Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Single Non-Event that Changed Prog Rock ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Single Non-Event that Changed Prog Rock ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2010 at 04:10
Originally posted by Pekka Pekka wrote:

Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

I wish punk would have wiped out AOR and hair-metal too, though. 

Didn't grunge do just that? Wink


Imagine them wiped out at the very beginning in 1977-78 instead of wiping them at their end, one decade later. The world would have been a better place. LOL
Back to Top
Cactus Choir View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2010 at 04:33
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

 
I bloody loathe Style Council btw!Wink


A Jam purist eh? You're missing out Snow Dog, Cafe Bleu is a great album!
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"

"He's up the pub"
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2463
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2010 at 11:39
What do you make of Paul Weller's recent hairstyles, Snow Dog?

I saw the Jam play Brussels right after "A Town Called Malice" was released. A large contingent of English fans had travelled all the way from the UK just to see them. They were incredibly big in England at the time.

I was never into punk but I dug the Jam because they reminded me of the early Who, which I only knew from albums.

Edited by fuxi - February 10 2010 at 11:39
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2010 at 09:28
You can't fault Bruce Foxton for playing one of THE most iconic prog instruments on the planet, The mighty Rickebacker Bass. Thumbs Up
 
Ironically the rise of punk, new wave and the indie scene actually drove Prog back into the underground where it had originally came from. Prog today might even have a better claim at being the real alternative to mainstream music as it owes it's continued existance to the support of it's fans rather than the huge PR and media machines that sustain todays stadium acts.


Edited by sigod - February 12 2010 at 09:30
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2010 at 15:36
Yeah, punk and prog just switched places. Both were strictly an English (not British) phenomenon. I wonder if there's any significance in the virulence of asttitude toward either from both becuase of that.

Was it really 'cause all these art rock bands played so well. I was just giving a spin to a Magazine promo compilation yesterday (New wave was the punk equivalent of prog rock, it''s artistic side, as prog rock was to psychedelia - which wasn't that sophisticated generally (IMHO.) Anyway Magazine were a terric band. Quality muscianship although no showing off now (permaeted all the way to Radiohead.) Motoercade and Shot By Both Sides among many others have power drive and melody. And they are not poppy. Although Magazine originated from the Buzzcocks which had quiet an anolmay. Have You Ever Fallen In Love With Someone? A great melody and a punk tune.

As mentioned The Jam were also a good band. Great rhythm section. Imagine having a band like that and breaking it up. To play soul instead. Why not as well as? Humph. Was that a progression... or diversion? Still the Style Council were very successful so plased lots of people. And that is a good thing.

Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2010 at 20:10
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

You can't fault Bruce Foxton for playing one of THE most iconic prog instruments on the planet, The mighty Rickebacker Bass. Thumbs Up
 
Ironically the rise of punk, new wave and the indie scene actually drove Prog back into the underground where it had originally came from. Prog today might even have a better claim at being the real alternative to mainstream music as it owes it's continued existance to the support of it's fans rather than the huge PR and media machines that sustain todays stadium acts.

So true. It's such an irony that much of today's 'indie' music is on major labels. Prog is the real alternative music. 
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
DangerousCurves View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 07 2009
Location: Plymouth, Devon
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2010 at 11:01
Originally posted by Kashmir75 Kashmir75 wrote:

The thing with some modern prog bands is: Do Muse or Mars Volta fans bopping along at Wembley Arena think they're listening to prog? I imagine a lot of Muse fans who are young and not necessarily clued up about music history think Matt Bellamy and co. are just an indie rock band, and might not pick up a Yes or Genesis album. 
 
My former house mate is a mega Muse fan and he cringed when I called Muse prog. I'm not sure he thought they were indie, I think he thought they were a rock band who were a bit different. I used to tease him by showing him Classic Rock Presents Prog magazines with them in, especially when they were on the cover!
Back to Top
Cactus Choir View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2010 at 11:41
Originally posted by DangerousCurves DangerousCurves wrote:

My former house mate is a mega Muse fan and he cringed when I called Muse prog. I'm not sure he thought they were indie, I think he thought they were a rock band who were a bit different. I used to tease him by showing him Classic Rock Presents Prog magazines with them in, especially when they were on the cover!


LOL Prog truly is "The Love That Dare Not Speak Its Name". Steve Hillage always makes me laugh with his efforts to deny  associations with the genre, stating he's "Not happy with the prog tag" in seemingly every interview I've read with him in the last few years (this from a man who was in Gong and made albums like L and Fish Rising). In fact I wouldn't be surprised if he actually changed his name to Steve "I'm not Prog" Hillage.
"And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"

"He's up the pub"
Back to Top
Bitterblogger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 04 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2010 at 14:37
I'll agree that had Anderson not left Yes in '79/'80, then no Asia. And pop-prog might've had little more than Genesis to carry it on, which may or may not have launched Collins' solo pop vocal career.
 
But the collective musical world was more interested in new wave or punk or disco. Prog was definitely seen as old hat, was understandable given the poor efforts of the Prog big acts (Tormato; And Then There Were Three; Octave) from 1978, when these other movements really hit their stride (and when smug MSM music critics congratulated themselves on how they'd been right to tell the readers to disdain it for years now).
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2010 at 22:24
I waded through all of this to see if anybody mentioned it, but I didn't see a mention.  When Genesis released Duke it seemed like that gave most progressive artists permission to explore more popular music.
 
Of course one could make the case that Camel was a year ahead of them with I Can See Your House From Here.
Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2010 at 23:58
I wonder if Jon Anderson was in the same musical realm as Yes... just thinking of his work with Vangelis while Drama was being toured. Melodic stuff but not exactly trendy Top 40 disco was it? (Thankfully IMO) Mind you Yes were a hard edged prog outfit with Drama. But only Yes fans cared - one way or another. 
Back to Top
RoyFairbank View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2010 at 19:47
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Punk did virtually nothing to destroy prog, excepting in the eyes of the trendy & fashionable media, a silly trait that lasts to this day in most music publications, although, of course, they never bleat on about just how sad it is that The Pistols reform or UK Subs crawl around pubs & clubs stillWink

The bands we love still continued, and, indeed, continue to this day, to sell out conert halls or stadiums, sell truckloads of records, and inspired a whole new generation of great bands.

Punk did NOT kill progAngry


No, No, No No No, Agreed, Punk didn't kill Prog. Prog did get cut off as an ascending art form quite severely at the end of the 70s though. This was done not by Punk, but the social/historical forces which brought punk to prominence. I'm becoming extremely interested in the question of historical progression of music and art lately, and I've not got much out of it so far except that the progression (or regression) of music is extremely forceful, quick and hard to attribute to any one thing. You see how so many fads are created and how so many apparently fruitful trends hit the ceiling very dramatically.

Its only speculation at this point, but I think it is wise to see the sixties musical direction in Rock and the Progressive Rock trend proper as one movement, and to identify them with cultural modernism which we identify as "60s spirit" and to identify Punk and the 80s music trends as part of a post-modernist cultural backlash (reflected in politics so acutely by the rise of Thatcher/Reagen, that's just one example in one area). I think this model is a good start to understanding the change over, and the evolution and reflection of all the minor trends into quite different trends which are related in non-obvious ways.

Make sense? I'm not suggesting my model should be adopted but its the sort of thing that should be worked towards, "Punk Killing Prog" doesn't say much, I think we all agree
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.