Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Political Figures: Most shocking Orwell fact?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPolitical Figures: Most shocking Orwell fact?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: what suprises you the most about Orwell?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [27.27%]
6 [54.55%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [18.18%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
RoyFairbank View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Political Figures: Most shocking Orwell fact?
    Posted: May 18 2009 at 15:40
Orwell is one of the most discussed authors in the world today, even more than a half-century after he died. However, his life was contradictory, as we can see! Which of these is the most shocking?

---------------------------------------

[These footnotes are NOT substitutes for consulting a good biography or encylopedia I do NOT claim them as a substitute for those]

*Lev Davidovich Trotsky led the Russian Revolution and the Russian Civil War. After the death of Lenin, he was exiled and later assassinated by Stalin. Orwell was possibly sympathetic with Trotsky because of his time in the POUM milita in Spain which had loose ties with Trotsky. Unlike Orwell, Trotsky rejected Burnham's (below) analysis of the Soviet Union as an emerging new class society and called it a "degenerated workers state" based on backwardness and outside pressures. Trotsky said without a "political revolution" the state would be sold out to or would be crushed by the capitalist nations. Orwell, heavily influenced by Burnham, believed the Capitalist countries would fall after the war and immediately be taken over by a new class of managers who would perfect exploitation. Orwell believed that Capitalism was doomed and socialism was impossible. So his book 1984 and the end of Animal Farm is about a historical impasse. Despite these critical differences, Orwell makes secondary protagonists out of Trotsky in Animal Farm and 1984. In both it appears that the Trotsky character is defeated.

**1984 and *the end of* animal farm portray what Burnham calls Bureaucratic Collectivism (Oligarchical Collectivism in 1984) which has defeated Socialism and has moved beyond the level of the Soviet bureaucracy which helped prevent the Spanish Revolution Orwell devoted himself to (for instance, there is a key passage in 1984 which states that the Nazis and the Stalinists came close in method but were not equivilent to "Ingsoc"). This new class is a new "managerial" class as portrayed in a book Orwell was fascinated with, the Managerial Revolution by James Burnham. Burnham was a Trotskyist until 1940 and by the 60s was a major conservative figure who was awarded a medal by Ronald Reagen. Orwell also was heading in this direction with his turning in of communist sympathizers, but he died in the 40s.

For more information please review Wikipedia, 1984 and the Managerial Revolution by James Burnham.


Edited by RoyFairbank - May 18 2009 at 21:05
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2009 at 15:45
Animal Farm emulates the USA in a way. The idea that all men are created equal. Yet if you observe, some are more equal than others. Particularly those with money.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 04:06
Revolutionary in Spain?!

That takes my cake.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 04:26
I find none of that shocking. What's so bad about communism, at least from a pre 1950s point of view? Today we know that it has failed, it's a flawed concept because it depends on the leaders of the society not taking advantage of their power.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 07:58
Well, I hadn't heard the bit about the communist sympathizers.  I think 1984 is one of the most important books of the 20th century.  But why did the Bush administration have to go an use it as a guide of how to do things? LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 08:43
I am not shocked either, especially not the Trotski part.Trotski was opposed to Stalinism, which is why he "got an icepick", as the Stranglers nicely put it.
"Animal Farm" actually portraits the situation in Russia from before the revolution (when Farmer Jones alias the Zar still ruled), early stage of the revolution, with Snowball alias Trotsky being one of the theorists of the movement, and after the revolution's failure, with Napoleon as Stalin.
Believing in communism was not unusual at all among intellectuals of that time, as it wasn't unusual in the 60s and 70s. I always saw the flaw of t, that it works only in a society with perfect human beings; the theory ignores the greed factor. Corruption starts with harmless things like "I can get you a cheaper lawn mower" (and who would not agree to that if a friend offered it to you)? Corruption is ubiquitous in ANY society; it is part of the human nature to be egotistical. You may find rare exceptions who are true altruists, but whatever their aim is, it is sure to fail unless there are more of them around.


Edited by BaldFriede - June 06 2009 at 08:44


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 08 2009 at 11:33
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Animal Farm emulates the USA in a way. The idea that all men are created equal. Yet if you observe, some are more equal than others. Particularly those with money.


And those born into the right families.
Back to Top
zappaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 08 2009 at 19:37
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Well, I hadn't heard the bit about the communist sympathizers.  I think 1984 is one of the most important books of the 20th century.  But why did the Bush administration have to go an use it as a guide of how to do things? LOL
 
I always love how the right wing in America claims - insists, even - that 1984 is a polemic against socialism.  DUH!  Orwell WAS a socialist!
 
/my favorite book
 
 
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 08 2009 at 19:45
Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:

Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Animal Farm emulates the USA in a way. The idea that all men are created equal. Yet if you observe, some are more equal than others. Particularly those with money.


And those born into the right families.


That's for sure. My old roommate was one of those. We had some....fairly intense debates. Of course I always won because he was never able to prove how his economics dosn't just benefit those who have money already.
I digress

My vote went with turning in the list of Communists.
But maybe this shouldn't be a surprise. Socialists & Communists used to hate each other.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 08 2009 at 21:33
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:



My vote went with turning in the list of Communists.
But maybe this shouldn't be a surprise. Socialists & Communists used to hate each other.

What's really funny is when conservatives confuse the two.  I don't know if that is borne from ignorance or a deliberate attempt to deceive.

Now, how many fingers am I holding up? Thumbs Down


Edited by Slartibartfast - June 08 2009 at 21:34
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
TheCaptain View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2009 at 17:30
Most shocking Orwell face? He's a psychic.


"More than 2,000 10 and 11-year-olds will see a short film, which urges them to tell the police, their parents or a teacher if they hear anyone expressing extremist views. "

Full article here:
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/blackburn/4425941.East_Lancashire_youngsters_see_film_on_terrorism_danger/
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
Back to Top
Syzygy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7003
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2009 at 17:49
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

I am not shocked either, especially not the Trotski part.Trotski was opposed to Stalinism, which is why he "got an icepick", as the Stranglers nicely put it.
"Animal Farm" actually portraits the situation in Russia from before the revolution (when Farmer Jones alias the Zar still ruled), early stage of the revolution, with Snowball alias Trotsky being one of the theorists of the movement, and after the revolution's failure, with Napoleon as Stalin.

 
And as a footnote to that, 1984 was originally titled 1948; Orwell was writing a satire based partly on post war Britain as it was and partly on how he saw it developing.
 
Anyway, enough about dead left wing intellectuals - how about sticking it to some living imperialist lackey running dogs? 
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'

Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom


Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2009 at 17:53
Originally posted by TheCaptain TheCaptain wrote:

Most shocking Orwell face? He's a psychic.


"More than 2,000 10 and 11-year-olds will see a short film, which urges them to tell the police, their parents or a teacher if they hear anyone expressing extremist views. "

Full article here:
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/blackburn/4425941.East_Lancashire_youngsters_see_film_on_terrorism_danger/

I think it's great that they teach these kind of things at school. When I was 10 years old it didn't even cross my mind that anyone around me could be a terrorist. If a terrorist had attacked me on the street, I wouldn't have known what to do! Kids today can probably liquidate terrorists with their left hand while swapping Pokemon cards with the right. It's amazing how things progress! Thumbs Up
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36789
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 10 2009 at 18:27
I read a wonderful biography on Eric Arthur Blair many years ago, and have read many writings of his and I don't see any new, shocking revelations here.  What's rather shocking is that so few people seem to know who Eric Arthur Blair is in my experience.

The other thing that shocks me is that Burmese Days seems to get neglected.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.192 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.