Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - For my Libertarian friends
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFor my Libertarian friends

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2526272829 269>
Author
Message
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 02:16
Well what about......*checks wikipedia*  Ida Fuller.

The first person to receive SS.
She only worked for 3 years, (while contributing to the fund) before she retired, and started receiving SS.
Put $24.75 into the system and collected $22,888.92 from it!

Just how it worked out but that is a lucky woman!

Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 02:31
Yeah, but she screwed everybody else! WHAT A BITCH!
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 09:17


Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Got my annual letter from Social Security telling me what I've "paid into" (like it was my choice) the system so far in my life.  Sigh, do they really have to waste more of my money taunting me with paperwork telling me exactly how much money I'll never get to actually see?  Hell, with my limited needs I could damn near retire on what they've taken from me already.


But you did agree to it! The government asked you the day you were born, they took your response as "sounded like yes" and there you go.

And I was joking about my taxes, but I remember it used to be clear...like I thought it said "medicaid" and all that. This makes no sense....all I see is "fed withholding" "fed MED/EE" "NJ Unempl EE" "NJ withholding" "NJ OASDI/EE" and so on

Wacko At least I wish I knew what all that sh*t is. I am assuming the fed and state witholdings are...income tax? A payroll tax, but MED....ugh...what is this? I don't even....


Yeesh, JJ, you can't even read your paycheck?  Kids today... Wink

I mean seriously go ask your Dad or something.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 09:26
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:



Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Got my annual letter from Social Security telling me what I've "paid into" (like it was my choice) the system so far in my life.  Sigh, do they really have to waste more of my money taunting me with paperwork telling me exactly how much money I'll never get to actually see?  Hell, with my limited needs I could damn near retire on what they've taken from me already.


But you did agree to it! The government asked you the day you were born, they took your response as "sounded like yes" and there you go.

And I was joking about my taxes, but I remember it used to be clear...like I thought it said "medicaid" and all that. This makes no sense....all I see is "fed withholding" "fed MED/EE" "NJ Unempl EE" "NJ withholding" "NJ OASDI/EE" and so on

Wacko At least I wish I knew what all that sh*t is. I am assuming the fed and state witholdings are...income tax? A payroll tax, but MED....ugh...what is this? I don't even....


Yeesh, JJ, you can't even read your paycheck?  Kids today... Wink

I mean seriously go ask your Dad or something.
Or just take a wild guess ... MED Ermm medical...medicare?... OASDI Ermm Old Age something Disability Insurance?
 
Or just look it up on the internets: Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Wink
 
 
..and I've never seen a USA paycheck.


Edited by Dean - July 13 2010 at 09:26
What?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 09:30
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:



Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

Got my annual letter from Social Security telling me what I've "paid into" (like it was my choice) the system so far in my life.  Sigh, do they really have to waste more of my money taunting me with paperwork telling me exactly how much money I'll never get to actually see?  Hell, with my limited needs I could damn near retire on what they've taken from me already.


But you did agree to it! The government asked you the day you were born, they took your response as "sounded like yes" and there you go.

And I was joking about my taxes, but I remember it used to be clear...like I thought it said "medicaid" and all that. This makes no sense....all I see is "fed withholding" "fed MED/EE" "NJ Unempl EE" "NJ withholding" "NJ OASDI/EE" and so on

Wacko At least I wish I knew what all that sh*t is. I am assuming the fed and state witholdings are...income tax? A payroll tax, but MED....ugh...what is this? I don't even....


Yeesh, JJ, you can't even read your paycheck?  Kids today... Wink

I mean seriously go ask your Dad or something.
Or just take a wild guess ... MED Ermm medical...medicare?... OASDI Ermm Old Age something Disability Insurance?
 
Or just look it up on the internets: Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance Wink
 
 
..and I've never seen a USA paycheck.


Neither have I.  Unhappy
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 09:52
Ponzi Schemes, illegal for you, unchangeable policy for government. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 14:13
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Nah, I watched a bunch of Futurama on Netflix but then I got over it, Matt Groening's style of humor gets really repetitive.

Seriously though, look at this guy
Doesn't anybody else want to punch him? Although he's probably dead now so I guess that's some consolation.
 
SS was all about buying that guys vote for the remainder of his life.  Actually most of what FDR did keeps todays elderly voting Democrat despite how far the parties social policy may have veered away from them.  The myths surrounding the effect FDR's policies had on the Great Depression persist to this day and are the reason politicians feel (correctly, for the most part) that they can still get away with complete economic bullsh*t like the recent "simulus package".


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 14:20
The thing about these myths that shocks me the most is how they're almost purely historical in nature. It's not like its some hidden fact in the economics community, but yet nearly every history textbook endlessly lauds FDR for anything his hand touched. 


"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 14:37
Boo FDR! Boo, I say.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 20:21
Jeez people I was just kidding. I'm not that  stupid. LOL
But yeah...what happened to medicare and payroll? They just had to make it more official sounding

And Im not denying the more sinister nature of SS and FDR's plans but I assume you guys see it as all politics? I mean Democrats have like 10% care for people usually LOL Do keep in mind, (I believe this was said) SS and a lot of of welfare junk was supposed to be limited. In fact wasn't SS only to be temporary?
FDR's policies were taking farther than he probably wanted. If anyone was going for votes for the rest of eternity it was LBJ!

EDIT: I know FDR gets the flak for starting the welfare state as we know and all that jazz, but you guys have some anger stored for LBJ and Nixon right? Wink Just wanna make sure they get their fair share of flak!


Edited by JJLehto - July 13 2010 at 20:22
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 10:58
I'm not sure what you mean by seeing it as all politics.

SS was never intended to be temporary. FDR actually wanted SS to be funded via a nation payroll tax to give the facade of it being self-financing insurance and more difficult to politically repeal. His programs were never meant to be temporary. In fact, a majority of the time they were never meant to recover the economy. His primary interest was reform, not recovery. His policies were certainly not taken further than he wanted. They were taken much shorter than what he wanted. Because of dwindling political support and Constitutionality issues many of his most desired reforms were struck down or had to be compromised. I know much less about LBJ's presidency, but I'd be surprised if he went to greater lengths to win votes through fraud than FDR.

I certainly dislike LBJ and Nixon, but they simply don't compare to FDR.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 11:12
A question for our libertarian friends... Do you think your preferred system is as much of a utopia as true communism was? Do you believe it is actually doable in the real world or is another dream like true Marxist communism was? 
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 11:29
True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
horsewithteeth11 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 11:42
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I'm not sure what you mean by seeing it as all politics.

SS was never intended to be temporary. FDR actually wanted SS to be funded via a nation payroll tax to give the facade of it being self-financing insurance and more difficult to politically repeal. His programs were never meant to be temporary. In fact, a majority of the time they were never meant to recover the economy. His primary interest was reform, not recovery. His policies were certainly not taken further than he wanted. They were taken much shorter than what he wanted. Because of dwindling political support and Constitutionality issues many of his most desired reforms were struck down or had to be compromised. I know much less about LBJ's presidency, but I'd be surprised if he went to greater lengths to win votes through fraud than FDR.

I certainly dislike LBJ and Nixon, but they simply don't compare to FDR.

Pat, you stole the words out of my mouth.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:02
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. If you had read the communist manifesto (maybe you have) you know what I mean. Socialism existed. Communism never. 

And your system better be perfect if it's to replace one that has brought a certain degree of prosperity (a little) and well being to the nation... 




Edited by The T - July 14 2010 at 12:03
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:04
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. 


I think Pat meant are you sure it's a utopia and not a dystopia.  Wink
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:08
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. If you had read the communist manifesto (maybe you have) you know what I mean. Socialism existed. Communism never. 

And your system better be perfect if it's to replace one that has brought a certain degree of prosperity (a little) and well being to the nation... 




I understand that, but as Pat said I wouldn't consider that a Utopia.

"My" system is what caused the prosperity that we have enjoyed here. Further adherence to "my" principles will only bring us more of it. The more libertarian our economic system the better, even if it never goes to pure free market.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:12
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. If you had read the communist manifesto (maybe you have) you know what I mean. Socialism existed. Communism never. 

And your system better be perfect if it's to replace one that has brought a certain degree of prosperity (a little) and well being to the nation... 




I understand that, but as Pat said I wouldn't consider that a Utopia.

"My" system is what caused the prosperity that we have enjoyed here. Further adherence to "my" principles will only bring us more of it. The more libertarian our economic system the better, even if it never goes to pure free market.

"Your" system was never the one you wanted. You want almost zero government, market preponderance over any regulation, absolute liberties in almost all areas. That has not happened here. Yet. 

Other societies have prospered and even further (some at least) with other options. Would you agree on that? (no, it doesn't have strict relation with the other half of the post.. it's just something I wanted to ask you). 
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:13
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. 


I think Pat meant are you sure it's a utopia and not a dystopia.  Wink

It's a utopia. A society of all equals and free is a utopia. In reality it got closer to a dystopia, I can't deny that. But in principle, it is (was?) a utopia
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2010 at 12:40
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

True communism is a Utopia?

Of course I believe its doable. It'll be mighty hard to sustain in its pure form, but it doesn't need to be perfect to be better than what we have.

Of course it was. It was never a reality. If you had read the communist manifesto (maybe you have) you know what I mean. Socialism existed. Communism never. 

And your system better be perfect if it's to replace one that has brought a certain degree of prosperity (a little) and well being to the nation... 




I understand that, but as Pat said I wouldn't consider that a Utopia.

"My" system is what caused the prosperity that we have enjoyed here. Further adherence to "my" principles will only bring us more of it. The more libertarian our economic system the better, even if it never goes to pure free market.

"Your" system was never the one you wanted. You want almost zero government, market preponderance over any regulation, absolute liberties in almost all areas. That has not happened here. Yet. 

Other societies have prospered and even further (some at least) with other options. Would you agree on that? (no, it doesn't have strict relation with the other half of the post.. it's just something I wanted to ask you). 

What I mean is free market as espoused by libertarian philosophy has created our prosperity. Just because it was never realized in full is irrelevant. Time and time again we see the freer the market, the more prosperity is created. 

I don't know what that first sentence of the second paragraph is supposed to mean.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2526272829 269>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.332 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.