Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - For my Libertarian friends
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFor my Libertarian friends

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9293949596 269>
Author
Message
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:17
When it comes to Proposition 8, you do not have it right to pass a proposition that violates The Constitution even if a majority in your state vote for it.  I totally support either marriage equality or having the state get totally out of the business of licensing marriages.

Edited by Slartibartfast - August 04 2010 at 19:18
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:29
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Hey MOM, once more the charm. One reason you libertarians (and specially you) get such strong reactions is because you just can't talk about what other people say without using words like "idiocy, stupid", or other ones like them. It would appear the ones wanting to force people into their system (or lack thereof) are you, the advocates od absolute freedom.

Equality, you say MOM just wants to be left alone. Well, that requires society doing what he wishes, that requires him imposing his will on others. If people so want a libertarian society to emerge, it would have happened or it will happen one day, but not because MOM wants to be left alone, but because everybody else wants a system that permits that. You don't live alone. So make your dreamed system prevail and then you'll be alone MOM, if not, you're just a maladapted loner.

By the way, when we talked about burqassome people said maybe women in islam don't want the full freedom we westerners seem to impose on them. Maybe most people in general also prefer a system with rules and a governing body and limitations? Maybe they can be as free as MOM is by not wanting to be as free as he wants them to?

You are the ones who are so upset because your ideal libertarian society is not in place. Then work to make it happen instead of trying to make those who don't think it's all that good to look as the ones imposing things on people.

If you're going to define action so losely so that any lack of action is itself an action, then fine T you've played with semantics enough to get yourself out of the argument, but you have to admit it's much much less demanding than what you ask of government.

However most people agree there's a difference between acting and not acting. 

It's fine for people wanting rules. Then they can go and form a body which will give rule to their lives which they are so willing to abdicate to others. They cannot however force their will upon me.

Lol @ your last statement. Don't be a child. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:30
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

When it comes to Proposition 8, you do not have it right to pass a proposition that violates The Constitution even if a majority in your state vote for it.  I totally support either marriage equality or having the state get totally out of the business of licensing marriages.

Proposition 8 violates the Constitution how?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:33
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Hey MOM, once more the charm. One reason you libertarians (and specially you) get such strong reactions is because you just can't talk about what other people say without using words like "idiocy, stupid", or other ones like them. It would appear the ones wanting to force people into their system (or lack thereof) are you, the advocates od absolute freedom.

Equality, you say MOM just wants to be left alone. Well, that requires society doing what he wishes, that requires him imposing his will on others. If people so want a libertarian society to emerge, it would have happened or it will happen one day, but not because MOM wants to be left alone, but because everybody else wants a system that permits that. You don't live alone. So make your dreamed system prevail and then you'll be alone MOM, if not, you're just a maladapted loner.

By the way, when we talked about burqassome people said maybe women in islam don't want the full freedom we westerners seem to impose on them. Maybe most people in general also prefer a system with rules and a governing body and limitations? Maybe they can be as free as MOM is by not wanting to be as free as he wants them to?

You are the ones who are so upset because your ideal libertarian society is not in place. Then work to make it happen instead of trying to make those who don't think it's all that good to look as the ones imposing things on people.
 
 
For one, I don't usually use "idiocy" in my responses (you can go back and look) but I don't consider myself above it if I'm the subject of direct attacks and misrepresentations.
 
You still just simply miss the point of libertarianism completely.  You can say I'm just as opposing as yourself but it simply isn't true: supporting a government that insures you can live as you would were it not there at all is not imposing anything upon you but yourself.  Hell, it isn't even doing that because you can still go ahead and hand your decision making over to whomever you want.
Your example of islamic women doesn't apply because they wouldn't be forced to abandon their religion and throw down their burqas just because freedom exists.  Your belief system, your morals, etc do not just fly out the window just because you are being allowed to make decisions for yourself.  If an islamic women wants to keep her burqa thats fine, if she decides to stop wearing one that is also fine.  I just want you to be able to think and do for yourself.  I may not like what you do with that freedom but I'm sure as hell not going to try to take it away from you.
 
I've never heard someone so passionately argue that freedom is an imposition.  If you don't want freedom that's cool, hand your decisions over to whomever you want, just don't demand I follow suit.


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:34
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

When it comes to Proposition 8, you do not have it right to pass a proposition that violates The Constitution even if a majority in your state vote for it.  I totally support either marriage equality or having the state get totally out of the business of licensing marriages.


Funny how people only invoke the Constitution some of the time.  Ermm






Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:36
Yeah people completely unconcerned with the document shouldn't reference it. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:38
Hey Pat, MOM is old enough to speak for himself (which he just did).

Hey MOM, you say "f**k politicians" but you are making political statements anyway. f**k THESE politicians might be a better fit. You say "I'm all for freedom" yet you want a system where they left you alone, I insist, maybe people prefer what we've got (that's another debate).

I'm not arguig against freedom. I'm just arguing against the ideas you hae to obtain it and against the illusion that you are the one speaking for everybody and I'm some stalinist museum
Piece.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:39
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Hey Pat, MOM is old enough to speak for himself (which he just did).

Hey MOM, you say "f**k politicians" but you are making political statements anyway. f**k THESE politicians might be a better fit. You say "I'm all for freedom" yet you want a system where they left you alone, I insist, maybe people prefer what we've got (that's another debate).

I'm not arguig against freedom. I'm just arguing against the ideas you hae to obtain it and against the illusion that you are the one speaking for everybody and I'm some stalinist museum
Piece.

Hey T you directly addressed me in y our post. Are you a moron? 

You are against freedom. How can you deny that? Tell me in what way you are not. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:43
^^^
equality, why would we want complete freedom? how would this benifit anyone? you can not just tear down a well established system and expect to find order... and least of all freedom. Just look to the french revolution to see what a complete dismantaling of many pillars of modern american government would be like.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:43
Speaking of which, here's someone who has no idea what the purpose of the Constitution is.

I'll highlight this one so one might see the flaws in so many people's thinking:

"22. Create a Constitutional requirement that all able-bodied young Americans devote at least 2 years of their lives in service to the country."

The Constitution does not tell citizens what they must and must not do.  It tells citizens what the federal government can and cannot do.  That simple.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:45
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Yeah people completely unconcerned with the document shouldn't reference it. 
Just as a side note: you have never seen me mentioning the constitution or believing it's perfect or sacred.

Hell, I come from a country with 19 Constituions in its history. I stopped believing in sacred constitutions long ago .

I see your point Robert, though. My value tell me proposition 8 had to be repelled. It wasn't because the majority wanted. Now, based on the constitution, they've oerturned that ban. We will have to check the validity of that. I can't lie and say I'm not happy, though.

Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:46
^^^
your thinking of the bill of rights, not necesarily the constitution which outlines much of how this country functions and does not speak explicity about the federal government
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:46
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Yeah people completely unconcerned with the document shouldn't reference it. 
Just as a side note: you have never seen me mentioning the constitution or believing it's perfect or sacred.

Hell, I come from a country with 19 Constituions in its history. I stopped believing in sacred constitutions long ago .

I see your point Robert, though. My value tell me proposition 8 had to be repelled. It wasn't because the majority wanted. Now, based on the constitution, they've oerturned that ban. We will have to check the validity of that. I can't lie and say I'm not happy, though.


I don't see it as sacred either. I would like to change a lot about it. That's not what I meant by my comment.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:47
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

^^^
equality, why would we want complete freedom? how would this benifit anyone? you can not just tear down a well established system and expect to find order... and least of all freedom. Just look to the french revolution to see what a complete dismantaling of many pillars of modern american government would be like.


For the answer to this question, please read the previous ninety-four pages of this discussion.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:47
Well, the Prop 8 thing will likely make it to the Supremes.  Any predictions?



Edited by Slartibartfast - August 04 2010 at 19:54
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:48
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

^^^
equality, why would we want complete freedom? how would this benifit anyone? you can not just tear down a well established system and expect to find order... and least of all freedom. Just look to the french revolution to see what a complete dismantaling of many pillars of modern american government would be like.

Look to the French Revolution? So I should look to a tyrannical government with an overbearing government to see why freedom won't work?

Why wouldn't we want freedom? This will benefit the people who are preyed on by those in government. This will benefit the people, who want to express their freedom.


"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:51
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Well, the Prop 8 thing will likely make it to the Supremes.  Any predictions?


I predict Diana Ross will sing "Ain't No Mountain High Enough."  Tongue



Seriously, does anyone else find the US Supreme Court to be a conflict of interest in the first place?

The Supreme Court is a governmental body, and yet it gets to ultimately decide how to interpret a document that restricts the federal government.  Ermm


Edited by Epignosis - August 04 2010 at 19:52
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:51
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

^^^
equality, why would we want complete freedom? how would this benifit anyone? you can not just tear down a well established system and expect to find order... and least of all freedom. Just look to the french revolution to see what a complete dismantaling of many pillars of modern american government would be like.

Look to the French Revolution? So I should look to a tyrannical government with an overbearing government to see why freedom won't work?

Why wouldn't we want freedom? This will benefit the people who are preyed on by those in government. This will benefit the people, who want to express their freedom.


yes. look to what happens when systems are radically altered in the name of freedom. verry often we see the opposite.
freedom is good in a limited sence... not even libertarians want complete freedom. we are merely arguing where to draw the line
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:52
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

^^^
equality, why would we want complete freedom? how would this benifit anyone? you can not just tear down a well established system and expect to find order... and least of all freedom. Just look to the french revolution to see what a complete dismantaling of many pillars of modern american government would be like.


For the answer to this question, please read the previous ninety-four pages of this discussion.
I have. You have not presented any convincing evidence... or perhaps just cant put what you mean into words...
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 04 2010 at 19:52
Hey Shields, I just mentioned a comment that you made defending MOM. And hey, I might be a moron. I won't descend to your level and call you names. You're full of anger, I understand.

By the way, I defend freedom. Just think for a second Equality, I'm just opposing your view of freedom. It seems a lot of people think like me. Are we all freedom-hating morons? No, we have a different view of things, that's all. Anyway, as I said I'll check into some of your ideas via books and texts. Let's see if reading words of people who don't insult and pretend they have figured out everything is better for my even liking your proposals.

It's a shame. Your ideas have potential. You are just an atrocious spokesperson.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9293949596 269>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.162 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.