Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report bugs here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Indent in track listing?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIndent in track listing?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Indent in track listing?
    Posted: August 25 2009 at 21:13
Now, I'm starting to have a problem. I've been going around and assuaging my OCD by fixing bungled album listings. You know, making sure the tracks are spelled right, the formatting isn't wild, etc. But there's a serious need that has to be addressed, or at least explained to me how to address.

Why can't we indent when we're editing track listings?

I mean, think about it. This music site against all others, it still needs it more. All these multi-part epics that have eight subtracks all listed along the same line as the others. I was going in to try to work the new rerelease bonus track info into In the Court of the Crimson King, and that was when the dam broke. It looks like this now:

1. 21st Century schizoid man Mirrors (7:20)
2. I talk to the wind (6:05)
3. Epitaph (8:47)
a) March for no reason
b) Tomorrow and tomorrow
4. Moonchild (12:11)
a) The dream
b) The illusion
5. The court of the crimson king (9:22)
a) The return of the fire witch
b) The dance of the puppets


I can't figure out why. Why can't we indent the a)s and b)s, so that it looks more like this:

1. 21st Century schizoid man Mirrors (7:20)
2. I talk to the wind (6:05)
3. Epitaph (8:47)
     a) March for no reason
     b) Tomorrow and tomorrow
4. Moonchild (12:11)
     a) The dream
     b) The illusion
5. The court of the crimson king (9:22)
     a) The return of the fire witch
     b) The dance of the puppets


Is there something wrong with me, or is that not much more readable? That's how it's usually listed on the albums in question, anyways. Thoughts?


Edited by LiquidEternity - August 26 2009 at 14:05
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2009 at 15:03
Why is this not in the Improve the Site section? Hm. I'm not talking about a bug. I'm talking about a suggestion for dramatically improving the readability of thousands of important albums' track listings...
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2009 at 15:12
^ They are weird about album info rules and regs. When I recently put all the work into adding the entirety of Gaia Consort's discography, I chose to capitalize the instruments when listing musicians, as I have seen other sites to. As soon as I was finished, a site admin was hot on my heels and changing everything I just wrote into lower-case words. Why such OCD concerning certain formats?

I think your idea in terms of track listing would be really good, but don't expect it to be changed by this point. Way too much work to go back through all the albums with split tracks and indent the letters.
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2009 at 16:05
Ha. I'm OCD like that. Though I didn't do the set you mentioned.

The thing is, if they make it available, people will start fixing them. I know I've fixed or updated at least a good dozen albums with multi-part songs like this, and I tried for a while to get them to work. They underestimate just how few anal reviewers they have who would love to tidy up parts of the site. As soon as I found out I could a few months ago, I've fixed almost every shaky album I've run into.

They could just give me the power to do it, and I'd run through and get tons of popular ones nicely sorted in a day or two. Hehe.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 26 2009 at 19:12
^ Well, i suggest you PM one of the admins about this, as they seem to always be hanging out in that area.
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2009 at 15:02
I can understand the ident complaint.I would like to be able to ident myself,especially with all the multi-part epics listed here.
 
As far as the other complaints...the founder and owners of this site want info displayed like this:
 
1. Song Title (track time)
 
If possible Total Time (time) at the bottom of the track listing.
 
For musicians listed
 
- Band Member / guitar,vocals
 
You  guys might not like it,but the founder of this site has set up these guidelines and that is the way he wants it.Without them,there wouldn't be a PA.They spend their free time and their money on this site,and we should respect their wishes.


Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2009 at 15:23
Oh, I think you're misunderstanding me a bit. The indent thing is the only thing I want to change. I really would love to be able to indent.

However, I am in complete agreement with the formatting laid down by the founders. That's what I correct things to. I am trying to make all the track listings I find in line with that style of layout. That's what I do. I don't make them my own style, because that would be stupid and selfish. I just see the indentation issue as something separate that would tremendously benefit the site. (And is it really that hard of a thing to do? I know nothing about all that, but to me it would seem to be a simple thing to allow.)
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2009 at 15:36
I will point Max to this thread.
 
As far as the formatting issue,I was addressing p0mt3's first post.


Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2009 at 17:14
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

I will point Max to this thread.
 
As far as the formatting issue,I was addressing p0mt3's first post.


Never said I didn't like it, or had a problem with it. But when somebody re-writes my hard work to simply change capitalization into lower-case (the format I use is following the guidlines), I find it a bit odd and obsessive.

Sorry if I seemed like I was complaining.
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 27 2009 at 17:21
No problem man.I was just trying to address the issues you guys brought up.I wasn't trying to imply you were wrong or invalidate your imput.


Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 09:15
Just a bump here. I happen to think that this teeny little indent thing is hugely important to the website... I guess I'm weird like that.

If we don't enable an actual indent in the track listing, I vote that we at least normalize and standardize all the multi-part layout. There are so many with a) and i. and ...I) and all that. I'm willing to help out with whatever we choose to do, but I'm really rooting for the first...
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 09:35
The first letters of the tracks should be capitalized. in evry word.

Ok...fixed it.


Edited by Snow Dog - September 16 2009 at 09:44
Back to Top
Rivertree View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions

Joined: March 22 2006
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 17627
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 10:00
apart from this claimed indent option (not easy to implement as for my understanding) I want to point out that we have Album Data Standards (not officially published yet - don't ask me why)

as for that the initial example should be edited like that

1. 21st Century Schizoid Man Mirrors (7:20)
2. I Talk To The Wind (6:05)
3. Epitaph (8:47)
- a. March For No Reason
- b. Tomorrow And Tomorrow
4. Moonchild (12:11)
- a. The Dream
- b. The Illusion
5. The Court Of The Crimson King (9:22)
- a. The Return Of The Fire Witch
- b. The Dance Of The Puppets



Edited by Rivertree - September 16 2009 at 10:04


Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 10:10
Originally posted by Rivertree Rivertree wrote:

apart from this claimed indent option (not easy to implement as for my understanding) I want to point out that we have Album Data Standards (not officially published yet - don't ask me why)

as for that the initial example should be edited like that

1. 21st Century Schizoid Man Mirrors (7:20)
2. I Talk To The Wind (6:05)
3. Epitaph (8:47)
- a. March For No Reason
- b. Tomorrow And Tomorrow
4. Moonchild (12:11)
- a. The Dream
- b. The Illusion
5. The Court Of The Crimson King (9:22)
- a. The Return Of The Fire Witch
- b. The Dance Of The Puppets


You are quite right, I should have checked the data standards rhead. I wii deal with it now
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 10:14
Done it and have added thge words "including" as the pieces are not in sections, but included within the tracks.

BVTW..shoulbe be including Mirrors Sxchizoid Man. Just noticed.


Edited by Snow Dog - September 16 2009 at 10:16
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2009 at 11:37
Okay. Cool!
Back to Top
Area View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: September 24 2009
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2009 at 08:34
Impossible to play:
FABRIZIO DE ANDRE - Volta La Carta (Fabrizio De Andrč + PFM In concerto, 1979)
"And in the end,
the love you take
is equal to the love you make."
(Paul McCartney - Beatles)

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.