Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Obama Presidency
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedObama Presidency

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 22>
Author
Message
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:05
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Not to be too pedantic, but MA did not exist in the 17th century.  
 


Are we talking about Massachusetts?

The Massachusetts Bay Colony most certainly did exist in the 17th century.
I was assuming the state.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:07
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Not to be too pedantic, but MA did not exist in the 17th century.  People, at least me, do not have much leisure time now, though for me that will change shortly (please faceless corporation let's just get it over) and I welcome it.  Maybe I'll have some time to home school myself, as I have done countless times over the decades, if only to be able to find another job.   
 
Public education still has its place.  My children went to a public school where generally something like 70% of the students did not come from families where English was even a spoken language, and a similar percentage were of said families were  below government-defined poverty level.  I'm sure home schooling would have worked out real well for those.  (Realistically, in spite of public education they spent a lot of time maiming and/or killing each other.  And still do.)
 
I am not against home schooling at all.  But let's set some boundaries and give 'em a chance. 
 
Just realized I'm pulling the "but think of the children" card.
 
Oh well. 
 
 

It existed. Just not as a state in the Union which didn't exist obviously. Anyway, if you know you're being too pedantic, why say it? I don't know what you're point is. I don't have much free time, but the fact is that we undeniably have much much more free time than people did in the 17th century. 

I don't see why you don't think home schooling worked as the dominant force in educated all over the world for throughout history, but now it is suddenly infeasible. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:08
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Not to be too pedantic, but MA did not exist in the 17th century.  
 


Are we talking about Massachusetts?

The Massachusetts Bay Colony most certainly did exist in the 17th century.
I was assuming the state.


Well no "states" existed in the 17th century lol.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:08
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Not to be too pedantic, but MA did not exist in the 17th century.  
 


Are we talking about Massachusetts?

The Massachusetts Bay Colony most certainly did exist in the 17th century.
I was assuming the state.

Why would you assume I meant the thing that didn't exist rather than the one that did?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:12
Sorry, tt was the use of MA abbreviation. 

Edited by jammun - September 09 2010 at 22:15
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:18
No sweat brah.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:31

Actually, it's my brainwashed mind that's misinterpreting since MA did not even exist as a legit abbreviation (as in representing a state) until the Great Postal Reform of whenver it was Wink .  I'm too lazy to look up when they changed that but it's in my lifetime and they still can't make any money.

Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 22:44
And I still say our poor huddled masses, provided they are here legally, still deserve at least a chance at an education.  I don't care if it's public or private or home-schooled or whatever. 
 
There's a Little Somalia just down the street from me.  The children don't adapt so well, their parents being goatherds by birth, and as such they are goatherds.  But they are here now, and last I checked demand for goatherds is way down, along with everything else.  Can we not give them a chance at an education that will make them good productive mindless tax-paying citizens, rather than keep them on the dole?  Either that or just send 'em all back to Somalia so that they can engage in piracy.   
 
My son has spent a considerable amount of unpaid time with these kids (hey, he's not working anyway), tutoring them after school.  They need all the help they can get.  They are not getting it at home and never will. 
 
 
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2010 at 23:01
(wolf) Pat!
Glad to see you back!

EDIT: LOL WOW
my eyes see what they want apparently


Edited by JJLehto - September 10 2010 at 03:10
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 06:32
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 08:16
Oh the liberal myth that increases in consumer spending are a good thing.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 08:40
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Staying off topic:
A question for you home schooled folks.  How wealthy are your parents?  Because it's nice if your parents can do it and are competent to do so.  And do you believe this is even practical for the rest of us?

People had much less leisure time in the 17th century in America, yet there were few public schools (which existed only for the poor) and no compulsory education laws, except in MA which established both as part of their mini-theocracy. People still got educated back then. 
They probably had about the same amount of leisure time as we do now, (17th century was pre-industrial so work was more seasonal), but with only oil and candle lighting there wasn't a whole lot they could do with it.
What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 10:52
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Oh the liberal myth that increases in consumer spending are a good thing.
Elaborate please. This sounds interesting. I would think that in the society you want you also need strong spending. 
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 11:11
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Oh the liberal myth that increases in consumer spending are a good thing.
Elaborate please. This sounds interesting. I would think that in the society you want you also need strong spending. 


We covered this in my macroeconomics class last night. All else equal, a higher savings rate leads to a faster growing economy, because the money people save gets invested by businesses into new machines (capital) and research (technological development) which raises output in the long run. A higher savings rate necessarily requires a smaller consumption rate.


Edited by thellama73 - September 10 2010 at 11:11
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 11:13
I can side with that, certainly. 

I was checking the libertarian's party website last night. Many things I can agree with. There are others that I can't (eliminating some welfare for the worst-off, Pat's road-privatization project). 
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 13:20
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Oh the liberal myth that increases in consumer spending are a good thing.
Elaborate please. This sounds interesting. I would think that in the society you want you also need strong spending. 


We covered this in my macroeconomics class last night. All else equal, a higher savings rate leads to a faster growing economy, because the money people save gets invested by businesses into new machines (capital) and research (technological development) which raises output in the long run. A higher savings rate necessarily requires a smaller consumption rate.
 
I like when we answer for each other.
 
I would add that the common confusion is that in good economics times, people tend to spend more, as they are making more money, and thus have a higher disposible income. Classic confusing correlation with causation. Of course, the spending of more money is a sympton of prosperity, but it does not cause it.
 
America's problem is that it does not save, not that it does not consume.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 13:21
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Staying off topic:
A question for you home schooled folks.  How wealthy are your parents?  Because it's nice if your parents can do it and are competent to do so.  And do you believe this is even practical for the rest of us?

People had much less leisure time in the 17th century in America, yet there were few public schools (which existed only for the poor) and no compulsory education laws, except in MA which established both as part of their mini-theocracy. People still got educated back then. 
They probably had about the same amount of leisure time as we do now, (17th century was pre-industrial so work was more seasonal), but with only oil and candle lighting there wasn't a whole lot they could do with it.
 
The data would disagree with you.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 13:23
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Oh the liberal myth that increases in consumer spending are a good thing.
Elaborate please. This sounds interesting. I would think that in the society you want you also need strong spending. 


We covered this in my macroeconomics class last night. All else equal, a higher savings rate leads to a faster growing economy, because the money people save gets invested by businesses into new machines (capital) and research (technological development) which raises output in the long run. A higher savings rate necessarily requires a smaller consumption rate.
 
I like when we answer for each other.
 
I would add that the common confusion is that in good economics times, people tend to spend more, as they are making more money, and thus have a higher disposible income. Classic confusing correlation with causation. Of course, the spending of more money is a sympton of prosperity, but it does not cause it.
 
America's problem is that it does not save, not that it does not consume.

Damn! Here I am actually agreeing with all of these. Good points. 

On another note, "I like when we answer for each other" sounds cute. TongueHeart

Clown


Edited by The T - September 10 2010 at 13:23
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 13:25

I was laying on my stomach, swining my feet in the air, and giggling while I typed it.

"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2010 at 13:25
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

My parents are well off now, but they were quite poor when I was young. One common misconception about homeschooling is that the parents have to function as teachers. At least in the variety that I was raised under, I was basically just encouraged to pursue my own interests. If I wanted to learn something, my parents would buy me a book. If I didn't want to learn something, I was not forced to. If I had trouble understanding something they would help to the best of their ability, but they were far from formal instructors.That being said, I have never held the view that everyone should be homeschooled. Many parents do not have the time nor the temperament for it, but I think it's a really great option for those that want to try.


What you're describing sounds more like unschooling, something I personally don't agree with. No offense.

To answer slarti's question: my family lived comfortably for many years until my parents divorced. After that, it became much harder for my mother to properly provide the schooling I needed. That's a big reason why I went to public high school. Do I recommend schooling at home to others? Honestly, no.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 22>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.