Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > Just for Fun
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SR V: To boldly go where no room has gone before
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSR V: To boldly go where no room has gone before

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 124125126127128 636>
Author
Message
Alitare View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:35
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Trans-Siberian Orchestra...
There is no such thing as good Christmas music. 


That's why they have Beethoven's Last Night.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:40
Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:46
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:48
Phallus Dei was pretty good, but not OMG AMAZING good. I can definitely see myself listening to it again.

Time for Mike Oldfield now.
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:50
On whose part.  The government's or the parents.  I think I would much rather go the route with 90% chance of survival over the route with 5% survival.  And nothing makes me cringe more than stupid decisions made based on religious beliefs.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:51
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:51
How can you have a bunch of bullsh*t?

Surely a load of bullsh*t is easier?
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 14:57
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?


The decision.

I innately oppose nearly any decision that involves force like that.
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:02
To an extent I agree, but sometimes when parents are being so blatently stupid in the care of their children the government needs to step in. 
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:02
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?


The decision.

I innately oppose nearly any decision that involves force like that.
If a child is denied treatment by the parents, doesn't that fall under child abuse or child endangerment?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:02
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?


The decision.

I innately oppose nearly any decision that involves force like that.


Like the millions of people who are sentenced to prison for murder?
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:08
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

To an extent I agree, but sometimes when parents are being so blatently stupid in the care of their children the government needs to step in. 


They may be making a decision which isn't entirely informed, but I still entirely disagree with it. You can't force someone to take chemotherapy.

If I had cancer, I would rather die.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:08
Denying a child life-saving medical care is evil.

What if religious parents said, "Well, food is evil.  We don't need any of that.  The Spirit of Cthulu will sustain us."


Ermm
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:09
Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?


The decision.

I innately oppose nearly any decision that involves force like that.
If a child is denied treatment by the parents, doesn't that fall under child abuse or child endangerment?


When chemotherapy is as ineffective as it is now, no.

When it becomes better in the future, perhaps.
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:10
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_he_me/us_med_forced_chemo



58 page ruling?  Who the hell was the judge?  The Hon. Stephen King?


What a bunch of bullsh*t. Angry


What is, the judge's decision, or the parent's belief that hibiscus leaves cure cancer?


The decision.

I innately oppose nearly any decision that involves force like that.


Like the millions of people who are sentenced to prison for murder?


That's an absurd comparison and has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:11
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

To an extent I agree, but sometimes when parents are being so blatently stupid in the care of their children the government needs to step in. 


They may be making a decision which isn't entirely informed, but I still entirely disagree with it. You can't force someone to take chemotherapy.

If I had cancer, I would rather die.


You can't force someone who is an adult.
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:11
Originally posted by MovingPictures07 MovingPictures07 wrote:



When chemotherapy is as ineffective as it is now, no.

When it becomes better in the future, perhaps.
It's one of the only options left for cancer patients. Two of my friends have had family members that have survived cancer because of chemo. Yes, it's not efficient, but doing nothing is not an option.
Back to Top
horsewithteeth11 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:12
It's stupid that the parents won't try to treat their son's illness through chemotherapy, but no one has the right to tell them what to do or what not to do. At least that's my feeling on it.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:14
Originally posted by birdwithteeth11 birdwithteeth11 wrote:

It's stupid that the parents won't try to treat their son's illness through chemotherapy, but no one has the right to tell them what to do or what not to do. At least that's my feeling on it.


That's evidently not true.
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2009 at 15:15
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Denying a child life-saving medical care is evil.

What if religious parents said, "Well, food is evil.  We don't need any of that.  The Spirit of Cthulu will sustain us."


Ermm


Again, not an apt comparison.

Chemotherapy BREAKS DOWN a person; ineffective medical care is NOT the same as basic survival needs, I'm sorry, that's just common sense.

It is innate in our survival skills that food is necessary for people to live, and that would qualify as starving a child. I would agree then that the parents are being stupid and something needs to be done---when something as essential as that is purposefully being taken away.

Cancer is unfortunate, but because it seems to be caused by just about ANYTHING and because our treatment methods are not effective, I believe that is not denying someone a survival right.

In fact, I would much rather live on not knowing I had cancer than find out I have cancer and get tons of half-assed treatments for it. Part of the reason people die from cancer is because of the treatments, another part is because of a mental loss (loss of a will to fight, depression, etc.), and another part is the actual disease.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 124125126127128 636>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.376 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.