Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Phil Collins - Is He Any Good?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPhil Collins - Is He Any Good?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 03:00
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

I liked some of his work with Brand X, but have hated every song he has recorded on his own. I have heard all his solo albums, and I think they are rubbish, without exception. I used to get teased at school for liking Genesis, not because they were prog rock, but because Phil Collins was in them, and he had recorded 'You cant hurry love' and other such musical monstrosities. You can hardly blame the teasers, Genesis sounded like PC's backing group after 1982.

He has turned his back on creative, meaningful music and has chosen a life of celebrity; red carpets, awards ceremonies, bimbo brides and gold jewelery. What makes it worse is that he is so keen to get his boat (face, for non UK forumers

) in wherever he can. He was even duped by Channel 4's Brass Eye team along with other such celeb fools in the Alan Partridge league, like Noel Edmonds..

Anyway, I rant

What happened to one of the best rock/jazz drummers in the world??, and how did he get away with taking Genesis from 'Foxtrot' to 'Invisible touch' Didn't Tony Banks notice what was happening???

 

OK just a bit harsh.  I think the rest of Genesis was on board his "boat" that set sail for the land of fame and fortune. At least none of them jumped ship in protest did they ?  I think the band itself did the greatest injustice not by turning to pop but by completly turning it's back on the fans that kept them afloat for all of those years by not playing live any of it's music pre 1980. It is what  ticked me off and I stopped buying albums and going to see them live.  Oh, if someone had their album I would listen just to see what they were doing but I think I jumped off their bandwagon just as everyone else in the world was jumping on. You cannot lay that all at the guy with the round head's feet. That was a band decsion. I think poetic justice for Genesis is this the last thing you see on the Wembly viedo is them doing copy tunes.  That is a fitting end for that era of the band. So Charlie Brown uh Phil Collins is what he is.

 

 Oh and to say he did something wrong by choosing what he did?  Man, I didn't know there were rules attached to this anywhere?

 

(To be honset I saw the Charlie Brown reference elsewhere.)

My comments are no more harsh than many others here. I'm expressing my opinion on Phil Collins. I'm not stating that I am correct, I am sharing my view. Thats the point of a forum.

I accept your point about Banks and Rutherford wanting fame and fortune as much as PC. I, but remember Steve Hackett did jump ship, with a little help from his freinds of course. Genesis gradually pushed him out by rejecting the songs he was bringing to the band. His song 'Please dont touch' was bound for 'Wind & Wuthering' until PC said he dodn't want to play it, and instead the paying customer was left with 'Wot Gorilla'  That was when Steve Hackett worked out that they were heading for very 'safe' waters and that there was politics at play to get him out. 

I'm not sure what you mean when you speak of not knowing where the rules are for the choices he made. Thats irrelevant. I never stated that there were any rules and that he should have followed a path of Prog obscurity. I dont personally like the celebrity thing, and as a long term Genesis fan I was dissapointed and quite surprised that PC would want to mix with that set. I considered what he had before to be better. He made his choice and as someone who has helped line his pockets over the years I consider myself entitled to criticize him.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 03:59

"Wind And Wuthering" less interesting than "A Trick Of The Tail"? Why do people keep knocking "Wind..."? It's filled with prog gems,more so than "A Trick...". To wit: "Eleventh Earl Of Mar", "One For The Vine", "All In A Mouse's Night", "Unquiet Slumber For The Sleepers In That Quiet Earth",all classics. And not forgetting the whimsy of "Wot Gorilla" and the beauty of "Blood On The Rooftops". It has only one weak track,Rutherford's lamentable pop dirge which is so bad I've even forgotten the title of it! But the rest is very proggy and it has a very particular kind of etheral,very English,beauty to it that makes "Wind..." stand out in the Genesis canon.

As for "Invisible Touch" being the worst album ever by a prog band,yes it's pretty awful but it least it had "Domino" and "The Brazilian" which weren't half bad. I think the "honour" of the worst albums ever made by a prog band would undoubtedly have to go to Yes for their two crimes against humanity called "90125" and,especially "Big Generator".

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 04:28

Pixel Pirate:

I agree about 'Wind & Wuthering' its a brilliant album, with some of Banks best songs.

I'm a far bigger Genesis fan than I am a Yes fan, but to be honest I'd rather listern to 90125 anyday than Invisible Touch. I've always liked 90125, it's not the Yes that we'd come to know, but at least it rocked, sounded original and refreshing and maintained the Yes high standard of musicianship. Invisible touch was actually dumbed down, riddled with love songs which could have been plucked from any PC solo album.

Big Generator  I have to agree..

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 05:07
The lyrics to " In A Mouse´s Night " are the most  lyrics I´ve ever heard in my life !!!!!!!! 
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 05:17

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

The lyrics to " In A Mouse´s Night " are the most  lyrics I´ve ever heard in my life !!!!!!!! 

Cant argue with that.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Dragon Phoenix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 05:26
YMMV and all that jazz. Wind and wuthering never did it for me, unlike A trick of the tail. There's nothing on W&W that I can listen to again and again, and enjoy it as much every time, in contrast to the tracks Mad man moon, Entangled, Ripples, A trick of the tail and Squonk from ATOTT.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 05:38
ATOTT is certainly more immediate in its appeal. I liked it the moment 'Dance on a Volcano' started up. WAW can take quite a few spins IMO, it took me about 5 years to really embrace it, but I think its on par with Trick.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 06:50

Pity Phil didn't record more like "In the Air Tonight" - that was a great song.

I like ATOTT, WAWATTWT and Duke - all great Genesis albums, IMO - but showing a consistent decline in complexity in favour of catchy melodies. Nothing really wrong in that, as Phil's drumming remains consistently good.

However, the seeds of Phil's longing for horrible saccharine-filled love songs started as early as SEBTP with the revolting "More Fool Me" - a track made for CD, as turntables don't have skip buttons.

However, the question "Is he any good?" only requires ears to answer - and don't forget that Genesis, Brand X and his solo material is not the limitation of his dissemination - he recorded with loads of people, and his signature drum sound and style is quite special, IMO.

Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 07:00
I like the lyrics to "All In A Mouse's Night",I think it's cute. I can just picture the mouse scuttling through the house,whiskers twitching.. But there's no doubt that from an objective point of view,they are fairly badly written,but that was to be the case with Genesis more and more after Gabriel left. He was the wordsmith in the band. Although I still think Banks was good with conjuring strong images with his lyrics,which at the end of the day probably counts for more with me than how eloquent they are or how many literary qualities they might have.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 07:20

I grew up with 'Seconds Out' and the early Collins era Genesis was the prog music that I first came into contact with. I like Duke, I like Abacab and I even liked 'Genesis/Shapes/Mamma (whatever the damm thing is called), but not at the time they were released. All of the buggers we're growers for me.

The Gabriel era was secondary when I first got into the Charterhouse boys but I gradually investigated the early releases and found them to be astounding recordings that filled me with both awe and joy but it never shook my love for the 75-80 line up.

Collins contributed many lead vocals during the Gabriel era (many of you know this I suspect) above the 'More Fool Me' track from Selling England... eg, dual vocals on 'For Absent Friends' lots of one liners on and most of 'Lillywhite Lillith' from The Lamb.

Similarly I like the first two Collins solo albums but not as a prog listening experience. Brand X was a recent revelation to me and Collins (the drummer) truly shines. His playing is astonishing and along with Bill Bruford and Mark Mondesir, he is one of the best prog/jazz drummers to come out of the UK in the last forty years.

Latter period Genesis is the proverbial curate’s egg and I can count on the fingers of one hand the listenable tracks they contain. I do agree that latter day solo Collins is (in my opinion) without any redeeming features whatsoever.

For me, 'The Second's Out' live line up has been and always will be my favourite. Double drum bands are so cool. I mean look at Spock's Beard...

 

 

I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 07:35

And once more a thread has deteriorated! I don't mind,it's just an observation.... As for the original question,I think that's been answered already but to recap: Collins is a great drummer,but a lamentable songwriter and performer in his own right. His reputation would have remained very nearly spotless if he'd only done the first soloalbum,and then concentrated on the drums and vocals with Genesis and instead of the terrible solo career he should just have continued with Brand X or started another hobby band in the fusion/prog vein and left it with that.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 07:36
I don't think I meant deteriorated just then,but I'm not sure just what I meant.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Lunarscape View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 19 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 09:49

When Selling England By The Pound was released, one track was definitly "designed" to hit the radios - I Know What I Like and that tune became the elevator for the band. They probably made a huge effort to mantain the Prog pattern for 2 more albums, and then back in the commercial lane with The Trick of The Tail... Yes was in a deadlock and totally obcure untill the arrival of Trevor Rabin and the release of 90125, a clearly designed album for the radio charts. But hey guys, considering many other Prog names like Oldfield, just take a look at QEII, Platinum and Earth Moving ! ! ! ! Have any of you "die-hard" prog fans out there ever head TRIUMVIRAT's Russian Roulette (1980)...

________

Lunar 

Music Is The Soul Bird That Flies In The Immense Heart Of The Listener . . .
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 11:59

Funny enough Lunarscape, I re-purchased Platinum on CD just the other day.

How's that for off topic Pixel?

I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 12:18

Phil Collins, odious little man!

Dissed Rush and Styx in the late seventies and Marillion in the eighties. Must dislike Fish because he does a better PG impression than himself! Wouldnt appear on the Buddy Rich tribute albums claiming he was planning  one himself (Censored)

Very good drummer, but not great! Though it is not his Hi-Hats he should get off it is his high horse (kettles calling pots Reed?)

He is the only man I know that can out-smug Sting and destroyed one of the greatest bands of the last century to pave the way for his own pop career sell-out! GRRRRRRRAngry



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 12:45
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

[QUOTE=Blacksword]

 

 

My comments are no more harsh than many others here. I'm expressing my opinion on Phil Collins. I'm not stating that I am correct, I am sharing my view. Thats the point of a forum.

I accept your point about Banks and Rutherford wanting fame and fortune as much as PC. I, but remember Steve Hackett did jump ship, with a little help from his freinds of course. Genesis gradually pushed him out by rejecting the songs he was bringing to the band. His song 'Please dont touch' was bound for 'Wind & Wuthering' until PC said he dodn't want to play it, and instead the paying customer was left with 'Wot Gorilla'  That was when Steve Hackett worked out that they were heading for very 'safe' waters and that there was politics at play to get him out. 

I'm not sure what you mean when you speak of not knowing where the rules are for the choices he made. Thats irrelevant. I never stated that there were any rules and that he should have followed a path of Prog obscurity. I dont personally like the celebrity thing, and as a long term Genesis fan I was dissapointed and quite surprised that PC would want to mix with that set. I considered what he had before to be better. He made his choice and as someone who has helped line his pockets over the years I consider myself entitled to criticize him.

All I meant was it was a bit harsh to say he was the only one that went down that road.  The three of them did after getting rid of SH. THe other part was due to you saying "he did nothing worng before".  I just think that he has done nothing worng period.  I don't like what he did but is not worng.  Just semantics on my part.  Almost everything else I agreed with you. You do have the right to critize him all you want (and I will stand right next to you and rage at him also)

 

But here is a question to all of you:

 If Genesis reformed with Peter and Steve and did a tour, knowing how Phil has put down the prog crowd (namley Us) and laughed all the way to the bank How many of you would shell out hard earned cash to see a show with him there knowing he is a hypocrite playing that music again just to take another dollar (or pound etc.) out of your wallet?  If you did go would you cheer him or boo him when he was introduced?

 

 

 

Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 16:16

Phil Collins is a true music God! One of the best drummers in the world, he flirted with the "top pop artist on the planet" status ! In other words, he has been able to interest many types of music listeners! And, obviously, songs like Ripples and Blood on the rooftops are nothing without Collins' voice!

I prefer a guy like Phil Collins to Peter Hammill, who made tons of bland, irritating and unuseful albums! Actually, who likes such a bad singer?

Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 16:41
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Phil Collins is a true music God! One of the best drummers in the world, he flirted with the "top pop artist on the planet" status ! In other words, he has been able to interest many types of music listeners! And, obviously, songs like Ripples and Blood on the rooftops are nothing without Collins' voice!

I prefer a guy like Phil Collins to Peter Hammill, who made tons of bland, irritating and unuseful albums! Actually, who likes such a bad singer?

As stated earlier my whole beef with him is not turning to pop or any other kind of music but turning his (and the band's) back on thier fans from the earlier stuff.  Not only by not playing any of this musc again but by being very critical of the progressive era fans(their fans) publicly. I can't think of another band, maybe Cat Stevens but at least he had a reason most people could respect,  who completly cut their ties with their own roots like that.

 

Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2004 at 06:58
Respect Cat Stevens? Not since the late 70's. And "Platinum" was really the beginning of the downward spiral of Mike Oldfield's creativity into the pop blandness of the 80's,Sigod. Even on his website it's described as "Oldfield by numbers". It's not bad per se,but it's just so aneamic and lacks the true spark of inspiration that had signified his albums up to that point. He had an upturn with "QE 2" on which he seems to have regained some of the spirit of his great first 4 albums,but on "Five Miles Out" the commercial beast started to rear it's extremely ugly head in the guise of "Family Man" and from that moment he produced a string of bewildering and frustrating albums that had some brilliant moments but mostly awful ones except for "Earth Moving" which was completely awful with no redeeming features and was the lowest point in his entire career,and would have been in anyone else's too I suspect! Even "Big Generator" sounds like a bonafide masterpiece compared to that one! But all was forgiven when the amazing "Amarok" was released and I realised that the real Mike Oldfield had finally returned.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2004 at 07:17
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

[QUOTE=Blacksword]

 

 

My comments are no more harsh than many others here. I'm expressing my opinion on Phil Collins. I'm not stating that I am correct, I am sharing my view. Thats the point of a forum.

I accept your point about Banks and Rutherford wanting fame and fortune as much as PC. I, but remember Steve Hackett did jump ship, with a little help from his freinds of course. Genesis gradually pushed him out by rejecting the songs he was bringing to the band. His song 'Please dont touch' was bound for 'Wind & Wuthering' until PC said he dodn't want to play it, and instead the paying customer was left with 'Wot Gorilla'  That was when Steve Hackett worked out that they were heading for very 'safe' waters and that there was politics at play to get him out. 

I'm not sure what you mean when you speak of not knowing where the rules are for the choices he made. Thats irrelevant. I never stated that there were any rules and that he should have followed a path of Prog obscurity. I dont personally like the celebrity thing, and as a long term Genesis fan I was dissapointed and quite surprised that PC would want to mix with that set. I considered what he had before to be better. He made his choice and as someone who has helped line his pockets over the years I consider myself entitled to criticize him.

All I meant was it was a bit harsh to say he was the only one that went down that road.  The three of them did after getting rid of SH. THe other part was due to you saying "he did nothing worng before".  I just think that he has done nothing worng period.  I don't like what he did but is not worng.  Just semantics on my part.  Almost everything else I agreed with you. You do have the right to critize him all you want (and I will stand right next to you and rage at him also)

 

But here is a question to all of you:

 If Genesis reformed with Peter and Steve and did a tour, knowing how Phil has put down the prog crowd (namley Us) and laughed all the way to the bank How many of you would shell out hard earned cash to see a show with him there knowing he is a hypocrite playing that music again just to take another dollar (or pound etc.) out of your wallet?  If you did go would you cheer him or boo him when he was introduced?

 

 

Garion81:

Sorry, I really sounded like I was having a go at you. Probably feeling irritable at time of posting. I do also have a tendancy to go over the top with criticism at times too. Anyway, thanks for writing back

If Genesis did a tour with PG, SH AND PC all on the same stage, I would go. Providing they played what I wanted to hear I would probably be able to bury my disaproval for PC for one night. Although, its probably best that he stays behind the drums in case of low flying vegetables and beer bottles  Leave the singing entirely to PG.

 

 

 



Edited by Blacksword
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.223 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.