Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: June 08 2009 at 00:58 |
I think Rock Island is fine considering how much material they'd done by then, certainly beats Under Wraps and was a solid followup to Crest
|
|
Bufo
Forum Groupie
Joined: June 07 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: June 08 2009 at 00:54 |
Hopeless devotion? No. Hatred? Never. Not even Rock Island, which is merely disappointing. Well, very disappointing.
These days, I like when Ian writes clever songs and melodies in the limited range he can comfortably sing, especially Secret Language of Birds but also Roots to Branches. The 70s stuff was my favorite. Most of Stormwatch and Too Old To Rock 'n' Roll (just not the title track) still sound great to me.
|
|
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
|
Posted: May 23 2009 at 09:46 |
American Khatru wrote:
Ian Anderson can apparently be a real, er, doosh. |
Should that be the criterion of whether you like a band or not? I love Ted Nugent's music, but as a person...
Tull have some great albums and some that aren't so great.
|
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|
AlanOB
Forum Groupie
Joined: February 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: May 23 2009 at 08:58 |
They're incredibly hit and miss really.
Thick as a Brick and Aqualung are two stone cold five star classics, without question.
Yet albums like Passion Play and Minstrel are simply above average.
And some of the later stuff is dire.
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: May 23 2009 at 08:48 |
I really like the remasters with the bonus tracks. The A with the DVD is pretty cool, too. My latest addition is Nightcap with the Chateau. Quite pleased with that.
Edited by Slartibartfast - May 23 2009 at 08:48
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
American Khatru
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
|
Posted: May 23 2009 at 06:12 |
PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:
American Khatru wrote:
They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums. I just listened to Stand Up at work today. Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre.
If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982. Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year! (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.) Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about. You have to admit, that beez impressive. More than most bands can say. I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever.
Edit: Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969. Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started! |
Well you must include all remastered versions of each album
Even This Was has some real cool tunes, expecially the bonus tracks Love story, xmas song
I'm surprised you haven't mentioned the 90s remasters and relative outtakes
Dotcom + it all trickles down(outtake)
Roots to branches
Catfish rising remaster( with bonus track 'night in the wilderness') + silver river turning, truck stop runner(outtakes)
If you have the remasters of these 3 and you add those 3 extra outtakes, then you trim those 3 albums down to the 10 best songs (including the bonus tracks and outtakes) then you have 3 very good albums which are even better than some of the 70s albums(or even revised 70s albums using the bonus tracks)
|
Holy smokes! You seem like a respectable chappy (or lass, I don't know), so if you're saying this and that means that there's even a possibility that I could agree if I heard it all, then I am one happy Tull fan to know that there is yet more material to hear! Forgive me: though I do have cd transfers or cds bought years back (which were not then blessed with extras), my familiarity is almost all from my collection of these odd and somewhat cumbersome flat black objects which are gingerly placed on a form-fitting rotatable surface to then receive a needle to their face . In other words, bit of an old fart here I guess (ah, I don't guess). Anyway, I am grateful and eager, when I can afford it, to get me paws on these extra tracks. This music in waiting, though a small thing to some, just made life more deee-licious.
Edited by American Khatru - May 23 2009 at 06:13
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 22:33 |
I have everything from the band. Love the bonus tracks on Stormwatch and Warchild. Everyone of them are very cool. I really like the 90s Tull too
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:35 |
PROGMONSTER2008 wrote:
I was always a bit disappointed with Warchild and thought, Tull are better than this. But when I got the remaster I listened to the 7 bonus tracks and realised the band were still producing the same great music, but the original 11 songs were done for sound track purposes for a movie. So if you want to hear the real Tull of 1974, just listen to the bonus tracks. Don't forget that Skating away and Solitaire were written in 1973 for the Chateau sessions. So what we have newly written in 1974 is 7 tull songs(bonus tracks) and 9 playful soundtrack songs(not really tull, made purposely for a movie). But I must say Queen and Country and Warchild(title track) are pretty damn cool soundtrack songs |
those extras are superb, 'Paradise Steakhouse' for one not to mention 'Kelpie' from Stormwatch, and if you really wanna indulge in extras try something like the Flawed Gems and the Other Sides of Tull CD from the 20 Years set they deserve every bit of devotion they get, to continue on so long and continue to do great things, amazing
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:23 |
As Micky, neither devotion or hatred, they are great, but there are too many great bands in the same level out there to swear eternal devotion to all of them.
Iván
|
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 21:14 |
micky wrote:
Raff is the Tull fan of the two of us... she has all the remasters... I've heard all the albums of course.. but probably not many of the later bonus tracks...
if they were like the bonus tracks on the early ones I'd be a happy man.. which I'd bet my paycheck they aren't
I'm a firm believer in the notion of 'finite creativity'... Anderson was and IS a great showman.. and could and DID write some great songs... but his songwriting talent was overwhelmed by the shear volume of their output IMO. Oh well... I will take a listen to those later albums and their bonus tracks this weekend.
|
Trust me
I was always a bit disappointed with Warchild and thought, Tull are better than this. But when I got the remaster I listened to the 7 bonus tracks and realised the band were still producing the same great music, but the original 11 songs were done for sound track purposes for a movie. So if you want to hear the real Tull of 1974, just listen to the bonus tracks. Don't forget that Skating away and Solitaire were written in 1973 for the Chateau sessions. So what we have newly written in 1974 is 7 tull songs(bonus tracks) and 9 playful soundtrack songs(not really tull, made purposely for a movie). But I must say Queen and Country and Warchild(title track) are pretty damn cool soundtrack songs
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:32 |
Raff is the Tull fan of the two of us... she has all the remasters... I've heard all the albums of course.. but probably not many of the later bonus tracks... if they were like the bonus tracks on the early ones I'd be a happy man.. which I'd bet my paycheck they aren't I'm a firm believer in the notion of 'finite creativity'... Anderson was and IS a great showman.. and could and DID write some great songs... but his songwriting talent was overwhelmed by the shear volume of their output IMO. Oh well... I will take a listen to those later albums and their bonus tracks this weekend.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:27 |
micky wrote:
^ more power to you brother They sure as hell wouldn't have had the career they did if everyone felt as I do hahahha. |
Without the bonus tracks, i'd only say taab, heavy horses, songs from the wood, litp and bursting out are strong releases. Which would make me sound like you . But with bonus tracks, it is proved Warchild could have been another strong album if it wasn't a soundtrack, Aqualung could have been great if Side 2 was made of songs such as life is a long song, dr bogenbroom, for later, wondring again, up the pool . Stormwatch, Benefit and Stand up could have gained an extra star if the singles/bonus tracks were included instead of some other songs . Broadsword could have been better with the use of some bonus tracks too
Edited by PROGMONSTER2008 - May 22 2009 at 19:29
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:20 |
^ more power to you brother They sure as hell wouldn't have had the career they did if everyone felt as I do hahahha.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:15 |
micky wrote:
Jethro Tull? neither devotion or hatred... not good enough to be devoted to... not bad enough to hate them haha..
just think large portions of their discography are completely average at best..... but what I love... I truly love.. mainly those first 4 albums.
|
There's not 1 single weak remaster
Just go over each remaster and LITP and pick the best 10 songs from each year and you have lots of strong compilations for each year from 1969-1982
Edited by PROGMONSTER2008 - May 22 2009 at 19:20
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 19:05 |
Jethro Tull? neither devotion or hatred... not good enough to be devoted to... not bad enough to hate them haha.. just think large portions of their discography are completely average at best..... but what I love... I truly love.. mainly those first 4 albums.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 18:52 |
American Khatru wrote:
They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums. I just listened to Stand Up at work today. Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre.
If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982. Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year! (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.) Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about. You have to admit, that beez impressive. More than most bands can say. I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever.
Edit: Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969. Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started! |
Well you must include all remastered versions of each album
Even This Was has some real cool tunes, expecially the bonus tracks Love story, xmas song
I'm surprised you haven't mentioned the 90s remasters and relative outtakes
Dotcom + it all trickles down(outtake)
Roots to branches
Catfish rising remaster( with bonus track 'night in the wilderness') + silver river turning, truck stop runner(outtakes)
If you have the remasters of these 3 and you add those 3 extra outtakes, then you trim those 3 albums down to the 10 best songs (including the bonus tracks and outtakes) then you have 3 very good albums which are even better than some of the 70s albums(or even revised 70s albums using the bonus tracks)
Edited by PROGMONSTER2008 - May 22 2009 at 18:56
|
|
American Khatru
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:54 |
oh, and I may have started the thread, but I love the off topic stuff. you guys r funny.
|
|
American Khatru
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:53 |
They do have a high amount of very good-to-great albums. I just listened to Stand Up at work today. Just thinking, following Lucas' post, I get a picture pretty well unmatched by any other band in the genre. If I count what I consider to be the "very good-to-great" albums I get a solid 14 years, 1969-1982. Within that period, excepting the two year wait before Broadsword, an album was released every year! (I leave out This Was because it's not really yet the Tull sound, and the all-important Barre isn't there; and for me the machine comes to a stop with Broadsword, though there are of course some things of merit after that.) Throw in the stupendous Life Is A Long Song E.P. of 1971 (thank you progmonster2008) and you have 14 studio releases and very little to complain about. You have to admit, that beez impressive . More than most bands can say. I love King Crimson just as much as Tull, but their prolific output does admittedly travel through quite different line ups, with of course some big gaps in there for other projects and whatever. Edit: Shouldn't forget the songs Sweet Dream and Witche's Promise, released 1969. Amazing and immediate Grand sound from a band that just started!
Edited by American Khatru - May 22 2009 at 18:05
|
|
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:51 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
After a point, what's the point? |
This is the point
.
|
|
|
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: May 22 2009 at 17:16 |
I love their seventies discography. 'A' is good also.
Barriemore Barlow was a great improvement to their sound. Probably the prog band who released the highest amount of quality albums with King Crimson.
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.