Have you noticed how we libertarians and liberals have hijacked the entire "topics not related to music" forums?
|
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:00 |
The T wrote:
Have you noticed how we libertarians and liberals have hijacked the entire "topics not related to music" forums? |
And even some of the music forums as well.
|
|
|
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:00 |
thellama73 wrote:
No one is saying that it's easy to go from being poor to being rich. Of course it isn't But it is possible. And it's not matter of working harder alone, but also working smarter. Finding a niche in the market that needs filling. Plenty of people have accomplished this, but I agree that it's very difficult. The general philosophy of America is that those who overcome this difficulty should be rewarded for it, whereas those who do not have that choice. Even the poorest Americans are not starving to death. If they want more, opportunities exist. |
Why are they not starving?
The state stealing from the rest of us with money and giving out food stamps.
The idea of a minimal safety net with ability to get higher quality if you can afford it has always been my ideal, including for health care (wow back to topic.)
In terms of health care our current safety net involves expensive, poor care. But if our argument was "Ok what is the safety net going to look like and how will we fund it?" and "How will other options look and how will they be funded?" we'd have moved WAY forward. Instead we're arguing about whether there should be a safety net at all, when there already is one.
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:00 |
The T wrote:
Have you noticed how we libertarians and liberals have hijacked the entire "topics not related to music" forums? |
yeah..
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:01 |
Negoba wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
No one is saying that it's easy to go from being poor to being rich. Of course it isn't But it is possible. And it's not matter of working harder alone, but also working smarter. Finding a niche in the market that needs filling. Plenty of people have accomplished this, but I agree that it's very difficult. The general philosophy of America is that those who overcome this difficulty should be rewarded for it, whereas those who do not have that choice. Even the poorest Americans are not starving to death. If they want more, opportunities exist. |
Why are they not starving?
The state stealing from the rest of us with money and giving out food stamps.
The idea of a minimal safety net with ability to get higher quality if you can afford it has always been my ideal, including for health care (wow back to topic.)
In terms of health care our current safety net involves expensive, poor care. But if our argument was "Ok what is the safety net going to look like and how will we fund it?" and "How will other options look and how will they be funded?" we'd have moved WAY forward. Instead we're arguing about whether there should be a safety net at all, when there already is one. |
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:01 |
The T wrote:
I should've added "in the industrialized world" and then it would be absolutely true. The US kicks the hell out of all Europe and prosperous countries in obesity... | Doesn't that run counter to your notion that somehow being poor makes you obese?
You keep making claims (that you never back up) and they seemingly contradict each other.
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:02 |
Epignosis wrote:
The T wrote:
I should've added "in the industrialized world" and then it would be absolutely true. The US kicks the hell out of all Europe and prosperous countries in obesity... |
Doesn't that run counter to your notion that somehow being poor makes you obese?
You keep making claims (that you never back up) and they seemingly contradict each other.
|
No I actually acknowledged that it is possible that being stupid makes you obese.
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:03 |
Negoba wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
No one is saying that it's easy to go from being poor to being rich. Of course it isn't But it is possible. And it's not matter of working harder alone, but also working smarter. Finding a niche in the market that needs filling. Plenty of people have accomplished this, but I agree that it's very difficult. The general philosophy of America is that those who overcome this difficulty should be rewarded for it, whereas those who do not have that choice. Even the poorest Americans are not starving to death. If they want more, opportunities exist. |
Why are they not starving?
The state stealing from the rest of us with money and giving out food stamps.
|
That's one way.
Another are local food banks and/or kitchens, the former to which I donate a considerable amount, because I personally abhor the thought of anyone not having enough to eat.
|
|
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:03 |
I don't understand the point you're trying to make. We all know it is difficult to break away from your upbringing. So what? Why is that my fault?
No one said it was your fault, just that you have to help pay for the safety net. The more you prosper, the more you have to contribute. It's really not that difficult a concept. Yes it's a disincentive to overstratify SES. Good. Overstratified SES is a huge, if not the primary source of social unrest.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: September 23 2010 at 15:03 |
The T wrote:
Now you also want to take public education away from them... What chances do they have now to ever learn?? | OMG without government education, how will anybody learn anything?
|
|
|