Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Downloading
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDownloading

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1011121314 18>
Poll Question: Is it right to download music for free without the artist's consent?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
13 [22.41%]
24 [41.38%]
4 [6.90%]
17 [29.31%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Wilcey View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:27
It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills or whatever........... the very idea makes my toes curl, I can't even listen to commercial radio without screaming, this (music) is about something more spiritual than that surely?


Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:34
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

I wish you guys lived through the seventies when you had to go out to the store to buy music rather than sitting at a stupid keyboard. It was so much fun. You would actually meet all kinds of freaky people face to face and  the store owners were really cool and actually knew their stuff. The internet is killing the spirit of music.

For example, in the jazz section in Sam The Record Man ( which is no longer there) there was this old guy who knew everything about jazz, I mean everything. He arranged the jazz section himself. He deliberately put the fusion section in the very rear. People would come up to the second floor where the jazz section was located wandering around looking for a Stanley Clarke or Spyra Gyra album and more than once I heard him say that " It`s in the back there although I can`t understand why you would want to listen to that crap but it`s there in the back". He was more of a purist. But my point here is that back in those days the music stores were full of characters. I actually learned a lot about older jazz from this guy who sadly passed away a few years ago.

Fortunately we have one store left here in Montréal, Beatnick Music,  where you can still go to and meet all kinds of record freaks, musicians and the owner, a former local professional musician, can find anything through his many contacts. And believe it or not there`s even a prog section with both vinyl and CDs both new and used!

I dunno, c`mon Duke let`s go out to the porch and watch the sun go down.


Well, VB, aren't we those record freaks/ musicians here at PA ? I still get the face to face at the local Indie shop, the music instrument stores. But even better, with the web, I can share my enthusiasm with those who have the same interests or tastes as me. Before the internet explosion, that was something that was hard to do if you lived outside a major city. I mean Moncton New Brunswick does not have too many RIO/Avant-Garde fans. Our metro area has some 110,000 people. So being a fan of a small niche genre means you might be a pretty lonely soul.

Add to that the ability to search AND find those rarities. I still get a thrill discovering a group like Leitmotiv through PA, and then being able to legally download their album (and directly pay the artist) and enjoy it right away. The same as I did when I was buying LPs at Oasis records in the late 70s, the used record shops in Moncton & Toronto in the 80s/90s/ 00s, and now also through the internet.

So nowasays, a music freak like myself isn't restricted to what a local store might stock, no matter how extensive their offerings are.

Frank's Music, which was the local Sam the Record Man franchise is still around and carrying a great selection of music. But they are often unable to even order such groups as Le Orme. Even an american group like King's X can be difficult to get. I've had their latest on order for two months now. The store does have 4-5 of their earlier albums, but not this one. So  - ITunes, Amazon.com and others come in handy. Along with the Specialty shops that a guy stuck out in the sticks would only know about through the internet.

These are glorious times to be a musician and a fan. The answer is in finding ways to help satisfy both groups.

And that's where the subscription model works. Pay $20  a month. Unlimited downloads, no DRM. Each musical act gets paid based on the amount of downloads. Heck in Canada, if you assume a million customers, that's $20 million a month. If an act like Jelly Fiche gets $500 each month from this service, it must beat getting a few thousand a year from CD sales, not counting the manufacturing costs.

There are those who will download tons of music. Most will not. And there will still be some who will steal the files online. But security and convenience at a good price will draw most in. Even Steve Jobs has argued that 99 cents a track is too much. Check out Amazon.com. They have daily sales on certain MP3 albums. $1.99 for an old classic jazz album ? Woohoo.

There are also those who will download the same music several times over the course of years. Why ? Well, why use up memory space on your PC if you know you can always get the same music again later. Best of all, the artist gets paid again. The CD you burnt is damaged, lost or whatever ? Download & burn it again. And with such products as Sonos, you can access the music on your computer in any room in your house.

You prefer the physical product ? There will always be LPs or CDs , or some other form of concrete hold in your hand thingy to own. Chances are that more groups will be able to issue them because of revenue from the internet.

So it's not exactly a bad scenario all round. IF and when it happens. But it will happen.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:35
Originally posted by Wilcey Wilcey wrote:

It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills


"The Sentinel" sponsored by Imodium perhaps

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:36
The relationship between individual purchases and the artists themselves is shaky at best. The bigger, population-oriented, question is "How much capital has downloading pulled out of the music economy?" which then does effect how much capital trickles down to the artist. I guarantee that the percent of my income that goes into the music economy is in the top 95-99% and my downloading patterns have not changed that, though I've gone through several stages as others here have as well.
 
People copied LP's onto tapes back in the 60's and in fact the copy of _Revolver_  that was so important to me growing up was just such a copy my father had made in Germany while in the service. In the 80's people copied everything to cassettes and most students I knew had massive amounts of "Shared" music. And if you think sound quality is an issue with mp3, try a 3rd generation tape to tape.
 
Guess what, the folks with the largest pirated (stolen) collections also had the largest legitimately paid for collections. For most, very near the amount of their budget that was ever going to leave their pocket for music already had. This is not completely true today, though it still likely holds for prog fans. I'm fairly certain that while downloading has pulled a significant amount of money out of the corporate music economy, more independent and smaller size music has blossomed in mp3 era, including prog. Which is a good thing for music.
 
"Stealing" is a word that gets thrown around easily. Everytime you leverage someone into paying more than they wanted to, you're stealing. Every time you hide your costs you're stealing. Every time you jack up the price because the demand is high you're stealing. Everytime you jack up the price because there is little competition you're stealing. Think any stealing of this sort has happened to you the consumer during a music transaction? And yes enjoying an artist's music when he didn't agree to let you and you know he didn't is stealing too.


Edited by Negoba - February 17 2009 at 11:53
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:38
Originally posted by Wilcey Wilcey wrote:

It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills or whatever........... the very idea makes my toes curl, I can't even listen to commercial radio without screaming, this (music) is about something more spiritual than that surely?




Those service are already in place. And again, the Cable TV services use Ads as a source of revenue. But you can still enjoy the shows, eh.
So if you're paying $40 a month to watch HBO, and you're getting shows like Lost, the Sopranos, the Trailer Park Boys, along with other channels and programs, do you think that most figure they're getting a good deal.

Subscription , Subscription, Subscription.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:43
Hello i find this topic interesting
 
About this i want to say that in most of the cases, the artist earn more money when go on tour, the profits of a tour are always wider than album sales in these times, maybe in pre internet years was at inverse.
 
About Copyright infrigment, here in México the law is quite strict but allow that a person can do only one copy of the intellectual work  for studing or scientist purpose but not to selling.
 




Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:44
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by Wilcey Wilcey wrote:

It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills


"The Sentinel" sponsored by Imodium perhaps

As we get older it all Depends doesn't it? Tongue
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 11:59
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:


A stolen copy is a stolen copy regardless of whether it was shoplifted from Borders or copied onto a CDR - reselling it is effectively scenario-3, not scenario-2.
 
 
Not exact Dean, if you buy any item:
 
  1. From a legal source (E-Bay is a legal source)
  2. The Cd is original
  3. The guy never tells you it's stolen.

You are acting legally, because you don't have to know if this guy has stolen it. As a fact the artist has already received  his payment when the album reached the store, because the stores get the album and pay the price to the distributuion company.

Of course the seller is a crook, but you have no responsability.
 
Iván
 
That's right that call buying in good will




Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 12:29
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

But if the artist is more concerned about their albums selling than people just enjoying their music, then that is also immoral.
 
Why? The artist has to eat, the artist has a family, most of them except the most successful have a mortgage to pay, they have to care for the money, because that's their work
 
Personally, if I were a popular artist, I wouldn't care less who shared my files, just so long as it's making me famous and selling out my concerts
 
That's very easy to say, i don't know in what you work, but...Would you allow people to take 50%, 60% or 70% of your salary to be famous? Honestly i wouldn't, I have to berak my balls working all day and nobody will put a finger on my money, and I'm sure you wouldn't allow either.
 
Living on concerts..Ha ha, maybe Yes, King Crimson, and some more, but excellent artists as Anton Roolaart, Lunar Dunes, Factor Burzaco, etc live of their albums because they are not famous enough (even when they  deserve to be) to live on their small concerts.
 
Fame doesn't pay the bills.
 
In Perú 98% of the music is ILLEGAL, yes 98 from each 100 albums are sold in the black market in CDR's or illegaly downloaded...is this fair, moral or legal?
 
All the music stores except one have closed, there are no Video Rental business, because you can buy a brand new DVD in 2 dollars in every corner and keep it for ever, but thousands  of persons were left without work because of this.
 
An illegal store is closed at 10 am and at 1 PM they is open again with the site all covered in CDs an DVDs, but a legal store is closed and never opens again and 20 or 30 families cease to have money to eat.
 
Where is the morality of that?
 
Iván
 
.
            
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 12:56
Originally posted by Wilcey Wilcey wrote:

It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills or whatever........... the very idea makes my toes curl, I can't even listen to commercial radio without screaming, this (music) is about something more spiritual than that surely?


I agree that it will probably take a few decades until we can listen to Dark Side of the Moon for free, and without advertising -  the rights are owned by a major label. But today there are already some artists who give away their music for free, and maybe that catches on. I'll definitely try to compile a list of those albums at Progfreak.com - they need all the support they can get!Smile
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:11
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

But if the artist is more concerned about their albums selling than people just enjoying their music, then that is also immoral.
 
Why? The artist has to eat, the artist has a family, most of them except the most successful have a mortgage to pay, they have to care for the money, because that's their work
 
I will join Ivan in asking why? That idea is ridiculous! The artist can do whatever he/she wants with the product of his work. Anyway, you're defending a completely egotistical cause (artists pleased with people listening to their music... complete ego-gratification...USELESS... ) over a more human cause (the artist wanting to FEED his family) So you say is inmoral to try to earn a living, but is moral to try to have everyone listen to your music therefore making you famous and boosting your ego? I can't help but feel quite repelled towards such a notion....
 
Personally, if I were a popular artist, I wouldn't care less who shared my files, just so long as it's making me famous and selling out my concerts
 
So my Death-fan friend, what you want is millions of people to boost your ego, you don't care whether you eat or not. Well, that's fine. It is your right. But many others would prefer the other way around.
 
Even doctors, that most human of all professions (MUCH more human than art) need to charge for their services.... Yes, many are crooks that would choose to earn millions over saving a poor man's life... But we agree that even doctors who can save lifes have to roght to make money off their work... why can't artists, whose work is, at the end of the day, completely irrelevant to the survival of the species?
 
That's very easy to say, i don't know in what you work, but...Would you allow people to take 50%, 60% or 70% of your salary to be famous? Honestly i wouldn't, I have to berak my balls working all day and nobody will put a finger on my money, and I'm sure you wouldn't allow either.
 
Living on concerts..Ha ha, maybe Yes, King Crimson, and some more, but excellent artists as Anton Roolaart, Lunar Dunes, Factor Burzaco, etc live of their albums because they are not famous enough (even when they  deserve to be) to live on their small concerts.
 
Fame doesn't pay the bills.
 
In Perú 98% of the music is ILLEGAL, yes 98 from each 100 albums are sold in the black market in CDR's or illegaly downloaded...is this fair, moral or legal?
 
Same in my country of origin, Ecuador, where it's even semi-legal now to sell piracy!!!!!???
 
All the music stores except one have closed, there are no Video Rental business, because you can buy a brand new DVD in 2 dollars in every corner and keep it for ever, but thousands  of persons were left without work because of this.
 
Exactly the same. There was even a Tower records franchise. Even that one collapsed against piracy.
 
An illegal store is closed at 10 am and at 1 PM they is open again with the site all covered in CDs an DVDs, but a legal store is closed and never opens again and 20 or 30 families cease to have money to eat.
 
Where is the morality of that? Oh I guess what's moral is the artist self-fulfilling his fame-desire and egomania.... Confused
 
Iván
 
.
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:19
Keep on downloadin`. It`s already killed music anyway. Just like parts of the rainforest have been killed by overlogging.
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:21

Mixing economics and art is always very sticky stuff. Unfortunately art and entertainment have been entangled, and econmics and entertainment are almost impossible to unbundle.

Doctors, BTW, give away alot of their services because there is no way to rightfully economize that either.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:25
^ well, it's up to the artists to untangle art and economics. Maybe we'll see more and more artists resorting to a model where they keep their day job at least to some extent and make music in their spare time - like Shadow Gallery (RIP MikeCry).
Back to Top
Wilcey View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:26
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Wilcey Wilcey wrote:

It'll only be "Free" when you don't mind "Dark Side of the Moon" sponsored by duracell torch batteries, or "The Tall Ships" sponsored by seasickness pills or whatever........... the very idea makes my toes curl, I can't even listen to commercial radio without screaming, this (music) is about something more spiritual than that surely?


I agree that it will probably take a few decades until we can listen to Dark Side of the Moon for free, and without advertising -  the rights are owned by a major label. But today there are already some artists who give away their music for free, and maybe that catches on. I'll definitely try to compile a list of those albums at Progfreak.com - they need all the support they can get!Smile


They really do need all the support they can! But if you have a million albums downloaded for free, or 5 albums downloaded for free I am assuming you make the same ammount of money. NOTHING, not a sausage not a drop. SO, when the mortgage company comes a calling you are going to say "have a slive of my fame instead of money, it's free"   I don't wish to be pedantic, but How does this FREE model work?  How you supposed to pay for  recording let alone living?

Confused
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:29
^ you can upload your music on last.fm - there people can listen to it for free, and you'll get a share of their advertising revenue. Also, providing your music as free downloads doesn't mean you can't still sell it on CD or vinyl. Remember, people are already downloading music illegally ... it can't be helped. Why not give it to them as mp3, and if they like they can also purchase the "physical version"?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:31
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ well, it's up to the artists to untangle art and economics. Maybe we'll see more and more artists resorting to a model where they keep their day job at least to some extent and make music in their spare time - like Shadow Gallery (RIP MikeCry).
 
Do not day-dream too much Mike... In this world where money is every day more important in every field, I think art and economics will become even more tangled in the future. Those days of romantic artists dying for the cause are over. Actually, very few really did. Art has always been b*****dized by money. Most of the great art has been created thanks to money, and for monetary reasons (survival the primary one). The only artist that truly can afford to have economics and art separate is he who has art as a side-hobby, not as his primary source of income. But the people who can afford a side-hobby are those well-off in the first place, the wealthy ones, or coming from rich nations like Sweden or Norway where the government can help you live off your art.
 
Really...
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:47

Why can't one have just a reasonable day job, create and play great music, hopefully break even on it, and leave the fame and riches to other fools?

You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 13:55
I get the majority of my stuff from DGM live.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2009 at 14:01
Originally posted by Negoba Negoba wrote:

Why can't one have just a reasonable day job, create and play great music, hopefully break even on it, and leave the fame and riches to other fools?

 
Because you can't concentrate on Art if you have to work all day and come home at 7 or 8 pm tired, wanting to see your family, eat a hot meal, rest a bit but instead you have to go to make music, sooner or later you will hate music because the human needs rest.
 
Now,  if you have a busy week or month, you will be working on music but thinking in what you have to do in the office, so at the end you will not give your best.
 
Also...How can you tour if you have a day job?
 
Plus the desire to be the best in your field is the only thing that gives you a chance of success, if you want to be the best, probably you'll be good enough at least, but if you take music as a hobby, you'll probably have to leave it.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1011121314 18>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.