Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 16:01 |
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 18:39 |
Say no more: ![](http://www.bartcop.com/slappy-sleeps-inaug.jpg)
He was just resting his eyes, yeah that's the ticket. ![LOL LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
Here's a few more funnies to spare folks from actually having to visit bartcop.com: ![](http://www.bartcop.com/pigboy_nest.jpg)
![](http://www.bartcop.com/wn-gop-wont.jpg)
![](http://www.bartcop.com/michelle-vs-pigboy.jpg)
![](http://www.bartcop.com/pigboy-fails-obama.jpg)
![](http://www.bartcop.com/palins-book.jpg)
Edited by Slartibartfast - January 29 2009 at 15:06
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 21:54 |
I would rather pay for both of them to shut up.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 21:56 |
The T wrote:
So what? Should he be prohibited of making millions with his speeches? Why don't we prohibit Bush from making millions with his businesses then? |
Oh yeah? Speeches? Who would pay $200K just to hear him speak?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 22:01 |
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
So what? Should he be prohibited of making millions with his speeches? Why don't we prohibit Bush from making millions with his businesses then? | Oh yeah? Speeches? Who would pay $200K just to hear him speak? |
I'm not saying you have to attend his speeches or even that they're any good. I'm just quite amazed at your surprise and bewilderment and the quick notice you have given us about this irrelevant fact.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 28 2009 at 22:34 |
The T wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
So what? Should he be prohibited of making millions with his speeches? Why don't we prohibit Bush from making millions with his businesses then? | Oh yeah? Speeches? Who would pay $200K just to hear him speak? |
I'm not saying you have to attend his speeches or even that they're any good. I'm just quite amazed at your surprise and bewilderment and the quick notice you have given us about this irrelevant fact. |
What irrelevant fact? Those speech payments are disguised lobbying fees.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: January 29 2009 at 13:46 |
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
So what? Should he be prohibited of making millions with his speeches? Why don't we prohibit Bush from making millions with his businesses then? | Oh yeah? Speeches? Who would pay $200K just to hear him speak? |
I'm not saying you have to attend his speeches or even that they're any good. I'm just quite amazed at your surprise and bewilderment and the quick notice you have given us about this irrelevant fact. | What irrelevant fact? Those speech payments are disguised lobbying fees. |
Oh I understand... Bring forth the evidence sir... I guess this is exclusive of democrats, the lobbying thing, isn't it?
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: January 29 2009 at 14:36 |
IVNORD wrote:
I would rather pay for both of them to shut up. |
I'd suspect that might work better with GW than Bill. Nukeular nukeular nukeular. Ah feel your paihn.
![](http://www.bartcop.com/tom-universe.jpg)
![](http://www.bartcop.com/obama-mech.jpg)
DO WE HAVE TO LISTEN TO THIS
FOR THE NEXT 4 (8) YEARS?
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/waaambulance.jpg) ![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/investigate%20obama.jpg)
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/move_on.jpg)
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/marcus.jpg)
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/bitch_slap.jpg)
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/cantor.gif)
![](http://pabloonpolitics.com/images/jets.jpg)
Edited by Slartibartfast - January 30 2009 at 11:52
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: January 29 2009 at 19:52 |
The T wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
IVNORD wrote:
The T wrote:
So what? Should he be prohibited of making millions with his speeches? Why don't we prohibit Bush from making millions with his businesses then? | Oh yeah? Speeches? Who would pay $200K just to hear him speak? |
I'm not saying you have to attend his speeches or even that they're any good. I'm just quite amazed at your surprise and bewilderment and the quick notice you have given us about this irrelevant fact. | What irrelevant fact? Those speech payments are disguised lobbying fees. |
Oh I understand... Bring forth the evidence sir... I guess this is exclusive of democrats, the lobbying thing, isn't it? |
Not at all. It's a well-known fact that presidents make money when they leave office
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: January 29 2009 at 23:53 |
Cartoons...........so..............unfunny.............must.............not.....................kill.................again.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: January 30 2009 at 04:21 |
stonebeard wrote:
Cartoons...........so..............unfunny.............must.............not.....................kill.................again. |
Give in.....together....we.......can.....become.....more.....powerful.........than........they........can......imagine.
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: January 30 2009 at 11:52 |
Bwahahahahaha.
Edited by Slartibartfast - February 02 2009 at 16:13
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: February 02 2009 at 15:55 |
I wish we could all just out our political differences aside.
Let's have a party.
A communist party!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: February 02 2009 at 16:03 |
Thanks for posting that, I love that cartoon (seen it before).
From our local paper's daily feature called The Vent:
If there's one upside from that Gove. Rod Blagojevich fisaco in Illinois, it's that we learned how to pronounce his previously unpronouncable name.
Edited by Slartibartfast - February 03 2009 at 14:19
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: February 03 2009 at 14:19 |
![](http://www.bartcop.com/obama-kick-me.jpg)
Edited by Slartibartfast - February 08 2009 at 02:16
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: February 03 2009 at 14:23 |
Ah, yes. "Bipartisanship", or as I see it, "Drop all your arguments and do what we tell you to do."
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: February 07 2009 at 12:18 |
Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.
545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.
Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices
545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally,
and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this
country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because
that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated
its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally
chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.
They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a
senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.
|
The
politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what
the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you
that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common
con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a
Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating
deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot
force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.
Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not
replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of
incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem
that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully
grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal
government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to
exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red .
If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ
If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement
plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom
they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts
and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power
to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not
let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical
forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent
them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are
their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their
own employees.
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Charlie
Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper. What
you do with this article now that you have read it.......... is up to
you.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: February 08 2009 at 02:12 |
University of Toronto and Oregon State University
geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and
melt in a warming world – as many scientists are concerned it will – it is the
coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that
will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.The catastrophic increase
in sea level, already projected to average between 16 and 17 feet around the
world, would be almost 21 feet in such places as Washington, D.C., scientists
say, putting it largely underwater. Many coastal areas would be devastated. Much
of Southern Florida would disappear, according to researchers at Oregon State
University.
Edited by Slartibartfast - February 08 2009 at 02:26
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: February 08 2009 at 02:20 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
University of Toronto and Oregon State University
geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and
melt in a warming world – as many scientists are concerned it will – it is the
coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that
will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.The catastrophic increase
in sea level, already projected to average between 16 and 17 feet around the
world, would be almost 21 feet in such places as Washington, D.C., scientists
say, putting it largely underwater. Many coastal areas would be devastated. Much
of Southern Florida would disappear, according to researchers at Oregon State
University.
|
Wash DC I'm not worried about......Florida would suck. There is a lot of nice beach front property there.
Edited by crimhead - February 08 2009 at 02:21
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: February 08 2009 at 02:25 |
crimhead wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
University of Toronto and Oregon State University
geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and
melt in a warming world – as many scientists are concerned it will – it is the
coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that
will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.The catastrophic increase
in sea level, already projected to average between 16 and 17 feet around the
world, would be almost 21 feet in such places as Washington, D.C., scientists
say, putting it largely underwater. Many coastal areas would be devastated. Much
of Southern Florida would disappear, according to researchers at Oregon State
University.
|
Wash DC I'm not worried about......Florida would suck. There is a lot of nice beach front property there.
|
But on the other hand I wouldn't have to drive as far from Atlanta to get to a beach.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.