Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:50 |
I don't know about badass! Dream Theater has been at the level of almost extreme Metal on occasion but Octavarium was very Floydish to me.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:47 |
rushfan4 wrote:
To my ears, 21st Century Schizoid Man was the first prog metal song, and of course that has been around since the 1960's. I
|
I would call KC and VDGG PROG metal, though no such subgenre is recognized of course. Also Il Balletto Di Bronzo's Ys album. As an aside, though in point of fact, DT have more metal elements than these three bands, in spirit, they were far more badass.
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:45 |
Rushfan - Rush - as I'm sure you'll agree- definately belong here!!!! A Rush hater??? Hey - how could anyone be a Rush hater!!! The album 2112 alone demands their space as prog!!!!
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:42 |
Hi Ivan - all a matter of taste - Scenes from a Memory (especially orchestrated in the Live DVD) blew my mind like only Yes or Genesis ever could. The latest (and previous) Karmakanic album is, to me, a crossover between prog rock and prog Metal! It stunned me!!!!
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:41 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
[
"Close to the Edge must be the worst Prog metal album, only in the keyboards you listen some Metal sounds"
The guy didn't even knew there was something called progressive Rock, he believed Prog was a term that only made sense attached to the suffix Metal.
Iván |
Hahahaha. Actually Wakeman should be proud that this guy thought he was so metal.
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66266
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:41 |
To my ears, 21st Century Schizoid Man was the first prog metal song, and of course that has been around since the 1960's. I am also of the opinion that Relayer is the Yes metal album. I know that others say that it is Yes' RIO/Avant album, but there are some guitar and keyboards riffs within Gates of Delirium that are as heavy and fast as many prog metal bands.
Of course the same posters that are on the anti-prog metal side of this argument are also Rush haters and don't feel that they belong on PA either, but again even though Rush are listed under Heavy Prog, in my opinion there is quite a bit of prog metal happening within their music too.
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:38 |
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:37 |
slaver wrote:
Hey Ivan - please listen to One hour by the concrete lake by Pain ........... I'm sure you'll like it or Octavarium by Dream Theater. They are purely harder forms of the old Genesis, Yes etc etc.... Again I'll advocate Karmakanic which is definately not Prog Rock - it's decidedly prog metal to me. Or has elements of both. |
Bo Slaver, I tried DT, I heard all their albums, bought the DVD, bought a couple of albums, but still can't stand them.
If you talk about Pain of Salvation, yes, it's a band that I can listen.
Iván
|
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:35 |
rogerthat wrote:
Rocktopus wrote:
Very convinient to hide behind: Non-PM collaborators don't understand this sub genre. Maybe the PM collaborators don't understand the main Progrock genre who's site they keep adding all these metalbands in? ... and that's why people who don't listen to this genre 90% of the time disagrees every now and then?
|
You are not being too charitable, are you? I think most people in the PM team are prog rock fans in general too. And I get back to the same point I made at the start: it's not for me to say whether prog metal should be on this website or not but if it is, then prog METAL has to be included, not PROG metal. In other words, you cannot go looking for progginess in the way of vintage prog bands in prog metal bands, you will pretty much draw a blank. |
I agree with you Roger in the case of the PM Collaborators, I read very intelligent comments and protests gfrom guys like Mike and The T (To mention 2) about bands being added to other genres, they are Progheads and Mealheads, that's why they are in the team, but that's not the case of many Progmetalheads.
I remember a review written by a one time visitor who said:
"Close to the Edge must be the worst Prog metal album, only in the keyboards you listen some Metal sounds"
The guy didn't even knew there was something called progressive Rock, he believed Prog was a term that only made sense attached to the suffix Metal.
Iván
|
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:34 |
Hey Ivan - please listen to One hour by the concrete lake by Pain ........... I'm sure you'll like it or Octavarium by Dream Theater. They are purely harder forms of the old Genesis, Yes etc etc.... Again I'll advocate Karmakanic which is definately not Prog Rock - it's decidedly prog metal to me. Or has elements of both.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:29 |
rogerthat wrote:
And did I mention that there are borderline cases in prog rock too? As I said, it would clear a lot of confusion if a majority of users on this website understood prog metal but that is not possible without first understanding metal and that, dear me, is a hard road unless you are a metalhead. |
Good point Rogerthat, as a fact, I believe Prog Metal is the only sub-genre in which a fan doesn't need to be a Proghead to like and understand a band.
I believe that fans of Metal will like many Prog Metal bands even if they don't heard the word Progressive Rock before, in comparison with albums as Foxtrot, Close to the Edge or Thick as a Brick, in which you need to be a Proghead to really love them as we do.
On the other hand, many Progheads (I would dare to say the vast majority) may like any sub-genre except Prog Metal, because the metal elements are so obvious and preeminent, that the Prog component is hidden for us.
Understanding Metal is hard, I admit that ourside lets say Led Zeppelin, Iron Maiden and AC/DC, I heard very little Metal, I don't care for growls of so extended solos, I'm not a metal man.
Iván
|
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:27 |
I purely love old Genesis, as of today Karmakanic, Dream Theater and Pain of Salvation. Am learning to like Opeth. One doesn't have to seperate Prog Metal from Prog Rock. They are Prog.
I would suggest a revamp of many of the bands on the Site - many would have to be removed - but perhaps on a vote sysytem????
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:20 |
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Those are the fringes of prog metal ... they're all borderline cases. Nightwish were here long before I even joined (under my old Jedi name of Obi Wan Kenobi Special Collab Account). But if you take a closer look at the music of the bands which have been added you'll find some things which set them apart from other symphonic metal bands. A direct comparison of Evanescence and Epica show fundamental differences - Epica is much more orchestral than Evanescence, and much less mainstream. Rhapsody are often bashed as being completely cheesy and ridiculous, but if you examine the actual music you'll see that it is much more sophisticated than your typical power metal with symphonic/orchestral ornamentations.
|
And did I mention that there are borderline cases in prog rock too? As I said, it would clear a lot of confusion if a majority of users on this website understood prog metal but that is not possible without first understanding metal and that, dear me, is a hard road unless you are a metalhead.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:16 |
Rocktopus wrote:
Very convinient to hide behind: Non-PM collaborators don't understand this sub genre. Maybe the PM collaborators don't understand the main Progrock genre who's site they keep adding all these metalbands in? ... and that's why people who don't listen to this genre 90% of the time disagrees every now and then?
|
You are not being too charitable, are you? I think most people in the PM team are prog rock fans in general too. And I get back to the same point I made at the start: it's not for me to say whether prog metal should be on this website or not but if it is, then prog METAL has to be included, not PROG metal. In other words, you cannot go looking for progginess in the way of vintage prog bands in prog metal bands, you will pretty much draw a blank.
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:16 |
Again - Mr Progfreak - I agree whole heartedly.If Evanescence is here then they shouldn't be. Rhapsody is way beyond them!!!! They have defined a lot of music today and are continuing to do so!
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:15 |
rogerthat wrote:
To be fair to Rocktopus, Epica and Nightwish are not considered prog metal on metal-archives either, it's slotted under gothic/symphonic metal. Kamelot neither but since I have not heard any of their albums, I won't judge Kamelot. This is bound to happen because the way a proghead looks at prog metal will be different from the way a metalhead looks at it. I presume Nightwish is here because of the symphonic elements - used it in its lay, loose sense, am mindful of the debates that go on here about the connotation of "symphonic" - in their music but we simply call it symphonic metal. And as Ivan said, as long as non-PM collaborators don't fully understand this sub genre, it's going to be difficult to have any meaningful debate on which bands should be included in prog metal and which shouldn't. |
Those are the fringes of prog metal ... they're all borderline cases. Nightwish were here long before I even joined (under my old Jedi name of Obi Wan Kenobi Special Collab Account). But if you take a closer look at the music of the bands which have been added you'll find some things which set them apart from other symphonic metal bands. A direct comparison of Evanescence and Epica show fundamental differences - Epica is much more orchestral than Evanescence, and much less mainstream. Rhapsody are often bashed as being completely cheesy and ridiculous, but if you examine the actual music you'll see that it is much more sophisticated than your typical power metal with symphonic/orchestral ornamentations.
|
|
Alberto Muńoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:14 |
Agree also with Mike
|
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:14 |
Mr Proghead, Symphony X - V: The New Mythology Suit is one of the few cases in which I fully understand we're talking about a Prog album, I even done one of my three Prog Metal reviews about it and gave 4 stars, something that can be explained when I read reviewers saying is a Symphonic "Metalish" album.
The less metal elements or more Symphonic sounds they have, the easier to understand for non Prog Metal experts.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 10 2008 at 11:16
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:12 |
rogerthat wrote:
To be fair to Rocktopus, Epica and Nightwish are not considered prog metal on metal-archives either, it's slotted under gothic/symphonic metal. Kamelot neither but since I have not heard any of their albums, I won't judge Kamelot. This is bound to happen because the way a proghead looks at prog metal will be different from the way a metalhead looks at it. I presume Nightwish is here because of the symphonic elements - used it in its lay, loose sense, am mindful of the debates that go on here about the connotation of "symphonic" - in their music but we simply call it symphonic metal. And as Ivan said, as long as non-PM collaborators don't fully understand this sub genre, it's going to be difficult to have any meaningful debate on which bands should be included in prog metal and which shouldn't. |
Those are the fringes of prog metal ... they're all borderline cases. Nightwish were here long before I even joined (under my old Jedi name of Obi Wan Kenobi Special Collab Account). But if you take a closer look at the music of the bands which have been added you'll find some things which set them apart from other symphonic metal bands. A direct comparison of Evanescence and Epica show fundamental differences - Epica is much more orchestral than Evanescence, and much less mainstream. Rhapsody are often bashed as being completely cheesy and ridiculous, but if you examine the actual music you'll see that it is much more sophisticated than your typical power metal with symphonic/orchestral ornamentations.
|
|
DavetheSlave
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2007
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 492
|
Posted: December 10 2008 at 11:08 |
Hey Ivan - I agree with Mr Progfreak to a large extent. If anyone says that Symphony X or Dream Theater aren't prog enough then I really have a problem. They today are defining Prog music. Keep in mind that as of today I really like Karmakanic's music as well as Opeth's. Maybe you mean that it should be classed as Prog Rock - Prog Rock today is using elements of Prog metal in their music as well as visa versa. I've never liked or really understood the term "metal" Maybe when applied to Wasp, Motley Crue, Guns and Roses and the ilk I could accept it. In that case Metal is no more than extreme power pop.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.