| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The Monodrone 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4489
|
 Topic: trilogyLord of the Rings vs. Star Wars trilogy
Posted: July 25 2010 at 22:57 |
Which trilogy do you favor? I didn't include the new Star Wars trilogy...   For me, LotR by many, many miles, though I still really like the old SW (no, not Steven Wilson) trilogy.
|
|
|
 |
CinemaZebra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2010
Location: Ancient Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 6795
|
Posted: July 25 2010 at 22:58 |
|
I hate Star Wars. New and old.
LotR easily for me.
|
|
DisgruntledPorcupine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
|
Posted: July 25 2010 at 23:05 |
|
The watchable one. (LotR)
|
|
A Person
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
|
Posted: July 25 2010 at 23:05 |
|
SW is fun but LotR is great.
|
|
CinemaZebra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2010
Location: Ancient Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 6795
|
Posted: July 25 2010 at 23:09 |
 DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
The watchable one. (LotR) |
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12799
|
Posted: July 25 2010 at 23:11 |
|
I actually liked Star Wars very much. But I like LotR much better. By the way, would you define Star Wars as Science Fiction, or as Fantasy?
|
|
UndercoverBoy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 00:26 |
The Lord of the Rings
Dellinger wrote:
I actually liked Star Wars very much. But I like LotR much better. By the way, would you define Star Wars as Science Fiction, or as Fantasy? |
Fantasy, definitely. Just because it takes place in outer space doesn't mean it's Sci-fi. Sci-fi still has to be somewhat logical and plausible. SW is the exact opposite of that.
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65508
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 00:34 |
|
SW is generally considered 'Fantasy' but actually has as many similarities to 'Sci-fi' [Star Trek, Logan's Run] as it does Fantasy [LotR, Dune]-- the Rings trilogy is clearly superior to Episodes 4 thru 6, but as a whole saga I prefer Star Wars and am one of the few people who really liked the new trilogy
|
|
EatThatPhonebook
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2009
Location: Norwich, VT
Status: Offline
Points: 788
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 07:10 |
|
LoTR. But I like Star Wars as well.
|
|
|
|
jampa17
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 10:49 |
A Person wrote:
SW is fun but LotR is great. |
|
|
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
|
|
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 13:01 |
|
But what about the Twilight Trilogy?
Ahahahahahahahahahaha.
|
|
CinemaZebra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2010
Location: Ancient Rome
Status: Offline
Points: 6795
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 13:07 |
You mean quadrilogy?
|
|
The Truth
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 13:12 |
|
I'm somewhat of a SW fanboy so I'll go with that.
|
|
|
|
Evolutionary Sleeper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7037
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 15:05 |
|
I like both, but LotR is superior.
|
|
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 16:11 |
jampa17 wrote:
A Person wrote:
SW is fun but LotR is great. |
|
Yeah, I'm with the majority here.
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12799
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 23:08 |
Atavachron wrote:
SW is generally considered 'Fantasy' but actually has as many similarities to 'Sci-fi' [Star Trek, Logan's Run] as it does Fantasy [LotR, Dune]-- the Rings trilogy is clearly superior to Episodes 4 thru 6, but as a whole saga I prefer Star Wars and am one of the few people who really liked the new trilogy
|
Well, I did like the new trilogy too. I'm not sure which of the two SW trilogy I prefer (perhas the older one), but the new is great too. Though in some parts the new Trilogy seemed a bit "forced" in order to match the events of the old one.
|
|
The Monodrone
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4489
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 23:21 |
^ I thought that Hayden Christiansen was just a terrible actor altogether as Anakin, and the Emperor came off as extremely cheesy and cliched. I did like the first one, with the exception of JarJar Binks  .
|
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65508
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 23:35 |
|
^ I think Ian McDiarmid is incredible as both Sidious and Palpatine, one of the best things about the whole saga
|
|
jplanet
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 23:38 |
|
I love both, but for entirely different reasons, I would need to be in a completely different mood to watch one or the other.
Star Wars is for fun, that's the point - the style of acting, I think, is quite deliberately not classic dramatic acting - there is a certain monotone that all of the characters have, even those portrayed by some of the brilliant actors in it who are Oscar-worthy in other roles (Christopher Lee, Natalie Portman, Liam Neeson, etc.). It's that kind of detachment from real human emotion that somehow gives it its unique quality...I'd be interested in knowing the reason from Lucas himself, but it probably has something to do with making it palatable for kids without dumbing down the story line...
LoTR, on the other hand, has much of its magic in the believability of the characters, and their relationships - who can't smile at the friendship between Legolas and Gimli? It's a timeless story with its roots in Tolkien's experiences in World War I...
|
|
|
|
Evolutionary Sleeper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7037
|
Posted: July 26 2010 at 23:55 |
ptkc123 wrote:
^ I thought that Hayden Christiansen was just a terrible actor altogether as Anakin, and the Emperor came off as extremely cheesy and cliched. I did like the first one, with the exception of JarJar Binks .
|
I agree with the bolded part, that really bothered me throughout episode II and III, he was a total robot. The Emperor/Palpatine was great though.
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
trilogyLord of the Rings vs. Star Wars trilogy
