Suggestion: Discuss reviews on review page |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||||||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: February 20 2009 at 12:48 | ||||||
The idea that most people are selfish (in the negative sense) jerks pretty much denies the existence of humanity, so yeah, I think I'll pass on believing that.
|
|||||||
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: February 20 2009 at 12:54 | ||||||
Talking about humanity in case of internet comments is a bit of a stretch.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: February 20 2009 at 14:20 | ||||||
This is also true. I'm much different on the internet than in real life. |
|||||||
Trademark
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 21 2006 Location: oHIo Status: Offline Points: 1009 |
Posted: February 20 2009 at 14:54 | ||||||
Wait a minute, you mean there's MORE???!!!
|
|||||||
Desoc
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: Oslo, Norway Status: Offline Points: 216 |
Posted: February 21 2009 at 09:07 | ||||||
My question was not "do you think that 50 comments multipled by 600 reviews would be a bit too much", but "do you really think it's realistic that every single Close to the Edge-review would get 60 comments" I'd be surprised if people care enough to pull that off. (But I can't understand why it would pose a problem to anyone. Necessary? Depends on your aim. To protect and preserve? Perhaps not. To make a community growing and appealing? Then perhaps.)
Did we? To me, that's democracy (change the word "reviews" to "regime"). Now, if he/she was attacking you, and not challenging your review, then I'd agree we were talking about agressiveness and abuse. But we shouldn't restrict challenges out of fear of attacks, neither in society nor in small communities [/philosophy mode].
I don't know if the "fact" you're talking about is a concern or a conclusion, but I suspect the latter. And then I disagree with you, because I believe that the discussions will take place because of opinions about the album. This is not a zero-sum game, why should it be? And because I believe the benefits to way outweigh whatever problems there might be with abuse. But none of us can prove our predictions, because nothing has bee tried. Furthermore, I maintain my case that the Forum has a high threshold for people to enter. And that it significantly more work lurking into a forum, looking through all the lounges, finding the appropriate thread, being yelled at by experienced forum participants for posting in the wrong thread, etc, etc, than it is to simply post your thoughts and reactions underneath the review.
Hm. I'm tempted to ask you where you get these numbers. As far as I know, no trial or experiment has been carried out. I could easily post the opposite numbers with just as little evidence to back it up...
Sorry, my comment was more aimed at MrProgFreak, whose comment was dystopian no matter how you view it |
|||||||
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: March 05 2009 at 11:00 | ||||||
I did not have the time to read all the post but I must say that this idea is one that I'd like to put in place since a long time.
About the "comment a review" , I was thinking ... - Allow member only to do it - Allow reviewer to delete comment and report abuse to admin This could only be positive since it could lead to ... - A way to connect between reader and reviewer easily - Get tips to improve future reviews contruction - Complete the review in a way ... (date correction , member name fix, others...) Please comments this |
|||||||
Prog On !
|
|||||||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: March 05 2009 at 14:47 | ||||||
This thread has a similar ongoing discussion : http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=55758
|
|||||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65255 |
Posted: March 05 2009 at 14:59 | ||||||
I believe Ground&Sky has a comment box next to reviews, I used to enjoy it, though sometimes whole discussions take place where only comments are meant to be posted.
|
|||||||
Desoc
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: Oslo, Norway Status: Offline Points: 216 |
Posted: April 10 2009 at 09:30 | ||||||
Sorry M@X for having unintentionally ignored this. I'm glad to hear that you're thinking in this direction. I believe this would take this site a long step in the direction of a social, interactive site not only in the forum for in the site at large. That would be vital improvement for an already vital site.
I think your ideas are largely good. Only members should be allowed to post, definitely - also to avoid spam. I'm a little hesitant toward allowing reviewers to delete comments, though. Imagine a reviewer having written highly controversial or inaccurate statements in his review, and systematically deleting every comment that points this out. Everybody should be allowed to report inappropriate comments to a moderator, but perhaps reviewers should be given special priority?
|
|||||||
debrewguy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3596 |
Posted: April 11 2009 at 23:13 | ||||||
I'd like to stick to the "write your own review" point of view. Like, who wants to read someone arguing with someone else's subjective hearing of a certain piece of music. Just tell me what YOU think of the music instead.
|
|||||||
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
|
|||||||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 07:02 | ||||||
I think we have three active threads on this... the one Bob posted a link for... and another... http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=51719&PN=2 anyway... here are my two cents M@X.. for what it is worth.
just last night I had a collab take a run at me for a post of mine that he misread.. misinterpreted and was looking for a fight. The forum has been mighty chippy and has been going that road for some time. Don't think this is a good idea at all. A PM or even a shout out post works if one likes a review.. and if one doesn't... get over it. |
|||||||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||||||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 07:52 | ||||||
Over the years, I have read lots of reviews I didn't like or agree with, but I am quite sure I would never criticise its author openly - unless the review itself went against the rules (this is why we have the Report Reviews thread for). Personally, I think having a 'comment a review' space would stifle people's freedom of expression, and ultimately damage what is one of our most important assets.
|
|||||||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 07:59 | ||||||
not to be lost... is the fact that good reviews...good reviewers get their just desserts.. and recognition... they are made prog reviewers.
|
|||||||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||||||
cobb2
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 25 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 415 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 08:03 | ||||||
This is really quite dopey- you want to discuss the reviews???
Discuss the album, not the review- this is really simple to do- you write a review.
|
|||||||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 08:14 | ||||||
^ yepper.... the site is about album reviews... not making sport of rating or reviewing the reviewers.
Love what M@X has done here... but think this is a stinker of an idea. |
|||||||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||||||
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2007 Location: Penal Colony Status: Offline Points: 11415 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 08:51 | ||||||
[/QUOTE]
just last night I had a collab take a run at me for a post of mine that he misread.. misinterpreted and was looking for a fight. The forum has been mighty chippy and has been going that road for some time. Don't think this is a good idea at all. A PM or even a shout out post works if one likes a review.. and if one doesn't... get over it. [/QUOTE] Em...that wouldn't be me would it, re the Tommy thread ? |
|||||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65255 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 20:28 | ||||||
I agree-- will the madness never end?! ..I mean eventually we'll have comments on the comments, and a Review Comment Abuse Thread where whole debates will rage only to be ended by annoyed Admins |
|||||||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: April 13 2009 at 20:44 | ||||||
I will lend my support to the naysayers this time round.
I have people PMing me with praises, criticisms, and suggestions regarding my reviews. I welcome all those. But do keep them private. Otherwise, bugger off. |
|||||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: April 14 2009 at 06:31 | ||||||
I like the idea of reviews being static, regardless of whether I agree with the views expressed or not.
One positive aside would be that if the possibility of a direct discussion remained closed, it could get people to wite their own reviews as a reaction.
I don't think very positively of human nature, and a discussion as suggested would inevitably lead to trouble, as mentioned above.
The Wikipedia example only works because of a very strictly enforced admin- and editing policy, and I very much doubt that those responsibilities could be kept to a humane level here, when debating such volatile matters as taste.
|
|||||||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: April 14 2009 at 07:11 | ||||||
Then we'd need to have a discussion or review for the review discussions.
Edited by Slartibartfast - April 14 2009 at 07:12 |
|||||||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||||||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |