![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | ||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
When I was in the air force you wouldn`t believe some of the stories I heard about nukes. One of the types I flew carried nukes ( genie AAMs ) in the late 60s & early 70s but we only carried 2 Falcon AAMs in my day because the Liberal government under Trudeau said no more nukes around `71 . They ( the Genies ) were nevertheless stockpiled and we were trained to fire them.
I met this US Navy pilot once down in Florida and he told me that there are nukes scattered all over the Pacific ocean floor from crashes and accidents. One particular incident he related to me was about a A-4 Skyhawk with a nuke on it that rolled off the deck of a carrier intact as result of a handling mishap in the Sea Of Japan in the early 70s. They were unable to recover the nuke and the a/c because the water was too deep so they left the a/c down there nuke and all. Just about 5 or 6 years ago they recovered some nukes from a crashed B-52 bomber off the coast of Spain that went down back in the 60s! Just makes me wonder what would happen if some rich madman salvages of one these and decides to hold the planet hostage. Then we`d have to call in James Bond. Edited by Vibrationbaby - April 16 2009 at 16:01 |
||
![]() |
||
tszirmay ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 17 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 6673 |
![]() |
|
Good ole Bond to save the world, again........
![]() |
||
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
|
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
Vibrationbaby, thats terrifying.
Not the sort of thing you hear on mainstream primetime news. Funny how we alwsys said it was nukes from the former USSR that could fall into the hands of terrorists, when it could just as well be nukes lying in the sea off the coast of some European country, courtesy of our good selves. |
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
There was another story I heard about a B-52 carrying nukes that accidentally flew into Russian airspace back in the 80s ( I was in Australia ) during a SAC exercise and it was a Russian air force general who realised that it was an error because they were monitoring the exercise and prevented the scrambling of Russian interceptors or the firing of missiles thus potentially averting a third world war.
Funny because they used to always do it to us on almost a weekly basis and all we`d do is intercept them ( delayed intercepts ) , take pictures of them, wave to them then escort them back to their airspace and from what I understand they are up to their old tricks again with their old TU-95 Bear cold war bombers in addition to the newer nuke capable TU-160 Swan supersonic bombers which is their answer to the American B-1 Lancer. In addition to a few incidents with our own CF-18s in the Canadian arctic , the Danes and British have reported a number of interceptions over the North Sea. Must be something about this on the wonderful internet somewhere. Edited by Vibrationbaby - April 17 2009 at 11:00 |
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
It was reported on the BBC news (perhaps suprisingly) last year, that Russian aircraft had enetered British airspace, and that the Russians were routinely carrying out this kind of exercises. I thought that was quite a big deal, symbolically if nothing else. I assume it still goes on, but we never hear about it now. |
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
Punch in Canada : Piss Off Russia on youtube.
|
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
^^^ Indeed and it's clear to see why Russia are hanging out in the arctic so much..
Battle for resources.. Edited by Blacksword - April 17 2009 at 13:33 |
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
Yeah, now that it`s convenient for them ( with this global thaw ) they think that they can just stroll in and make territorial claims.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
I had to go looking for this in the news. It's not been on TV, and it dissapeared off the BBC news homepage, yesterday, where it was only a minor story anyway.
NATO exercises in Georgia - 'A dangerous move' This would have been 'top of the pile' news years ago, why is the media so coy about reporting things like this now? Edited by Blacksword - April 19 2009 at 02:53 |
||
![]() |
||
Failcore ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 27 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4625 |
![]() |
|
The only way I see nukes being gotten rid of is if ballistic missile defense gets so advanced that they are rendered unusable. But then you still have the issue of suitcase bombs and the like.
|
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
^^^ A number of which have been unaccounted for since the collapse of the USSR.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Vibrationbaby ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
![]() |
|
They were selling all kinds of military hardware back in the early 90s from AK 47s to freakin`submarines. Th Columbians were using one to smuggle cocaine.
|
||
![]() |
||
Failcore ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 27 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4625 |
![]() |
|
At least if there's an apocalypse, I hope it's all cool and dramatic like Jericho.
![]() I like that show, but man that's the most unlikely group of characters to end up in a backwater Kansas town. |
||
![]() |
||
progkidjoel ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: March 02 2009 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 19643 |
![]() |
|
Nope.
|
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() |
|
nuclear weapons have become a symbol of global power and fear. even if the usa and europe eradicate nuclear weapons, other nations will seek to acquire them to show their advancement into being a global power.
|
||
![]() |
||
JJLehto ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
![]() |
|
Yup, it's pretty f*cking stupid. We had to go back and forth with the Soviets saying "oh look at me! I can wipe out the planet" "yeah? I can wipe out the planet twice" Really the Cold War was just 2 kids on a playground trying to run it. And now we all have matured....but there's the new generation of kids on the playground... |
||
![]() |
||
Blacksword ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
![]() |
|
Indeed. They are basically bargaining chips. Countries like Iran and North Korea want these weapons, because they know the US and her allies will leave them alone. |
||
![]() |
||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() |
|
it was more elaborate than that-the weapons actually kept two mostly rational nations from going to war. during the cold war, there were representational fights and small wars, but the thing keeping the usa and the ussr from launching into a huge full blown death and destrction war was the fact that neither wanted to be the one that set forth the wheels of annihilation. the problem with nuclear weapons in the hands of religious radicals such as iran or rogue nations such as north korea (they are a chinese puppet that is now refusing to listen to china) is they are more interested in wreaking havoc than in using diplomacy to avoid war. iran is without a doubt the biggest factor in the terrorism being carried out in the middle east. they would have no qualms turning over nuclear warheads to hamas or hezbollah to cause mayhem. similarly, north korea could hand over nuclear weapons to enemies of the usa, europe or even china to prove a point and to get funding.
|
||
![]() |
||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() |
|
it also is power...iran does not necessarily want us to leave them alone, they seek influence in the middle east, especially in regards to religious zealotry and to the presence of israel. north korea has a leader that is dying and probably does not give a rat's ass now who he pisses off.
|
||
![]() |
||
camilleanne ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 29 2009 Location: Philippines Status: Offline Points: 403 |
![]() |
|
I think not..It's a great weapon during wars.
|
||
The planet is fine the people are f**ked.
-George Carlin- |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |