Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Nuclear Weapons.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNuclear Weapons.
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Poll Question: Will The World Ever Be Rid Of Them?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
9 [15.00%]
38 [63.33%]
13 [21.67%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 11:27
Yes. But only if we come across a more powerful weapon. Example, you don't see many wars fought with axes nowadays do you?
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 12:58
Don't know how to answer to the big question, but I could not hesitate to link as flavour pic to the discussion a pic about "rope trick effect", where the explosion shockwave runs faster in the cables holding the device than in air.
 
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 14:04
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Yes. But only if we come across a more powerful weapon. Example, you don't see many wars fought with axes nowadays do you?


No, and that's why the nowadays world sucks.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 14:15
Originally posted by Eetu Pellonpää Eetu Pellonpää wrote:

Don't know how to answer to the big question, but I could not hesitate to link as flavour pic to the discussion a pic about "rope trick effect", where the explosion shockwave runs faster in the cables holding the device than in air.

 



Thats an amazing pic. Is that the split second of the detonation?
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 15:28
hmmm... I guess either we put an end to the world using nuclear weapons, or they never go away.

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
Conor Fynes View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 11 2009
Location: Vancouver, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3196 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 23:50
of course, once they annihilate the world =)
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2009 at 08:20
Originally posted by Conor Fynes Conor Fynes wrote:

of course, once they annihilate the world =)


How true!

No, not true: nuclear weapons couldn't annihilate the world. They could annihilate any lifeform, except scorpions and tardigrads.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2009 at 12:22
Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Originally posted by Conor Fynes Conor Fynes wrote:

of course, once they annihilate the world =)


How true!

No, not true: nuclear weapons couldn't annihilate the world. They could annihilate any lifeform, except scorpions and tardigrads.



And Keith Richards.
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
valravennz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 19 2009 at 22:40
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Originally posted by Conor Fynes Conor Fynes wrote:

of course, once they annihilate the world =)


How true!

No, not true: nuclear weapons couldn't annihilate the world. They could annihilate any lifeform, except scorpions and tardigrads.



And Keith Richards.
and Cockroaches - urgh! Imagine being outlived by such vile insects!!Dead

"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp


Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 19 2009 at 23:07
Originally posted by valravennz valravennz wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Originally posted by Conor Fynes Conor Fynes wrote:

of course, once they annihilate the world =)


How true!

No, not true: nuclear weapons couldn't annihilate the world. They could annihilate any lifeform, except scorpions and tardigrads.



And Keith Richards.
and Cockroaches - urgh! Imagine being outlived by such vile insects!!Dead

That's why we should work to create a weapon that will annihilate all life forms, if I'm going down all the creepy crawlies should go down too. Off course, there should be a shelter for all cute animals, with food synthesizers to provide food after the holocaust. I wouldn't want the bunnies to be hungry, but all the spiders and bees can die a long slow death for all I would care at that point.
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 17:21
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

I had to pick yes. there is no logical way I could pick no or maybe. The world will eventually end, and therefore, will be rid of nuclear weapons. We will probably use said nuclear weapons to vaporize the planet, but after that, no more nuclear weapons.

Call it a pragmatic technicality. Tongue


 
Agree... of course, some of us will survive, will survive in small countries that do not have technology enough to be destroyed... and then there will be no more nuclear weapons... I really see it like that... after that... we will change... until our children forgot and start everything all over again... Dead
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
The Block View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2009
Location: St. Alfonzo's
Status: Offline
Points: 924 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2009 at 19:58
The world will never be rid of them as long as Dream Theater is playing, for once they have the song it will destroy the world
Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp!

Back to Top
Philamelian View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2009
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 67 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2009 at 06:19
Getting rid of weapons means getting rid of the idea of war for me. You must be so hopeful to expect such kind of wisdom from humankind. We are somehow still in the very beginning of humankinds evoluation. There is no difference than stupid tribe fights than, wars for nation, wars for religion ... How many wars or fights aims a sustainable peace and throughout progress for humankind's future. The sense of belonging is a primitive thing and source of destruction in many cases.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.