Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Topic: Fenders or Gibsons? Posted: October 26 2004 at 06:07 |
I'm a Fender man myself. Particularly Telecasters. This Nashville model is my weapon of choice. I'd love to hear from people about what they think about the differences/preferences between Fender and Gibson guitars.
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
|
Posted: October 26 2004 at 08:59 |
I've always drooled over the Nashville Tele! I'm completely a Fender guy too...a little harder to play but more character, IMAO. Plus, my fat fingers don't fit in those tiny Gibson frets too well...
My Strat has been with me for years of abuse, and now has two Texas Specials (mid and neck) and a red Lace in the bridge. Raw, raw, raw sound...in the out-of-phase position it has more twang than any Rickenbacker or Gretsch!
I ended up getting my Reverend Rocco because it has the same feel as a Fender semi-hollow but with a couple of beefy humbuckers just in case I want 'em. It's got a coil tap, so I do lose some of the tone of both settings, but they still sound better than most stock pickups.
|
|
|
The Owl
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 19 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: October 26 2004 at 17:00 |
I'm an SG fan myself, my webpage explains why:
www.geocities.com/theowlwatches/sg.html
|
People are puzzled why I don't dig the Stones, well, I listened to the Stones, I tried, and I tried, and I tried, and--I Can't Get No Satisfaction!
www.myspace.com/theowlsmusic
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: October 28 2004 at 10:04 |
James Lee wrote:
Plus, my fat fingers don't fit in those tiny Gibson frets too well...
|
I hear you, I have long fingers and playing a Gibson is like trying to fit a bunch of commuters onto an overcrowed train. No room, no room!!!
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: October 28 2004 at 10:07 |
I've used SG's too and I like the way the body is so thin, you feel really close to the playing surface - right there in fact!
Now if it weren't for the bloody cramped Gibson fretboard, I much just be a convert. However, I can never fully dislike any guitar that is a hardtail...
Edited by sigod
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: November 01 2004 at 21:27 |
I play a strat. At first I found Gibsons to be a bit fat and blocky, however, as I've progressed in my slim/weak abilities, I've found Gibson's, Les Paul custom actually, to be very comfortable and responsive to bends and basic action. I've played a few detroyers too, that felt good. Now, the SG, is really made for soloing. Light weight and comfy in the palm.
I think, as players progress in abilities, certain instruments can feel more comfotable than others. The guitar that I found consistantly lets me play beyond my abilities is the Parker Fly Custom. Stuff I struggle with on my strat, flows on the fly. Weird!
|
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
|
Posted: November 01 2004 at 23:05 |
I'll second that- the Parker Custom is almost too good, I seem to double my prowess even on the cheaper bolt-on model (Nite-Fly?). The only other stock guitar I can compare them to is the PRS Santana (the original, not the Santana SE models...although those are still amazing when compared to most similarly priced guitars).
One thing I hate about Strats, though, is that I've never played one that didn't need constant re-tuning on the B string. You know, the one that you're about 75% more likely to bend regularly...even when in-tune, it always sounds a little off...or is that just a by-product of tempering?
|
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 01:17 |
Hey James. My strat has no sustain at the twelfth fret on the high E. How can I fix it? Is it a warp or a bridge adjustment?
Yeah, the frigger goes flat every other song and I'm always re-tuning. Yer Rocco looks like a good replacement!
The nightfly is sweet, but very strat like. The Custom sings. I almost bought one. I kept walking around and coming back to it and it was magic.... I even had the cash in pocket, but something hauled me back.... Seven years later, I'm still kicking myself in the arse, my ex ended up with the cash.... bitch!
What do you think of Gibson Hollow bodies? I love that BB tone.
|
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 08:08 |
Hmm, I used to have serious e-string sustain problems on my strat. I couldn't track it down, either; I tried a fret job, different pickups, altering the string height (in case there was too much 'pull' from the pickups). Turned out that my bridge was the problem; I had replaced the stock non-locking tremolo bridge with a Kahler trem, didn't like it, and swapped it back but I must have missed the alignment just enough to kill the response of that one string. It took several tries to get the bridge fastened right (the Kahler had required me to drill tune-o-matic spaced holes, so those had to be filled in and re-drilled with the Fender spacing).
That poor strat. Sometimes I wonder if it regrets being purchased by such a brutal master
|
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 10:40 |
Thanks, I'll try some (MORE) bridge adjustments...
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 11:38 |
James Lee wrote:
I'll second that- the Parker Custom is almost too good, I seem to double my prowess even on the cheaper bolt-on model (Nite-Fly?). The only other stock guitar I can compare them to is the PRS Santana (the original, not the Santana SE models...although those are still amazing when compared to most similarly priced guitars).
One thing I hate about Strats, though, is that I've never played one that didn't need constant re-tuning on the B string. You know, the one that you're about 75% more likely to bend regularly...even when in-tune, it always sounds a little off...or is that just a by-product of tempering?
|
Ronnie Stolt uses a Parker Fly a lot these days and I was tempted to get one but I worry they they will turn out to be the guitar equivilent of loon pants. I mean, look at Jackson and Charvel guitars back in the 80's. So cool back then but nowadays, you can't get arrested with 'em slung round your neck.
There is no denying they are great guitars but the styling could date...
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 16:22 |
Parkers have been around for quite a while, at least ten years. The cost is the problem. The Nightfly is not too expensive, but a custom will run up to $2,600.
One thing about styles.... they always come back around, so who really cares. If the axe feels rights.... go for it.
|
|
arcer
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 01 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1239
|
Posted: November 02 2004 at 16:49 |
I seem to have become Fender guy - using a tele - mainly cause Fender's cheaper and, I find, more versatile than anything else. For example, my old Tele is an early Jap model that I snapped up for 200 old Irish pounds about a billion years ago and for years it was my axe of choice live with a cheapo Hohner ST 57 as back up.
Having said that, it's horses for courses.
I use an Epiphone G1275 6&12 string thing for obvious reasons on the 12 neck and for chunky lead on the six.
BY and large I'll use the Tele for rhythm stuff and switch to the Hohner for almost all the lead stuff. It's a cheap old strat copy but to my ears sounds better than 90 per cent of strats I've heard.
I think it just comes down to what feels conmfortable on a given piece of music.
I would, however, dearly love to get my hands on a 335 or similar. Now that would be fun....
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: November 03 2004 at 10:49 |
It's amazing that the price very rarely has anything to do with how much you love a guitar. I have a cheapo Squire Strat that I love as the action is just right and the feel of the neck is really comfortable.
I've owned guitars five times as expensive as the Squire that haven't given me the same thrill to play.
Life is strange
Edited by sigod
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: November 03 2004 at 12:02 |
I know what you mean. Money doesn't mean it's gonna be good.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: November 03 2004 at 12:53 |
I've never had enough money for either - I bought a Westone Thunder 1A many, many moons ago, and still play it - wouldn't part with it!
For me it's the ideal budget compromise - the sustain is superb, especially when you switch in the active circuitry for an extra gain boost. The coils in the twin humbuckers can be split, for an out-of phase harmonic rich sound with all 4 single coils in play. The neck is slightly wider than a Fender, but narrower than a Gibson.
Problem areas; Tuning on the octave can be hit and miss unless you do some surruptitious bending, and the G is nearly impossible to get right. I know about equal temperament, but that string defies anyone's temperament
They're collectors items now, I understand. Pity, I always wanted the bass version.
I have a Fender Katana bass, which suits my manic style just fine - I particularly like the extremely narrow neck and amazingly low action with minimal fret buzz
|
|
James Lee
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
|
Posted: November 04 2004 at 07:47 |
There's a good topic- active or passive?
For bass, it's mostly moot, but how many of you folks like active guitar pickups? I can never get them to sound right for distorted tones (too boxy on the bass end, especially), but I like 'em for clean and slightly dirty sounds.
|
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: November 04 2004 at 09:37 |
Certif1ed wrote:
They're collectors items now, I understand. Pity, I always wanted the bass version.
|
My bass player owns a Westone Thunder 1 bass. He doesn't use it but it's a left hander.
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: November 04 2004 at 09:40 |
James Lee wrote:
There's a good topic- active or passive?
For bass, it's mostly moot, but how many of you folks like active guitar pickups? I can never get them to sound right for distorted tones (too boxy on the bass end, especially), but I like 'em for clean and slightly dirty sounds.
|
Yeah good question. I used a Steinberg which had active picups and a push/pull pot which selected single or humbucker configs. The active picups always seemed to run too hot for my tastes and tended to ignore the guitar's body in favour of it's own character.
I think that they do help bass guitars though. Much more defined sound.
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: November 04 2004 at 12:39 |
Not having played many other guitars, I can only speak for my little Westone - but the active gain switch is perfect for distorted tones - it adds exactly the right amount of punch, and always solicits a "Wow" from people when I click it in (I have to say that the "Wow" thus solicited has nothing to do with my somewhat amateur playing style... ).
If anything, I find the guitar a little "boxy" in most tonal regions without the gain switched in - I generally have to EQ like mad to get a balanced tone, especially if I switch between pickups. But hey, it was cheap, sounds good, and suits my overly dramatic style of riffing. My solos are definitely not my trademark...
The tone boost is fairly redundant, as it seems to cut bass in order to boost treble, but the coil-split is fantastic for getting those Joe Satriani sounds. A couple of slides and a bit of "widdly bluff" and you can fool most non-guitarists into thinking you can play... I like my guitar to sound "hot".
The best thing I ever discovered for my Westie is the Pod XT. The more I hear it, the more I like it. I do think it's good etc, etc, etc.
|
|