Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Stereo or 5.1
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedStereo or 5.1

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Manuelmoreno View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 17 2008
Location: Barranquilla
Status: Offline
Points: 51
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Stereo or 5.1
    Posted: July 20 2009 at 09:16
I have a simple stereo set on my bar: A Yamaha amplifier and a pair of Bose 301 series IV speakers with a TEAC CD player (and now a 32" LCD and a LG DVD player recently attached...).  I have been blasting this system for almost 12 years and had no complain at all, it sounds like the day I unpacked them.  Now I want to assemble a new system and bring the Yamaha-Bose equipment to a nice retirement in my bedroom.  My question is, Should I switch to 5.1? It is really worth it? My original plan was to repeat the formula Yamaha-Bose because I never feel the necesity of five speakers.  What do you prog fans think? I am missing a whole new experience and must run to the shop for a 5.1 system?


Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 09:45
I think 5.1 (or even 6.1 or 7.1) is a good bonus if you're watching DVDs and plan to listen to SACD or DVD-Audio, but don't hurry to buy anything. I don't think cheap 5.1 system will be an improvement. In stereo mode new system should sound at least no worse than your old one. Choose carefully A/V reciever (Yamaha has lots of pretty good models), good speakers and perhaps subwoofer. Of course the pleasure will take some money.

Edited by NotAProghead - July 20 2009 at 09:46
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 09:46
For movies: Definitely. For music: It's not really that important. There are a couple of nice 5.1 mixes of prog albums, but they're not exactly mind-boggling.
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 09:52
I can't agree with Mr. ProgFreak, there are lots of live music DVDs with great DD5.1 or DTS sound.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 09:59
I prefer Stereo to surround for music listening.  Surround is a nice gimmick, but I find it more distracting than anything else (for music)
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 10:04
If you have surround system Stereo option is always with you.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 10:11
Originally posted by NotAProghead NotAProghead wrote:

I can't agree with Mr. ProgFreak, there are lots of live music DVDs with great DD5.1 or DTS sound.


I'd say that those are movies (DVD) rather than music (CD, DVD-A, SACD). Of course you'll need a 5.1 system to properly watch live music DVDs.Smile
Back to Top
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 10:17
Stereo- cause I only have two ears. But I like the .1 as well, so I prefer 2.1, stereo plus sub.

Surround sound is great for movies to give perception of movement, but what's the point in music- instruments don't move forwards to backwards or vice versa when played.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 11:12
^ true, but some 5.1 music mixes are nice indeed ... for example you can place strings on the back speakers and the rest in the front, or place the whole band around the listener. And of course live music DVDs benefit from 5.1 in that the audience ambience (sic) can be placed on the back and front speakers while the music remains in the front ... giving you the feeling of being among the audience.
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2009 at 11:13
go for 5.1 if you can, some interesting sounds can be had from these systems and the quality is usually very good.  the effect of hearing a familiar album remixed for 6 channels is a very rewarding experience, but study the reviews, they''re not all good, but the best ones (such as PT "Fear of a blank planet" ) really shine.  Smile


Edited by mystic fred - July 20 2009 at 11:14
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2009 at 02:42
5.1 anyday for me...
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2009 at 21:22
I'm old school, using 2.1.  I can't see spending the $$ on a 5.1 system.  The amp isn't much more, but those satellite speakers would surely bankrupt me.  Two ears, two speakers, and a sub to pump it up.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2009 at 01:34
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2009 at 19:33
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/speakers_audio/home_pc_speakers/devices/224&cl=US,EN

Big smile
I think I paid that much for my sub.

Edited by jammun - July 24 2009 at 19:34
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2009 at 20:21
Find yourself one of those old quadraphonic systems.LOL

Isn't it weird how that was a fad in the '70's but came back as surround sound?

On a serious note, you can still do stereo on a surround sound system, so why not go that route?


Edited by Slartibartfast - July 25 2009 at 08:02
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2009 at 22:32
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Find yourself one of those old quadraphonic systems.LOL

Isn't it weird how that was a fad in the '70's but came back as surround sound?

On a serious note, you can still do stereo on a surround sound system, so why not go that route?
Hey, don't mess with quad LOL I had a friend with a quad system and he had Overnite Sensation in quad.  You ain't lived until you've heard that in quad.  "I might be movin' to Montana soon" in all its quad glory.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2009 at 22:56
I've never understood what's so special about 5.1 mixes for music listening alone. I am perfectly fine with what my headphones give me. :)
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2009 at 08:01
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I've never understood what's so special about 5.1 mixes for music listening alone. I am perfectly fine with what my headphones give me. :)

To heck with that.  Mono baby! Tongue

What's so special about surround mixes?  Well, they do add an extra dimension to the music.  But let's face it, if the music is crap a 5.1 mix won't make it any better.  For those who take the position that albums are best sat down and listened to with your undivided attention, surround mixes aren't particularly amenable to portable listening experiences.  I suppose maybe there will be car systems where you can do that if there aren't already, but until we grow extra ears, headphones are right out.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2009 at 09:47
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I've never understood what's so special about 5.1 mixes for music listening alone. I am perfectly fine with what my headphones give me. :)

To heck with that.  Mono baby! Tongue

What's so special about surround mixes?  Well, they do add an extra dimension to the music.  But let's face it, if the music is crap a 5.1 mix won't make it any better.  For those who take the position that albums are best sat down and listened to with your undivided attention, surround mixes aren't particularly amenable to portable listening experiences.  I suppose maybe there will be car systems where you can do that if there aren't already, but until we grow extra ears, headphones are right out.
May grow some extra ears some day, but in the meantime, I'm gonna grow fins Wink
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2009 at 10:48
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I've never understood what's so special about 5.1 mixes for music listening alone. I am perfectly fine with what my headphones give me. :)

To heck with that.  Mono baby! Tongue

What's so special about surround mixes?  Well, they do add an extra dimension to the music.  But let's face it, if the music is crap a 5.1 mix won't make it any better.  For those who take the position that albums are best sat down and listened to with your undivided attention, surround mixes aren't particularly amenable to portable listening experiences.  I suppose maybe there will be car systems where you can do that if there aren't already, but until we grow extra ears, headphones are right out.


Today many people have good 5.1 systems in their living rooms ... and of course they can also be used to play 2.0 audio.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.