Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 22:47 |
jammun wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
jammun wrote:
Actually, I don't know if I'm being sarcastic or not. I don't know if that whole post is sarcastic or not. All's I'm saying, is that a certain segment of our population already has complete access to taxpayer-funded, free health care. |
yes, Congress
|
Actually, I was referring to the other 3.2% of the criminal population. |
I was going to say, think jammun was talking about crooks, but David was being redundant
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 22:55 |
It's not just that, otherwise I'd be f**king rich. Without people like me, the yuppies wouldn't get their morning stimulant that gives them the energy to f**k the rest of the country over financially. Hmm...now I wonder which of us is worse.... Done wondering. It's them.
|
|
|
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 22:59 |
Oh come on stonie, being a Starbucks barista isn't a high demand job. I could never work there, I hate coffee and I hate that people spend so much on it, and I don't think I could contain all that hatred.
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:02 |
^ Your not alone, Starbucks is a haven for hatred, it's worse than Radio Shack, which is now The Shack ... it's that bad.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:09 |
Oh it's not really a high demand job economically, but if SB disappeared overnight, I'm pretty sure the entire country would at least be off balance enough to lose a crapton of money is lost productivity. Can't say that about many other single food service companies.
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:11 |
Radio Shack is a travesty, and because it's a frachise it means whoever runs their own Shack can be as big a jackass as they want.. which they are.
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:12 |
stonebeard wrote:
Oh it's not really a high demand job economically, but if SB disappeared overnight, I'm pretty sure the entire country would at least be off balance enough to lose a crapton of money is lost productivity. Can't say that about many other single food service companies.
|
Yes, if SB disappeared overnight. If you disappeared overnight, your shift manager would shrug, and put out the help wanted sign.
|
|
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:17 |
When i moved to Seattle in 1979, there was a single SB down at the Market. I think it was the only SB at the time...there may have been one or two out in the 'burbs, but I never went out to there. I used to go to that SB to buy my coffee beans every couple of weeks. Never bought the espresso or lattes at the time...to expensive...not that the beans weren't, but they were worth it vs. the commercial crap on the grocery store shelves.
I'm in Seattle. I never really got into the latte habit. That's money better spent on beer.
|
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:19 |
Padraic wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
Oh it's not really a high demand job economically, but if SB disappeared overnight, I'm pretty sure the entire country would at least be off balance enough to lose a crapton of money is lost productivity. Can't say that about many other single food service companies.
|
Yes, if SB disappeared overnight. If you disappeared overnight, your shift manager would shrug, and put out the help wanted sign.
|
Don't be ridiculous. They don't even have a help wanted sign.
|
|
|
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:24 |
Now that I think about it, I wasn't being particularly sarcastic. Here in the U.S., we do provide free legal representation to all, and in fact to those who probably least deserve it. And once their sorry asses end up in prison, we do provide them with free health care. So why is it so outrageous to ask that we provide at least minimum health coverage for those far more deserving of it. You know, that average SB employee who goes to work every day, pays taxes, and generally provides a positive contribution to society, and doesn't rob banks, burglerize homes, assault the innocent.
|
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:36 |
jammun wrote:
Now that I think about it, I wasn't being particularly sarcastic. Here in the U.S., we do provide free legal representation to all, and in fact to those who probably least deserve it. And once their sorry asses end up in prison, we do provide them with free health care. So why is it so outrageous to ask that we provide at least minimum health coverage for those far more deserving of it. You know, that average SB employee who goes to work every day, pays taxes, and generally provides a positive contribution to society, and doesn't rob banks, burglerize homes, assault the innocent. |
Hey, all I gotta do is stop robbing banks, then heath care my way, baby. (Also, I was more concerned about your suggestion rescinding free legal counsel to all is the way to go, not the health care thing. As someone said somewhere or something maybe: it's better to let a guilty person walk free than to put an innocent one behind bars. I probably mangled that. Oh well. Point is, in a society with so many dumb laws and ways to get around every law, including killing people if you know the legalese, regular folks have no chance of defending themselves against the onslaught of a prosecutor. Free defense is 100% necessary for true legal justice)
|
|
|
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 23:43 |
^^
Nah, I'm not suggesting we rescind the right to free legal counsel. Who's gonna buy all those lattes if not the lawyers?
|
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 06:57 |
Edited by Slartibartfast - March 20 2010 at 06:59
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 08:04 |
That is a completely unrealistic comic!
There's a talking elephant, for gosh sake!
|
|
|
ClemofNazareth
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Researcher
Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 10:52 |
Pekka wrote:
Just out of curiosity, in the US approximately how big a percent of let's say a 2000 dollar monthly paycheck is taken away by the gunmen? |
Great question, and as a few people have already pointed out
one that is almost impossible to answer.
I’m not aware of any really good comprehensive study on the
subject, but it’s not unreasonable to assume that a typical middle-class family
lays out 50-75% or more of their income in taxes of one form or another in a
given year. For single people that
burden is usually higher since most exemptions on income and gains taxes favor
married couples. And of course that doesn't include the inevitable huge tax increases we'll see in coming years to begin paying down the debt we're incurring bailing out our gambling (er., "banking and insurance") industry.
Here are some taxes that hit just about everyone in the U.S. to one
extent or another:
Income:
- Social Security tax (6.2% direct burden on employee and on
employer for a total of 12.4%)
- Medicare (1.45% on employee and employer for a total of 2.9%)
- Unemployment tax (6.2% on employer, sum of federal burden
offset by whatever state assesses)
- State income taxes (0 to 9.5% percent depending on the
state; usually there are caps and exemptions)
- Federal income tax (0-35% based on net income with loads
of exemptions and exceptions)
- Local income taxes (vary widely with many regions having
none and some having multiple – i.e., county, borough, municipality, city,
district, parish, etc.)
- “death” taxes (18-50% with a labyrinth of exemptions,
exclusions, etc.)
- Capital gains taxes (vary)
Consumption:
Too many to mention, but here are some of the more prevalent
and common -
- State sales taxes (0-8.25%)
- Local sales taxes (vary)
- Property taxes (usually on homes, but also on other
properties like campers, boats, etc.)
- Usage taxes (similar to sales tax, often applied to things
like hotels, rental cars and entertainment events as a way to shift local tax
burdens to tourists and nonresident visitors)
- Communication taxes (levied on telephone, television,
internet and other communication services)
- Utility taxes (levied on electricity, natural gas, water,
sewage, etc.)
- Automobile taxes (including sales tax, licensing fees,
registration, and permits)
- Federal excise taxes (example, 18.5 cents per gallon for
gasoline)
- State and local excise taxes (vary)
- “sin” taxes (on tobacco, alcohol and other vices. Many states and local governments have
greatly expanded the use of these taxes in recent years as a way of increasing
their coffers by employing a ‘moral indignation’ approach to taxation)
- stupid taxes (i.e., lotteries and gambling – ‘nuff said)
I haven’t read this entire thread and I know there have been
other similar ones in recent months, but just a comment (which I’ve made
before) on ‘government-funded’ healthcare in the U.S.: most industry experts acknowledge that ~82%
(give or take a few percentage points) of all healthcare expenses in our
country are already being paid by one government agency or another, meaning
those expenses are paid for through taxes.
These payers include –
- Medicare (federal)
- Veteran’s Administration (federal, for military and some
civil servant retirees and disabled)
- CHAMPVA (federal, for active duty military and their
dependents)
- Indian Health Service (federal, for native Americans)
- Medicaid (state, subsidized with federal funds)
- Federal employee insurance (federal, including Congress,
the President, Supreme Court, and federal civil servants)
- federal, state and local law enforcement, fire and rescue,
shore patrol, border patrol, port authority, immigration and drug enforcement
workers
- retired and disabled railroad workers and many air-traffic
control workers
- NTSB employees and contractors
- prisoners (federal, state and local), as well as prison
workers
And most states have programs for the disabled, elderly,
children and disadvantaged citizens who cannot otherwise afford insurance that
supplement Medicare and Medicaid.
Also, the federal government is the largest non-profit payer
for healthcare research including clinical trials, which contributes both
directly and indirectly to publicly-funded healthcare.
Here’s my point: “We the People” are already paying for the vast, vast
majority of healthcare consumed in this country, and we’re doing so through
taxation and programs that are controlled by governments.
The real issue (as I see it) is that insurance companies act
as a for-profit middleman shaving hundreds of billions of dollars in profits
off the top. Since most of these
insurance companies are multinational corporations whose shares are often held
by foreign investors, this means billions of dollars allocated to providing
healthcare in our country are instead siphoned off and shipped overseas to line
the pockets of wealthy speculators instead.
Those who argue that publicly-funded and managed health coverage will
destroy our capitalist society are being duped, misled and driven to fear by
very well-funded and powerful industry lobbyists who, candidly, are clearly
brighter and more aware than we are.
This is a hugely contentious issue in our country, but I
think it is interesting (and a little embarrassing) that so many people from
other parts of the world refer to our healthcare system as “barbaric”, “appalling”
and “ruthless”. I know we Americans tend
to think of ourselves as ‘special’ and ‘different’ somehow, but it should give
pause for thought that more than 6,000,000,000 people around the world all
believe that access to medical care is a fundamental human right, while in our
country we don’t see a problem with marginalizing nearly 40,000,000 men, women
and children simply because they haven’t managed to capture that slice of the
capitalist pie that would allow them to pay for those services.
(…dismounting soapbox…)
|
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."
Albert Camus
|
|
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 11:17 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
The real issue (as I see it) is that insurance companies act as a for-profit middleman shaving hundreds of billions of dollars in profits off the top. Since most of these insurance companies are multinational corporations whose shares are often held by foreign investors, this means billions of dollars allocated to providing healthcare in our country are instead siphoned off and shipped overseas to line the pockets of wealthy speculators instead. Those who argue that publicly-funded and managed health coverage will destroy our capitalist society are being duped, misled and driven to fear by very well-funded and powerful industry lobbyists who, candidly, are clearly brighter and more aware than we are.
This is a hugely contentious issue in our country, but I think it is interesting (and a little embarrassing) that so many people from other parts of the world refer to our healthcare system as “barbaric”, “appalling” and “ruthless”. I know we Americans tend to think of ourselves as ‘special’ and ‘different’ somehow, but it should give pause for thought that more than 6,000,000,000 people around the world all believe that access to medical care is a fundamental human right, while in our country we don’t see a problem with marginalizing nearly 40,000,000 men, women and children simply because they haven’t managed to capture that slice of the capitalist pie that would allow them to pay for those services.
|
Excellent post.
|
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 12:21 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
The real issue (as I see it) is that insurance companies act
as a for-profit middleman shaving hundreds of billions of dollars in profits
off the top. Since most of these
insurance companies are multinational corporations whose shares are often held
by foreign investors, this means billions of dollars allocated to providing
healthcare in our country are instead siphoned off and shipped overseas to line
the pockets of wealthy speculators instead.
Those who argue that publicly-funded and managed health coverage will
destroy our capitalist society are being duped, misled and driven to fear by
very well-funded and powerful industry lobbyists who, candidly, are clearly
brighter and more aware than we are.
(…dismounting soapbox…)
|
goddamn right... I love people like you Bob (and Jay)... smart enough to say what I can't. I dance around it ..but get lost in denigrating the other side on this debate. Yes... that is exactly the REAL issue. The ignorance of those in this country who think that the rest of the world.. not us... have it wrong. great post.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Qboyy007
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2009
Location: SoCal
Status: Offline
Points: 186
|
Posted: March 21 2010 at 03:23 |
micky wrote:
ClemofNazareth wrote:
The real issue (as I see it) is that insurance companies act
as a for-profit middleman shaving hundreds of billions of dollars in profits
off the top. Since most of these
insurance companies are multinational corporations whose shares are often held
by foreign investors, this means billions of dollars allocated to providing
healthcare in our country are instead siphoned off and shipped overseas to line
the pockets of wealthy speculators instead.
Those who argue that publicly-funded and managed health coverage will
destroy our capitalist society are being duped, misled and driven to fear by
very well-funded and powerful industry lobbyists who, candidly, are clearly
brighter and more aware than we are.
(…dismounting soapbox…)
|
goddamn right...
I love people like you Bob (and Jay)... smart enough to say what I can't. I dance around it ..but get lost in denigrating the other side on this debate. Yes... that is exactly the REAL issue. The ignorance of those in this country who think that the rest of the world.. not us... have it wrong.
great post.
|
Absolutely laughable post.....
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: March 21 2010 at 04:08 |
^^^ Yeah, and the penis mightier than the sword.
Qboyy007 wrote:
micky wrote:
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Those who argue that publicly-funded and managed health coverage will
destroy our capitalist society are being duped, misled and driven to fear by
very well-funded and powerful industry lobbyists who, candidly, are clearly
brighter and more aware than we are.
|
goddamn right...
I love people like you Bob (and Jay)... smart enough to say what I can't. I dance around it ..but get lost in denigrating the other side on this debate. Yes... that is exactly the REAL issue. The ignorance of those in this country who think that the rest of the world.. not us... have it wrong.
great post.
|
Absolutely laughable post..... |
Ah, but if we only had tort deform that would fix everything.
Edited by Slartibartfast - March 21 2010 at 04:41
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: March 21 2010 at 06:05 |
Do you all realize how much political debate, not only in here but in Washington, is predicated on partisan reductive fallacies?
|
|
|