Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Music and Musicians Exchange
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Serialism
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSerialism

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
MonkeyphoneAlex View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 234
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Serialism
    Posted: January 11 2009 at 20:46
I just wrote this essay for school on serialism.  It's a little rough, as I haven't had a chance to revise it yet, but I was hoping to see what some people thought of it.  Thanks!
< ="-" ="text/; =utf-8">< name="ProgId" ="Word.">< name="Generator" ="Microsoft Word 11">< name="Originator" ="Microsoft Word 11">

Brief History and Overview of The Serialization of Music

Alex Stackhouse

Serialism, when referred to in music is a compositional technique in which all or some aspects of the music are determined using numerical patterns.  This process is referred to as “serialization”.  The process developed post-WWII from the 12-tone chromatic music of Arnold Schoenberg and the second Viennese school, especially his students Anton Webern and Alban Berg.  These three composers represent a cross-section of serialism as a whole, from the works of Weberm, who adhered vehemently to the tenets of serialism, to that of Alban Berg, who regarded the rules more loosely, incorporating elements of romanticism into his serial work.  Schoenberg’s serial compositions represent a sort of happy medium between the polarized views of Webern and Berg.

Serialism began with the serialization of pitch in modernist music, and grew outwardly.  The pitch patterns are based on numerical patterns which determine tone rows.  The basic tone row consists of the numbers 0-11, each number representing a different pitch, with 1 being C and 11 being B.  This basic tone row beginning on C is known as P0, or Prime row 0, because it begins on C, which is represented by the number 0, and the row is a prime row.  A prime row is a row that shares the same intervallic relationships between pitches as the original tone row.  In the basic row each pitch is used only once.  Although repetition of pitches is allowed in succession, once the composer leaves a pitch it may not be used again until each other pitch in the tone row is used in order of the row.

The basic tone row may undergo several transformations to provide variations on pitch order throughout a composition.  The most basic transformation is the transposition.  In a transposed tone row the intervallic relationship between the pitches remains the same, but the row is “moved” so that it begins on a different pitch.  For instance, if the first 2 pitches in the basic tone row (P0) were C and D, and the row was transposed up a half step, the first two pitches of the transposed row (P1) would be C#/Db and D#/Eb.

The next transformation the tone row may undergo is called a retrograde transformation.  In this transformation a prime tone row is played backwards.  In a prime tone row beginning on C, the retrograde transformation would be called R0, because the transformed row is a retrograde row whose prime row begins on C.

The third transformation is called the inversion.  In an inverted tone row, the intervallic relationships between pitches in the prime row are reversed, or “inverted”.  For example, if the interval between the first two pitches of P0 was a minor third (such as C-Eb), in the inverted row, known as I0, the interval between the first two pitches would be a major sixth (C-A).

The final and most complex transformation is the retrograde-inversion, abbreviated as RI.  In this transformation the prime row is played backwards and inverted.  The row is reversed as in a retrograde transformation, and the intervallic relationships between pitches is inverted as in an inverted tone row.

It is possible to see every possible derivation of a basic tone row in a matrix that is generated by the composer to use as a reference for quickly employing the various transformations of the basic tone row.  When reading the matrix left-to-right you are reading a prime tone row, or a transposition of the basic row.  Right-to-left is the retrograde transformation of each of these prime rows.  Reading the matrix top-to-bottom gives inverted tone rows, and reading bottom-to-top gives you rows that have undergone transposition and retrograde inversion.  For modern composers there are several effective matrix generators located on various music theory sites that will generate a complete, printable matrix when fed a basic tone row.

As more and more composers began experimenting with serialized pitch, some composers seeking to further serialize their compositions began to experiment with the serialization of other aspects of music, such as instrumentation, dynamics, and tempo using the same numerical rows from the matrices used to generate pitch.  The serialization of many or all aspects of a composition became known as “total serialism”.

Serialism has been highly influential on experimental composers in the 20th century.  From Arnold Schoenberg to Igor Stravinsky to John Cage to Pierre Boulez, many of the most popular and successful modernist composers have experimented with the technique, some even devoting their careers to serial compositions.  Although widespread use of serialism has diminished, it remains a huge milestone in the history of music and art.


"Information is not knowledge. Knowledge is not wisdom. Wisdom is not truth. Truth is not beauty. Beauty is not love. Love is not music. Music is THE BEST."
-FZ
Back to Top
DatM View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 95
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 12 2009 at 07:16
Looks good Thumbs Up My only critique is that I would add that Webern became a major influence for later serialist composers, since he really developed a whole new musical language and was already alluding to things that Boulez and others took further. 

And I'm not sure if I'd describe Scheonberg's music as a "happy medium" of anything LOL  But that's more subjective.


Death and the Maiden - A Metal Tribute To String Quartets

Website
Myspace
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2009 at 04:59

Looks generally good - but the first paragraph seems a bit misleading (at least, in the way it comes off the page); There are many compositional techniques that use numerical systems or determinacy; Serialization just happens to be one of them.

Otherwise a reasonable definition that covers the basics - I don't know what level you're at in school, but it covers the essentials without getting bogged down in detail.
 
 
The other thing I'd remark on is a personal issue and you probably won't want to argue it, but it's worth considering;
 
Twelve-Tone is a very bad way of describing a system that actually comprises 12 semitones or (if you want to be pedantic and take the absence of key/harmony argument) 12 undefined pitches which do not have assigned tones.
 
Twelve Note is a much better and more accurate way of describing it - but then that's what is taught in British universities rather than in the rest of the world. Feel free to ignore it. Tongue
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2009 at 05:18
Alas Mark, I don't think the rest of the world will ever see it "our" way - 12-tone is the name Schoenberg gave it and that's the term universally recognised(even we Brits know what is meant by it).
 
Am I right in thinking that the American interpretation of "note" is length rather than pitch-spacing? A whole-note being a semibreve?
 
Anyway, I digress. Good article Alex. Clap
What?
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2009 at 05:37
Actually, Schoenberg used the German "Ton", which, I understand, is not always the same as "Tone" - my understanding is that the word "Ton" can translate as "Note". Wink
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2009 at 06:10
Ah - I remember now Embarrassed - we've had this conversation before Wink
What?
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10261
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2009 at 07:49
The German word "Ton" has, allow me this pun, a ton of meanings. It may mean "note" (in the musical sense only though, not as in "note=notice" or as in "banknote")), but also simply "sound". it can also mean "tone", like in "der Ton seiner Stimme wurde schärfer" ("the tone of his voice became more aggressive"). It can also mean "argil, potter's clay", but also "clay" in the geological sense, like "wir fanden das Dinosaurierskelett in einer Schicht aus Ton" ("we found the dinosaur skeleton in a layer of clay"; also see note below *).



* Annotation: Instead of "Schicht aus Ton" Germans would usually just say "Tonschicht"; the German language is famous for its ability to create compound words, like "Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänsmützenband", which means "ribbon on the cap of a captain of the Danube steamboat company". Of course this is an exaggerated example to make fun of this feature of the German language).


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2009 at 02:03
Your last line mentions John Cage as using serialism, I may be wrong, but I don't think he ever did outside of classwork under Schoenberg.

Cage turned to aleotoric methods and minimalism as an anti-serialist sort of approach.

The brilliant American composer Milton Babbit is a perfect example of total serialism, plus his music is a lot of fun and proof that serialism is not 'cold'.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2009 at 10:07
Serialism was certainly an influence on Cage's work nonetheless:
 
Most if not all aleatoric and minimalist forms of music are steeped in serialism - minimalism particularly took it to extremes with the uber-repetitive cell-like structures and drones in the music of composers such as Philip Glass.
 
At the other end of the scale, even the most random approaches tended towards event-driven serialism based on elaborate (or plain wierd and simple) sets of rules rather than the more parallel approach demanded by conventional diatonic harmony.
 
4'33" is, perhaps surprisingly, a good example of this. It has 3 predetermined movements. One movement occurs in time after another, creating a fundamentally serialized approach. The piece begins and ends in time, and in between, sound events occur. Some may be or appear to be "simultaneous", but most occur one after another. These are the works' primary features, and they are all serial in nature.
 
You could, of course, argue that the 3 movements exist simultaneously, or even overlap - but that does not take away the predetermined mathematical structure, it just makes it a bit more random - which is the "anti-serialist approach" at work, falling into the very traps it was seeking to avoid.
 
If you think about diatonic harmony, it is also fundamentally dependent on predetermined mathematically related chunks of music - except that the primary goal of the composer is not to organise these events mathematically, but artistically, and the mathematical nature of the music is usually a happy accident that the key relationships happen to fall into such patterns.
 
There is also a much higher tendency towards parallelism - multiple tunes or themes occurring simultaneously, greater concentration on harmony and harmonic movement, subtle dynamic and timbral changes. Formally, there is a great body of work in what appear to be pretty rigid formats, but upon closer inspection, most composers were pretty free with such apparently restrictive constructs as the Sonata Form.
 
With serialism, like Sonata form, the mathematical structure is key - it's the framework within which artistic exploration of the music can take place (if you're "inventive" about following the rules!). I found that you can create free-flowing jazz-like music quite easily using 12-note/serialist approaches, by manipulating the rules to suit the way you wanted the music to go.
 
But generally, the predeterimed rules are followed very closely - it's often said that Schoenberg was music's first beaureacrat.
 
I tend to find that having strict rules in place can lead to freer composition and artistic expression, and ultimately more rewarding music - and music written with few rules tends to be sprawling, overly abstract and hard to listen to frequently.
 
Could be just me, of course.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.525 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.