Shred the Eleventh: The sleeper has awakened!

Tsevir Leirbag wrote: MovingPictures07 wrote: Tsevir Leirbag wrote: I am definitely not an expert in Electronic Progressive. Definitely not. But I think it'd fit in that genre. Has it been suggested by anybody? I am an expert in it, I don't have the position (nor will I get it), and as much as I think it would fit and that the Prog Electronic genre needs a total revamp... none of that will happen. At least for the time being.   I don't know enough to have an opinion on that. The only Electronic artist I appreciate (a little little bit, sometimes) is Klaus Schulze.

The "Progressive Electronic" genre here is pretty much mainly "The Berlin School of Electronic Music and Anything That Sounds Like It".

It by no means represents actual progressive electronic music over the past 40-50 years. People would argue this is where you get the "prog rock" v. "progressive rock" arguments. Meh.


Edited by MovingPictures07 - February 24 2010 at 19:54

MovingPictures07 wrote: The reality is that most things take forever to get done because of the fact that collaborators are not paid, it takes alot of time to sort an entire genre's worth of music (which is why the split of RIO and Avant that I've wanted FOREVER hasn't happened yet), and that people (like myself) become unmotivated because of how inefficient things can be. It's a shame. But oh well.

That is the problem with collaboration via internet, I have seen the same thing happen to gaming communities. Having other people to depend on has pros and cons.

MovingPictures07 wrote: Tsevir Leirbag wrote: MovingPictures07 wrote: Tsevir Leirbag wrote: I am definitely not an expert in Electronic Progressive. Definitely not. But I think it'd fit in that genre. Has it been suggested by anybody? I am an expert in it, I don't have the position (nor will I get it), and as much as I think it would fit and that the Prog Electronic genre needs a total revamp... none of that will happen. At least for the time being.   I don't know enough to have an opinion on that. The only Electronic artist I appreciate (a little little bit, sometimes) is Klaus Schulze. The "Progressive Electronic" genre here is pretty much mainly "The Berlin School of Electronic Music and Anything That Sounds Like It". It by no means represents actual progressive electronic music over the past 40-50 years. People would argue this is where you get the "prog rock" v. "progressive rock" arguments. Meh.

The whole prog/progressive "rock" thing is so annoying. I have pretty much given up on those discussions.

I quit caring about what wasn't or was included the Archives a while ago though, for the most part.

I just enjoy whatever I listen to.

A Person wrote: MovingPictures07 wrote: I quit caring about what wasn't or was included the Archives a while ago though, for the most part. I just enjoy whatever I listen to. True I just hate the fact that all the debates I've seen come down to semantics.

Yeah, that's part of the inefficiency that baffles me.

A Person wrote: MovingPictures07 wrote: A Person wrote: MovingPictures07 wrote: I quit caring about what wasn't or was included the Archives a while ago though, for the most part. I just enjoy whatever I listen to. True I just hate the fact that all the debates I've seen come down to semantics. Yeah, that's part of the inefficiency that baffles me. It is why I discuss music in the SR more than anywhere else.

 

That's because people in the SR are awesome. 

Well ciao guys.

Tsevir Leirbag wrote: Well ciao guys. See you!

Night!

MovingPictures07 wrote: Tsevir Leirbag wrote: Well ciao guys. See you! Night!

Yeah, see ya.