Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 21:47 |
James wrote:
A God cannot possibly have always been there though. This is the point.
|
Still where does anything come from? Isn't the existence of a god the only rational possibility?
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 04 2009 at 21:47
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 21:48 |
I don't see how "I had a bad experience with religion" proves religion wrong. That's just as good as "I had a good experience with religion, so it's true."
I don't wish to stir anything up (thank you for those who popped into my Christian thread or stayed out if you felt you had to). If I am, feel free to boot me. I don't wish to cause any problems. My wife and I were actually moved by Dean's initial post- mainly because I wanted to scream, "Yeah, but those people were dicks!"
|
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 21:50 |
KoS wrote:
^ See it all works out
Back to topic, I have found this to be very informative,
|
Honestly I find Dawkins and Co. arrogant, with a self superiority feeling that they own the truth and are allowed to decide what we must think and believe in.
I believe in God but I don't find offensive that anybody doesn't believe, but this guys say they find our beliefs offensive, is their disbelief so weak that they are afraid of us?.
For the same reasons I dislike fundamentalists who want us to believe their truth, I dislike the guys who feel so superior to call our deep beliefs a superstition just because they don't share it.
They are doing the same evangelism of their disbelief that fundamentalists do of their beliefs and still they claim to be morally superior.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 04 2009 at 22:01
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 21:53 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
James wrote:
A God cannot possibly have always been there though. This is the point.
|
Still where does anything come from? Isn't the existence of a god the only rational possibility?
|
No, it's the silliest and least likely possibility. I'm serious too. It's much more feasible for particles and the like to form the Universe, than for some God to miraculously appear and be able to also create all life. Evolution has made life on earth what it is over millions of years. God (however you imagine it) would also have to form over a hell of a long time if they were able to create life. If that is the case, then it would also have formed from particles and the like. It wouldn't just appear. Also, it cannot have been there forever either.
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 22:25 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
KoS wrote:
^ See it all works out
Back to topic, I have found this to be very informative,
|
Honestly I find Dawkins and Co. arrogant, with a self superiority feeling that they own the truth and are allowed to decide what we must think and believe in.
I believe in God but I don't find offensive that anybody doesn't believe, but this guys say they find our beliefs offensive, is their disbelief so weak that they are afraid of us?.
For the same reasons I dislike fundamentalists who want us to believe their truth, I dislike the guys who feel so superior to call our deep beliefs a superstition just because they don't share it.
They are doing the same evangelism of their disbelief that fundamentalists do of their beliefs and still they claim to be morally superior.
Iván
|
I think they are arrogant if they are because the empirical evidence is usually on their side, contrary to the stance of apologists, or worse, peddlers of Creationism and fundamentalists.
And when society is still being bombarded with people who love bathing in ignorance as if blind faith is a good thing, I can hardly blame them. Arrogant, perhaps, but they often have the evidence to back it up.
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 22:35 |
Epignosis wrote:
I don't see how "I had a bad experience with religion" proves religion wrong. That's just as good as "I had a good experience with religion, so it's true."
I don't wish to stir anything up (thank you for those who popped into my Christian thread or stayed out if you felt you had to). If I am, feel free to boot me. I don't wish to cause any problems. My wife and I were actually moved by Dean's initial post- mainly because I wanted to scream, "Yeah, but those people were dicks!"
|
Agreed. I hate that as well. I didn't turn away from religion because of one thing but just slowly over time. Though there were a few specific incidents that helped, but that was just with my family not anything about the whole Catholic Church.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 04 2009 at 22:50 |
stonebeard wrote:
I think they are arrogant if they are because the empirical evidence is usually on their side, contrary to the stance of apologists, or worse, peddlers of Creationism and fundamentalists.
And when society is still being bombarded with people who love bathing in ignorance as if blind faith is a good thing, I can hardly blame them. Arrogant, perhaps, but they often have the evidence to back it up. |
Evidence?
Where is the evidence that proves beyond any doubt that God doesn't exist?
Iván
|
|
|
Plankowner
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 09 2008
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 4006
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 01:15 |
Iván and Robert, please don't take offense but I really don't think you guys should be part of this thread. From what I gather you both are very devout christians and personally I feel there's nothing that can be said by an atheist that could change your mind. So anything you post will be argumentative. Your mind has been made up and you have "faith." You have a very nice thread with very few interruptions, so personally I'd like to see the same here.
It's rather difficult to talk about atheism as it is, because of the pressure of society and its history. And I feel I understand the need to reach out to those you feel have lost their way and bring them back if you can. It has been taught to you since childhood.
If you truly respect what others believe then you won't post here.
|
|
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 01:39 |
Plankowner wrote:
Iván and Robert, please don't take offense but I really don't think you guys should be part of this thread. From what I gather you both are very devout christians and personally I feel there's nothing that can be said by an atheist that could change your mind. So anything you post will be argumentative. Your mind has been made up and you have "faith." You have a very nice thread with very few interruptions, so personally I'd like to see the same here.
It's rather difficult to talk about atheism as it is, because of the pressure of society and its history. And I feel I understand the need to reach out to those you feel have lost their way and bring them back if you can. It has been taught to you since childhood.
If you truly respect what others believe then you won't post here. |
I applaud this post. Has anyone heard of Bart Ehrman?
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 01:39 |
Plankowner wrote:
Iván and Robert, please don't take offense but I really don't think you guys should be part of this thread. From what I gather you both are very devout christians and personally I feel there's nothing that can be said by an atheist that could change your mind. So anything you post will be argumentative. Your mind has been made up and you have "faith." You have a very nice thread with very few interruptions, so personally I'd like to see the same here. |
What? Have you opened this forum to convince people?
I'm not part of any thread much less of any thread trying to convince people of anything.
But this forum is open, I see in the Christian thread many people questioning Epignosis, so any member is free to post in the Christian or any thread I feel the same in this case.
Atheists feel free to enter to any theological thread and say what they want, why can't we?
Plankowner wrote:
It's rather difficult to talk about atheism as it is, because of the pressure of society and its history. A |
That's FALSE, in this forum the majority is Atheist or Agnostic, and everybody is free to say what they want.
Plankowner wrote:
And I feel I understand the need to reach out to those you feel have lost their way and bring them back if you can. It has been taught to you since childhood. |
I been here since the forum started and everybody knows I never tried to convince any person of anything, never diid it and never will, as a fact I ALWAYS take the position against evangelism outside a church, even if it carries disagreements with Christians or whoever.
Plankowner wrote:
If you truly respect what others believe then you won't post here. |
Respect and disagreement are different, as long as people feel free to enter to any thread and give their opinion, I will feel free to enter to any thread.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - June 05 2009 at 01:58
|
|
|
Failcore
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 4625
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 01:41 |
For the love a lack of God, keep it clean guys!
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65261
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 01:46 |
I see your point Dave but I don't know if it feels right-- it's true most non-Christians have stayed out of or been respectful when posting in the Christian thread, but conversely the Christian threaders have always been welcoming of non-religious members too as far as I know. Besides I don't think this site encourages [or even allows] exclusivity in threads, and considering the spirit of the President's speech today, perhaps we should welcome anyone here as long as they don't attack members.
|
|
Plankowner
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 09 2008
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 4006
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 02:14 |
Well I kind of wanted to talk about things without spiraling down the usual christian debates... is all.
Guess I can ignore certain posts.
Who's Bart Ehrman?
Since I don't watch TV I missed the President's speech, should find it and listen. Anything he said you feel like sharing?
Edited by Plankowner - June 05 2009 at 02:22
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65261
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 02:19 |
yeah I understand, me either
|
|
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 02:42 |
Ehrman has written many books dealing with the Christian faith. I am currently reading his book "God's Problem" which is about how the bible fails to offer a truly adequate answer to the problem of suffering.
He is an agnostic who has been studying the bible for years. I think he has multiple degrees in testament study, and writes very well in an intellectual, yet terse manner. Not to mention, he raises some superb points.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 04:07 |
Epignosis wrote:
I don't see how "I had a bad experience with religion" proves religion wrong. That's just as good as "I had a good experience with religion, so it's true."
I don't wish to stir anything up (thank you for those who popped into my Christian thread or stayed out if you felt you had to). If I am, feel free to boot me. I don't wish to cause any problems. My wife and I were actually moved by Dean's initial post- mainly because I wanted to scream, "Yeah, but those people were dicks!"
|
Yes and no. Those people were not dicks, they were intently serious earnest people - the church they were a part of was similarly set up for all the right reasons and never went "off-message" like so many of the brainwash cults did. As I said more than once, it was not an epiphany, nor was it a bad experience. I just did not see myself fitting in to their rules-set (I could have returned to my old church and still kept my record collection ) - I wanted my religion to complement my life, not rule it, I wanted to question and discuss without receiving scripted answers or being fobbed off with "god made it so". My issue was not with them specifically, but with the whole Charismatic Movement which had swung to the opposite extreme of High Church and had effectively become just as constrained and restrictive, may be even more so. I also grew to realise that perhaps much of it was self-perpetuating and in some cases even a pretence in order to belong. I remained a christian for almost twenty years after that, but never again as a member of any organised religion. My personal view now is that man created god in his image, that the scriptures are the word of man and the holy trinity (something that occurs in several non-Abrahamic religions as well) is a projection of man trying to explain consciousness and free will as separate from, but a still part of, the corporeal body.
Edited by Dean - June 05 2009 at 04:11
|
What?
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 04:38 |
|
What?
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 04:42 |
Why do we have to have a talk about religion in a specific non religous thread? Go back to your own thread!!!
|
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 04:47 |
Now that's the best explanation I've seen in a long time......still if a God exists, it is as a lonesome and powerless or disinterested energy and I believe his/her dervish dance spiralled out of control a long time ago. The repeated lack of divine interventions within a universal collective consciousness proves it. " My God my mediator, may you flourish in your solitude....."
Edited by Chris S - June 05 2009 at 04:47
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: June 05 2009 at 15:19 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
I think they are arrogant if they are because the empirical evidence is usually on their side, contrary to the stance of apologists, or worse, peddlers of Creationism and fundamentalists.
And when society is still being bombarded with people who love bathing in ignorance as if blind faith is a good thing, I can hardly blame them. Arrogant, perhaps, but they often have the evidence to back it up. |
Evidence?
Where is the evidence that proves beyond any doubt that God doesn't exist?
Iván |
Nowhere, of course. You'll never get beyond any doubt, likely. In my view, rational holes in religious texts and silly twisting of religious dogma is more important to counter than belief in God, even though I think there is enough evidence to make believing in a theist God less reasonable than not doing so. I doubt any of those guys would really care if someone is deist, agnostic, apathetic, atheist and so on because those types of belief are really inconsequential when you get down to it. Only an interventionist God matters in terms of practical, day-to-day beliefs. I mean this in the sense that the belif would counter scientific and rational outlooks, as an supernatural, interventionist God would be beyond the scope of science, I think, though I don't believe that. This riles a lot of those people.
|
|
|