Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Single Non-Event that Changed Prog Rock ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Single Non-Event that Changed Prog Rock ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2010 at 13:15
Originally posted by Bonnek Bonnek wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Punk did virtually nothing to destroy prog, excepting in the eyes of the trendy & fashionable media, a silly trait that lasts to this day in most music publications, although, of course, they never bleat on about just how sad it is that The Pistols reform or UK Subs crawl around pubs & clubs stillWink

The bands we love still continued, and, indeed, continue to this day, to sell out conert halls or stadiums, sell truckloads of records, and inspired a whole new generation of great bands.

Punk did NOT kill progAngry


The reply is to all posts above actually.
First of all, I think Prog pretty much killed itself. It didn't need punk at all.
Sure Prog still exists but it is mostly only relevant to it's fanbase. Only recent bands like PT, Opeth, Mars Volta,... manage to break out into the 'mainstream' (whatever that is these days)
And of course, any rock journalist denying the existence or quality of any rock-genre didn't do his homework.


Hmmm. I remember Wakeman stating that the first ABWH album shifted a million copies with barely any media mention at all. Also, there are a lot of prog or prog related bands really hitting the commercial heights these days - DT, Muse, Radiohead and so on. Also, many of the old bands still sell out large arenas and the innovation shown by bands such as Marillion and others on the internet has created a brand new and highly successful cottage industry.

Prog did not kill itself nor fall up its own backside - this was the media lie and perception.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:08
I don't quite see how Punk had anything to do with the slump of Prog music. Somehow Prog just seemed to have ground to a halt.
 
Nobody heavily into Punk could have been really musical, otherwise they wouldn't have listened to it. It was just for fartarsing about to, so they weren't syphoned off a possible Prog audience.
 
I'd think it more likely that Punks took off a slice off the Disco scene, that's just as daft musically.
 
As strange as it seems, I think the 'end' of Prog and the beginning of Punk were pretty much coincidental with both being on entirely different planets.


Edited by npjnpj - February 05 2010 at 07:11
Back to Top
American Khatru View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:18
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Originally posted by Bonnek Bonnek wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Punk did virtually nothing to destroy prog, excepting in the eyes of the trendy & fashionable media, a silly trait that lasts to this day in most music publications, although, of course, they never bleat on about just how sad it is that The Pistols reform or UK Subs crawl around pubs & clubs stillWink

The bands we love still continued, and, indeed, continue to this day, to sell out conert halls or stadiums, sell truckloads of records, and inspired a whole new generation of great bands.

Punk did NOT kill progAngry


The reply is to all posts above actually.
First of all, I think Prog pretty much killed itself. It didn't need punk at all.
Sure Prog still exists but it is mostly only relevant to it's fanbase. Only recent bands like PT, Opeth, Mars Volta,... manage to break out into the 'mainstream' (whatever that is these days)
And of course, any rock journalist denying the existence or quality of any rock-genre didn't do his homework.


Hmmm. I remember Wakeman stating that the first ABWH album shifted a million copies with barely any media mention at all. Also, there are a lot of prog or prog related bands really hitting the commercial heights these days - DT, Muse, Radiohead and so on. Also, many of the old bands still sell out large arenas and the innovation shown by bands such as Marillion and others on the internet has created a brand new and highly successful cottage industry.

Prog did not kill itself nor fall up its own backside - this was the media lie and perception.


Clap

Why must my spell-checker continually underline the word "prog"?

Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:29
And amen to thatThumbs Up! I wonder how we can still fall into the trap of the 'punk killed prog' stereotype (so we're all here to worship a corpseWink?), when we should know all too well how the media love to put up new idols and tear them down in the space of a few years (or even a few months).
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20032
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:37
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

I don't quite see how Punk had anything to do with the slump of Prog music. Somehow Prog just seemed to have ground to a halt.
 
 
I clearly remember a number of people at school around the time of Punk completely renounced all other types of music practically overnight and "went Punk". After that every other sort of music was rubbish, according to them.
 
Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:42
And yet...

Prog never died, but something definitely went underground in the late seventies, early eighties. In the eighties I was subscriber to a Dutch prog rock magazine, which started in the early eighties with yellow leaflets and is now a big full colour monthly magazine (after several name changes). In the eighties there was litte talk about Italian bands, Canterbury etc. and the magazine was often filled with AOR bands, because even the writers of the magazine didn't seem very much aware of the rich heritage of prog from the seventies. Neo prog was being covered, but apart from that...

It was hard to find good prog in the eighties. Now that's all changed. There is a flood of prog releases nowadays, and enormous attention to the heritage of prog from the seventies. CD and internet helped out enormously, I'm sure.

Prog never died, but prog and its audience seemed to drift apart for some time, for some part.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 07:52
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

I don't quite see how Punk had anything to do with the slump of Prog music. Somehow Prog just seemed to have ground to a halt.
 
 
I clearly remember a number of people at school around the time of Punk completely renounced all other types of music practically overnight and "went Punk". After that every other sort of music was rubbish, according to them.
 

This is true.....Punk was anti music "establishment" and they hated Led Zep and all stadium acts. And disco.

They were all "boring old farts". I was a punk too. Kind of. Clown


Edited by Snow Dog - February 05 2010 at 07:53
Back to Top
Bonnek View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 10:14
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:


Hmmm. I remember Wakeman stating that the first ABWH album shifted a million copies with barely any media mention at all.



I find that an absolutely horrifying piece of knowledge that I sure didn't want to know.Confused


Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20032
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 11:04
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

I don't quite see how Punk had anything to do with the slump of Prog music. Somehow Prog just seemed to have ground to a halt.
 
 
I clearly remember a number of people at school around the time of Punk completely renounced all other types of music practically overnight and "went Punk". After that every other sort of music was rubbish, according to them.
 

This is true.....Punk was anti music "establishment" and they hated Led Zep and all stadium acts. And disco.

They were all "boring old farts". I was a punk too. Kind of. Clown
 
Thanks for telling me I was a BOF at the age of 14. Cry
Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 15:54
Ok, so punk did not kill progressive rock. If prog rock killed itself then what was the single event that triggered it? Jon Anderson not returning to Yes (IMHO). Zeppelin and Floyd notwithstanding Yes were very much THE band that prog rock hinged. As they did not achieve Dramatic success in 1980 then that was the single event that ensured industry takeover and the demotion of art rock to roots rock. Cut 'em down to size etc.

Nothing wrong with roots rock by the way, but it's the (media prompted) resentment of progressive or the art form of rock that prompts a certain elitist attitude. Prog elitists versus punk elitists. Quite funny really.

I think one reason the media hates prog rock so much is that it makes their job so hard. Imagine reviewing and understanding Tales and Lamb. Much easier to champion the easy to understand and easy to review, go with a fashion get your copy in by deadline time and off to the pubs for a view from the bar. Sells more copies to those who prefer to have the tabloids do their thinking for them.

Oh, yes, ask the punks (they are still around) that if punk was so great then why was the industry so thankful  for Floyd and Zep? (Both of whom saved it's bacon in 79 and 80.)

But if Jon's Yes had gone supernova in 1980 then thigs may have been very different.
Back to Top
Bonnek View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 16:27
^ Ok, to get to the point.
It's a bit too optimistic to try to explain the rise and fall of prog  by one single event.
That's not how things work usually.

If you look in the thread, there isn't even a consensus whether Prog has fallen nor not.
So this thread might take a while longer to reach any kind of conclusion. LOL

I tend to think Yes and ELP had taken the format as far as they could around 1974. They had arrived at a dead end.
Obviously there's been tons of good stuff ever since. But that was other generations carrying it on.


Edited by Bonnek - February 05 2010 at 16:28
Back to Top
Elcroft View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 03 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 17:44
Originally posted by Kashmir75 Kashmir75 wrote:

Very well said. Punk failed to kill prog. But it did harm the media's perception of it. A stupid trend that lasts to this very day. The mainstream music mags still rave about punk like it was the second coming, pretend nothing existed before 1977, and rave about the latest trendy emo bands. Prog is still disparaged in most of the so-called 'guardians of music taste' mags.
 
There was a very good article by David Hepworth in Word Magazine a couple of years ago about punk, titled: "It's Like Punk Never Happened ... That's because for most people it never did and as for the rest of us, isn't it time we got over it?"  He basically exposed all the nonsense around it, describing it as a "media-driven fashion movement" that produced an almost totally malign influence on music and spawning the biggest con in music ever, the "indie" movement. He also made the point that some of the most popular and acclaimed albums of all time were made in the mid-1970s, when punk's adherents would like you to believe nothing good was happening.
Back to Top
Elcroft View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 03 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 17:56
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:


I remember an interview with Danny Baker (a british TV presenter and former journalist for the Melody Maker) He said, things changed big time in 1977. The results for the readers polls started coming in, and as usual is was the big rock and prog rock bands of the day, that were winning. The editor was furious at this, and decided things needed to change, so he told the team to lie about the results, and put the new punk bands at the top of the polls. Of course these days, an editor of a magazine would be prosecuted for this kind of thing, back then no one gave a monkeys. The Melody Maker team knew that many young people would listen to anything, if you told them it was the new thing, and was 'cool'
 
I don't think an editor would be prosecuted for that today.  Most magazine's still deliberately ignore prog bands, even if they are popular.  A perfect example of this is when a Q journalist chose Marillion's Afraid of Sunlight as one of the best 50 albums of 1995 but the magazine refused to interview the band because they weren't "cool" enough for the magazine.
 
Prog bands are woefully under-represented in the music press.  With a lot of papers, it's as if they still don't exist.  There's a media agenda to hype up indie bands and keep prog bands in the shadows. 
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 19:56
^That Melody Maker story is disgraceful. Can't believe they got away with such a thing. 

Even today, most mags refuse to give any coverage of prog. The current editor of Rolling Stone is apparently a PT fan, yet the new album got only a tiny review in the mag. 
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
RalphWaldo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 31 2010
Location: Sunhillow
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 05 2010 at 21:52
I would venture to say that  prog as a MUSICAL genre exists and will continue to exist and to be created anew. The temporal fall of the amazing prog groups  in the late 70's was a consequence of the success (financial, psychological) on members of diffrent prog band and the impact of this success on the relationships with themselves and others.  It's hard for magical combinations of brilliant musically collaborating minds to stay in a vacuum of continued original musical production. Unfortunately the world around them changed them back. It's like a sociological cycle.
A record is a concert without halls and a museum whose curator is the owner - Glen Gould
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2010 at 22:12

Will the cycle ever completely turn back, though? Back in the early 70s, prog was all the rage. It would be great for that to happen again. As long as the media continues to champion punk (will they ever get over that?), most of today's prog bands won't get the mainstream exposure they deserve.

Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
RalphWaldo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 31 2010
Location: Sunhillow
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2010 at 22:38
Will the cycle ever completely turn back, though?

Kashmir, that is a very good question. Confused

I wish I were a musicologist to be able to dissect and compare different musical forms through history and their reappearance.

I think I'd be generalizing it to say that prog is a musical form, but I believe that key elements of prog are sustainable in different re-incarnations in the future. And this new music with a similar combination of elements would probably appeal to us - and maybe the whole world again!

You can tell I think the glass is half full.
A record is a concert without halls and a museum whose curator is the owner - Glen Gould
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2010 at 01:09
Ok, I think we get the message that it is a rather tired and glib attitude to say that 'punk killed prog' but when I was growing up Scotland during the late 70's, such was the Maoist fervour of 'year zero' punk converts both from my own peer group and those in music journalism whose views I hitherto respected , that 'Prog' was roped off as a crime scene for anyone between the ages of say, 16 to 25. It's equally glib and disingenuous to pretend that such pressures exerted on vulnerable (working) adolescents with money in their pockets is not going to have a significant impact on any marketplace. Prog certainly didn't disappear after 1977 but should you wish to see the collateral damage report inflicted by the 'phantasm' and 'media lies' of history you might wanna check out Tormato, And Then There Were Three, Love Beach, Giant For a Day, Passpartu, A (Tull), I Can See Your House From Here etc as betraying evidence of a patient whose vital signs you have diagnosed as healthy while the relatives and loved ones scour their wardrobes for black apparel.

For all its faults Punk gave the music industry the huge kick in its loon patchouli pants it had long deserved i.e. it scattered the output of complacent hippies to the underground margins where their brand of smug cosmology could only be enjoyed from the privacy of their own pampered fantasy worlds.

Punk too in a very short time degenerated into another dissolute train-wreck fuelled by speed instead of weed where Tales From Topographic Oceans was supplanted by the equally obese Sandinista. However for a few fleeting months (probably similar to the musical climate of halycon 1969) there was a genuine mood in the air that popular culture just might actually manage for once to mirror the thoughts and feelings of its audience.

We keep gettin' fooled again and again
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2463
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2010 at 05:00
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

For all its faults Punk gave the music industry the huge kick in its loon patchouli pants it had long deserved i.e. it scattered the output of complacent hippies to the underground margins where their brand of smug cosmology could only be enjoyed from the privacy of their own pampered fantasy worlds.Punk too in a very short time degenerated into another dissolute train-wreck fuelled by speed instead of weed where Tales From Topographic Oceans was supplanted by the equally obese Sandinista. However for a few fleeting months (probably similar to the musical climate of halycon 1969) there was a genuine mood in the air that popular culture just might actually manage for once to mirror the thoughts and feelings of its audience.We keep gettin' fooled again and again


This is very true. If you'd like to look at the situation from a non-anglocentric point of view, punk's DIY spirit also encouraged dozens of young & lively bands to spring up in The Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany, most which put out recordings IN THEIR MOTHER TONGUE (Dutch, French, German). This had been comparatively rare until then.

As for punk's influence on prog, the sudden change in fashion was more than a media-generated storm. If you look at most of the late 1960s/early 1970s generation of British prog bands (Yes, Genesis, Caravan etc.), it seems undeniable that they had nothing left to say.

But there were bands who COULD have developed more, e.g. National Health. Only, the public's sudden change in preference for fun & easy bands that could be pogoed to meant that the Health were banished from the UK's club and college circuit virtually overnight. (As explained in Dave Stewart's liner notes to the CD reissues.)

Wire, Ian Dury, Elvis Costello, Magazine, Television, Pere Ubu: there are numerous reasons why the mid-seventies Change of the Guard was actually a good thing. (But let's not forget Disco and soft rock probably sold far more than punk or new wave.) But I'll never forgive them for the downfall of Canterbury's best and brightest!
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2010 at 05:05
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

I don't quite see how Punk had anything to do with the slump of Prog music. Somehow Prog just seemed to have ground to a halt.
 
 
I clearly remember a number of people at school around the time of Punk completely renounced all other types of music practically overnight and "went Punk". After that every other sort of music was rubbish, according to them.
 

This is true.....Punk was anti music "establishment" and they hated Led Zep and all stadium acts. And disco.

They were all "boring old farts". I was a punk too. Kind of. Clown
 
Thanks for telling me I was a BOF at the age of 14. Cry

No you're ok...you were a Jam fan! Big smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.270 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.