Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Atheist - Agnostic - Non religious thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Atheist - Agnostic - Non religious thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 191>
Author
Message
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:21
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

 
There is no ONE universal truth that suits all people. 
 
That's why in any civilized country there is freedom to believe in what you want or not to believe.
 
That's why there are about 30,000 Christian denominations alone and countless religions.
 
That's why there's a separation between Church and state in most countries supported by most religions.
 
This is my last post in this thread because it seems that many don't like a debate.
 
Iván


Well there is certainly NO SUCH THING as separation of church and state in the U.S., that is a myth if I ever heard one.  The Right wing aligning itself with the religious right back in the fifties pretty much guaranteed that there would never be a separation, not to mention that the subject of Abortion is a platform utilized and twisted to pull votes (which tends to be a religious debate, even though it should be a civil debate/right).   The fact that the U.S. dollar has "in god we trust" on it, denies separation of church and state.... I could go on, but you get the drift....  Wink

I don't mind debate.  But it is one thing to argue and another to go into a thread knowing that most of the people will be opposed to you;  (I don't go into the Chritianity thread for this very reason) It's one thing to "preach to the choir" and another to do missionary work in a foreign land that may or may not be full of godless cannibals!  Tongue
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:22
Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by SergiUriah SergiUriah wrote:

Do atheists say: "Oh, my God!"?, or that exclamation set phrase is prohibited for them?

I actually avoid it and other forms of "religious swearing" as best I can. Not because I want to avoid offending religious people, or because I am still fearful of breaking the third commandment after being a christian for the first thirty+ years of my life, but simply because it has no meaning for me.


That's probably the reason why I use it so much LOL


Jesus-f**king-christ is one that I often forget to censor



LOL

I use that one too Mike, along with God-f******-Dammit, when I stub my toe or something.....you have to wonder where those combinations come from. 


Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:26
I use Jesus f**king Christ!
God-f**king-Dammit!

not so weird that these supposed slurs/sins have become part of the vernacular!
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:27
For respect to Dean I will reply his post before I leave.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Well, that's the last time I try and inject some tongue in cheek humour into this particular discussion Tongue
 
LOL Don't worry about that,
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

[hahaha! not the most appropriate choice of expletive in this instance, and certainly not one that would compell me to visit those sites Wink 
 
Anyhow, I have read several sites like them and what they state is their opinion in issolation of all other athiests. They did not canvas all athiests to obtain a consensus of opinion and no athiest has to agree to those opinions in order to be an athiest.
 
That's why i said SOME in capital letters, there are SOME atheists doing evangelism as there are SOME Christian, denominations making evangelism, seems we agree in this point also.
 
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

You are presenting all these minority sites, and this one in particular as universally accepted by all atheists. Atheists who post on this site has clear stated otherwise. The fact that I ridicule those "commandments" is a reflection of my opinion of them, nothing more nothing less. Do you seriously believe that those ten statements are tenets that all atheists support? Or could support?
 
As to Strong/Weak/Possitive/Negative atheism, I dispute them, as do others:
Originally posted by wiki, in very bad English wiki, in very bad English wrote:

The validity of this categorisation is disputed, however, and a few prominent atheists such as Richard Dawkins avoid it.
 
Not all, but some do the problem is that when people refer to christianity they have a vision of two guys knocking at your door at 6 am to sell you salvation, some do this, and it's wrong, I'm the fiorst one who has saidfthis several times. Some atheists act in similar way.
 
But as some dispute his categorization, others believe in it and there lies the problem....Or the schism LOL
 
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Not true, you would like there to be perhaps, but there is no organisation to create schism within - they are not factions, but seperate and unconnected opinions that some people have decided to categorise for their own ends. They are not clubs that you can chose to join or sides that you can chose to take, they are only opinions that you can either agree or disagree with.
 
Well Dean, I found several organizations with dfferent perspectives, some even not compatible, so it's reasonable to believe there's some sort of schism.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So if I have no belief system I am not allowed to call myself an atheist? Okay, I am not an atheist, I just don't have a religion or belief system that requires a supernatural figure head.
 
Again you are changing my words, i say there's a common dogma in atheism, and it's "There's no God" if you don't accept that dogma (And for that reason believe in some divinity), then you can't be an atheist by definition.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Love is a human characteristic, as is compassion, the use of "jealous" in the scriptures was not to denote "envy", but to show "love" - a god that loves his people so much that he would be jealous if they worshipped any gods as well as him. That is not the same as being envious of the other gods. As I said - it was written to dissuade the Israelites from turning to the polytheistic ways of their neighbours.
 
Then we agree, this are the beliefs or the interests of the Israelites that were added to the Old testament as if it was the word of God.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

But that is beside the point, you have agreed with the point that began this particular branch of discussion, which was to demonstrate that christians know that other gods do not exist without having to prove belief that they do not exist: " of other Gods that don't exist"
 
Of course we have dogmas, that's a characteristic of a religion.
 
Originally posted by dean dean wrote:

The phrase "I am a jealous god, worship no other god but me", which is the specific phrase that I stated that caused you to question the use of the word "jealous" I made no mention of Abraham in connection with that word and specifically said it was used during the exile of the Israelites in Egypt.
 
I believe the jealous quotation came after, but doesn't matter we were talking about different quotes.
 
That's all for me in his thread
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 06 2009 at 22:30
            
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:28
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnation

Wiki, proving more helpful than the Bible since 2001.
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:29
Finnforest, what is the origin and context of your Sagan quote at the bottom of your posts?  Is it relevant to this topic?  I think so, but want to know more about it!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:29
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

Jedi is a religion these days.




I find it funny that the atheists opened this discussion as a topic to chat and the religious folk have crusaded our asses and turned it into a huge debate. You guys are silly with your opinions which you hold as fact - at least we don't go door to door saying, "hi, have you found faith in life and no longer have need for an idol which to fear and give thanks to? Let me tell you about Atheism."


Well, Jedi IS a religion to some people. In fact, according to the 2001 census Jedi is the 4th largest religion in England and Wales!




That's nuts. LOL



yep.  But it also serves the argument that any religion can be nuts.  The majority of them can be based on good intentions, it is when these good intentions begin to poison the majority of secular life that they become absurd and out of control.  There is no ONE universal truth that suits all people.  That is the danger of these beliefs.... and the nature of beliefs is that they are personal (or at least should be), and yet people make money and ruin lives over these beliefs!!!!  Hello?  Am I the only one that sees the corruption here?  (But you could argue that humans, by their very nature; especially in a post-modern capitalistic society, are corrupt.)


You're not the only one; I agree with that.
Before this gets distorted beyond recognition - this was not a serious campaign to start a new religion - it was a direct protest towards the 2001 census in the UK concerning the Religion question on the census. This rapidly escalated into a huge practical joke where people were urged to put "Jedi" on the form to either show their love for Star Wars, or just to annoy people.
What?
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:34
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

For respect to Dean I will reply his post before I leave.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Well, that's the last time I try and inject some tongue in cheek humour into this particular discussion Tongue
 
LOL Don't worry about that,
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

[hahaha! not the most appropriate choice of expletive in this instance, and certainly not one that would compell me to visit those sites Wink 
 
Anyhow, I have read several sites like them and what they state is their opinion in issolation of all other athiests. They did not canvas all athiests to obtain a consensus of opinion and no athiest has to agree to those opinions in order to be an athiest.
 
That's why i said SOME in capital letters, there are SOME atheists doing evangelism as there are SOME Christian, denominations making evangelism, seems we agree in this point also.
 
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

You are presenting all these minority sites, and this one in particular as universally accepted by all atheists. Atheists who post on this site has clear stated otherwise. The fact that I ridicule those "commandments" is a reflection of my opinion of them, nothing more nothing less. Do you seriously believe that those ten statements are tenets that all atheists support? Or could support?
 
As to Strong/Weak/Possitive/Negative atheism, I dispute them, as do others:
Originally posted by wiki, in very bad English wiki, in very bad English wrote:

The validity of this categorisation is disputed, however, and a few prominent atheists such as Richard Dawkins avoid it.
 
Not all, but some do the problem is that when people refer to christianity they have a vision of two guys knocking at your door at 6 am to sell you salvation, some do this, and it's wrong, I'm the fiorst one who has saidfthis several times. Some atheists act in similar way.
 
But as some dispute his categorization, others believe in it and there lies the problem....Or the schism LOL
 
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Not true, you would like there to be perhaps, but there is no organisation to create schism within - they are not factions, but seperate and unconnected opinions that some people have decided to categorise for their own ends. They are not clubs that you can chose to join or sides that you can chose to take, they are only opinions that you can either agree or disagree with.
 
Well Dean, I found several organizations with dfferent perspectives, some even not compatible, so it's reasonable to believe there's some sort of schism.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So if I have no belief system I am not allowed to call myself an atheist? Okay, I am not an atheist, I just don't have a religion or belief system that requires a supernatural figure head.
 
Again you are changing my words, i say there's a common dogma in atheism, and it's "There's no God" if you don't accept that dogma (And for that reason believe in some divinity), then you can't be an atheist by definition.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Love is a human characteristic, as is compassion, the use of "jealous" in the scriptures was not to denote "envy", but to show "love" - a god that loves his people so much that he would be jealous if they worshipped any gods as well as him. That is not the same as being envious of the other gods. As I said - it was written to dissuade the Israelites from turning to the polytheistic ways of their neighbours.
 
Then we agree, this are the beliefs or the interests of the Israelites that were added to the Old testament as if it was the word of God.
 
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

But that is beside the point, you have agreed with the point that began this particular branch of discussion, which was to demonstrate that christians know that other gods do not exist without having to prove belief that they do not exist: " of other Gods that don't exist"
 
Of course we have dogmas, that's a characteristic of a religion.
 
Originally posted by dean dean wrote:

The phrase "I am a jealous god, worship no other god but me", which is the specific phrase that I stated that caused you to question the use of the word "jealous" I made no mention of Abraham in connection with that word and specifically said it was used during the exile of the Israelites in Egypt.
 
I believe the jealous quotation came after, but doesn't matter we were talking about different quotes.
 
That's all for me in his thread
 
Iván



so are you hanging your head in defeat, because Dean is the only one worthy of your respect?  Shouldn't respect just be a mutual thing to begin with, or do you only answer to those whom have matched your intellectual stature?  Just curious, because that is how it seems.  I would think you would take a hint from good old Daniel in the lion's den and speak to all of us without fear, yet with respect (and certainly without the apparent reproach).  Tongue
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:36
Seriously people, I think time both sides go back to their respective posts.
This has gotten out of hand. Discussion is great but this has turned nasty.
People from ALL sides are saying pretty disrespectful things now.


Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:38
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Seriously people, I think time both sides go back to their respective posts.
This has gotten out of hand. Discussion is great but this has turned nasty.
People from ALL sides are saying pretty disrespectful things now.




Agreed. Let's just have this thread return back to what it's supposed to be.
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:40
how'd it get outta hand?  Doesn't any/every thread get outta hand where passion is involved?  That is the nature of online anonymity, it makes many into Gods, capable of nastiness, egotism, and no intention to back up their words with their physical manifestation.  If that post was pointed at me, I really don't think I was unfair, and was merely trying to interject, even though apparently my ideas are NOT WORTHY.... oh boy the self-affirmations I am gonna have to do in the mirror tonight are going to keep me up LATE!!!!!!    LOL
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:41
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:



so are you hanging your head in defeat, because Dean is the only one worthy of your respect?  Shouldn't respect just be a mutual thing to begin with, or do you only answer to those whom have matched your intellectual stature?  Just curious, because that is how it seems.  I would think you would take a hint from good old Daniel in the lion's den and speak to all of us without fear, yet with respect (and certainly without the apparent reproach).  Tongue
 
Please, most of the members here are asking to stop this, some like King by Tor are pretty angry. For God's sake you even implied in your last post that i shouldn't be here as you don't visit the Christian thread (With which i have no connection), And still you question why I leave?
 
I answer Dean because we have been directly debating one with the other for several pages, that's all, I'm not leaving in defeat or triumph, I'm just leaving because the memebrs who started this thread want to discuss other issues.
 
Iván
 
 
 
 
            
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:43
so back on track:

good books for Atheists who want to temper weigh their individual ideas against others'????

I personally really enjoyed Richard Dawkins "The God Delusion"
as well as the trilogy I previously mentioned, "His Dark Materials" by Philip Pullman....the first book was made into a terribly rendered movie:  The Golden Compass- but I assure you, the books are nothing short of AMAZING!
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:46
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Finnforest, what is the origin and context of your Sagan quote at the bottom of your posts?  Is it relevant to this topic?  I think so, but want to know more about it!


I don't know what book or speech that came from, but yes, it would be relevant to this thread.  Sagan was an agnostic.  And a great mind.  And an avid cannabis user.  LOL
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:46
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:



so are you hanging your head in defeat, because Dean is the only one worthy of your respect?  Shouldn't respect just be a mutual thing to begin with, or do you only answer to those whom have matched your intellectual stature?  Just curious, because that is how it seems.  I would think you would take a hint from good old Daniel in the lion's den and speak to all of us without fear, yet with respect (and certainly without the apparent reproach).  Tongue
 
Please, most of the members here are asking to stop this, some like King by Tor are pretty angry. For God's sake you even implied in your last post that i shouldn't be here as you don't visit the Christian thread (With which i have no connection), And still you question why I leave?
 
I answer Dean because we have been directly debating one with the other for several pages, that's all, I'm not leaving in defeat or triumph, I'm just leaving because the memebrs who started this thread want to discuss other issues.
 
Iván
 
 
 
 



okay dude.  Most of my posts have been rather jocular, but apparently that gets lost online.  No offense intended.  I was just trying to ascertain your intent... that's all.  Carry on!  I didn't know you were not part of the christian thread...I was not trying to assume, merely making an example of why posting in some threads with a certain intent may not be a good idea..... I bet some even hate what I have said... It's not my intent to be a jerk.  I just come off as sassy sometimes.... Shocked
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:48
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Finnforest, what is the origin and context of your Sagan quote at the bottom of your posts?  Is it relevant to this topic?  I think so, but want to know more about it!


I don't know what book or speech that came from, but yes, it would be relevant to this thread.  Sagan was an agnostic.  And a great mind.  And an avid cannabis user.  LOL


cool.  back on track!  what of his would you recommend reading/seeing/listening to?
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:49
at least the religious members have not tried to push religion itself in this thread, and wouldn't things get a little dull without debate?  I mean a bunch of frustrated non-believers like us saying "yeah I agree, there's no God" ..sounds like a blast Sleepy     I was interested, though, to hear what Windhawk had to say about the apparent rise of organized Atheism in his country, which would tend to lend credit to what Ivan suggests about how some see it, and where it might be heading in the future as the Catholic church continues to slowly lose power.  A religious Atheism would be a contradiction to at least half its community, if the posts in this thread are any indication.





Back to Top
SergiUriah View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2009
Location: I don´t know
Status: Offline
Points: 453
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:56
I have read 4 or 5 pages in this discussion, and in the same way I´ve never understood the church doctrines (well, if I ignore their hungry for power, money and for having the population quieten down for their own benefit...over the course of the history), I see atheists haven´t got a true strong reason to base on their ideas. Even they don´t know why are atheists in so many cases. Many people consider non-believers theirselves just to go against church doctrines...and they are wrong.
 
I am against church because of their hypocrysy (and so many other things...)but I have my beliefs. I think is very very logical that God exists. Well, it´s obvious actually.
 


Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:56
Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Originally posted by avalanchemaster avalanchemaster wrote:

Finnforest, what is the origin and context of your Sagan quote at the bottom of your posts?  Is it relevant to this topic?  I think so, but want to know more about it!


I don't know what book or speech that came from, but yes, it would be relevant to this thread.  Sagan was an agnostic.  And a great mind.  And an avid cannabis user.  LOL


cool.  back on track!  what of his would you recommend reading/seeing/listening to?


I'm not sure about books, its been so long since I've read stuff like that.  But I can heartily recommend his TV series Cosmos if you haven't seen it.  Wonderfully entertaining and informative.  A bit dated now in terms of the look, but still inspiring. 
Back to Top
avalanchemaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 06 2009 at 22:56
the debate was insightful.  and much needed.  I was not personally trying to scare that away.  We can all come away better for learning from each other.....
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 191>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.273 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.