10 Point Review System |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||||||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 01:08 | |||||||
Me too . Don't forget this is a constant recurring theme ! And it would satisfy many reviewers, I'm very sure of that. And also Ivan's idea to leave it at that and make that very clear could solve the problem of constant new proposals in the ratingsystem.
|
||||||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||||||
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 30 2006 Location: LA, CA Status: Offline Points: 7113 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 01:17 | |||||||
Oh no. No no no. I've worked out my own little system WITHIN the five point system. A ten point system would drive me nuts. Probably. Actually, no, it probably wouldn't. But that's beside the point. I'd have to...gasp...EDIT REVIEWS! Webber. |
||||||||
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
||||||||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 08:04 | |||||||
Again, I don't think a half-star system is necessary, but of course, that's one fellow's opinion.
|
||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 09:43 | |||||||
Not necessary, not even ratings are necessary, everything we add has to be better only.
This is my proposal
Whistler: Yes, I know some will have to change the reviews, but that would be voluntary, If I'm not wrong you have 88 reviews, that wouldn't be so traunatic.
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - May 08 2009 at 09:52 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 09:49 | |||||||
I understand it could be broken down that way, but I think it's just too nitpicky. As I mentioned elsewhere, the five star system forces us to think critically about the music. There have been a few times when I've had a tough time deciding between a 3 and a 4, but the fact that I have to choose one or the other makes me listen more carefully to the music. Edited by Epignosis - May 08 2009 at 09:53 |
||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 09:58 | |||||||
I agree, but we are not here only for those with the abbility to discriminate as well as you do or people who simply don0t want to give that extra effort and fall in incredible contradictions.
I read reviews about albums that are above average and end being rated with twio stars.
Th Average rating marks a breaking point that would help a lot, now the Average is not marked, but it's still 3 stars, despite this fact, many people think is too low, others believe average is 2 stars..
Plus a masterpiece doesn't has to be essential for everyybody.
We are here to get more reviews and to make people's work easier, not ours maybe, we are willing to give that extra step, but many won't and we will gain more reviews
But again, this for M@x to decide
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - May 08 2009 at 09:59 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Posted: May 08 2009 at 10:03 | |||||||
How about a letter system :
A - Hi B - Hello C - Good Evening |
||||||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Posted: May 09 2009 at 03:30 | |||||||
Again 100% subscribe ! The biggest problems for my ratings are indeed between 3 and 4 stars. And I have seen at least a thousand ! (and probably many more) 3.5 ratings when I read reviews. So that confirms my statement that this is a significant problem. But also the masterpiece status of albums suffers in the recent system. I have about 35 five starratings but there is big difference between them and some of them are screeming for a 4.5 possibility. And of course there are also 4 star cases that are in fact 4.5 and they are done hard by right now. With Ivan's proposal it could all be solved leaving the raters and reviewers much more satisfied with the outcome.
And Ivan is also right about the two star problem. I'm convinced many albums have received two stars but are actually 2.5 and I think that's a big difference to the album. Especially the more critical reviewers like Kenethlevine, Zowieziggy and Sean Trane could adjust many many ratings and have given two stars just because the albums were a bit less than the real good ones.
I think in the end it makes a big difference for many albums (I already posted a topic about this) especially those who have just a few reviews or ratings. Again I will give this example that makes it all clear:
In this example this album would get some 3,2 as average instead of 2,96. Makes a difference doesn't it ? Edited by progrules - May 09 2009 at 03:35 |
||||||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||||||
Soul Dreamer
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 17 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 997 |
Posted: May 10 2009 at 18:05 | |||||||
I agree completely with Ivan and Progrules: Let all existing ratings stand, but introduce 0.5 steps in between. Since all members can now edit their reviews (I just received a mail about that), it would enable me to rate some albums which I gave 5* to 4.5*, simply because I think they are a masterpiece, but I recognize that they are not necessarily also a masterpiece for the whole genre prog. Stated differently...I can then distinguish between what I think is great, and what I think is essential to all prog lovers. Now this choice is not available...
|
||||||||
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
|
||||||||
DamoXt7942
Special Collaborator Joined: October 15 2008 Location: Okayama, Japan Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: May 10 2009 at 18:12 | |||||||
I think indeed Ivan's opinion be very good, but can M@X change the system easily?
I'm afraid it's so hard for him...and how should be the ratings previously posted? Hmm... |
||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: May 10 2009 at 18:19 | |||||||
No need to change anything, because:
But we must forget about the 1 to 10 new system,. because in that case, the 5 stars rating would represent average, so lets stay with the 5 system but with EXTRA half points, in the worst scenario, an album awarded with 4.5 or 5 will still be a masterpiece and a 0.5 and a 1 star rating will also be very much close to say "better avoid it pal" Iván
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: May 10 2009 at 20:19 | |||||||
So Sean Trane could go through his 1000 plus reviews and amend those that he wrote were really x.5 ?
|
||||||||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
||||||||
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 09 2008 Location: Beasty Heart Status: Offline Points: 32181 |
Posted: May 10 2009 at 23:06 | |||||||
I would literally have to go through a bunch of reviews and completely re-write them, because I wrote them based on a 5-star system.
I also agree with Robert (Epignosis) that the 5-star system forces listening to the music more carefully and I think the limiting choice of stars is actually a benefit in this case, rather than something negatively restricting. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 01:33 | |||||||
Introducing a new 10 star system would be as easy as introducing half steps ... you would simply have to multiply existing ratings by 2, which is no problem at all in an sql database. |
||||||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 01:36 | |||||||
Indeed. And let's not forget: the 5 star system is a general reward system used all ove rthe world in all kinds of media and not even just for music, also for movies for instance. And at least half of those use the half star possibility. So it's not uncommon or not done.
|
||||||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||||||
DamoXt7942
Special Collaborator Joined: October 15 2008 Location: Okayama, Japan Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 03:50 | |||||||
Exactly Ivan , thanks...but,
Oo...so hard efforts. |
||||||||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 10:55 | |||||||
I'll propose an alternative - Apples & Oranges. You get to choose the number of apples & oranges to make up a total of 5.
This should be readily seen as the best system as you can't compare apples & oranges . And not just to each other. |
||||||||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
||||||||
Alberto Muńoz
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 26 2006 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 12:41 | |||||||
I see the proposal good but i am with Ivan this time
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 13:13 | |||||||
|
||||||||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: May 11 2009 at 13:19 | |||||||
I have no problem with the 5 point system as long as people obey the proper mathematical rules of rounding. Alas, mine is apparently a lost cause.
Unfortunately, before I came on the scene some of the higher ups were already guilty of misrounding so all hope is lost. Edited by Slartibartfast - May 11 2009 at 13:25 |
||||||||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |