Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Official 2010 Football & World Cup Thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Official 2010 Football & World Cup Thread
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9899100101102 113>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:09
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

I don't know what game you saw Jampa.
 
Uruguay only played the last 5 minutes, the rest of the game Netherlads played when they wanted.
 
They stopped afte the first goal and were tied, but after that, Netherlands was much better when they wanted.
 
Yes Van Bommel kicked everything that moves, but Uruguayans were no saints, in the minute 22 Pereira got yellow card that could well had been red and that back kick in the face of Demi de Zeeuw should had been red card.
 
At the end the referee allowed 3 extra minutes and went until 50:30.
 
Iván
During those 3 minutes Van Bommel committed a foul and then pretend to be injured. That was a minute more... the other two the Ref's add on, I don't know...
 
And com'on, how many red cards have you seen for "chilenas" kicking the faces of an opponent. I'm not quite sure what the rules said about it, but I seriously doubt it was a red card. What? the player of Uruguay have eyes on the feet or what...? Confused
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:15
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

I understand Juan, he's a great fan of Uruguay and sees everything from the fan's perspective. I would have preferred being a supporter at this World Cup too, instead of an "objective spectator", but my team didn't even qualify at this World Cup... CryLOL
I am an Argenitan fan way more than Uruguayan man, but the way the lost was so clear who was better. Today Holland didn't play the way the want to, Uruguay take the lead after they make the goal and then it was a well balanced match until they committed a goal in a clear offside. Then of course, Holland played the way the wanted. Just like Brazil, when they are winning they do feel like they are great until they are down, then the team shows their weakness...
 
Again, Germany should crash them...
 
And you have to agree, Forlán is way more better than to so called "stars" from Holland...
 
BTW: dont' feel bad about it Alex, my team has never get into a WC. Guatemala has failed time and time again. CryLOL


Edited by jampa17 - July 06 2010 at 16:17
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:18
Well, let's agree to disagree, we saw completely different matches. Smile
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:34
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

And com'on, how many red cards have you seen for "chilenas" kicking the faces of an opponent. I'm not quite sure what the rules said about it, but I seriously doubt it was a red card. What? the player of Uruguay have eyes on the feet or what...? Confused
 
In first place, thee's no such thing as Chilena, the official name is CHALACA and was invented in Callao - Perú in the second half of the XIX Century. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilena_(f%C3%BAtbol)  Even in the FIFA,. the name Chalaca is the official, as a fact the hstorian Jorge Basadre describes the play as registered in August 3 1892 in a game between Lima and Callao.
 
Now, the back kick is illegal when a player is near because it's an extremely dangerous play.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 06 2010 at 16:37
            
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17848 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:39
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

[QUOTE=jampa17]
 
 
Now, the back kick is illegal when a player is near because it's an extremely dangerous play.
 
Iván
 
Then it should be illegal to try period.......they were both going after the ball..no foul, no card at all was the correct call.
Get out of the kitchen if u don't like the heat...can't red card everytime someone falls down.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:44
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Get out of the kitchen if u don't like the heat...can't red card everytime someone falls down.
 
It's not falling down, it's a direct kick in the face Ouch
 
Iván.
            
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:44
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

And com'on, how many red cards have you seen for "chilenas" kicking the faces of an opponent. I'm not quite sure what the rules said about it, but I seriously doubt it was a red card. What? the player of Uruguay have eyes on the feet or what...? Confused
 
In first place, thee's no such thing as Chilena, the official name is CHALACA and was invented in Callao - Perú in the second half of the XIX Century. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilena_(f%C3%BAtbol)  Even in the FIFA,. the name Chalaca is the official, as a fact the hstorian Jorge Basadre describes the play as registered in August 3 1892 in a game between Lima and Callao.
 
Now, the back kick is illegal when a player is near because it's an extremely dangerous play.
 
Iván
 
Jajajaja... I don't care who the hell invented it, Iván. I never thought I would see that a Perú player invented. I just know that right from Mexico down to Costa Rica we called "chilena", Mind you, what difference it is. And as you say, it's dangerous, why the defenses want to play kamikaze with it? the rule says nothing about red cards... so, sorry, it was a legal playing...  
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:47

seen red cards because a chalaca or chilena a couple of times.

But again, it's discretion of the referee as the off side you claim, the two players were in the same line and the Dutch player doesn't even touch it, so it's not a robbed game.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 06 2010 at 16:48
            
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:49
Now tomorrow's game is harder.
 
Both teams are almost with their best players, except Muller and Cesc Fabregas.
 
I believe Spain can surprise Germany, but not very likely.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:51
^  What's wrong with Fabregas?
Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 16:52
I heard in the radio today that Fabregas was injured  during yesterday's training.
 
A bone injury has been ruled (They had to make scans) out, but he's in serious doubt for tomorrow.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 06 2010 at 16:56
            
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17848 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 17:17

Yes tomorrow will be/should be a great game.....

Maybe FIFA should adopt the electronic eye line as tennis does now with balls hitting the line, for offsides....but then nobody will hear the beep over the bumblebee horns
LOL
Back to Top
memowakeman View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 18:10

Congratulations to Uruguay. They qualified fifth in CONMEBOL and managed to reach semi-finals. Great work they did, they fought until the very last minute, so they have to be happy with their performance. Clap

Nice to see Holland in the final match, though I cannot say I like their football right now.

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19535 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 18:25
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Yes tomorrow will be/should be a great game.....

Maybe FIFA should adopt the electronic eye line as tennis does now with balls hitting the line, for offsides....but then nobody will hear the beep over the bumblebee horns
LOL
 
They did it (along with the artificial field) in the Sub-17 World Cup in Perú 2005 and didn't work, they had to shut them out and now we have to pay a lot of money to change the stadiums back to grass.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 18:27
The best team won, the final is already looking good. Now I hope tomorrow Deutschland beats Spain, for whom getting this far is good enough, in my view. The final should be Netherlands-Germany and then my heart will be torn. regularly, I'd want Germany to win. But maybe the world of soccer owes the Dutch a title... 
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 18:29
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Yes tomorrow will be/should be a great game.....

Maybe FIFA should adopt the electronic eye line as tennis does now with balls hitting the line, for offsides....but then nobody will hear the beep over the bumblebee horns
LOL
 
They did it (along with the artificial field) in the Sub-17 World Cup in Perú 2005 and didn't work, they had to shut them out and now we have to pay a lot of money to change the stadiums back to grass.
 
Iván
 
Now they are ussing a mixture of artifial field and real grass and many players claimed that this kind of textures increase the risk of injuries, and it's evident. Grass is a natural soft texture that make softer the way of walking. The artificial fields do not protect the players feet...
 
Most of FIFA's changes in the game are complete cr*p, and those important helps by technology are still denied. Until Blatter leaves, this is not likely to change...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2010 at 18:31
Although I wanted Uruguay to win, I shall support the Netherlands in the final.  I'm hoping it'll be a Netherlands vs. Spain final.  I dislike Germany and I dislike Spain.  I dislike Germany more.

I mean the teams, not the countries or the people in them.

Neither the Netherlands or Spain have won the World Cup so it would be great to see a new champion.
Back to Top
b4usleep View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 21 2009
Location: Istanbul
Status: Offline
Points: 620 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2010 at 04:42
Let's think England finished group stage as a leader.
Then they would have played against Ghana instead of Germany. Most probably win
Then Uruguay and probably win
Then Netherland in the semi final.

it was too close.  one accidental goal (hand of a clot) ruined the tourney for them.
Really don't mind if you sit this one out.
My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2010 at 10:00
^No, England played horribly. Horribly. They would've never won any important game. They couldn't beat the US remember? 

England won ONE world cup centuries ago with help from referees. They have never won a Euro. England is up there with the big ones only because of their 1966 win. They are, statistically, not even close to Germany, Italy or even France. 
Back to Top
progmetalhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 2081 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2010 at 10:09
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

^No, England played horribly. Horribly. AGREE They would've never won any important game. AGREE  They couldn't beat the US remember? BUT FOR ONE AWFUL MISTAKE THEY WOULD HAVE 

England won ONE world cup centuries ago with help from referees. COMMON MYTH AND VERY WRONG They have never won a Euro. AGREE England is up there with the big ones only because of their 1966 win.  They are, statistically, not even close to Germany, Italy or even France. CHECK THE ACTUAL STATS, I THINK THEY SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES Tongue Wink
 
England's Record against Italy       Clean Sheet Goal Scored Two Goals                  
      P22  W7-D6-L8  F28-A26  Record: 45.45%
 

England v Germany stats

ENGLAND'S COMPLETE RECORD

Played 27 W 12 D 5 L 10 F 47 A 34

World Cup matches

Played 6 W 2 D 1 L 3 F 12 A 7

European Championships

Played 4 W 1 D 1 L 2 F 2 A 4

v East Germany

Played 4 W 3 D 1 L
http://www.last.fm/user/colt2112

Colt - Admin Team MMA

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 9899100101102 113>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.445 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.