Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Popular Prog Bands that you just can't get into
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPopular Prog Bands that you just can't get into

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 33>
Author
Message
manofmystery View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 10:30
- Genesis
- The Beatles
- The Decemberists
- Brian Eno (any ambient really)
- Magma (the few albums I have heard aren't that special)
- Kansas (too poppy)
- almost every popular band from the last 20 or so years
- Prog Metal (truely awful genre)


Time always wins.
Back to Top
Isa View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 13:12
There are VERY FEW prog bands I've found who's discography I find overall to be uninteresting or dislikable. These are those very few:

Pain of Salvation. I can't stand them. At all. AngryCry
Sieges Even. Just not for me.
Psychotic Waltz, though I can put up with hearing it for quite a while. I've just never gotten into them for some reason. Someday maybe...
Oh and I've never been able to get into IQ either. Too repetitive for me, but I don't mind them.

That's all, actually. I don't overall dislike any other of the thousands of bands I've heard from here. Big smile
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 13:33
Harsh vocals for me are very hard to get into, and I've tried alot. Listening to Textures right now (they not only growl but act like they are vomitting while they do it), but the excellent Between the Buried and Me is similar. It's just unpleasant and really doesn't do anything for me musically.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
American Khatru View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 14:22
Originally posted by Isa Isa wrote:

There are VERY FEW prog bands I've found who's discography I find overall to be uninteresting or dislikable. These are those very few:

Pain of Salvation. I can't stand them. At all. AngryCry
Sieges Even. Just not for me.
Psychotic Waltz, though I can put up with hearing it for quite a while. I've just never gotten into them for some reason. Someday maybe...
Oh and I've never been able to get into IQ either. Too repetitive for me, but I don't mind them.

That's all, actually. I don't overall dislike any other of the thousands of bands I've heard from here. Big smile
 
Now there's a nice fellow!Approve  I wish I were so thoroughly tolerant.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 14:26
Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

- Genesis
- The Beatles
- The Decemberists
- Brian Eno (any ambient really)
- Magma (the few albums I have heard aren't that special)
- Kansas (too poppy)
- almost every popular band from the last 20 or so years
- Prog Metal (truely awful genre)

Brian Eno did not only make ambient albums; I highly recommend "Another Green World".
And to say that Magma is not special - man, a whole genre was named after the music they invented.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 14:29
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by manofmystery manofmystery wrote:

- Genesis
- The Beatles
- The Decemberists
- Brian Eno (any ambient really)
- Magma (the few albums I have heard aren't that special)
- Kansas (too poppy)
- almost every popular band from the last 20 or so years
- Prog Metal (truely awful genre)

Brian Eno did not only make ambient albums; I highly recommend "Another Green World".
And to say that Magma is not special - man, a whole genre was named after the music they invented.


A sub-genre (of prog)
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 14:45
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:



Originally posted by listen listen wrote:


Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:


Rush. I never understood all the fuss about them.* Good musicians, though not as exceptional as their fans try to make them, but the music is nothing special at all.

for you, that is.
It is probably special for many people from the North American continent, simply because the first prog band they ever come in contact with is Rush, and first loves are always special. But that's not the way it happened with me. (....) The first time I heard Rush was years later, and while I acknowledged their advanced musicianship I did not see anything special in them at all, not after all the things I had already heard.That is how I grew up. I fully understand that for people who first came in contact with prog through Rush they must mean a lot more to them; it just is not the case with me.


Same here. I started listening to prog in 1975 but I never met anyone who listened to Rush. I only noticed how popular they were when I "landed" on Progarchives. But if I had discovered them back in the seventies, would I still be fond of them now? Perhaps. After all I still enjoy about half of the tracks on WHITE ROCK, NO EARTHLY CONNECTION and THE MYTHS OF LEGENDS OF KING ARTHUR AND THE BLOODY KNIGHTS OF THE ROUND TABLE. (Well, at least RW has a sense of humour!)

But what an avalanche of venom you got, Baldfriede (and sorry, I'm aware that must be one of the worst mixed metaphors ever), when you indicated Rush was not for you. After a fierce outburst of anger, one chap even had the cheek to exclaim "Don't patronise me!" Well, if I look at some of my favourite bands, I don't give a toss if other people can't get into them. After all, neither my wife, nor my daughters, nor my best friends like them.

One more band I just can't get into? Okay, I'll admit it. MAGMA.
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2009 at 14:53
Originally posted by SgtPepper67 SgtPepper67 wrote:

Frank Zappa, I like the album One size fits all and some of The grand wazoo, but besides that I just don't get most of his stuff, and his awfull singing doesn't help at all.


Hey sarge, have you tried ROXY AND ELSEWHERE? Or ZAPPA IN NEW YORK? I'm just asking 'cause together with the albums you mention these are my Zappa favourites. The others come a looong way behind. So perhaps you'll like my suggestions too?
Back to Top
GaryB View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 12:02
As I follow this thread I keep asking myself WHY?
Why don't I like this album or that album? The obvious answer is that there's a lot of music out there and some of it is just not going to appeal to you. But what about when it SHOULD appeal to you but doesn't?
Here's an example. I like a lot of Italian prog but I have three Italian albums that I just can't get into.  They are:
Il Balletto Di Bronzo - YS
Corte dei Miracoli - s/t
Uno - s/t
Now, each of these albums received decent reviews here on the site and are considered by some RPI fans to have been important to the Italian prog movement. Also, I have albums that I like by other bands that include some of the musicians on these three LPs. But, why not these three?
All of the ingredients I like are there, but I can't get into the music.
So, is it composition or arrangements or what?
Back to Top
mr.cub View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 14:29
Radiohead

Back to Top
Matthew T View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 01 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5291
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 15:59
Originally posted by mr.cub mr.cub wrote:

Radiohead
LOLEverybody here says that.Wink
Matt

Back to Top
American Khatru View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 16:04
Originally posted by Matthew T Matthew T wrote:

Originally posted by mr.cub mr.cub wrote:

Radiohead
LOLEverybody here says that.Wink
 
LOLLOLLOL
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 16:14
Okay (applies breathing apparatus and dives into the deep dark pool):
 
Magma
Dream Theater
Porcupine Tree
Soft Machine
Flower Kings
Marillion
Post-Gabriel Genesis (OK I admit it, this one's from pure anger out of respect to what went before)
Metallica
Yes after CTTE
KC after Starless
 
Disclaimer: No hatred for bands or fans of said bands: these are all bands that leave me cold 'cos I couldn't get into them - and in each case I've heard enough of them to form that opinion.
 
Re Rush (most folks seem to have an opinionSmile): I'm not a massive fanboy or anything even close to it, but IMO they're easy to get into and I don't really understand what there is to dislike about them.
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
hitting_singularity2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 14 2009
Location: ON, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 127
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 19:04
you can't seriously think metallica is prog ?!?!?

as to the Rush comments, I don't like them as much for their prog elements (except on natural science and 2112) so much as their  rockoutableness and because it's so easy to really just move with the music in a sense.. I find a lot of psychedelic bands I can't get into like that, and that is often how I like my music. (Yes, DT and Rush are probably the bands I really can rock out with the most) oh and sum 41 but they aren't prog


Edited by hitting_singularity2 - June 17 2009 at 19:05
Back to Top
The Acolyte View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2007
Location: Colombia
Status: Offline
Points: 85
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 19:16
For me, it's Magma and ELP, i listen to that bands and really don't get it.Embarrassed
"…but would I leave you in this moment of your trial?"
Back to Top
Captain Capricorn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 21 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1085
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 19:37
I'm not shocked at the amount of proggers who can't seem to access the celestial styling that is Magma ...they're arguably the most esoteric band on the planet. If you don't get it on first listen, you'll probably never get it Wink
 
...not that there's anything wrong with that Tongue
 
 


Edited by Captain Capricorn - June 17 2009 at 19:44
Back to Top
American Khatru View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 20:41
Originally posted by Captain Capricorn Captain Capricorn wrote:

I'm not shocked at the amount of proggers who can't seem to access the celestial styling that is Magma ...they're arguably the most esoteric band on the planet. If you don't get it on first listen, you'll probably never get it Wink
 
...not that there's anything wrong with that Tongue
 


I remember reading a thread somewhere; a poster was saying to someone that you have to hear their first album first.  I completely agree - if someone offers to show you any album but Kobaļa as a first exposure just say no thanks and step slowly away.  If you're reading this thread and haven't heard Magma, start with Kobaļa.  Maybe you still won't 'get it', but at least you will have given it a fair shot. 

Me likey.Big smile
Back to Top
Gooner View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 14 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2009 at 21:00
I just can't get into The Flower Kings.  Also, have tried Spock's Beard several times and they grew on me a bit...but still not blown away.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 18 2009 at 04:55
Originally posted by hitting_singularity2 hitting_singularity2 wrote:

you can't seriously think metallica is prog ?!?!?

as to the Rush comments, I don't like them as much for their prog elements (except on natural science and 2112) so much as their  rockoutableness and because it's so easy to really just move with the music in a sense.. I find a lot of psychedelic bands I can't get into like that, and that is often how I like my music. (Yes, DT and Rush are probably the bands I really can rock out with the most) oh and sum 41 but they aren't prog

Ever heard High Tide? Now if there is a band I can rock out with, it is them..


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 18 2009 at 05:40
Originally posted by hitting_singularity2 hitting_singularity2 wrote:

you can't seriously think metallica is prog ?!?!?

as to the Rush comments, I don't like them as much for their prog elements (except on natural science and 2112) so much as their  rockoutableness and because it's so easy to really just move with the music in a sense.. I find a lot of psychedelic bands I can't get into like that, and that is often how I like my music. (Yes, DT and Rush are probably the bands I really can rock out with the most) oh and sum 41 but they aren't prog
 
No I don't, but some previous posters have mentioned them so i thought I'd go with the flow. They're often cited on the forums in one context or another and they do nothing for me at all so I thought I'd list them anywayStern Smile
 
I know what you mean, I just find them a bit 'take it or leave it' - if I want to rock out I'd choose different bands to you (hard rock more than prog), but that's what it's all about I guessSmile
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 33>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.182 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.