Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Topic: Neo-progressive, new guidelines Posted: April 28 2009 at 22:22 |
Some news from the Neo-Progressive team: We have worked out a new definition for the genre, which have been officially approved and has been implemented. In case anyone is interested, our redefined guidelines goes as follows:
----------------------------------
Neo-Progressive rock (more commonly “Neo-Prog”) is a subgenre of
Progressive Rock that originally was used to describe artists strongly
influenced by the classic symphonic prog bands that flourished during
the 1970s. At the beginning of the neo-prog movement, the primary
influence was early to mid-70's Genesis. Debate over when Neo-Prog
actually came into being often takes place, with some asserting it
began with Marillion's Script for a Jester’s Tear in 1983. Others
contend it began with Twelfth Night at the dawn of the 80s, while some
even suggest the popular symphonic prog band Genesis gave rise to
Neo-Prog with their 1976 album, A Trick of the Tail. If one
analyses the progressive movement just before 1980, then some albums
which heavily influenced the Neo-Prog movement easily come to mind:
Steve Hackett - Spectral Mornings, Genesis - Wind & Wuthering,
Genesis - And Then There Were Three, Genesis - Seconds Out, Saga -
Saga, all the Camel albums between Breathless and The Single Factor
included, and some Eloy's albums, especially Silent Cries And Mighty
Echoes. This new form of progressive rock originated in the UK,
and is most strongly associated with bands such as Marillion, Pendragon
and IQ; and while theatrical stage antics were a part of the live
performances of many artists exploring this subset of the progressive
rock genre it's the musical elements that are key to the genre;
typified by the use of atmospheric guitar and synth soloing with
symphonic leanings, with a tendency towards floating synth layers and
dreamy soloing. An additional trait is the use of modern synths rather
than vintage analogue synths and keyboards. The main reasons for
Neo-Progressive artists to be separated from the ones exploring
Symphonic Prog in the first place are the above, as well as a heavier
emphasis on song-form and melody than some of their earlier symphonic
counterparts. As time went by other artists appeared that also
deviated from the norms created by the classic wave of progressive rock
artists in the 70's. The late 70's had given the world punk music; the
80's gave the world new wave; and the 90's grunge. These, as well as
other forms, had a tremendous amount of influence outside of the
progressive rock realm. The advent of the modern synth also inspired
artists like Tomita, Vangelis and Kitaro to explore dreamier musical
works. These and other forms of more or less newly made musical
genres influenced artists exploring progressive rock as well. Although
many artists did so within the framework of 70's progressive rock, more
and more artists developed a sound and style so heavily influenced by
these more recent musical developments that categorizing them within
the existing subgenres of progressive rock became increasingly
difficult. While the Neo-Progressive genre initially consisted
of artists exploring a modernized version of Symphonic Prog, these days
artists coined as Neo-Progressive cover a multitude of musical
expressions, where the common denominator is the inclusion - within a
progressive rock framework - of musical elements developed just prior
to and after 1980. The Neo-Progressive genre in it's refined form
thus covers a vast musical territory, to some extent covering all
existing subsets of progressive rock and also searching out towards
genres as different as new age on one side and punk and metal on the
other.
Opening paragraphs written by Stonebeard, Cygnus X-2, Greenback Revised, edited and refined April 2009 by windhawk, The Doctor and E-Dub
Edited by Windhawk - July 27 2009 at 05:46
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: April 28 2009 at 22:29 |
Very nice work guys. Clappies for all of you!
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: April 28 2009 at 22:41 |
|
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13627
|
Posted: April 29 2009 at 13:11 |
Excellent work!
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
DamoXt7942
Special Collaborator
Joined: October 15 2008
Location: Okayama, Japan
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: April 29 2009 at 17:45 |
Thanks Neo-team for making progress in our prog thought and knowledge. Great work!
|
|
|
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: May 19 2009 at 10:00 |
Good!
|
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: May 19 2009 at 11:47 |
|
What?
|
|
Dr Clovenhoof
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 13 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 23
|
Posted: June 29 2009 at 18:02 |
Thanks for this, its a valiant effort to identify some common ground in a diverse sub-genre.
|
Existence is no advantage!
|
|
progkidjoel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 02:59 |
Thanks
-Joel
|
|
|
DaysBeforeTomorrow
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 25 2008
Location: Wyckoff, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 10:22 |
Now I don't know who I am! Are Days Before Tomorrow still neo-prog in your book, or are we something different? Somebody tell me just who I am :-p.
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 10:44 |
In terms of stylistic expression, your musical style was thought to fit marginally better in the Neo-Prog category than in the others. A few years ago it would probably have been labelled art rock.
Feel free to contact any of the other genre specialist teams if you want them to consider moving you to their part of the progarchives - click the genre names on the frontpage, and the team members of that particular genre can be found at the bottom of the page; with a menu giving the choice to send a personal message :-)
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
DaysBeforeTomorrow
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 25 2008
Location: Wyckoff, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 10:55 |
Nah, we're totally fine with neo-prog, even if our influences were more 80s than 70s. :-)
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 11:33 |
Corresponds nicely with paragraphs 3 - 6 of the new Neo definition, actually ;-)
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
DaysBeforeTomorrow
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 25 2008
Location: Wyckoff, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 12:05 |
Yes it does :-).
|
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 19:08 |
I salute the expanded Neo Prog, but I must ask one question: how to carefully allocate ehm... interchangeability with Crossover Prog? I mean, in the very core Neo Prog is a form of rock music often resembling its Symphonic Prog origins in dense and compact form with high production values. In essence, Crossover Prog is Art Rock often stepping in more traditional pop rock structures. They're both having high degree of eclecticism. Nowadays they're both sharing (as other forms of prog as well) a rich pedigree of potential influences, varying from punk& new wave, AOR, metal to new age and electronica. As music is constantly evolving, subgenres are spreading away from the core. I'm asking this because my knowledge of the genre is anything but deep, and I would appreciate any answers. Please keep in mind this is by no means a negative criticism - in fact, this widened definition is a great answer to all neo-haters that Neo-Prog is one of the many members of large Prog family, constantly changing, evolving and pushing forward
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 19:41 |
That's a fair question Moris - there is a small degree of overlap between Neo-Prog and Crossover but the two subgenres remain rooted in their "parent" subgenres (for want of a better terminology) and are used to maintain that seperation between them. To date the interchangeability has generally flowed in one direction (from Neo to Xover) governed by the "mainstream" quotient of the music (eg Gazpacho)
The eclecticism of both subs is from non-Prog sources rather than Prog sources so it is the "prog" element that defines where any artist should reside, not the punk, new wave, AOR, metal etc. elements. Therefore any symphonic influence would probably push the addition towards Neo rather than Xover.
|
What?
|
|
Windhawk
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
|
Posted: June 30 2009 at 23:21 |
Generally, I'd push music with more typical mainstream musical tendencies over to the Crossover team myself. But there's no denying the fact that part of the reason for the definition change here was to be able to include bands that fell between the cracks - artists generally thought to belong here that due to one reason or another isn't seen to belong in the other subs. We will usually take them rather than witness prolonged sessions of pass the ball.
|
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com
My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
|
|
progkidjoel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
|
Posted: July 01 2009 at 04:28 |
I'd also like to mention that it was good you changed the Marillion entry...
|
|
|
debrewguy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
|
Posted: July 01 2009 at 19:58 |
next step - getting neo prog the respect it deserves !
|
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
|
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: July 03 2009 at 03:34 |
While I appreciated all of the work the neo-prog team has done on this, I think the new definition goes way too far in grasping back to the roots in symphonic and does not go far enough acknowledging the harder edge of neo-prog (i.e. Pallas, and a shout out to Triumph [even though they are in prog-related.])
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.