Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The priests abuse scandal...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe priests abuse scandal...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 6789>
Author
Message
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:03
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Sorry. Means you get to choose what suits you best and disregard any negatives.


No, it means I examine the Bible in its historical, cultural, and linguistic context and I discard tradition when tradition clashes with scripture.

It isn't about what "suits" me best, it's about having exegetical integrity, that's all.
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:17
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Sorry. Means you get to choose what suits you best and disregard any negatives.


No, it means I examine the Bible in its historical, cultural, and linguistic context and I discard tradition when tradition clashes with scripture.

It isn't about what "suits" me best, it's about having exegetical integrity, that's all.
 
I had that once.  It was painful.  Ouch
 
You really should see a doctor.Tongue
 
 
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:18
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Sorry. Means you get to choose what suits you best and disregard any negatives.


No, it means I examine the Bible in its historical, cultural, and linguistic context and I discard tradition when tradition clashes with scripture.

It isn't about what "suits" me best, it's about having exegetical integrity, that's all.
 
I had that once.  It was painful.  Ouch
 
You really should see a doctor.Tongue
 
 


I went to one, but this doctor kept talking about wanting to examine my hermeneutics.  Confused
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24566
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:19
The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Edited by someone_else - April 22 2010 at 07:21
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:22
Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Right.  And when Jesus uses that word, did he mean a place of eternal, conscious torture and physical agony?

I submit that he did not.
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:30
So what is he supposed to mean then?
I find those lines quite clear.
I mean, he probably didn't mean "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell which is quite a comfy place where you'll be given a good talking to and then psychiatrists will evaluate whether you can rejoin society" 
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:36
That reminds me of this:
 
 
 
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:37
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

So what is he supposed to mean then?
I find those lines quite clear.
I mean, he probably didn't mean "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell which is quite a comfy place where you'll be given a good talking to and then psychiatrists will evaluate whether you can rejoin society" 


Do you honestly believe the only interpretation is the Westernized traditional one?


Edited by Epignosis - April 22 2010 at 07:38
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24566
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:42
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Right.  And when Jesus uses that word, did he mean a place of eternal, conscious torture and physical agony?

I submit that he did not.
 
 
 
Apparently not, according to these verses (in English):
 
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Rev. 20:14,15)
 
(In Dutch the word for 'hell' here differs from the word used in the Gospel according to Matthew).
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 07:53
At this point I'll probably go along with Saint Ian's immortal line: 'It always causes a fight, man' and bow out.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 08:00
Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by someone_else someone_else wrote:

The Scriptures speak of hell as well, and no one in the Scriptures speaks more about hell than Jesus. No matter what tradition makes of it:
 
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. (Matt. 5:29)
 
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matt. 23:33)
 
 
 


Right.  And when Jesus uses that word, did he mean a place of eternal, conscious torture and physical agony?

I submit that he did not.
 
 
 
Apparently not, according to these verses (in English):
 
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Rev. 20:14,15)
 
(In Dutch the word for 'hell' here differs from the word used in the Gospel according to Matthew).


As well it should, because they are two different words in the Greek as well (gehenna in Matthew and hades in Revelation).
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2010 at 10:10
I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.
Back to Top
who-knows-it's-prog View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 13 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2010 at 20:01
This whole thing has nothing to do with the bible or any other nonsensical religious nonsense, it's all about abusers in the Roman catholic church who should know better, these people are put in a position of trust, and children should be free from paedophiles. Hang them high, and show to the world we will not accept paedophilia or any other abuse.
Remember this pope was in the Nazi party...so denial should come easily to him.


Edited by who-knows-it's-prog - April 30 2010 at 18:06
Back to Top
UndercoverBoy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2010 at 21:58
Originally posted by who-knows-it's-prog who-knows-it's-prog wrote:

Remember this pope was in the Nazi party...so denial should come easily to him.
You had to be a part of Hitler's Youth if you were a boy at that time.  Please don't start this.
Back to Top
ReaganwillshottyLibs View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2010
Location: Da Hood
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 03:44
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 04:39
Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
ReaganwillshottyLibs View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2010
Location: Da Hood
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 04:42
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse

Only by someone whose morally challenged. 
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 08:28
I have a hard time ranking bad things like that.  When someone is murdered that person doesn't go on killing other people.  The molested do sometimes turn into molesters.  A sick gift that keeps on giving.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 11:48
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:

Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol
Pretty much.....far worse
 
I honestly don't know which is worse, raping is so repulsive for me that I can't imagine something worst.
 
It's so repulsive that even the criminals consider child raping horrendous, when I made my practice of Penal law in a prison, child rapists had to be appart of the rest of the prisoners, because they were raped, harrassed and even murdered on daily bases.
 
But there's a way toi know...Ask a father of a raped child, if he would rather had his son killed....That will tell you what's worst, despite our natural repulsion for pedophilia.
 
Iván.


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 24 2010 at 19:39
            
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2010 at 11:53
Originally posted by ReaganwillshottyLibs ReaganwillshottyLibs wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

I'm honestly not sure how many acts of true compassion without strings attached the Church could do to balance the scales of just violating the trust of just one child under their care. I'm also drawing a blank right now of one single act that is worse than having a child trust you and your institution not only as a physical guiding force but as something in charge of your eternal soul, which can use that as leverage against the child, and then conning the child into sexual acts. Outright murder doesn't even come close to the evil of that act.

You think sexual acts with children is worse then murder? lol


You missed the point.

Is murder worse than rape? Yes.

Is murder worse than pedophilia. Maybe.

Is murder worse than conning a child to have sex with you because you can easily prey on his fears that if he strays from you he will be tormented for eternity? Sweet Jesus Hell yes.

You can lament the taking of someone's life, but this act here should make your jaw drop to the f**king floor by how evil it is.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 6789>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.