Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Theist - Agnostic - Atheist Poll
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Theist - Agnostic - Atheist Poll

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 41>
Poll Question: What are you?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [30.59%]
13 [15.29%]
46 [54.12%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 13:15
Anyway, now the main problem is to determine if the apostles and the evangelists ever existed.
I'm still waiting for copies of the Evangiles which would be older than the 4th century. What a pity no one has ever found copies of the said texts which would date of the times of the apostles, in the 1st century.
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 14:34
I think most of the especialist from the Bible, Theist and Atheist agreed that the Apostles did existed... the thing is that they actually didn't wrote the gospels, but is a certainly true that it was their disciples... It was discovered a papyrum from the second century, which is considered the earilest evidence of any gospel... is dated near 125 A.C. and the evidence within the gospel of John reveals that it was written maybe only 30 or 40 years after Jesus death... so... it's very likely, acording to the evidence, that the apostles did exist... most of the christian communities were establish by them so... the evidence is there... I apologyze for just posting wikipedias articles... but it's a little hard for me to find Catholic formal sites in english... and I'm at work so...
 
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 14:43
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ not wanting to be picky, because it doesn't matter to me one way or the other, but that merely demonstrates the divine conception, not the virginal state of the mother.
 
Lets add some documents, starting by a non Christian
 

1.- Mary's virginity is accepted by the Quran in the Chapter 19

The Holy Quran : Chapter 19: Maryam مَریَم

[19:21] She said, ‘How can I have a son when no man has touched me, neither have I been unchaste?’
 
[19:22] He replied, ‘Thus it is.’ But says thy Lord, ‘It is easy for Me; and We shall do sothat We may make him a Sign unto men, and a mercy from Us, and it is a thing decreed.
 
A first Non Christian Holy Text (which deserves our respect), recognizes that Surya Maryam, mother of Jesus (Issa) was a virgin

2.- The Gosple of James (The Infancy Gosple of James The Just, son of Joseph and step brother of Jesus) dated between 100 - 140 which original dcuments exists, talks abouut the perpetual virginity of Mary.

3.- The Gospel of Peter (190 AD because is a compilation of fragments): Recoognizes the perpetual virginity of Mary.
There are several documents besides the Bible, that accept the virginityvof Mary.
 
Iván
 
            
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 14:48
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

I now Deans point is not about how to interpret the bible, but surely he already knew that we have arguments and notions about our believes that are not blind faith or that we are just accepting it because someone told us to... You Ivan and myself gave you in a couple of posts the posture of the church according to a formal research of the gospels... so... farther than that, are just especulation... the silence of mike seems strange to me...


Mike does not spend his entire time monitoring the atheist discussions in the PA forum.Wink

I read your post, and I still think that my theory is more rational ... I will definitely get Bart Ehrman's book and find out more about the Bible.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 14:51
^^ sorry, but how does scripture from centuries later make the story more credible? Besides, the "virgin birth" myth dates back to Horus even. Of course it comes in handy when you need to beef up your story a little bit. 
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 14:56
Fine by me dude... there's plenty of work about the gospels... it only depends on you to check them... so... I have to run... comeback maybe tomorrow... good night....
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 15:04
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^^ sorry, but how does scripture from centuries later make the story more credible? Besides, the "virgin birth" myth dates back to Horus even. Of course it comes in handy when you need to beef up your story a little bit. 
 
One of the themes of the article I mentioned in the other thread is that among the things "hard-wired" in the human mind is our use of narrative as a way to organize information. In fact, it is probably the primary way in which most of humanity sees the world. The analytical is an aspect of our psyches, but it is only us nerds (seen as a bit odd by the majority) who think that the world can be reduced to only the analytical.
 
Similarly, the ancient wisdoms use stories, parables, myths, not so much as literal descriptions but at lesson teachers.
 
Part of the problem is that we now live in a society designed by rationalists but inhabited by humans who are not entirely rational in the strictest sense. And, in fact, you can't convince them, because they are hard-wired in a different way.
 
Ideas are theirs, some conclusions mine.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 15:24
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^Besides, the "virgin birth" myth dates back to Horus even.  

Not accurate Mike, seems that your lack of knowledge about Mythology is as big as your lack of knowledge of Theology.

Let me explain you: Osiris was Isis husband and he was killed by his brother Set, but Osiris made a spell that she learned from her father.

This spell allowed Isis to get pregnant of Horus by Osiris before he died again.

This has no relation with virginity..just in case.

A second version is less romantic:

Quote The coffin was born by the Nile to the delta town of Byblos, where it became enclosed in a tamarisk tree. Isis, the wife of Osiris, discovered the coffin and brought it back home to guard. Isis gave birth to Horus after his death, having impregnated herself with semen from his corpse.


Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 17 2009 at 16:22
            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 15:33
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Similarly, the ancient wisdoms use stories, parables, myths, not so much as literal descriptions but at lesson teachers.
There is a line of thought (don't ask me where - the source is lost in 52 years of memory Wink) that suggests that the stories, parables and fables were a deliberate hiding of the message rather than as simplification for the masses. They were either not intended to be consciously understood or coded so that only "those in the know" got the message.
What?
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 15:40
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Similarly, the ancient wisdoms use stories, parables, myths, not so much as literal descriptions but at lesson teachers.
There is a line of thought (don't ask me where - the source is lost in 52 years of memory Wink) that suggests that the stories, parables and fables were a deliberate hiding of the message rather than as simplification for the masses. They were either not intended to be consciously understood or coded so that only "those in the know" got the message.
 
While that may be true in some cases, the narrative structure of knowledge in psychology is a pretty standard part of psychologic science. My expansion of that into religion is a logical move many have made but is really unknowable.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2009 at 15:42
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Similarly, the ancient wisdoms use stories, parables, myths, not so much as literal descriptions but at lesson teachers.
There is a line of thought (don't ask me where - the source is lost in 52 years of memory Wink) that suggests that the stories, parables and fables were a deliberate hiding of the message rather than as simplification for the masses. They were either not intended to be consciously understood or coded so that only "those in the know" got the message.


Good point, Dean.  The New Testament is even explicit that Christ did just that on more than one occasion.
Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 08:12
"Ideas are theirs, some conclusions mine."

Ideas rule, facts are boring and conclusions take all the fun out of life.  LOL
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 08:30
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^Besides, the "virgin birth" myth dates back to Horus even.  

Not accurate Mike, seems that your lack of knowledge about Mythology is as big as your lack of knowledge of Theology.

Let me explain you: Osiris was Isis husband and he was killed by his brother Set, but Osiris made a spell that she learned from her father.

This spell allowed Isis to get pregnant of Horus by Osiris before he died again.

This has no relation with virginity..just in case.



Ok, so we have a "Zombie conception", or something like that.Wink

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:



A second version is less romantic:

Quote The coffin was born by the Nile to the delta town of Byblos, where it became enclosed in a tamarisk tree. Isis, the wife of Osiris, discovered the coffin and brought it back home to guard. Isis gave birth to Horus after his death, having impregnated herself with semen from his corpse.


Iván


Now this is definitely a Zombie conception.Wink

I'll definitely spend some time checking out these mythologies ... right now it seems to me that in any way, we have the choice between a virgin birth (if Osiris was always dead) or if seen another way, the creation of semen from Osiris' dead body, or some other miracle (like the resurrection of Osiris). In any case, it wasn't a normal conception.


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - December 18 2009 at 08:50
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 08:52
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^Besides, the "virgin birth" myth dates back to Horus even.  

Not accurate Mike, seems that your lack of knowledge about Mythology is as big as your lack of knowledge of Theology.

Let me explain you: Osiris was Isis husband and he was killed by his brother Set, but Osiris made a spell that she learned from her father.

This spell allowed Isis to get pregnant of Horus by Osiris before he died again.

This has no relation with virginity..just in case.



Ok, so we have a "Zombie conception", or something like that.Wink


Mike, why can't you accept that you were wrong when proved wrong?
 
You said that the origins of the Virgin Mary are in Horus Myth, I proved it's false and you change the subject with a smiley instead of saying, yes, I was wrong.
Originally posted by Mr ProgFrek Mr ProgFrek wrote:


Now this is definitely a Zombie conception.Wink

I'll definitely spend some time checking out these mythologies ... right now it seems to me that in any way, we have the choice between a virgin birth (if Osiris was always dead) or if seen another way, the creation of semen from Osiris' dead body, or some other miracle. In any case, it wasn't a normal conception.
 
Mike, the point is that you invented an argument to discredit our belief, I proved you didn't knew what you were talking about, but you insist in changing the subject and trying to escape using a non funny joke and an emoticon.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 08:57
^ you cannot prove it false - you can list sources that claim it is false, and I'm inclined to believe them. I didn't invent it btw, I saw it throughout the net (on a number of websites) and I also saw it in Bill Maher's movie "Religulous" yesterday. I know that that doesn't mean it's true - like I said, if there are many more sources which say it's not true, then I'll happily accept that.

The fact remains though, and this you can't deny, that the concept of virgin birth occurs in many religions, many of which predate Christianity. I simply don't find it unlikely that some of the gospel writers simply assumed that that was what had happened.


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - December 18 2009 at 08:57
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 09:21
^ I've almost lost track of what Mike's original point was... it wasn't that the "origins of the Virgin Mary are in Horus Myth" but that the idea of virgin births was not new, so it wasn't that the Horus myth is virginal or not, (it counts as miraculous in some form or other), many world mythologies have stories of mortal women being impregnated by a god - some by the god becoming human (or a swan?!), others by mystical means (a sprinkling of gold). Even the foundation of Rome is based on one such myth - The war god Mars seduced the Vestal Virgin Rhea and she gave birth to twins Romulus and Remus - technically that can be seen as a virgin birth.

Edited by Dean - December 18 2009 at 09:22
What?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 09:25
^ you're right, but I made the mistake of putting it the wrong way at one point, and it's only fair that I formally take it back, or admit that my statement lacked the appropriate sources to back it up. According to Iván I never do that, so let's see what he says. ;-)
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 10:02
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ I've almost lost track of what Mike's original point was... it wasn't that the "origins of the Virgin Mary are in Horus Myth" but that the idea of virgin births was not new, so it wasn't that the Horus myth is virginal or not, (it counts as miraculous in some form or other), many world mythologies have stories of mortal women being impregnated by a god - some by the god becoming human (or a swan?!), others by mystical means (a sprinkling of gold). Even the foundation of Rome is based on one such myth - The war god Mars seduced the Vestal Virgin Rhea and she gave birth to twins Romulus and Remus - technically that can be seen as a virgin birth.
 
As I said before Dean, as far as I know there's not such myth.
 
The Romulus and Remus myth is absolutely different, as I said begfore, the Mythological Gods adopted Human or Animal or any other form to have sexual intercourse with humans, so the virginity issue is out of the question, most of this myths are about horny gods having sex with humans.
 
In the case of Romulus and Remus, Mars in human form had sex with Rhea - Silvia while she was sleeping, this is not a virgin birth, this is a birth product of sex.
 
But the case of Virgin Mary is absolutely unique as far as I know (Well, except the mother of Anakin Skywalker LOL), the difference is very important to us is one of the fundamental issues of our faith, and comparing it with mythology is at least harsh.
 
If somebody makes mockery of our beliefs are copied from mythology,  this person has to provide reliable information, and every source proves Mikes comparison was made without any support.
 
It's very easy to attack our beliefs with wrong facts and after that to say..."This is a meaningless mistake", it's very important to us, probably it's meaningless for somebody who doesn't believe in thiss religious dogma, but for us it's transcendental..
 
We are not talking about  horny gods raping women to satysfy their lust or womans taking semen from a corpse in a form of necrophilia, we are talking about a 100% virginal pregnancy without any sex.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 18 2009 at 10:14
            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 13:22
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ I've almost lost track of what Mike's original point was... it wasn't that the "origins of the Virgin Mary are in Horus Myth" but that the idea of virgin births was not new, so it wasn't that the Horus myth is virginal or not, (it counts as miraculous in some form or other), many world mythologies have stories of mortal women being impregnated by a god - some by the god becoming human (or a swan?!), others by mystical means (a sprinkling of gold). Even the foundation of Rome is based on one such myth - The war god Mars seduced the Vestal Virgin Rhea and she gave birth to twins Romulus and Remus - technically that can be seen as a virgin birth.
 
As I said before Dean, as far as I know there's not such myth.
 
The Romulus and Remus myth is absolutely different, as I said begfore, the Mythological Gods adopted Human or Animal or any other form to have sexual intercourse with humans, so the virginity issue is out of the question, most of this myths are about horny gods having sex with humans.
 
In the case of Romulus and Remus, Mars in human form had sex with Rhea - Silvia while she was sleeping, this is not a virgin birth, this is a birth product of sex.
I did say "technically" (though I could have picked a better word if I could think of one) all the conditions for a virgin birth are there since the impregnation details are not explicit in all versions of the story. There are accounts of Mars discovering Shea in a forest while she was fetching water and not while she was sleeping - so even the mythologies are not precise.
 
Of course every mythological "virgin birth" story can be dismissed in such a manner, (even Zeus turning into a shower of golden dust to impregnate Danae), just a cursory glance through this list: http://englishatheist.org/indexd.shtml reveals many non-sexual impregnations that can be dismissed rationally, the text even illustrates this in its last example where a myth was built around someone who had a natural conception and birth.
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

 
But the case of Virgin Mary is absolutely unique as far as I know (Well, except the mother of Anakin Skywalker LOL), the difference is very important to us is one of the fundamental issues of our faith, and comparing it with mythology is at least harsh.
 
If somebody makes mockery of our beliefs are copied from mythology,  this person has to provide reliable information, and every source proves Mikes comparison was made without any support.
 
It's very easy to attack our beliefs with wrong facts and after that to say..."This is a meaningless mistake", it's very important to us, probably it's meaningless for somebody who doesn't believe in thiss religious dogma, but for us it's transcendental..
 
We are not talking about  horny gods raping women to satysfy their lust or womans taking semen from a corpse in a form of necrophilia, we are talking about a 100% virginal pregnancy without any sex.
 
Iván
point taken.
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2009 at 15:13
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

 
But the case of Virgin Mary is absolutely unique as far as I know (Well, except the mother of Anakin Skywalker LOL), the difference is very important to us is one of the fundamental issues of our faith, and comparing it with mythology is at least harsh.
 
If somebody makes mockery of our beliefs are copied from mythology,  this person has to provide reliable information, and every source proves Mikes comparison was made without any support.
 
It's very easy to attack our beliefs with wrong facts and after that to say..."This is a meaningless mistake", it's very important to us, probably it's meaningless for somebody who doesn't believe in thiss religious dogma, but for us it's transcendental..
 
We are not talking about  horny gods raping women to satysfy their lust or womans taking semen from a corpse in a form of necrophilia, we are talking about a 100% virginal pregnancy without any sex.
 
Iván
point taken.
 
Thanks, this is the kind of reply I expected.
 
Iván.
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1718192021 41>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.227 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.