Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Burn speed??? Does it matter?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBurn speed??? Does it matter?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2009 at 05:24
Digital is a very complex technology which doesn't sum up to a following of 0 and 1. There are jitter issues, among others, and an audiophile burner enables to reduce those issues.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2009 at 05:31
Jitter is indeed an issue that affects the SNR of the reconstituted analogue signal and therefore is something that is easily measured and identified empirically. Figures for clock jitter on the ADCs and DACs are well documented (and mathematically predictable - SNR = 20 × log [1/(π × input frequency × Tj)]  where Tj=jitter time). Any figures you have for audiophile burners would be of interest to me, especially in comparison with box-standard transports.

Edited by Dean - November 27 2009 at 05:46
What?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 27 2009 at 05:57
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Jitter is indeed an issue that affects the SNR of the reconstituted analogue signal and therefore is something that is easily measured and identified empirically. Figures for clock jitter on the ADCs and DACs are well documented (and mathematically predictable - SNR = 20 × log [1/(π × input frequency × Tj)]  where Tj=jitter time). Any figures you have for audiophile burners would be of interest to me, especially in comparison with box-standard transports.

Uhm, it was my understanding there weren't going to be any math questions in this thread. LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
XunknownX View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 158
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 10 2010 at 20:36
Oh, yes, I certainly think it does. I burn at 16x, never faster.
Back to Top
WalterDigsTunes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 10 2010 at 20:43
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

I haven't burned a CD or DVD in more than three years ... who needs this today, with USB sticks and memory cards? Even a friend of mine who is totally "non-geeky" recently got a new car that has a SD card interface for transfering audio.

So: find a way to get rid of the need for CD-R ... you'll also help protecting the environment by producing less plastic garbage.


Not everyone has a new car with USB/SD card interfaces. And heck, some people even use boomboxes to play CD-Rs.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.