Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Lizzy
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 15 2010
Location: Schnitzelland
Status: Offline
Points: 4675
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 14:47 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
The Labour Party would definitely not be thought as a Right-oriented party in Eastern Europe. We do perceive the Centre-Left (Social Democracy), the Left (Socialism) and the extreme Left(s) all as Left. The shift towards (neo?)liberalism of many parties of the Left in Western Europe was indeed felt in the East too, but still we were educated to be partisans of the "true" Right |
We only started to think in terms of left and right only in the past few years, but still, if you ask people on the street about ideologies, then doctrines and then policies they look at you like WTF(lute). They associate left and right with parties because of the discourse of the party elites, not policies. Reminds me of the inter-war period where policies were taken regardless of their left or right specific and regardless of the party in power. I'm still amazed that some people, in this case lots of British, decide who to vote for based on policies. When will I see that happening over here?
|
Property of Queen Productions...
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 12:49 |
Trouserpress wrote:
Chris S wrote:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.........sorry if you vote for 3 dimwits you deserve what you get...........seek out a bigger picture folks. |
Is this mere trolling or are you actually trying to make a point here? A lot of people in this country don't want the choice to be between "3 dimwits" as you put it, but our f**ked up electoral system leaves us with little choice. How is it the british public's fault that we have an inherently flawed system which benefits the two major (both centre-right) parties to the exclusion of everyone else?
Oh, and as for a "bigger picture", what would that be, exactly?
|
No not trolling but I guess British Politicians have become the laughing stock of politics of late. Yes I understand you should/have to vote for a party but you/we get what we vote for. I think it is very sad that the electoral system leaves you with so little choice. I personally do not think any of these leaders will make any difference. I am British but I would be very hard pushed or motivated to vote for any of these guys. Don't you have a Green party?
The " Bigger Picture"..........High Finance i.e Blair's/Labour's foray into Iraq for example. Was it oil or was it a terrorist they were after?
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 10:33 |
I've always been of the opinion that you should vote for the local candidate who would be best suited to represent your views and will do the best for your local constituency in that big house up there in that there London place. More often that not that will mean voting for the candidate that also just happens to be a member of the party you prefer, but not always.
This is probably why I'll never understand why people vote for a candidate who has never actually lived in the area - our current Tory candidate comes from Cheshire and stood for Stretford in Manchester in the 2005 election (and lost), whereas his two opponents are local people. he will "win" because it's a nice safe rural seat. Pah! Politricks - I hates it.
|
What?
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 09:57 |
Precisely. People forget it's a party we're voting for, rather than just an individual.
Labour do still have excellent politicians too. Like Steve Pound (who I have met and was a friend of my late grandfather).
|
|
|
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 06:05 |
3 dimwits? I thought I voted for a political party, not an individual.
'Seek out a Bigger Picture' - the fall back position of the conspiracy theorist without the cogent argument in support
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 04:39 |
Chris S wrote:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.........sorry if you vote for 3 dimwits you deserve what you get...........seek out a bigger picture folks. |
Is this mere trolling or are you actually trying to make a point here? A lot of people in this country don't want the choice to be between "3 dimwits" as you put it, but our f**ked up electoral system leaves us with little choice. How is it the british public's fault that we have an inherently flawed system which benefits the two major (both centre-right) parties to the exclusion of everyone else? Oh, and as for a "bigger picture", what would that be, exactly?
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 03:51 |
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.........sorry if you vote for 3 dimwits you deserve what you get...........seek out a bigger picture folks.
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 03:26 |
Syzygy wrote:
I'm seriously contemplating a vote for the lib dems this time round. Our constituency is a real Tory stronghold, but it looks like the Lib Dems could have a real chance if enough people switch allegiance - Labour have no chance but Clegg's mob could just squeeze through (any other residents of Bishops Stortford thinking similarly?) |
I know what you mean Chris - Stevenage is a pretty safe Labour seat (despite Barbara Follett's part in the expenses debacle last year) & although I don't think the LD's have any real chance of election, if there was to be a hung parliament, it may just go more smoothly if it were Con/LibDem rather than Con/Lab (at least until the second general election which would probably follow within a year
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
|
Icarium
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34055
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 02:57 |
today the Russian Pressident Medvedev is in Norway on a State visit, that means i will sit in the coatch (sofa) and watch the news which fallows the event much like when Obama was in Norway.
and yes I have seen glimpses of the british Election debate (which is the first to be sent on television in Britain), it seem like Gordon Brown dosent manage live debates so well as the other two, he do not look comfortable on debate, he looks nervous.
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 22:34 |
Margaret Thatcher is one of my political heroes, but since I didn't live in the UK while she was in office, I suppose it's not my place to contradict your death-wishing.
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 18:49 |
Indeed, Dean. I don't wish death on many people but she is one of them.
|
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 18:45 |
Dean wrote:
All our political parties would be considered "Right" in Romania since none of them are truly socialist, however none of the the three main parties are strictly right-wing either.
|
The Labour Party would definitely not be thought as a Right-oriented party in Eastern Europe. We do perceive the Centre-Left (Social Democracy), the Left (Socialism) and the extreme Left(s) all as Left. The shift towards (neo?)liberalism of many parties of the Left in Western Europe was indeed felt in the East too, but still we were educated to be partisans of the "true" Right
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 18:28 |
harmonium.ro wrote:
Where I come from the Right is considered better than the Left "as a fact", but this because of the former communist regimes (the Left is really compromised back there). I now know things are of course much more nuanced and no policy is good or bad per se. Again where I come from Thatcher, Reagan and Kohl are regarded as great leaders so mentioning them works in a contrary way. RE Bush, he was OK for me, except that he didn't seem very bright (but I don't judge politicians on that) and his only major problem I can think of was the war in Iraq (not the war itself, I am a fan of throwing dictators out of business, but of its opportunity in that context). So can anyone enlighten me?
|
All our political parties would be considered "Right" in Romania since none of them are truly socialist, however none of the the three main parties are strictly right-wing either.
I won't comment on Thatcher - the mere mention of her name makes my flesh crawl.
|
What?
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 17:44 |
I apologize for my ignorance of UK politics, but could someone briefly sum up the different platforms of the parties? I have a feeling that you don't mean words like "Conservative," "Liberal" and "Labour" in the same way we do acros the pond.
|
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 17:12 |
Where I come from the Right is considered better than the Left "as a fact", but this because of the former communist regimes (the Left is really compromised back there). I now know things are of course much more nuanced and no policy is good or bad per se. Again where I come from Thatcher, Reagan and Kohl are regarded as great leaders so mentioning them works in a contrary way. RE Bush, he was OK for me, except that he didn't seem very bright (but I don't judge politicians on that) and his only major problem I can think of was the war in Iraq (not the war itself, I am a fan of throwing dictators out of business, but of its opportunity in that context). So can anyone enlighten me?
Edited by harmonium.ro - April 25 2010 at 17:13
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 17:00 |
Chris and/or Dean are best to explain, as they're much better at that type of thing than me. Plus they lived through the whole of Thatchers reign. I lived through all of it (except a year of it) but I am too young to fully appreciate her devastation and therefore explain it.
Of course, it runs further than that though.
Just think of a UK equivalent of George Bush.
|
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 16:56 |
akamaisondufromage wrote:
There is no general consent that the Tories are bad, At the moment far from it I think. |
I am referring to PA and the opinions from PA, like
James wrote:
Actually, I'd disagree. I think they're bad now too. Not
as bad as the Thatcher years but still bad. They always will be.
Otherwise they wouldn't be right wing and wouldn't be the Conservatives.
|
Everyone says it's a fact and no one gives examples. Why would they be bad?
Edited by harmonium.ro - April 25 2010 at 16:56
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 16:36 |
Oh come on, they have Con as part of their name. Actually, I'd disagree. I think they're bad now too. Not as bad as the Thatcher years but still bad. They always will be. Otherwise they wouldn't be right wing and wouldn't be the Conservatives.
|
|
|
akamaisondufromage
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 16:31 |
[QUOTE=harmonium.ro]Two questions: what is a hung Parliament? and why would be the tories bad? I've seen only general consent that they'd be bad. Mind you, I'm not wanting to start a debate, I'm just asking out of curiosity. [/
A hung Parliament is one where no one party has an overall majority of MP's. There is no general consent that the Tories are bad, At the moment far from it I think. (Its just a matter of fact ) Never trust a Tory
|
Help me I'm falling!
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: April 25 2010 at 16:28 |
This is the problem South Swindon have: 2005 Result
Party |
|
Votes Share |
Labour |
|
40.4% |
Conservative |
|
36.9% |
Liberal Democrat |
|
17.0% |
Others |
|
5.7% |
It's looking seriously like we could lose this to the Tories. Having said that, I'm actually living in North Swindon constituency now but they have the same issue: 2005 Result
Party |
|
Votes Share |
Labour |
|
45.1% |
Conservative |
|
38.9% |
Liberal Democrat |
|
12.9% |
Others |
|
3.1% |
Edited by James - April 25 2010 at 16:29
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.