Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - For my Libertarian friends
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFor my Libertarian friends

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4142434445 269>
Author
Message
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:33
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Enjoy living in your little libertarian fantasyland.  Notice how you didn't address the fact that unemployment compensation comes out of money that ultimately came out of your paycheck.

Ignorance is bliss.


Edited by Slartibartfast - July 22 2010 at 12:33
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:35
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Also (well said Slarti, I agree with that), another question: what is this theft I read constantly about in your posts??


Taxes

"Theft"??

Oh well.... The entire world is so full of idiots that everybody gets stolen every damn month... (or day, or week, whatever). 

A few illuminated ones have found out how a society can survive without them? 
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:37
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Enjoy living in your little libertarian fantasyland.  Notice how you didn't address the fact that unemployment compensation comes out of money that ultimately came out of your paycheck.

Ignorance is bliss.


What's there for me to address? I t does do that. What does that have to do with anything? You're demonstrating why its bad and you succeeded. Wtf is your point?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:38
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Your first reply is terrible Libertarian thinking. So what. What's this kind of answer? You can do much better. Maybe you feel your words will get lost in the muddle... Well, that's good. If all libertarians are so defeatist, your "dream" will never come true (please god)...
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:39
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Also (well said Slarti, I agree with that), another question: what is this theft I read constantly about in your posts??


Taxes

"Theft"??

Oh well.... The entire world is so full of idiots that everybody gets stolen every damn month... (or day, or week, whatever). 

A few illuminated ones have found out how a society can survive without them? 


Since our federal government was financed exclusively by land sales and tariffs up until the Civil War, I would say yes.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:42
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Your first reply is terrible Libertarian thinking. So what. What's this kind of answer? You can do much better. Maybe you feel your words will get lost in the muddle... Well, that's good. If all libertarians are so defeatist, your "dream" will never come true (please god)...


How is it terrible. His argument is assuming that the money collected through the Unemployment tax would not be spent. This assumption is completely unfounded. Also, even if it was not spent it would be most likely invested either directly or indirectly. Unless the money that would have been taken out of the paycheck is literally kept rolled up in a sock drawer  his argument falls apart.

Is that more complete for you?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:44
^Much better. You see, it only takes a few words to communicate what one's thinking or feeling.. Wink 
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:59
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Enjoy living in your little libertarian fantasyland.  Notice how you didn't address the fact that unemployment compensation comes out of money that ultimately came out of your paycheck.

Ignorance is bliss.


I'll gladly address that. Assuming that people get out the same amount they put in (which they don't don't because the people who in the most don't need unemployment insurance) then it would be better to just give people that money. They could invest it and make more than they will ever get from it sitting in an unemployment insurance lockbox. Secondly, I have nothing against unemployment insurance per say, but why not make it voluntary, like health insurance or fire insurance? Why should someone who is never going to need it be forced to pay into it? That's unfair coercion, in my book.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 12:59
As I said yesterday:

The government can never be a charity- only a thief.  Davy Crockett's account demonstrates why.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/ellis1.html
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:01
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

^Much better. You see, it only takes a few words to communicate what one's thinking or feeling.. Wink 


But sloth is a virtue.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:04
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Also (well said Slarti, I agree with that), another question: what is this theft I read constantly about in your posts??


Taxes

"Theft"??

Oh well.... The entire world is so full of idiots that everybody gets stolen every damn month... (or day, or week, whatever). 

A few illuminated ones have found out how a society can survive without them? 


A lot of people bristle at calling taxes theft. I don't understand why. Its seems simple enough to me. Dictionary.com defines the verb "to steal" as:

to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force

I earn property by working. I don't give the government permission to take my property, but they take it anyway.  If I try to prevent this, they will take it by force and ultimately lock me in prison. How is that not stealing?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:07
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


I should also point out that the pittance payed to the unemployed that qualified actually gets spent and thereby helps out the economy.  Not to mention the extension is a drop in the bucket compared to other things our government throws money at.

Take the libertarian blinders off and have yourself a cup of reality, dude, really.


Your first point is terrible Keynesian thinking. Your second is irrelevant.

Enjoy living in your little libertarian fantasyland.  Notice how you didn't address the fact that unemployment compensation comes out of money that ultimately came out of your paycheck.

Ignorance is bliss.


I'll gladly address that. Assuming that people get out the same amount they put in (which they don't don't because the people who in the most don't need unemployment insurance) then it would be better to just give people that money. They could invest it and make more than they will ever get from it sitting in an unemployment insurance lockbox. Secondly, I have nothing against unemployment insurance per say, but why not make it voluntary, like health insurance or fire insurance? Why should someone who is never going to need it be forced to pay into it? That's unfair coercion, in my book.

How would someone know that it's never going to be needed?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:08
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Also (well said Slarti, I agree with that), another question: what is this theft I read constantly about in your posts??


Taxes

"Theft"??

Oh well.... The entire world is so full of idiots that everybody gets stolen every damn month... (or day, or week, whatever). 

A few illuminated ones have found out how a society can survive without them? 


A lot of people bristle at calling taxes theft. I don't understand why. Its seems simple enough to me. Dictionary.com defines the verb "to steal" as:

to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force

I earn property by working. I don't give the government permission to take my property, but they take it anyway.  If I try to prevent this, they will take it by force and ultimately lock me in prison. How is that not stealing?

Money can buy you property. Money is not property itself. Is just a means to trade. Damn, the government is the one that prints it remember? TongueTongue
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:09
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

^Much better. You see, it only takes a few words to communicate what one's thinking or feeling.. Wink 


But sloth is a virtue.

At times you look like a saint then... Wink
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:15
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:



I'll gladly address that. Assuming that people get out the same amount they put in (which they don't don't because the people who in the most don't need unemployment insurance) then it would be better to just give people that money. They could invest it and make more than they will ever get from it sitting in an unemployment insurance lockbox. Secondly, I have nothing against unemployment insurance per say, but why not make it voluntary, like health insurance or fire insurance? Why should someone who is never going to need it be forced to pay into it? That's unfair coercion, in my book.

First of all, we're talking about insurance.  You get money out, theoretically, when you need to.  By definition you're not likely to get the same amount out that you pay in in many cases.  Let's outlaw insurance.  Everyone on their own.  No collective good to worry about.  If you happen to be wealthy or born into a wealthy family, you're in luck, if not you're screwed.  If you have just a few dollars to invest, how are you ever going to get wealthy?  The stock market is a casino and the house almost always wins.  Sounds like a plan. 
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:18
After weeks of being road blocked by Republicans, the Senate passed those unemployment extensions today. Last I saw it was winning in the House, where It'd probably win anyway.
They seem to be using the theory I've thrown out that: This is an emergency, deficit can wait for now.

Have to continue working on a paper, then I can bicker more regularly! But just gunna say, that news didn't much splash even here on MSNBC, seems to be more talk about this newest race "issue" going on, and frankly Im not sure what happened even. From what I gather though, seems to be less of a real issue than what I mentioned above, of course it deserves more air play! Ermm
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:20
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:



I'll gladly address that. Assuming that people get out the same amount they put in (which they don't don't because the people who in the most don't need unemployment insurance) then it would be better to just give people that money. They could invest it and make more than they will ever get from it sitting in an unemployment insurance lockbox. Secondly, I have nothing against unemployment insurance per say, but why not make it voluntary, like health insurance or fire insurance? Why should someone who is never going to need it be forced to pay into it? That's unfair coercion, in my book.

First of all, we're talking about insurance.  You get money out, theoretically, when you need to.  By definition you're not likely to get the same amount out that you pay in in many cases.  Let's outlaw insurance.  Everyone on their own.  No collective good to worry about.  If you happen to be wealthy or born into a wealthy family, you're in luck, if not you're screwed.  If you have just a few dollars to invest, how are you ever going to get wealthy?  The stock market is a casino and the house almost always wins.  Sounds like a plan. 


Ironically, your position lines the pockets of insurance company fat cats who make their living in the fear market.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:23
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:



Ironically, your position lines the pockets of insurance company fat cats who make their living in the fear market.

Insurance is about spreading out risk.  Good regulation can keep the fat cats thin.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:25
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:



I'll gladly address that. Assuming that people get out the same amount they put in (which they don't don't because the people who in the most don't need unemployment insurance) then it would be better to just give people that money. They could invest it and make more than they will ever get from it sitting in an unemployment insurance lockbox. Secondly, I have nothing against unemployment insurance per say, but why not make it voluntary, like health insurance or fire insurance? Why should someone who is never going to need it be forced to pay into it? That's unfair coercion, in my book.

First of all, we're talking about insurance.  You get money out, theoretically, when you need to.  By definition you're not likely to get the same amount out that you pay in in many cases.  Let's outlaw insurance.  Everyone on their own.  No collective good to worry about.  If you happen to be wealthy or born into a wealthy family, you're in luck, if not you're screwed.  If you have just a few dollars to invest, how are you ever going to get wealthy?  The stock market is a casino and the house almost always wins.  Sounds like a plan. 


You totally missed the point of my post. I don't have a problem with insurance at all. I have a problem with coerced insurance. If I am confident that I don't need unemployment insurance, why should I have to pay for it? There's no reason a private firm couldn't supply unemployment insurance the same way they supply every other kind of insurance. The only reason they don't now is that the government has a monopoly on it.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2010 at 13:26
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

After weeks of being road blocked by Republicans, the Senate passed those unemployment extensions today. Last I saw it was winning in the House, where It'd probably win anyway.
They seem to be using the theory I've thrown out that: This is an emergency, deficit can wait for now.

Have to continue working on a paper, then I can bicker more regularly! But just gunna say, that news didn't much splash even here on MSNBC, seems to be more talk about this newest race "issue" going on, and frankly Im not sure what happened even. From what I gather though, seems to be less of a real issue than what I mentioned above, of course it deserves more air play! Ermm

Actually, the race issue should be second... Please, Mel Gibson's rants deserve the top spot! 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4142434445 269>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.336 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.