Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Don't Ask, Don't Tell Deemed Unconstitutional
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDon't Ask, Don't Tell Deemed Unconstitutional

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 16>
Author
Message
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Don't Ask, Don't Tell Deemed Unconstitutional
    Posted: September 10 2010 at 22:13
  I'm sure everyone knows about this already, and it has probably even been discussed in some of our political threads, but I couldn't find a specific topic related to it, so yeah . . . 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/09/10/EDII1FBT5P.DTL

What are some of your thoughts? I hope this ruling stands, even when the opposition tries to get it re-evaluated. It's about time someone put their foot down and actually respected our damn constitution for once.

Non-Americans are free to chime in with their thoughts too, of course. Smile


Edited by JLocke - September 10 2010 at 22:15
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17304
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 22:29
Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about judges and their power to overturn military authority.
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 22:44
In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 
ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile


Edited by Chris S - September 10 2010 at 22:45
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 22:58
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about judges and their power to overturn military authority.


I pretty much agree with this.

As I mentioned elsewhere, it's a conflict of interest having a government-appointed body interpret a document that is meant to restrict the government.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 22:59
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 
ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile


You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.

Would you shower with one?


Edited by Epignosis - September 10 2010 at 22:59
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:01
 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.

Would you shower with one?


I would. I'm not afraid of any gay-germs. LOL

Would I get paid? Tongue




Edited by JLocke - September 10 2010 at 23:05
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:03
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 

ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile
You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.Would you shower with one?
That tells us more about your fears than about the wisdom or lack thereof in the resolution.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:06
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by
the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the
effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the
military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about
judges and their power to overturn military authority.
I understand this point. I'm not so sure it's right to force people to hide their sexual preferences though.

Are we then acknowledging that soldiers are by default homophobic?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:07
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 

ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile
You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.Would you shower with one?
That tells us more about your fears than about the wisdom or lack thereof in the resolution.


My fears?  I don't fear gay people.

Should women and men in the military shower together?  Why or why not?
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:10
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by
the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the
effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the
military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about
judges and their power to overturn military authority.
I understand this point. I'm not so sure it's right to force people to hide their sexual preferences though.

Are we then acknowledging that soldiers are by default homophobic?


This is all I'm really saying. If the apparent discrimination of homosexuals in the military weren't already apparent, I wouldn't care one way or the other. But when you're fighting to serve your country, you should have the dignity to be seen as exactly who you are, and not hide behind some clownish policy some homophobe dreamed up to muddy the waters.
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17304
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:11
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by
the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the
effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the
military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about
judges and their power to overturn military authority.
I understand this point. I'm not so sure it's right to force people to hide their sexual preferences though.

Are we then acknowledging that soldiers are by default homophobic?


Whoa, I don't acknowledge anything of the sort.  A few will be, sure, but my comments don't say that. 

To you other comment, I'd have no problem showering with anyone if I signed up for it.  I just think the military owns you when you enlist.  You can't have an army of individuals whining about their rights if you expect to maintain discipline.  YOu can whine once you get out.
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:13
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 

ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile
You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.Would you shower with one?
That tells us more about your fears than about the wisdom or lack thereof in the resolution.
My fears?  I don't fear gay people.Should women and men in the military shower together?  Why or why not?
No.

Not all men in the shower would be gay, though. It's a different scenario.

It's complex. But I would've guessed freedom would be first for you, wouldn't it? What freedom is there if one's forced to hide behind a curtain of secrecy, behind a lie?

It'd be better then if there was a requisite to join the army: "be straight".
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:15
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Well, I'm old fashioned, but I think military policy should be set by
the military, not judges.  I trust they are better able to gauge the
effects of rules on their troops, and I think military effectiveness is more important than the rights of the individual who has agreed to join that group.  I think one agrees to the
military's rules of admission when you sign the paper.

I'm not against gays and lesbians serving personally, my reaction is more about
judges and their power to overturn military authority.
I understand this point. I'm not so sure it's right to force people to hide their sexual preferences though.

Are we then acknowledging that soldiers are by default homophobic?


This is all I'm really saying. If the apparent discrimination of homosexuals in the military weren't already apparent, I wouldn't care one way or the other. But when you're fighting to serve your country, you should have the dignity to be seen as exactly who you are, and not hide behind some clownish policy some homophobe dreamed up to muddy the waters.


Bullsh*t.

The military doesn't enable you to express yourself.  The military teaches you to march in step, wear the same clothes as everyone else, and be on a strict schedule.  If you sign up, you become a clone when you wear those army greens.  And that's an important aspect of being a solider. 

Did you know religious soldiers aren't allowed to proselytize while they are deployed?  Should they be allowed to be who they are in the course of military duty?
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:16

Showers?  Showers?  Hell when I was in junior high some dude peed on me every day in the showers.  (Water was always cold, I knew when someone was peeing.)  I may be confused, but don't gay soldiers kill other people just the same as da others? 

Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:17
 
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

 
To you other comment, I'd have no problem showering with anyone if I signed up for it.  I just think the military owns you when you enlist.  You can't have an army of individuals whining about their rights if you expect to maintain discipline.  YOu can whine once you get out.


Being forced to hide the deepest part of yourself for fear of being kicked out of the service is a very serious issue for some. To call it 'whining' when someone speaks out about it is unfair. 
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:17
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 

ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile
You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.Would you shower with one?
That tells us more about your fears than about the wisdom or lack thereof in the resolution.
My fears?  I don't fear gay people.Should women and men in the military shower together?  Why or why not?
No.

Not all men in the shower would be gay, though. It's a different scenario.

It's complex. But I would've guessed freedom would be first for you, wouldn't it? What freedom is there if one's forced to hide behind a curtain of secrecy, behind a lie?

It'd be better then if there was a requisite to join the army: "be straight".


See my previous post.  When you join the military, a good bit of your freedoms go out the window.  That's why I'm opposed to the draft.  You know what you are getting into.  Don't like it?  Work elsewhere.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:22
 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

 
Bullsh*t.

The military doesn't enable you to express yourself.  The military teaches you to march in step, wear the same clothes as everyone else, and be on a strict schedule.  If you sign up, you become a clone when you wear those army greens.  And that's an important aspect of being a solider. 

Did you know religious soldiers aren't allowed to proselytize while they are deployed?  Should they be allowed to be who they are in the course of military duty?


I'm not saying we should let the gays go have gay sex whenever they feel like it while in the service. But to lie about who they are? Surely you can see the difference, here. It's not about expressing yourself, it's about feeling comfortable in your own skin during your service time. I guarantee you that a few closeted gay soldiers had a lot more inner torment going on than their openly straight brothers in arms. You don't think that can affect how you perform or your self-respect? 
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:22
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

 
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:


 To you other comment, I'd have no problem showering with anyone if I signed up for it.  I just
think the military owns you when you enlist.  You can't have an army of
individuals whining about their rights if you expect to maintain
discipline.  YOu can whine once you get out.
Being forced to hide the deepest part of yourself for fear of being kicked out of the service is a very serious issue for some. To call it 'whining' when someone speaks out about it is unfair. 
Maybe you will dislike this too JLocke as you are also one, but I see in most libertarians this thought: when people demand something they don't agree with, it's whining. It's always like that. Whining. But talk about taxes or anything like that, and it's a fair complain in the sake of liberty.

Bullsh*t.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:23
 
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

 
See my previous post.  When you join the military, a good bit of your freedoms go out the window.  That's why I'm opposed to the draft.  You know what you are getting into.  Don't like it?  Work elsewhere.


So, if an openly gay man or woman always dreamed of being a soldier, that's just tough sh*t? 

Listen to yourself. 


Edited by JLocke - September 10 2010 at 23:27
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 23:24
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

In the modern world and  hopefully more tolerant world, sexual preference should have no bearing on whether military or federal parties agree or disagree. Either soldier I would be proud to stand next to in a line of battle. They deserve medals just for showing up for their country regardless whether they are gay or hetero or where they are going and why? Democarts may not agree on Iraq etc but every soldier has the governments full backing. The army should not decide on sexual preference either, that is wrong, they just need to spend their budget dollars more wisely in managing ' digs"
 

ps: Non citizen/permanet resident POVSmile
You would stand next to a gay solider, fine.Would you shower with one?
That tells us more about your fears than about the wisdom or lack thereof in the resolution.
My fears?  I don't fear gay people.Should women and men in the military shower together?  Why or why not?
No.

Not all men in the shower would be gay, though. It's a different scenario.

It's complex. But I would've guessed freedom would be first for you, wouldn't it? What freedom is there if one's forced to hide behind a curtain of secrecy, behind a lie?

It'd be better then if there was a requisite to join the army: "be straight".
Clap
Except the last line.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 16>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.215 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.