Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Progressive Rock Composer: Left/Right Brained?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Progressive Rock Composer: Left/Right Brained?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Tengent View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2009
Location: Evansville, IN
Status: Offline
Points: 119
Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Progressive Rock Composer: Left/Right Brained?
    Posted: July 17 2010 at 21:53
Today I met someone that referred to Larks' Tongues In Aspic as pure left brain bliss. This brought up an interesting point. Would Fripp write Larks' Tongues for the sake of creativity or complexity?

The right brain is most often associated with art and creativity. To me, progressive rock is a term used for bands who write purely creative, ingenious music, disregarding what the public thinks.

The left brain is associated with logic and real world dealings. But many people associate prog rock with well thought out music with difficult time signatures and complex structure. To be considered a successful progressive rock composer, you would likely need a smokin hot left brain.

Do you think progressive rock composers (or composers of modern music) are more left brained or right brained? We are obviously going to encounter some that are more right brained and some that are more left brained. Are there any obvious examples? Maybe most composers have a balance. I have a growing interest in psychology and find this subject extremely fascinating. Thanks. :p
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2010 at 22:37
Depends, really, on the style of music.  Some things are intricately composed - more emphasis on the left-brain (most Zeuhl, RIO, Eclectic Prog bands) while some things are free and experimental - more right-brain oriented (most Krautrock, Space/psych)
Back to Top
Tarquin Underspoon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2009
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 01:34
You know, I'd almost call Larks Tongues  right-brained...funny how this stuff works.
 
I'd say that, ultimately, music is pointless unless it comes from the right brain. Sure, our prog heroes may weave in complex parts that require "left brain bliss", but it's all to achieve an effect that appeals to emotion. Close to the Edge is a complex structural marvel, but it's one of the most emotional works I know of.
 
In other words, well-composed music should utilize elements of both emotion and technicality. No musician worth his or her weight in treble clefs wants to be The Sex Pistols or Behold...the Arctopus.
"WAAAAAAOOOOOUGH!    WAAAAAAAUUUUGGHHHH!!   WAAAAAOOOO!!!"

-The Great Gig in the Sky
Back to Top
Falx View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2010
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 859
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 05:51
The good prog composers aren't biased either way - the music is both technically sophisticated and emotionally resonant. The "golden age" of prog (early to mid 70s) was when bands like Genesis, Yes, King Crimson, VDGG, Gentle Giant, Le Orme etc. got the balance right. Towards the end of the 70s bands diluted the technical aspects to make their music more accessible and appeal to a wider audience. I think punk rock came about because people were tired of their brains being taxed by all these complex time signatures and 20 minute epics.

=F=
"You must go beyond the limit of the limit of your limits!" - Mr. Doctor
"It is our duty as men and women to proceed as though the limits of our abilities do not exist." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
Back to Top
Rune2000 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 23 2004
Location: STHLM, Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 1833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 07:32
Originally posted by Falx Falx wrote:

I think punk rock came about because people were tired of their brains being taxed by all these complex time signatures and 20 minute epics.

That seems to be the general consensus. Wink
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 09:12
I think that musicians use both hemispheres... As anyone.

Back to Top
daslaf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 03 2009
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 10:17
Originally posted by Tarquin Underspoon Tarquin Underspoon wrote:

You know, I'd almost call Larks Tongues  right-brained...funny how this stuff works.
 
I'd say that, ultimately, music is pointless unless it comes from the right brain. Sure, our prog heroes may weave in complex parts that require "left brain bliss", but it's all to achieve an effect that appeals to emotion. Close to the Edge is a complex structural marvel, but it's one of the most emotional works I know of.
 
In other words, well-composed music should utilize elements of both emotion and technicality. No musician worth his or her weight in treble clefs wants to be The Sex Pistols or Behold...the Arctopus.
 
gosh you stole the words from my fingertips Tongue
 
But now my branches suffer
And my leaves don't bear the glow
They did so long ago
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 12:08
The brain may have two halves that work in different ways, but balance is the important thing in music and in life...
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 12:11
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

The brain may have two halves that work in different ways, but balance is the important thing in music and in life...


Well said, sir! Clap
Back to Top
Anthony H. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2010
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 6088
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 12:43
Originally posted by Tarquin Underspoon Tarquin Underspoon wrote:

You know, I'd almost call Larks Tongues  right-brained...funny how this stuff works.
 
I'd say that, ultimately, music is pointless unless it comes from the right brain. Sure, our prog heroes may weave in complex parts that require "left brain bliss", but it's all to achieve an effect that appeals to emotion. Close to the Edge is a complex structural marvel, but it's one of the most emotional works I know of.
 
In other words, well-composed music should utilize elements of both emotion and technicality. No musician worth his or her weight in treble clefs wants to be The Sex Pistols or Behold...the Arctopus.


I couldn't agree more with this.
Back to Top
Anderson III View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2007
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 708
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 18 2010 at 13:20
I've always thought of technicality as a way to reach emotion. I also believe basicly everybody to have some musicality, but only few have the technique to craft music that carries complex emotions.
Expressing some kind of emotion in music isn't necessarily very difficult, but if you want a dozen different shades, I'd say you already need some technical know-how in both playing and composition.
"Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and cannot remain silent" - Victor Hugo
Back to Top
stewe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Czechoslovakia
Status: Offline
Points: 593
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2010 at 04:45
Yes seem to me good example of that. As the musicians-composers themselves (according to their early solo) I would say - Anderson is purely right, Howe tends to be purely left, Wakeman rather left, Squire more or less balanced. As a guitarist, I find Howe's Beginnings or SH album, mostly self-indulgent, and not very creative or emotional. He shows big variety and technicality but obviously lacks the imagination. On the other hand, for me, only Squire can compose album which is complex and very emotional in the same time.

The beauty of the Yes is in mixture of different brains, in their early period I especially see the chemistry between Howe and Anderson. I feel that Anderson's mind and ideas can catalyse Howe to do very innovative and emotional stuff combined with the virtuosity.


Edited by stewe - July 19 2010 at 04:46


<a href="http://steveer.ic.cz" rel="nofollow"
Back to Top
Isa View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2010 at 12:28
I know one thing for sure: tech-metal = left brain, jazz-fusion = right brained (usually).

Listening to and composing great music requires much use of both sides. So I'd say most prog composers just have great minds period, using both sides more than any other rock composers. Wink
The human heart instrinsically longs for that which is true, good, and beautiful. This is why timeless music is never without these qualities.
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2010 at 14:03
Originally posted by Isa Isa wrote:

I know one thing for sure: tech-metal = left brain, jazz-fusion = right brained (usually).

 
Funny, I would have said its the other way around quite a bit of the time.
 
I think we can all agree that or any music to really be worth a damn it has to fully utilise the aspects of both sides of our brain, anything less and the results tend to be pretty meaningless.
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2010 at 19:09
Originally posted by Tengent Tengent wrote:

Today I met someone that referred to Larks' Tongues In Aspic as pure left brain bliss. This brought up an interesting point. Would Fripp write Larks' Tongues for the sake of creativity or complexity?

The right brain is most often associated with art and creativity. To me, progressive rock is a term used for bands who write purely creative, ingenious music, disregarding what the public thinks.

The left brain is associated with logic and real world dealings. But many people associate prog rock with well thought out music with difficult time signatures and complex structure. To be considered a successful progressive rock composer, you would likely need a smokin hot left brain.
 
I actually love this and have been saying for ever that KC is not "progressive" in the sense of the word since the process they use for creating music is actually theatrical and conceptual ... which, by definition is not even artistic or creative since it is a brain function. And all brain functions are logical and so left brain that this person does need a wife ... might as well have a mannequin!
 
It certainly should be more enjoyable I'm sure!
 
And I love the ramifications and jokes that we can make off this post!
 


Edited by moshkito - July 20 2010 at 19:12
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
thehallway View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2010 at 12:32
Originally posted by stewe stewe wrote:

Yes seem to me good example of that. As the musicians-composers themselves (according to their early solo) I would say - Anderson is purely right, Howe tends to be purely left, Wakeman rather left, Squire more or less balanced. As a guitarist, I find Howe's Beginnings or SH album, mostly self-indulgent, and not very creative or emotional. He shows big variety and technicality but obviously lacks the imagination. On the other hand, for me, only Squire can compose album which is complex and very emotional in the same time.

The beauty of the Yes is in mixture of different brains, in their early period I especially see the chemistry between Howe and Anderson. I feel that Anderson's mind and ideas can catalyse Howe to do very innovative and emotional stuff combined with the virtuosity.
 
And Bruford was left-brained......creating an imbalance: which is why he left the band!
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2010 at 21:13
Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

And Bruford was left-brained......creating an imbalance: which is why he left the band!
 
Nothing against Bill and he is nice ... but I am not sure that TFTO would be better with Bill ... I really think it needed a harder rock edge that Bill could not produce at the time. On the other hand, I really thought that Relayer could have used a Bill a lot better than Alan ... but that's just my ear!
 
I find it sad that we left our "preferences" get in the way of accepting artistic preferences and differences. YES did just fine without Bill and Bill did just as fine without YES, and the whole discussion is rather bizarre, insane and not necessary.
 
I do remember one comment by Robert Fripp that he really wanted to do one of the pieces in "Red" as punk rock, but if you listen to it, Bill didn't really come close to that either, but managed to add something else to the music -- that we're not complaining about.
 
So, let the dead dogs lie dead, unless you want to do the digging ... this is a fun discussion and we do not need to add more wood to a fire that has long since died out!


Edited by moshkito - July 26 2010 at 21:14
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
thehallway View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 07:33
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by thehallway thehallway wrote:

And Bruford was left-brained......creating an imbalance: which is why he left the band!
 
Nothing against Bill and he is nice ... but I am not sure that TFTO would be better with Bill ... I really think it needed a harder rock edge that Bill could not produce at the time. On the other hand, I really thought that Relayer could have used a Bill a lot better than Alan ... but that's just my ear!
 
I find it sad that we left our "preferences" get in the way of accepting artistic preferences and differences. YES did just fine without Bill and Bill did just as fine without YES, and the whole discussion is rather bizarre, insane and not necessary.
 
I do remember one comment by Robert Fripp that he really wanted to do one of the pieces in "Red" as punk rock, but if you listen to it, Bill didn't really come close to that either, but managed to add something else to the music -- that we're not complaining about.
 
So, let the dead dogs lie dead, unless you want to do the digging ... this is a fun discussion and we do not need to add more wood to a fire that has long since died out!
 
Confused I was only making a pun...
Back to Top
Angel of Death View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 82
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 15:25
LOL
Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 27 2010 at 16:37
"I think punk rock came about because people were tired of their brains being taxed by all these complex time signatures and 20 minute epics."

I think punk rock came about because people were TOLD BY CRITICS THAT THEY WERE tired of their brains being taxed by all these complex time signatures and 20 minute epics.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.